By Gary G. Kohls, MD
\nLewRockwell.com<\/p>\n
\u201cThe number of \u2018cases\u2019 in turn is dependent on the numbers of \u2018positive\u2019 PCR tests. You may have seen the term \u2018casedemic\u2019 being used to describe the situation, and while that term can also be misused, it legitimately calls attention to the problem of using PCR tests for diagnostic purposes and justifying policies based on PCR test \u2018cases\u2019 rather than clinically-confirmed illnesses\u2026While PCR tests can be useful to confirm a diagnosis of COVID-19, they should never be used by themselves as a diagnostic tool. Yet, in \u2018case\u2019 counts, that is precisely what\u2019s been done: people who do not have the disease and are not contagious are being counted as COVID-19 \u2018cases\u2019 on the basis of an unreliable lab test, and these numbers in turn are being cited to justify continued lockdown measures.\u201d \u2013\u00a0Jeremy R. Hammond,\u00a0<\/a>Independent Journalist and Author\u00a0\u2013\u00a0www.jeremyrhammond.com<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cCovid-19 \u2018cases\u2019 are a practically meaningless metric, especially in light of how their numbers are determined by counting \u2019positive\u2019 results from RT-PCR tests that do not distinguish between viable virus and non-infectious viral RNA fragments. Even the lockdown-loving New York Times has admitted that 90% of so-called \u2018cases\u2019 in the US have been individuals who were probably not contagious.\u201d \u2014\u00a0Jeremy R. Hammond<\/p>\n \u201cJust as there are professional propagandists masquerading as \u2018journalists\u2019, so are there propagandists dutifully masquerading in their role as \u2018scientists\u2019 to deceive the public in order to manufacture consent for harmful authoritarian policies.\u201d\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Jeremy R. Hammond Frank, Dr Bryan<\/span> Best Price: <\/span>$4.45<\/span><\/span> Buy New <\/span>$8.99<\/span><\/span> (as of 02:57 EST – Details<\/span>)<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n \u201c\u2026if a person gets a \u201cpositive\u201d PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is\u00a0less than 3%. The chance that the person received a \u201cfalse positive\u201d result is 97% or higher.\u201d \u2013\u00a0Swiss Policy Research<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s no reason to be walking around with a mask\u2026While masks may block some droplets, they do not provide the level of protection people think they do. Wearing a mask may also have unintended consequences: People who wear masks tend to touch their face more often to adjust them, which can spread germs from their hands.\u201d \u2014\u00a0Dr. Anthony Fauci\u00a0(60 Minutes interview \u2013 March 8, 2020)<\/p>\n \u201cThe question is, when do you know enough? When do you know enough to say that a vaccine\u2019s (theoretical) benefits outweigh its theoretical risks?\u2026You don\u2019t know how long protection is going to last. You\u2019re only going to know that afterwards. You don\u2019t know whether it causes\u2026side effect(s). You\u2019re only going to know that afterwards.\u201d\u2026\u201dIf we don\u2019t have adequate data in the greater-than-65-year-old group, then the greater-than-65-year-old person shouldn\u2019t get this vaccine.\u201d \u2013\u00a0Paul Offit \u2013\u00a0September 9, 2020<\/p>\n \u201cAluminum adjuvants\u00a0(which are present in many vaccines)\u00a0cause behavioral abnormalities, abnormal weight gain, learning and memory impairment, motor neuron death\/apoptosis, neuromuscular strength deficits, chronic microglial activation\/brain inflammation and large increases in brain and spinal cord aluminum content. These adverse effects occur at dosages less than or approximately equal to dosages received by infants according to the CDC vaccine schedule.\u201d\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Informed Consent Action Network<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cThe medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical (and vaccine) industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it\u2019s disgraceful.\u201d\u2013\u00a0Arnold Seymour Relman, MD\u00a0(1923-2014), Harvard Professor of Medicine and former Editor-in-Chief of the\u00a0New England Journal of Medicine Pilgrim, M. L.<\/span> Buy New <\/span>$12.99<\/span><\/span> (as of 02:57 EST – Details<\/span>)<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThe American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) derives a majority of its outside contributions \u2013 estimated at more than $25 million per year \u2013 from pharmaceutical companies that make vaccines. The pediatricians that the AAP represents derive the majority of their annual revenues from the administration of vaccines to their pediatric patients.\u201d\u00a0\u2013J.B. Handley<\/p>\n \u201cThe majority of studies that authorities point to as proof that vaccines do not cause autism have been published in a\u00a0(Big Pharma-subsidized)\u00a0journal called\u00a0Pediatrics<\/u>,<\/u>\u00a0the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. As we know, the AAP is a trade union for pediatricians.\u201d \u2013\u00a0J.B. Handley<\/p>\n \u201cYou\u2019d be amazed at the number of physicians who don\u2019t know what\u2019s in a vaccine. They\u2019ll say, well, there\u2019s the bacteria or the virus you want to vaccinate against, and then there\u2019s a little immune stimulant in there to help stimulate the immunity so they react against those viral antigens. They don\u2019t know about these other chemicals in there like aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, special proteins, special lipids that are known to be brain toxic, that are known to induce autoimmunity in the brain. They\u2019re not aware of that. They don\u2019t know that monosodium glutamate (MSG) is also in a lot of vaccines. MSG is a brain excitotoxin. They\u2019re not aware of what\u2019s in the vaccine they\u2019re giving!\u201d1<\/p>\n \u00a0\u2014\u00a0<\/sup>Russell Blaylock, MD<\/p>\n \u201cMost physicians haven\u2019t got a clue about vaccines.\u00a0Physicians are undeservedly endowed with a mantle of authority and therefore most of their patients think vaccines are simple, safe and effective. And therefore, there is nothing much to know about vaccines except that they somehow illicit magical antibodies that will protect the inoculated patient for life.\u00a0Total ignorance.\u00a0But that\u2019s what \u2018The Snake\u2019 tells physicians starting in medical school; and, since medical school (and nursing school) professors are also undeservedly endowed with a mantle of authority, both of whose healthcare professional groups believed it from the start.\u00a0 Until they get bit.\u201d \u2013\u00a0Anonymous Anti-Over-Vaccination activist parent<\/p>\n Smith, Brian K<\/span> Best Price: <\/span>$12.69<\/span><\/span> Buy New <\/span>$12.99<\/span><\/span> (as of 02:57 EST – Details<\/span>)<\/span> <\/span>\u201cThe true mortality rate\u00a0of Corona virus is less than one in 100,000, or\u00a0\u2264\u00a00.001%, which is even 10 times less than the whistleblowers explain why they died. Therefore, it was not the Corona\/COVID-19 virus that killed them. Professor P\u00fcschel concludes strongly that we have absolutely no reason to fear that the virus will kill us. The average age of the Corona\/COVID-19 dead that Professor P\u00fcschel did autopsies on was 80 years old, and they all had one or more severe diseases that could explain why they died. Therefore, it was not the Corona\/COVID-19 virus that killed them. Prof P\u00fcschel concludes strongly, that we have absolutely no reason to fear that the virus will kill us.\u201d\u00a0\u2014\u00a0S\u00f8ren Ventegodt, MD, Copenhagen, Denmark<\/p>\n \u201cThe\u00a0pharmaceutical industry obviously benefits from the panic over the COVID-19 pandemic. Could it be that the pharmaceutical companies have influenced how the mortality is measured and how the statistics are interpreted? Could commercial interests from the\u00a0pharmaceutical\u00a0companies\u00a0producing\u00a0vaccines\u00a0for\u00a0the world influence the way the World Health Organization (WHO) operates, the information it provided, the advice and guidance it offers to the world?\u00a0Yes, it is possible, and it could explain how this whole\u00a0Corona alarm and panic\u00a0started. The stronger the\u00a0interest, the less you can trust the data. If there is money involved, you need to be especially skeptical.<\/p>\n \u201cA medical statistic made by a\u00a0provider\u00a0or\u00a0manufacturer\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0drug\u00a0or\u00a0a\u00a0vaccine\u00a0is\u00a0normally flawed and manipulated to such an extent that\u00a0you cannot believe in the statistics. To answer this question about how big the\u00a0influence of the\u00a0pharma industry might be we need a deep exploration of the WHO, its peoples, the communication between internal organizations in the WHO, and with the industry and people related to the pharmaceutical industry. We need total transparency and full access to all communication in and with the WHO. The lack of openness has earlier made it\u00a0difficult to investigate the\u00a0WHO\u2019s Processes.\u201d See this.<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cDo you remember the \u201cSwine Flu Scandal\u201d of 2009 and the World Health Organization\u2019s (and CDC\u2019s) panicky pandemic prognosis at that time? The definition of \u2018pandemic\u2019 was changed by WHO 12 years ago to \u2018just a worldwide disease\u2019.\u00a0 Many serious illnesses and many deaths were not required anymore, to announce a pandemic. Due to this change the WHO was able to declare the swine flu pandemic in 2009, with the result that (fast-tracked, poorly tested, and therefore dangerous) vaccines were produced and sold worldwide, on the basis of contracts that have been kept secret until today. During the swine flu in 2009, Drosten was one of those who stirred up panic in the population; repeating over and over again that the swine flu\u00a0would claim many hundreds of thousands, even millions of\u00a0deaths, all over the world. Thanks to Germany\u2019s Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, this hoax was brought to an end before it would lead to even more serious consequences.\u201d \u2014\u00a0Dr Reiner Fuellmich Smith, Brian K<\/span> Best Price: <\/span>$12.69<\/span><\/span> Buy New <\/span>$12.99<\/span><\/span> (as of 02:57 EST – Details<\/span>)<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n \u201cAlso remember that the WHO has lied before, in\u00a02009, when they said the swine flu was dangerous and millions would die, and based on this, most governments bought many vaccines. It turned out that the\u00a0swine flu was just the normal flu, and what is\u00a0even more worrying, the vaccines the governments had bought had to be destroyed because of negative side\u00a0effects. Many children became handicapped because of the (toxic)swine flu vaccines. There is a conflict of\u00a0interests in WHO\u00a0(and the world\u2019s CDCs)\u00a0because they are sponsored by pharmaceutical industries. The swine flu scandal is documented.\u201d \u2014\u00a0Dr Reiner Fuellmich<\/p>\n \u201cSweden (with no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics.\u201d \u2014\u00a0Dr Reiner Fuellmich<\/p>\n \u201cUnder the rules of civil tort law, all those who have been harmed by these PCR-test-induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses. In particular, there is a duty to compensate \u2013 that is, a duty to pay damages for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed employed persons as a result of the lockdown and other measures.\u00a0In the meantime, however, the anti-corona measures have caused, and continue to cause, such devastating damage to the world population\u2019s health and economy that the crimes committed by Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO\u00a0must be legally qualified as actual crimes against humanity, as defined in section 7 of the International Criminal Code.\u201d \u2013\u00a0Dr Reiner Fuellmich<\/p>\n \u201cWhen the New York Times and other media have reported that SARS-CoV-2 is airborne transmissible because such-and-such a study found viral RNA in air samples, they were stating a fallacious conclusion.\u201d \u2013\u00a0Jeremy R. Hammond<\/p>\n \u201cIf the (PCR) Test works \u2014 Why the False Positives?<\/span><\/p>\n If the Masks work \u2013 Why the Six Feet?<\/span><\/p>\n If the Six Feet works \u2013 Why the Masks?<\/span><\/p>\n If all Three work \u2013 Why the Lockdown?<\/span><\/p>\n If all Four work \u2013 Why the Vaccine?<\/span><\/p>\n If SARS-CoV-2 exists \u2013 Why has the virus not been isolated?\u201d \u2013\u00a0<\/span>Geoffrey Callaghan<\/span>(See here<\/a><\/span>,\u00a0<\/span>\u201cThe\u00a0<\/span>Roadmap for the Next Phase\u201d of the World Economic Forum\u2019s \u201cGreat Reset\u201d New World Order Agenda of the Planet\u2019s Greediest Billionaires and the Planet\u2019s Most Sociopathic Multinational Corporations (particularly the CEOs of the Biggest Multinational Pharmaceutical Corporations [Big Pharma, Big Vaccine, Big Banks, Big Tech, Big Medicine, Big Media) and the Assorted Recipients of Bribes from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum])<\/p>\n The following 7 paragraphs are from the Dr Richard Moskowitz\u00a0article \u201cThe Case Against Immunizations\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIt is dangerously misleading, and indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us \u2018immune\u2019 to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously. What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe following\u00a0(the intramuscular)\u00a0administration of the measles vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026Once inhaled by a susceptible individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the \u2018visceral\u2019 organs of the immune system. Throughout this \u2018incubation\u2019 period, which lasts from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few or no symptoms of any kind.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cBy the time that the first symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the antibody response. In other words, the \u2018illness\u2019 that we call the measles is simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first place. It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and by no means the most important.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cSuch splendid outpourings indeed represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the future. The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and well-being that we all share.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cBy contrast, the live but artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the blood, by-passing the normal port of entry, and sets up at most a brief inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no \u2018incubation period,\u2019 no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized outpouring. By \u2018tricking\u2019 the body in this fashion, we have accomplished precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we have placed the virus directly into the blood and given it free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or route for getting rid of it.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe result is the production of circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general health of the recipient. Indeed, I submit that exactly the opposite is true, that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cFar from producing a genuine immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory drugs do. Artificial \u2018immunization\u2019 focuses on antibody production, a single aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without the cake. The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker, essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself spontaneously.\u201d\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Dr Richard Moskowitz\u00a0\u2013 from\u00a0\u201cThe Case Against Immunizations\u201d<\/p>\n