{"id":59522,"date":"2021-04-08T17:23:24","date_gmt":"2021-04-08T21:23:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=59522"},"modified":"2021-04-08T17:23:24","modified_gmt":"2021-04-08T21:23:24","slug":"heres-how-they-are-using-fetal-tissues-in-vaccines-often-without-disclosure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=59522","title":{"rendered":"Here&#8217;s how they are using fetal tissues in vaccines often without disclosure."},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Vaccines using fetal tissue: 12 faulty assumptions<\/h1>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h3><em>Some beliefs about the morality of vaccines using fetal tissue are flawed because they rest upon faulty assumptions \u2014 thus, whichever side you stand on, it\u2019s worth considering the most common ones.<\/em><\/h3>\n<div id=\"attachment_59524\" style=\"width: 820px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-59524\" class=\"size-full wp-image-59524\" src=\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/shutterstock_616263095_810_500_75_s_c1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"810\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/shutterstock_616263095_810_500_75_s_c1.jpg 810w, https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/shutterstock_616263095_810_500_75_s_c1-300x185.jpg 300w, https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/shutterstock_616263095_810_500_75_s_c1-768x474.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 810px) 100vw, 810px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-59524\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Doctor holding syringeShutterstock<\/p><\/div>\n<p><!--more-->By Thomas Seidler<br \/>\nLifeSite News<\/p>\n<p>April 1, 2021 (<a href=\"https:\/\/fetaltissue.org\/\">Fetal Tissue Vaccines<\/a>) \u2014 As with the MMR [1] vaccine, the Oxford\/AstraZeneca and Johnson &amp; Johnson COVID-19 vaccine are produced in cell lines derived from abortions [2] \u2014 by contrast, Moderna and Pfizer\u2019s vaccines used them in testing.[3]<\/p>\n<p>The debate around the morality of fetal tissue vaccines frequently has at its heart three beliefs:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In receiving the vaccine we are not cooperating with past evil;<\/li>\n<li>In receiving the vaccine we are not contributing to present or future evil;<\/li>\n<li>There is almost no connection between the vaccine and the murdered baby.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These beliefs are flawed because they rest upon faulty assumptions \u2014 thus, whichever side you stand on, it\u2019s worth considering the most common ones.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-block ad-content ad-pos-top\" data-mobile=\"84457\" data-desktop=\"84454\">\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h4>1. \u201cOnly a few babies were used.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>While each individual cell line contains the cells of just one baby, many aborted babies are used in the process of creating a cell line.[4] For example, under oath, scientist Stanley Plotkin admitted that there were 76 aborted babies used in just one vaccine study.[5] Furthermore, with cell line WI-25 we know that it was the 25th specimen from the 19th baby.[6]<\/p>\n<p>The two cell strains used by COVID vaccines are named HEK293 and PERC6.[7] The name HEK293 stands for a Human Embryonic Kidney from the 293rd experiment [8] \u2014 we can be confident that more babies preceded the final baby used for HEK293.[9]<span style=\"font-size: 12px;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"ctr-text\">\n<div class=\"subscribe-form-ctr subscribe-form-wrap\">\n<form class=\"lsn-newsletter subscribe-form-revised run-validator\" action=\"https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/\" method=\"post\" novalidate=\"novalidate\">\n<div class=\"form-group edition\">\n<div class=\"subscribe-form-group subscribe-radio\"><label for=\"world-214649\">\u00a0<\/label><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/form>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h4>2. \u201cThe babies were of a very early gestation.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>Most of the babies whose tissue formed the basis of the different vaccine cell lines, were over 3 months when aborted.[10] For example, under oath, scientist Stanley Plotkin admitted that all of the 76 unborn babies used in the study were 3 months or older.[11]<\/p>\n<p>At 3 months, a baby is fully formed: \u201cshe has begun swallowing and kicking \u2026 facial muscles are getting a workout as her tiny features form one expression after another \u2026\u201d[12]<\/p>\n<h4>3. \u201cConsent was given, so usage is ethical.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>Parties to a murder cannot ethically donate the body of their victim to research. Thus it follows that no meaningful consent exists. (Though the mothers involved are often, to varying extents, victims themselves.)<\/p>\n<h4>4. \u201cThe baby was dead when the tissue was taken.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>With fetal tissue research, cell death renders the tissue unfit for purpose: tissues and organs must be harvested \u201cwithin 5 minutes\u201d [13, 14] and at times this occurs while the baby\u2019s heart is still beating [15, 16] \u2014 this was also revealed during a Planned Parenthood court deposition.[17, 18]<\/p>\n<p>Thus, harvesting the organs can be a type of torture [19] beyond the normal abortion procedure. Though we have no definitive proof live harvesting occurred specifically in the making of vaccine cell lines, since it is \u201cno rare event\u201d [20, 21, 22, 23] there are legitimate grounds for concern.[24]<\/p>\n<h4>5. \u201cSome were from miscarriages.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>\u201cThe requirements for \u2018freshness\u2019 of many human foetal tissues\u201d [25] mean it is extremely unlikely any were from miscarriages.[26] \u201cTo obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used\u2026\u201d[27]<\/p>\n<h4>6. \u201cUsing a dead body is distinct from abortion.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>Some imagine that those involved in creating the cell lines have nothing to do with the abortion itself. However, in advance of the abortion of a fetus whose tissue will be used for research, there are a number of steps that take place. These include obtaining consent, conducting genetic screening,[28] selecting the abortion method [29] and other steps for optimal harvesting [30] \u2014 all of which impact the abortionist\u2019s conduct, creating considerable interplay with the agent seeking human material, who thus \u201cbecomes to some extent an accessory\u201d.[31] A parallel to Saul at Stephen\u2019s stoning [32] exists \u2014 Saul didn\u2019t throw a stone, but as a consenting bystander he was not without moral guilt.[33] In cases of live tissue extraction, research is still more directly connected to murder.<\/p>\n<h4>7. \u201cNo one now profits from the abortion.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>Companies who developed the cell lines continue to be rewarded by their use, including in vaccines.[34] Thus direct benefit accrues to agents complicit in the original murder.<\/p>\n<h4>8. \u201cVaccines don\u2019t contain the child\u2019s actual cells.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>Vaccines produced in cell lines contain fragments [35] of the child\u2019s DNA \u2014 one study even found \u201ca complete individual genome\u201d [36] of the aborted child. The divided cells the vaccine was grown in would have been the child\u2019s as she grew.[37, 38]<\/p>\n<h4>9. \u201cNo extra abortions are necessary.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>Despite claims to the contrary, normal cell strains \u201care in fact \u2018mortal\u2019\u201d [39], bound by the \u201cHayflick Limit\u201d [40] of about 50 cell divisions. Since HEK293 becomes cancerous after time,[41] it will need replacing \u2014 just as other early cell strains did.[42] The use of vaccines eventually creates a need for further abortions to replace depleting stocks.<\/p>\n<h4>10. \u201cThe abortions were from decades ago.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>Though most abortions for vaccines were from before the 80s,[43, 44] time cannot make murder moral. Moreover, a new Chinese cell line, WALVAX-2 was created in 2015,[45] and as already explained, more lines will be necessary.<\/p>\n<h4>11. \u201cNo further babies are suffering as a result.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>While fetal tissue vaccines are widely accepted, general fetal harvesting is legitimized and impossible to ban [46, 47, 48] \u2014 so it has grown instead, leading to many more babies suffering.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in 1982 a container of 16,500 fetuses was found at the US home of a former laboratory owner.[49] In 2003, the Dutch company behind HEK293 sought aborted babies as far afield as New Zealand [50] and Australia.[51] Journal articles discuss \u201cthe fetal tissue economy\u201d in Britain.[52] In 2019, 2,200 fetuses were found at an abortionists home [53] and the court depositions of Planned Parenthood staff [54] showed harvesting continues at scale.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, both polls [55, 56, 57] (and some practice [58]) indicate that parents are more likely to choose abortion if \u201cmedical use\u201d of a fetus is possible. Thus, if the option of having babies used for medical purposes was not available, less future babies would suffer and be aborted.<\/p>\n<p>If even a percentage of the 2-3 billion nominal [59] pro-lifers rejected such vaccines, moral alternatives would be found and an \u201cethically, morally and biblically wrong\u201d[60] industry might end.<\/p>\n<h4>12. \u201cThe \u2018greater good\u2019 outweighs concerns.\u201d<\/h4>\n<p>To acquiesce with evil against an innocent unwilling victim for the sake of communal blessing enters dark waters \u2014 all historic child sacrifice is based on this premise. \u201cHowever, it may then be argued that these baby body parts would otherwise be wasted, thrown away. But not only does this justify abortion, but it is pure utilitarianism, that says pretty well anything is justified as long as the end is (potentially) good. In good medical science the end does not justify the means.\u201d[61]<\/p>\n<h4>Conclusion<\/h4>\n<p>From a Judeo-Christian perspective, the God of the Old and New Testament is set apart by not asking for the firstborn of men to die that others might live. Fetal tissue vaccines perhaps possess moral taint far beyond that of meat offered to idols.<\/p>\n<p><em>Footnotes<\/em><\/p>\n<p>[1] For an excellent summary of all U.S. and Canadian vaccines with fetal tissue see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/\">Children of God for Life<\/a>\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/vaccineListOrigFormat.pdf\">vaccine list<\/a>. In the U.K., it is possibly only the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk\/vk\/mmr-vaccine\">MMR vaccine<\/a>\u00a0that contains them, and there are two brands: MMRVaxPro and Priorix. Priorix appears on the U.S. &amp; Canada chart: It\u2019s the Rubella component that is troubling (though you might not guess from the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.medicines.org.uk\/emc\/PIL.3180.latest.pdf\">Patient Information Leaflet<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 it appears \u201camino acids\u201d is the euphemistic term used). In the U.S., Children of God for Life successfully introduced legislation for fair labeling so parents could be properly informed. Fortunately, the MMRVaxPro\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.medicines.org.uk\/emc\/files\/pil.6307.pdf\">Patient Information Leaflet<\/a>\u00a0in section 6 describes the \u201ccontents of the pack\u201d and there lists production dependencies\/ingredients (WI-38 &amp; RA27\/3 are both explicitly listed \u2014 i.e. fetal tissue cell lines).<\/p>\n<p>[2] 2020-11-11; Prentice, David; Charlotte Lozier Institute; Update: COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates and Abortion-Dervived Cell Lines;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/lozierinstitute.org\/update-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-and-abortion-derived-cell-lines\/\">https:\/\/lozierinstitute.org\/update-covid-19-vaccine-candidates-and-abortion-derived-cell-lines\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[3] Moderna Development:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/2020\/11\/16\/moderna-covid-19-vaccine-facts-not-fiction\/\">Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine \u2013 Facts \u2013 Not Fiction<\/a>; See also:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/2021\/03\/04\/moderna-does-not-use-hek-293-fetal-cell-line-in-ongoing-quality-control-or-lot-testing\/\">Moderna Does Not Use HEK-293 Fetal Cell Line in Ongoing Quality Control or Lot Testing<\/a>; 2021-01-07; Trasancos, Stacy; Children of God for Life; COVID-19 Vaccine and HEK293:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/2021\/01\/07\/covid-19-vaccine-hek293-testing-and-production-are-ethically-equal\/\">Testing and Production are Ethically Equal<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>[4] Retrieved 2020-09-08; Vinnedge, Debra; Children of God for Life; Aborted Fetal Cell Lines;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AbortedFetalCellLines.pdf\">https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AbortedFetalCellLines.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[5] 2018-01-11; Plotkin, Stanley; Court Deposition; Excerpt answering the question: \u201cIn your work related to vaccines, how many fetuses have been part of that work?\u201d;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/DFTsd042M3o?t=27787\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/DFTsd042M3o?t=27787<\/a>. This figure concerns the 1966 study by Plotkin et al,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/Plotkin76Fetuses.pdf\">Cytological and Chromosomal Studies of Cell Strains from Aborted Human Fetuses<\/a>, Exp Biology, Vol 122. There is some confusion regarding the number, whether 74 (from the results section) or 76 (in the summary) \u2014 co-author Plotkin\u2019s statement under oath clarifies by indicating 76 embryos were used.<\/p>\n<p>[6] See table on page 591 of this study: 1961-05-15; Hayflick, L &amp; Moorhead, P; Experimental Cell Research; The Serial Cultivation of Human Diploid Cell Strains;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/Hayflick1961ExpCell.pdf\">https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/Hayflick1961ExpCell.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[7] Retrieved 2020-10-27; Children of God for Life;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf\">https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/CovidCompareMoralImmoral.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[8] Retrieved 2020-10-29; HEK293 Cells: Applications and Advantages;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.news-medical.net\/life-sciences\/HEK293-Cells-Applications-and-Advantages.aspx\">https:\/\/www.news-medical.net\/life-sciences\/HEK293-Cells-Applications-and-Advantages.aspx<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[9] \u201cIf [Frank] Graham wasn\u2019t just working on fetal cell lines during his time at the University of Leiden, it may not have been hundreds of abortions [in the development for HEK293],\u201d [Pamela Acker] added, \u201cbut we would need to see his notebooks to know.\u201d 2021-02-19; Baklinski, Pete; LifeSiteNews;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/news\/babies-were-aborted-alive-placed-in-fridge-to-harvest-cell-lines-used-in-some-vaccines-researcher\">Babies were aborted alive, placed in fridge to harvest cell lines used in some vaccines: researcher<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[10] See the gestational ages:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AbortedFetalCellLines.pdf\">https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AbortedFetalCellLines.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[11] 2018-01-11; Plotkin, Stanley; Court Deposition; Excerpt answering the question: \u201cIn your work related to vaccines, how many fetuses have been part of that work?\u201d;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/DFTsd042M3o?t=27787\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/DFTsd042M3o?t=27787<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[12] \u2018Fetal Ultra-Sound: 3 months\u2019;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.babycenter.com.my\/3-months-pregnant\">https:\/\/www.babycenter.com.my\/3-months-pregnant<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[13] \u2018In order to sustain 95% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion. Within an hour the cells would continue to deteriorate, rendering the specimens useless.\u2019<br \/>\nDr. C. Ward Kischer, Embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy; Specialist in Human Embryology, University of Arizona College of Medicine (Tucson, Arizona) Personal interview with Debra Vinnedge 7-02, ALL Conference<\/p>\n<p>[14] \u201cFetal tissue for transplantation must be \u2018harvested\u2019 within a few minutes of delivery\u2026 Drugs which reduce fetal physiological activity need to be avoided. The fetus is therefore in as alive and aware a state as possible when being opened.\u201d 1988-03; Alderson, Priscilla; Journal of Medical Ethics; Review: The Foetus as Transplant Donor: Scientific, Social and Ethical Perspectives;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/25178659_The_Foetus_as_Transplant_Donor_Scientific_Social_and_Ethical_Perspectives\">https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/25178659_The_Foetus_as_Transplant_Donor_Scientific_Social_and_Ethical_Perspectives<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"ad-block ad-content ad-pos-mid\" data-mobile=\"84459\" data-desktop=\"84456\">\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>[15] \u201cHuman embryos of two and one-half to five months gestation were obtained\u2026 They were placed in a sterile container and promptly transported to the virus laboratory of the adjacent Hospital for Sick Children. No macerated specimens were used and in many of the embryos the heart was still beating at the time of receipt in the virus laboratory.\u201d 1952-06; Thicke et al; Cultivation of Poliomyelitis Virus in Tissue Culture; Growth of the Lansing Strain in Human Embryonic Tissue, Canadian Journal of Medical Science, Vol. 30, p231-245;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cdnsciencepub.com\/doi\/10.1139\/cjms52-031\">https:\/\/cdnsciencepub.com\/doi\/10.1139\/cjms52-031<\/a><br \/>\nor more recently:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/FzMAycMMXp8?t=256\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/FzMAycMMXp8?t=256<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[16] \u201cIn 1974 the great English gyneacologist Dr Ian Donald, who \u2018invented\u2019 ultrasound, told me of witnessing modern experiments at Sweden\u2019s Karolinska Institute on large, living aborted babies, cringing with pain.\u201d 1988; Marx, Paul;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?redir_esc=y&amp;id=7p9FnZcssdwC&amp;focus=searchwithinvolume&amp;q=cringing+with+pain\">Confessions of a Pro-Life Missionary<\/a>; Human Life International<\/p>\n<p>[17] 2019-04-12; Larton, Perri; Court Deposition Planned Parenthood; Intact babies cut by procurement officer;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/lHh5IFXao-4?t=276\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/lHh5IFXao-4?t=276<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[18] \u201cI can see hearts that are beating in a POC that is not intact that are beating independently\u2026\u201d<br \/>\n2019-04-12; Larton, Perrin; Court Deposition Planned Parenthood;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/lHh5IFXao-4?t=373\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/lHh5IFXao-4?t=373<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[19] It is now suspected that unborn babies feel pain from as early as 3 months<br \/>\n2019-07-11; Derbyshire, Stuart &amp; Brockmann, John; BMJ: Journal of Medical Ethics; Reconsidering fetal pain;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/content\/46\/1\/3\">https:\/\/jme.bmj.com\/content\/46\/1\/3<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[20] \u201cThe first part of this chapter addressed the question of live birth or pre-viable foetuses after the use of different techniques of termination and suggested that this is no rare event.\u201d<br \/>\n1987; McCullagh, Peter; Wiley &amp; Sons; The Foetus as Transplant Donor: Scientific, Social and Ethical Perspectives, p115-116.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?redir_esc=y&amp;id=rVpsAAAAMAAJ&amp;focus=searchwithinvolume&amp;q=no+rare+event\">https:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?redir_esc=y&amp;id=rVpsAAAAMAAJ&amp;focus=searchwithinvolume&amp;q=no+rare+event<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[21] \u2018Obstetricians and gynaecologists are well aware of the increasing number of fetuses which are born alive, because of the increased use of prostaglandins\u2019 1976-10; Nathanson, Bernard; Hastings Center Report, pp. 11-12.<\/p>\n<p>[22] \u201cThe experience of one large American hospital was that 9% of second trimester deliveries induced by prostaglandin alone resulted in live births.\u201d 1979; Pahl, R &amp; Lundy, L; Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 53, p587-591; Experience with mid-trimester abortions.<\/p>\n<p>[23] More than 50% of babies removed by hysterotomy (i.e. caesarean section) were born alive: \u201c23 out of 44\u201d. 1961; Kullander, S &amp; Sunden, B; Journal of Endocrinology, 23, 69-77; On the survival and metabolism of normal and hypothermic pre-viable human foetuses.<\/p>\n<p>[24] For more mature reading on this matter, please see our ongoing project to collate the material here:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/fetaltissue.org\/live-harvesting\">fetaltissue.org\/live-harvesting<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[25] 1987; McCullagh, Peter; Wiley &amp; Sons; The Foetus as Transplant Donor: Scientific, Social and Ethical Perspectives, p17.<\/p>\n<p>[26] Re: HEK293, miscarriage is highly unlikely for various reasons \u2014 please see \u201cHow was it obtained?\u201d (page 2): \u201cin all probability the cells were obtained from the embryo of a wilfully induced abortion.\u201d 2006 Autumn; Wong, Alvin; National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly; The ethics of HEK 293;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/pdfs.semanticscholar.org\/65a7\/5696bb1e03a46cba9f0c976da2b50916dec2.pdf\">https:\/\/pdfs.semanticscholar.org\/65a7\/5696bb1e03a46cba9f0c976da2b50916dec2.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[27] 1986-04-26; Herranz, Gonzalo; Il Sabato, no.15; A reply to a previous article in the same journal by Paolo Cucchiarelli and Marina Ricci. Professor Herranz was, at the time, President of the Committee of Medical Ethics of Spanish Doctors and Vice-President of the Permanent Committee of Medical Ethics of the European Community. Source: 1999; Pietro Croce, \u2018Vivisection or Science\u2019, p86,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1119364\/\">https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1119364\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[28] \u201cthe fetus was chosen by Dr. Sven Gard, specifically for this purpose. Both parents are known, and unfortunately for the story, they are married to each other, still alive and well\u2026 There were no familial diseases in the history of either parent, and no history of cancer specifically in the families.\u201d 1969-08; Gamma Globulin Prophylaxis; Inactivated Rubella Virus; Production and Biologics Control of Live Attenuated Rubella Virus Vaccines: Discussion on Session V. Am J Dis Child. 118(2):372\u2013381.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamapediatrics\/article-abstract\/503195\">https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamapediatrics\/article-abstract\/503195<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[29] See the comments\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/ethicalresearch.net\/positions\/the-ethics-of-the-walvax-2-cell-strain\/\">here<\/a>\u00a0on the unethical complicity between doctors and researches for WALVAX-2. This is widespread, I just use WALVAX-2 as a clear recent example. 2015-04; Ma et al; Human Vaccines &amp; Immunotherapeutics; Characteristics &amp; viral propagation properties of a new human diploid cell line;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC4526020\/\">https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC4526020\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[30] \u201cBoth cell lines [HEK293 &amp; PERC6 \u2014 the two used by Covid vaccines] were made in my lab, and also the cells, the starting material, was prepared by myself at the University of Leiden [i.e. he was on hand at the hospital where the abortions occurred].\u201d 2001-05-16; Meeting transcript; USA FDA: Center for Biologics Evaluation &amp; Research;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/wayback.archive-it.org\/7993\/20170404095417\/https:\/www.fda.gov\/ohrms\/dockets\/ac\/01\/transcripts\/3750t1_01.pdf\">https:\/\/wayback.archive-it.org\/7993\/20170404095417\/https:\/www.fda.gov\/ohrms\/dockets\/ac\/01\/transcripts\/3750t1_01.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[31] \u201c[The] proposition to be discussed holds that individuals embarking on utilization of the aborted foetus for tissue transplantation may do so without incurring any moral opprobrium generated by the abortion. In addressing this proposition it is necessary to differentiate between the morality of the manipulations involved in harvesting transplantable organs or tissues from the aborted fetus and the moral status of the operator undertaking this task. In any sequence of two activities, the opportunity for the second of which is totally dependent on the occurrence of the first, the morality of the second agent\u2019s participation is not necessarily neutral or positive merely because the contents of the second action, assessed in isolation, may be so. Evaluation of the second agent\u2019s position requires information on the extent of any association with the first agent in addition to knowledge about the actual content of the second action \u2026 I would submit that the demonstration of association of the second agent with the first event, even at a level that falls substantially short of incurring any culpability for it, may suffice to vitiate claims for complete independence from it. Specifically, on the occasion of fetal utilization as a transplant donor, it is common practice for mutual agreement on the timing of initiation of termination procedures to be pre-arranged in order to ensure that those harvesting and utilizing the tissue from the foetus will be prepared. A specific example of the form of interaction that may appear in the course of collaboration to obtain foetal tissues in optimal condition concerns the selection and modification of termination procedures to achieve this end. The existence of such interactions between those performing the termination and those harvesting and transplanting tissue from the fetus is inconsistent with the contention that the second agent enters the situation as one completely free from any association with preceding events. This lack of a total separation is one (of many) ways in which collection of foetal organs differs from the collection of organs from road accident victims. Given that some influence relating either to a specific case (for example the timing of termination) or to that class of cases (such as the termination procedure) will indubitably be exerted on the first individual\u2019s activities by the second, the latter becomes to some extent an accessory.\u201d 1987; McCullagh, Peter; Wiley &amp; Sons; The Foetus as Transplant Donor: Scientific, Social and Ethical Perspectives, p17-18, 178, 179-180.<\/p>\n<p>[32] \u201cAnd when the blood of your martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by consenting to his death, and guarding the clothes of those who were killing him.\u201d The Acts of the Apostles, chapter 22, verse 20<\/p>\n<p>[33] \u201c\u2026moral complicity is best conceptualized as conduct that expressively aligns one with another agent\u2019s wrongdoing. Expressive alignment occurs as a result of one agent expressing a positive desire, attitude, or belief toward another agent\u2019s (a primary agent\u2019s) wrongdoing.\u201d 2003; Parker, Joseph; Rice University; Moral complicity: An expressivist account;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/1911\/18558\">https:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/1911\/18558<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[34] \u201cI realize that this sounds a bit commercial, but PER.C6 were made for that particular purpose [the pharmaceutical industry]. Also, as far as I know, more than 50 different companies have taken license for PER.C6.\u201d 2001-05-16; Meeting transcript; USA FDA: Center for Biologics Evaluation &amp; Research;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170516050447\/https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/ohrms\/dockets\/ac\/01\/transcripts\/3750t1_01.pdf\">https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170516050447\/https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/ohrms\/dockets\/ac\/01\/transcripts\/3750t1_01.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[35] Retrieved 2020-10-30; Children\u2019s Hospital of Philadelphia;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.chop.edu\/centers-programs\/vaccine-education-center\/vaccine-ingredients\/dna\">https:\/\/www.chop.edu\/centers-programs\/vaccine-education-center\/vaccine-ingredients\/dna<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[36] 2020-04-27; Corvelva; VaccineGate: Priorix Tetra human genome and MRC-5 cell line \u2013 comparative study;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.corvelva.it\/en\/speciale-corvelva\/vaccinegate-en\/priorix-tetra-human-genome-and-mrc-5-cell-line-comparative-study.html\">https:\/\/www.corvelva.it\/en\/speciale-corvelva\/vaccinegate-en\/priorix-tetra-human-genome-and-mrc-5-cell-line-comparative-study.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[37] \u201cHuman diploid cells undergo a number of population doublings inversely proportional to donor age.\u201d 1997-08-01; Hayflick, Leonard; University of California, San Francisco; Mortality and Immortality at the Cellular Level: A review;\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.protein.bio.msu.ru\/biokhimiya\/contents\/v62\/full\/62111380.html\">http:\/\/www.protein.bio.msu.ru\/biokhimiya\/contents\/v62\/full\/62111380.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[38] Perhaps, for this reason, Leonard Hayflick, the developer of an early cell line used by 2 billion people, has consistently claimed that \u201cthe WI-38 embryo\u2019s estate\u201d was a legitimate stakeholder: \u201ca good case could be made for title to WI-38 to be vested in the parents or estate of the embryo from which WI-38 was derived\u201d. 1998-01; Hayflick, Leonard; Experimental Gerontology; A novel technique for transforming the theft of mortal human cells into praiseworthy federal policy;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/13762615\">https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/13762615<\/a>; 2018-05-31; Hayflick, Leonard; The Biomedical Scientist; A Controversial Life: Interview with George Wister;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/thebiomedicalscientist.net\/science\/controversial-life\">https:\/\/thebiomedicalscientist.net\/science\/controversial-life<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[39] 1965-03; Hayflick, Leonard, Elsevier: Experimental Cell Research; The limited\u00a0<em>in vitro<\/em>\u00a0lifetime of human diploid cell strains;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/0014482765902119\">https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/0014482765902119<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[40] 2014-07-20; Bartlett, Zane; The Embryo Project Encyclopedia; Leonard Hayflick (1928- );\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/embryo.asu.edu\/pages\/leonard-hayflick-1928\">https:\/\/embryo.asu.edu\/pages\/leonard-hayflick-1928<\/a>. Or in summary from wikipedia pages: \u201c[Leonard] Hayflick found that only cancer cells are immortal and that normal cells have a mechanism for remembering what replication level they are at. He interpreted his finding that normal cells are mortal, to be an indication of aging at the cellular level.\u201d\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Leonard_Hayflick\">Leonard Hayflick<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 Again: \u201cHayflick was the first to report that only cancer cells are immortal. This could not have been demonstrated until he had demonstrated that normal cells are mortal.\u201d\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hayflick_limit\">Hayflick Limit<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[41] \u201cHEK293 is not a model for normal human cells; these cells are immortalized already by known oncogene but not malignant yet.\u201d 2011-05-23; Kavsan, Iershov &amp; Balynska; BMC Cell Biology;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC3224126\/\">Immortalised cells &amp; one oncogene in malignant transformation<\/a>, \u201cthe tumorigenicity of the HEK 293 cell line reached 100% when the passage exceeded 65, whereas using low-passage (&lt;52) HEK 293 cell line no tumor could be induced under the same condition&#8230; more attention should be paid to the passage level of the HEK 293 cell line, especially for vaccine production but the low-passage HEK 293 cell line should be acceptable to regulatory authorities for recombinant virus vector, vaccines, and gene therapy. Meanwhile, we also find that high-passage HEK 293 can be employed as a highly malignant tumor model as its tumorigenicity increases significantly.\u201d 2008-04-18; Shen et al; Elsevier; The tumorigenicity diversification in human embryonic kidney 293 cell line cultured\u00a0<em>in vitro<\/em>;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/18378163\/\">https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/18378163\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[42] \u201cin the early 70\u2019s, the [National Institute of Health] stock of low passage WI-38 cells had become seriously depleted\u2026 IMR-90 was developed [to enable] replacing WI-38 within ongoing laboratory programs.\u201d 2004; Coriell; Cell Collections;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.coriell.org\/0\/PDF\/IPBIR\/CCRNews.pdf_4.pdf\">https:\/\/www.coriell.org\/0\/PDF\/IPBIR\/CCRNews.pdf_4.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[43] 1983-10; Nichols, Warren; PubMed: In Vitro; Characterization of a new human diploid cell line\u2014IMR-91;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/6629383\/\">https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/6629383\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[44] Retrieved 2020-10-22; Creative Biolabs; PER.C6 Cell Lines;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gmp-creativebiolabs.com\/per-c6-cell-lines_74.htm\">https:\/\/www.gmp-creativebiolabs.com\/per-c6-cell-lines_74.htm<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[45] 2015-04; Ma et al; Human Vaccines &amp; Immunotherapeutics; Characteristics &amp; viral propagation properties of a new human diploid cell line;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC4526020\/\">https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC4526020\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[46] \u201cDuring the Senate sub-committee hearings on Embryonic Stem Cell Research [ESCR], Senator Harry Reid compared the possible benefits of ESCR to the polio vaccine, which used aborted fetal tissue, stating the public had no moral problem with that.\u201d 2000-04-28;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/CHRG-106shrg66482\/html\/CHRG-106shrg66482.htm\">Senate subcommittee hearings<\/a>; Washington DC<\/p>\n<p>[47] In a letter co-signed by 80 Nobel laureates to President Bush, urging federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, one paragraph noted: \u201cFor the past 35 years many of the common human virus vaccines \u2014 such as measles, rubella, hepatitis A, rabies and poliovirus \u2014 have been produced in cells derived from a human fetus to the benefit of tens of millions of Americans. Thus precedent has been established for the use of fetal tissue that would otherwise be discarded.\u201d 2001-02-21; Nobel laureates\u2019 letter to President Bush;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.stemcellresearch.org\/blog\/nobel-laureates-letter-to-president-bush-contains-misinformation-and-omissions\/\">Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[48] President Bush justified his decision in favor of Embryonic Stem Cell Research funding thus: \u201cThere is a precedent. The only licensed live chickenpox vaccine used in the United States was developed, in part, from cells derived from research involving human embryos. Researchers first grew the virus in embryonic lung cells, which were later cloned and grown in two previously existing cell lines. Many ethical and religious leaders agree that even if the history of this vaccine raises ethical questions, its current use does not.\u201d 2001-08-12; Bush, George;\u00a0<em>The New York Times<\/em>; Stem Cell Science &amp; the Preservation of Life;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2001\/08\/12\/opinion\/stem-cell-science-and-the-preservation-of-life.html\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2001\/08\/12\/opinion\/stem-cell-science-and-the-preservation-of-life.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[49] 1985-08-29;\u00a0<em>The New York Times<\/em>; 16,500 Fetuses to get burial after long fight on funeral;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1985\/08\/29\/us\/16500-fetuses-to-get-burial-after-long-fight-on-funeral.html\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1985\/08\/29\/us\/16500-fetuses-to-get-burial-after-long-fight-on-funeral.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[50] 2003-05-24; Bingham, Eugene; The New Zealand Herald; Government asked to sanction foetus sale;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20030710230811\/http:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3503775&amp;thesection=news&amp;thesubsection=general\">https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20030710230811\/http:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3503775&amp;thesection=news&amp;thesubsection=general<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[51] 2003-06-10; Wall, Tony; Herald Sun; Foetal tissue for overseas sale;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/2003\/06\/10\/crucell-nv-hunts-down-fresh-aborted-fetuses-for-vaccines\/\">https:\/\/cogforlife.org\/2003\/06\/10\/crucell-nv-hunts-down-fresh-aborted-fetuses-for-vaccines\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[52] 2008-12; Kent, Julie; The fetal tissue economy: From abortion clinic to the stem cell laboratory;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2008.09.027\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2008.09.027<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[53] 2019-09-14; Taylor, Derrick;\u00a0<em>New York Times<\/em>; More Than 2,200 Preserve Fetuses Found at Property of Dead Doctor, Officials Say;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/09\/14\/us\/dr-ulrich-klopfer-fetal-remains.html\">https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/09\/14\/us\/dr-ulrich-klopfer-fetal-remains.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[54] \u2018Fetal Trafficking Under Oath\u2019,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.centerformedicalprogress.org\/fetal-trafficking-under-oath\/\">https:\/\/www.centerformedicalprogress.org\/fetal-trafficking-under-oath\/<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.centerformedicalprogress.org\/2020\/06\/sworn-video-testimony-describes-infanticide-in-fetal-organ-harvesting-and-planned-parenthood-clinics\/\">https:\/\/www.centerformedicalprogress.org\/2020\/06\/sworn-video-testimony-describes-infanticide-in-fetal-organ-harvesting-and-planned-parenthood-clinics\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[55] 2001-02-23; Does Aborted Fetal Tissue Research Influence a Woman\u2019s Decision to Have An Abortion?;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20040910003058\/http:\/\/www.nebcathcon.org\/fetal_tissue.htm#Does\">https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20040910003058\/http:\/\/www.nebcathcon.org\/fetal_tissue.htm#Does<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[56] 1995-09-01; Martin et al; Canadian Medical Association Journal; Fetal tissue transplantation and abortion decisions: a survey of urban women;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/europepmc.org\/article\/PMC\/1487409\">https:\/\/europepmc.org\/article\/PMC\/1487409<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[57] 1991-06-17; Morrow, Lance; Time; When One Body Can Save Another;\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/content.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,973182,00.html\">http:\/\/content.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,973182,00.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[58] 2015-03-26; Pickles, Kate; Daily Mail; Family\u2019s anguish as woman aborts unborn child so she can donate bone marrow to sister battling leukaemia \u2013 only to find out they don\u2019t have enough money for transplant;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/peoplesdaily\/article-3011404\/Family.html\">https:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/peoplesdaily\/article-3011404\/Family.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[59]\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Islam_and_abortion\">Wikipedia<\/a>\u00a0suggests Christianity has 2.4bn adherents and Islam 1.9bn \u2014 though\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whyislam.org\/islam\/abortion\/\">Islamic views diverge<\/a>, they are broadly pro-life. Even a 10% to 20% loss of distribution might have a profound impact on the commercial and pragmatic viability for fetal tissue vaccines \u2014 thus pressuring the industry to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.catholicworldreport.com\/2020\/09\/03\/catholics-thank-drug-company-for-switching-to-ethical-polio-vaccine\/\">switch to ethical production of vaccines<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>[60] \u201cI had a previous 18-year career in biomedical research and can attest that the majority of biomedical research is ethically sound. However, basing bioethics on the truths of the Bible, abortion and the associated harvesting and selling of body parts from aborted babies is ethically, morally and biblically wrong.\u201d 2015-07-14; Patrick, Charles; Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary; Modern Day Molech;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20191012113917\/https:\/\/swbts.edu\/news\/releases\/modern-day-molech\/\">https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20191012113917\/https:\/\/swbts.edu\/news\/releases\/modern-day-molech\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[61] 2015-10-15; Taylor, Philippa; The Conservative Woman; Ground-breaking medical research can still be ethical;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativewoman.co.uk\/philippa-taylor-ground-breaking-medical-research-can-still-be-ethical\/\">https:\/\/www.conservativewoman.co.uk\/philippa-taylor-ground-breaking-medical-research-can-still-be-ethical<\/a><\/p>\n<p>___<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/news\/vaccines-using-fetal-tissue-12-faulty-assumptions\">https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/news\/vaccines-using-fetal-tissue-12-faulty-assumptions<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vaccines using fetal tissue: 12 faulty assumptions<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=59522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=59522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=59522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=59522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}