The scientists published a report in the\u00a0Royal Society Journal<\/em>\u00a0last week that acknowledged there is little data on how efficient or long lasting the current vaccines are, and so it is likely that countries will require a recent vaccination.<\/p>\n Having endless vaccinations when there is no indication of how effective they are, or what long term side effects there may be sounds absolutely mental, but that is what is being suggested.<\/p>\n Speaking to the\u00a0London Telegraph<\/a>, Epidemiologist Christopher Dye, a leading author of the reports stated\u00a0\u201cIf we thought that the duration of protection was just a matter of months, then the sort of criteria that might be introduced \u2013 we\u2019re not saying they should be \u2013 is that when one travels internationally for a short trip, going on vacation for example, that one is vaccinated each time on that occasion for that particular trip.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n The scientists also stated that vaccine passports are \u201cfeasible,\u201d but only when global standards can be agreed upon.<\/p>\n \u201cAn effective vaccine passport system that would allow the return to pre-Covid activities, including travel, without compromising personal or public health, must meet a set of demanding criteria,\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>said Dye.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Other co-authors of the study wanted that the covid passports, which the government\u2019s vaccines minister has\u00a0repeatedly said<\/a>\u00a0are not going to be used domestically, \u201cneed to be fully explored.\u201d<\/p>\n Professor Melinda Mills warned that such a system \u201ccould inadvertently discriminate or exacerbate existing inequalities,\u201d\u00a0adding \u201cThe intended use will have significant implications across a wide range of legal and ethical issues.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIs it literally a passport to allow international travel or could it be used domestically to allow holders greater freedoms?\u201d<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0Professor Mills further questioned.<\/p>\n \u201cWe need a broader discussion about multiple aspects of a vaccine passport, from the science of immunity through to data privacy, technical challenges and the ethics and legality of how it might be used,\u201d Mills added.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In the face of globalists\u00a0repeatedly pushing for<\/a>\u00a0the vaccination passport system, Silkie Carlo, the director of civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, has penned an important op-ed\u00a0warning<\/a>\u00a0that\u00a0we risk \u201cemerging like some sort of China-adjunct \u2013 a high-tech dystopia where citizens flash their vaccine IDs and biological risk scores to buy a pint of milk, or government-approved facial recognition for a pint of beer.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/GettyImages-1290826657.jpg?itok=e49DvVEU\")
<\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n