by Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n
MANY women are posting reports of disrupted and unusual menstrual cycles, heavy bleeding, and miscarriages.<\/p>\n
What\u2019s more, some of these women haven\u2019t received the COVID vaccine, but they\u2019ve been in close contact with others who have been vaccinated—leading to the question:<\/p>\n
Can the COVID vaccine (which is actually an experimental genetic treatment) \u201cshed\u201d something harmful that can be passed from person to person?<\/p>\n
Perhaps that sounds impossible, but in the world of genetics, much can go wrong.<\/p>\n
In fact, for the past 25 years, we\u2019ve had an illustration of shedding right in front of our eyes: GMO crops.<\/p>\n
If you recall, Monsanto assured one and all that these crops—genetically engineered to survive the sprayed herbicide Roundup—would flourish, while weeds would succumb to the chemical.<\/p>\n
So what actually happened? The weeds were resistant and became super-giants. And the Monsanto genes drifted from farm to farm, contaminating crops that were never meant to be engineered.<\/p>\n
The Monsanto genes were \u201cshed\u201d and they spread.<\/p>\n
This spread was not only the result of obvious cross-pollination. Bacteria in the soil, and in human digestive systems, also picked up and incorporated the Monsanto genes.<\/p>\n
Why couldn\u2019t \u201cshed and spread\u201d occur with a genetic COVID vaccine?<\/p>\n
The COVID injection contains a piece of RNA. The RNA nanoparticles enter human cells, forcing those cells to manufacture a protein similar to a protein in the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus. The immune system mounts a neutralizing attack against that protein, thus \u201crehearsing\u201d to defeat the virus if it comes along later.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s the hypothesis.<\/p>\n
In practice, who knows how many different dangerous and harmful processes can be detonated in the human body—plus the drifting of those genetic effects from person to person, whether vaccinated or not.<\/p>\n
Yes, I know the experts will point out the difference between inserting genes into crops and inserting them into humans. They\u2019ll say the GMO crops are supposed to hold on to those new genes long-term, but the COVID injection only has short-lived genetic effects.<\/p>\n
Supposedly, this is true. Supposedly.<\/p>\n
The universe of genetic experimentation, however, is rife with problems, mistakes, unintended consequences, as well as efforts to make weapons that attack life at basic levels.<\/p>\n
Consider, for example, gene drive technology, which asks the question: what species should we make extinct today?<\/p>\n
Why are Bill Gates and the US military involved in forwarding that technology?<\/p>\n
A gene-drive scientist says, \u201cI have a plan. By manipulating genes, we can make invasive rodents extinct, on an island where humans are living.\u201d<\/p>\n
In the next fraction of a second, a flurry of questions pops up.<\/p>\n
The overarching question is: Does this mean genetic manipulation can make ANY species extinct?<\/p>\n
Here is a passage from Gene Drive Files, a vital site with an enormous amount of referenced information on the subject:<\/p>\n
\u201cGene drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism\u2019s offspring carry that trait. For example, recent experiments are fitting mice with \u2018daughterless\u2019 gene drives that will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born, ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cProponents have framed gene drives as a breakthrough tool for eradicating pests or invasive species. However, the Gene Drive Files reveal that these \u2018conservation\u2019 efforts are primarily supported by military funds.\u201d<\/p>\n
Gene drive technology could be deployed to wipe out troublesome plant-parasites, weeds, crops, animal pests, animals, and\u2026humans. Mull that over with your morning coffee.<\/p>\n
Several years ago, certain UN member nations were considering a recommendation to call a moratorium on the use of gene drives. However, Bill Gates showed up to try to squash the moratorium.<\/p>\n
The Gene Drive Files reports: \u201cDocuments received under Freedom of Information requests reveal that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation paid a private agriculture and biotechnology PR firm $1.6 million for activities on Gene Drives. This included running a covert \u2018advocacy coalition\u2019 which appears to have intended to skew the only UN expert process addressing gene drives\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cFollowing global calls in December 2016 from Southern countries and over 170 organizations for a UN moratorium on gene drives, emails to gene drive advocates received under a Freedom of Information request by Prickly Research reveal that a private public affairs firm \u2018Emerging Ag\u2019 received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to co-ordinate the \u2018fight back against gene drive moratorium proponents\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n
There\u2019s more from the Gene Drive Files. It involves the military:<\/p>\n
\u201cA trove of emails (The Gene Drive Files) from leading U.S. gene drive researchers reveals that the U.S. Military is taking the lead in driving forward gene drive development.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cEmails obtained through a freedom of Information request by U.S.\u2013based Prickly Research reveal that the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has given approximately $100 million for gene drive research, $35 million more than previously reported, making them likely the largest single funder of gene drive research on the planet. The emails also reveal that DARPA either funds or co-ordinates with almost all major players working on gene drive development as well as the key holders of patents on CRISPR gene editing technology.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThese funds go beyond the US; DARPA is now also directly funding gene drive researchers in Australia (including monies given to an Australian government agency, CSIRO) and researchers in the UK. The files also reveal an extremely high level of interest and activity by other sections of the U.S. military and Intelligence community.\u201d<\/p>\n
As I\u2019ve shown in past articles, the latest and greatest gene-editing tools (e.g., CRISPR), which are used for gene drives, are far from slam-dunk precise, despite official assurances.<\/p>\n
For example, Nature Communications, May 31, 2017, \u201cCRISPR\/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome.\u201d That\u2019s UNINTENDED genetic \u201cdeletions and insertions.\u201d<\/p>\n
And how about this study? It was published in Genome Biology on June 14, 2017, and is titled, \u201cCRISPR\/Cas9-mediated genome editing induces exon skipping by alternative splicing or exon deletion.\u201d An exon is \u201ca segment of a DNA or RNA molecule containing information coding for a protein or peptide sequence.\u201d So you can see that exon skipping or deletion is a very bad outcome.<\/p>\n
In other words, ANY gene editing done on ANY species opens the door wide to all sorts of errors and unforeseen consequences. Doomsday genetic warfare and mutually assured destruction are the far shore of insanity\u2026but closer in, where more limited experiments are taking place, there is no safety zone, either. Insanity reigns there as well.<\/p>\n
Read what adorers of genetic experimentation have gushed:<\/p>\n
\u201cI went to Monsanto, and I spent a lot of time with the scientists there, and I have revised my outlook, and I’m very excited about telling the world. When you\u2019re in love, you want to tell the world.\u201d (Bill Nye, the Science Guy)<\/p>\n
\u201cI know it’s a long shot and people would say it’s ‘too absurd’\u2026 but I’m doing this with hopes of making a Mickey Mouse some day.\u201d (Arikuni Uchimura, quoted in “Japan bio-scientists produce ‘singing mouse'”, The Independent, 21 December 2010.)<\/p>\n
On the other hand, there is this: \u201cGenetic engineering is to traditional crossbreeding what the nuclear bomb was to the sword.\u201d (Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety)<\/p>\n
So\u2026we have a new COVID vaccine, based on experimental technology that delivers genetic instructions to cells of the body—instructions to create a protein that would otherwise never be created.<\/p>\n
We\u2019re told nothing can go wrong.<\/p>\n
We have many examples of genetic technology going very wrong.<\/p>\n
Farms that were supposed to be protected from Monsanto gene-drift turned into GMO Monsanto farms. So why couldn\u2019t unvaccinated people turn into vaccinated people, through \u201cshed and spread,\u201d without ever receiving the COVID injection?<\/p>\n
The problem is, the officials and experts who would answer that question for us are riddled with conflicts of interest; and they pretend to know what they don\u2019t know; and they\u2019re afraid of losing their jobs if they contradict the party line; and they\u2019re experienced professional liars.<\/p>\n
They\u2019ve rewritten the old fable, The Boy Who Cried Wolf. These professionals NEVER cry wolf, no matter what disasters are brewing.<\/p>\n
So we can never believe what they say.<\/p>\n
Now let\u2019s consider a key Pfizer document titled: \u201cA PHASE 1\/2\/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.\u201d<\/p>\n
On page 67, we find a warning about potential adverse effects of the vaccine. The abstruse term \u201cstudy intervention\u201d pops up. It surely means \u201cvaccination.\u201d \u201cEnvironmental exposure\u201d means contact with elements of the vaccine other than by injection.<\/p>\n
Warning of adverse effect: \u201cA female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cA male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.\u201d<\/p>\n
These warnings, from the vaccine manufacturer, Pfizer, are shocking. They imply that women can be harmed by breathing in, or contacting by skin, the vaccine as it moves from person to person. Which would be \u201cshedding.\u201d<\/p>\n
And what is being transferred from person to person? What is in the vaccine? Genetic material. RNA.<\/p>\n
—There is a Coda to this whole business. I write it because I don\u2019t believe in ringing lots of alarm bells and leaving people with nothing but fear.<\/p>\n
From personal experience, and 83 years of living, I know that people have an extraordinary ability to outlast elite insanity, no matter what.<\/p>\n
Our faith, desire for freedom, creative force, resistance, outrage, immortal refusal to give in; these are the core of a story that has been unfolding for centuries and millennia.<\/p>\n
This story goes beyond the forces arrayed against us. Regardless of the machinations brought to bear on humanity; regardless of claims that \u201cthere is no way out,\u201d we find ways.<\/p>\n
We\u2019re told: WELL, NO ONE CAN REMAIN HEALTHY IN THE FACE OF THAT. \u201cThat\u201d is the latest psychotic experiment in which we are the non-voluntary subjects.<\/p>\n
But many people do retain their strength, through their inner resources and their overriding faith, and their absolute refusal to knuckle under.<\/p>\n
Believe that, don\u2019t believe it; it\u2019s real.<\/p>\n
Permanent victimhood is not our destiny.<\/p>\n
It never was, it never will be.<\/p>\n
Sitting at the big table, shove in all your chips on that decision.<\/p>\n
If you do, you\u2019re in a community that has strengths no technocrat or secret society can begin to conceive of.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s not over. It\u2019s never over. Time is very long.<\/p>\n
We are the cure.<\/p>\n
This is the war.<\/p>\n