The pair’s\u00a0“expert”\u00a0testimony was given over Zoom and appears to have been kept relatively quiet, given it was a ‘closed door’ members only call,\u00a0until Axios learned of it.<\/p>\n Rice of course\u00a0infamously served as George Bush’s National Security Advisor during the initial invasions of both Afghanistan and\u00a0Iraq, and crucially helped make the case for war to the American public, later serving as Bush’s Secretary of State through 2009.<\/p>\n Having helped start two failed wars, both of which have long remained deeply unpopular among the American public,\u00a0naturally\u00a0Condi Rice as a pre-eminent neocon voice would be consulted as a “stay the course” point of view<\/strong>. It’s also deeply revealing that there’s no foreign policy space in terms of viewpoint whatsoever between Rice and Clinton – latter who pushed for the US-NATO invasion of Libya and planned covert regime change in Syria against Assad.<\/p>\n Little is known about precisely what Hillary testified, but it’s not difficult to imagine. Here are a few key insights\u00a0via Axios<\/a>:<\/p>\n One unnamed committee member told Axios further that\u00a0“they both agreed we’re going to need to sustain a counterterrorism mission somehow outside of that country.”<\/strong><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/styles\/inline_image_mobile\/public\/inline-images\/condandhcl.jpg?itok=BlZCpH3e\")
<\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n\n