![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/yeadon19521_810_500_75_s_c1-400x247.jpg\")
<\/div>\n***<\/p>\n
Dozens of medical experts issued a warning this month about COVID-19 vaccines<\/a>, slamming the jabs as \u201cunnecessary, ineffective and unsafe\u201d and likely to lead to \u201cforeseeable mass deaths.\u201d \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cIn short, the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe,\u201d Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics<\/a> said in an open letter two weeks ago. \u201cActors authorizing, coercing or administering experimental COVID-19 vaccination are exposing populations and patients to serious, unnecessary, and unjustified medical risks.\u201d<\/p>\n Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics, a group founded by Dr.\u00a0Stephen Frost<\/strong> counts more than 160 medical experts<\/a> from around the world among its signatories. Among its members are Dr.\u00a0Mike Yeadon,\u00a0<\/strong>Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi<\/strong> MD, former chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg,<\/strong> former head of the health committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.<\/p>\n The doctors have penned<\/a>\u00a0multiple<\/a> letters<\/a> to the European Medicines Agency on COVID-19 vaccine issues and are facing censorship, though their most recent letter can be found archived here<\/a>. The group also can be found on Twitter<\/a>. Their testimony reflects growing calls from experts, like Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay<\/a> and Dr. Peter McCullough<\/a>, to halt the jabs.<\/p>\n \u2018The tip of a huge iceberg\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n In their letter earlier this month, Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics emphasized serious health implications<\/a> of the vaccines for both the healthy and ill, saying that the shots \u201care not safe, either for recipients or for those who use them or authorize their use.\u201d<\/p>\n They pointed to risks of \u201clethal and non-lethal disruptions of blood clotting<\/a>\u00a0including bleeding disorders, thrombosis in the brain, stroke and heart attack,\u201d \u201cantibody-dependent enhancement of disease,\u201d autoimmune reactions, and potential effects of \u201cvaccine impurities due to rushed manufacturing and unregulated production standards.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cContrary to claims that blood disorders post-vaccination are \u2018rare\u2019, many common vaccine side effects (headaches, nausea, vomiting and hematoma-like \u2018rashes\u2019 over the body) may indicate thrombosis and other severe abnormalities,\u201d the experts said. \u201cClotting events currently receiving media attention are likely just the \u2018tip of a huge iceberg.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cDue to immunological priming, risks of clotting, bleeding and other adverse events can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination and each intervening coronavirus exposure,\u201d Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics added. \u201cOver time, whether months or years, this renders both vaccination and coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom without vaccination COVID-19 poses no substantive risk,\u201d they argued.<\/p>\n \u201cJust as smoking could be and was predicted to cause lung cancer based on first principles, all gene-based vaccines can be expected to cause blood clotting and bleeding disorders, based on their molecular mechanisms of action,\u201d they said. \u201cConsistent with this, diseases of this kind have been observed across age groups, leading to temporary vaccine suspensions around the world.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cSince vaccine roll-out, COVID-19 incidence has risen<\/a> in numerous areas with high vaccination rates. Furthermore, multiple series of COVID-19 fatalities have occurred shortly after the onset vaccinations in senior homes<\/a>,\u201d the doctors said. \u201cThese cases may have been due not only to antibody-dependent enhancement but also to a general immunosuppressive effect of the vaccines, which is suggested by the increased occurrence of Herpes zoster in certain patients.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cRegardless of the exact mechanism responsible for these reported deaths, we must expect that the vaccines will increase rather than decrease lethality of COVID-19,\u201d they continued.<\/p>\n The group stressed that the jabs remain technically experimental \u2013 a fact that legally precludes<\/a> mandatory vaccination in many cases:<\/p>\n \u201cThe vaccines are experimental by definition. They will remain in Phase 3 trials until 2023. Recipients are human subjects entitled to free informed consent under Nuremberg and other protections, including the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe\u2019s resolution 2361 and the FDA\u2019s terms of emergency use authorization.\u201d<\/p>\n \u2018Full onslaught of the immune system\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics particularly warned about vaccines, like those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, that rely on the novel mRNA vaccination method<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cInitial experience might suggest that the adenovirus-derived vaccines (AstraZeneca\/Johnson & Johnson) cause graver adverse effects than the mRNA (Pfizer\/Moderna) vaccines. However, upon repeated injection, the former will soon induce antibodies against the proteins of the adenovirus vector,\u201d according to the doctors. \u201cThese antibodies will then neutralize most of the vaccine virus particles and cause their disposal before they can infect any cells, thereby limiting the intensity of tissue damage.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIn contrast, in the mRNA vaccines, there is no protein antigen for the antibodies to recognize. Thus, regardless of the existing degree of immunity, the vaccine mRNA is going to reach its target \u2014 the body cells,\u201d they said. \u201cThese will then express the spike protein and subsequently suffer the full onslaught of the immune system. With the mRNA vaccines, the risk of severe adverse events is virtually guaranteed to increase with every successive injection.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cTheir apparent preferment over the latter is concerning in the highest degree.\u201d<\/p>\n Unnecessary vaccines, \u2018no medium-term or long-term data\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cIn most countries, most people will now have immunity to SARS-CoV-2,\u201d the experts additionally noted, pointing out that coronavirus has an estimated 99.8% survival rate<\/a> globally. \u201cRegardless of disease severity, they will now have sufficient immunity to be protected from severe disease in the event of renewed exposure. This majority of the population will not benefit at all from being vaccinated.\u201d<\/p>\n For those at risk of severe infection, the virus remains treatable, Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics said. \u201cA convergence of evidence indicates that early treatment with existing drugs reduces hospitalization and mortality by ~85% and 75%, respectively,\u201d they explained, highlighting \u201cmany tried and true<\/a> anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and anticoagulant medications, as well as monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cNatural T-Cell immunity provides stronger and more comprehensive protection against all SARS-CoV-2 strains than vaccines, because naturally primed immunity recognizes multiple virus epitopes and costimulatory signals, not merely a single (spike) protein,\u201d they continued.<\/p>\n The doctors\u2019 letter also debunked claims that vaccination is necessary to prevent viral spread through asymptomatic infection.<\/p>\n \u201cThe vaccines have been touted as a means to prevent asymptomatic infection, and by extension \u2018asymptomatic transmission,\u2019\u201d Doctors for COVID-19 Ethics said. \u201cHowever, \u2018asymptomatic transmission\u2019 is an artefact of invalid and unreliable PCR test procedures<\/a> and interpretations, leading to high false-positive rates. Evidence indicates that PCR-positive, asymptomatic people are healthy false-positives, not carriers.\u201d<\/p>\n