{"id":66829,"date":"2021-05-27T17:39:53","date_gmt":"2021-05-27T21:39:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=66829"},"modified":"2021-05-27T17:39:53","modified_gmt":"2021-05-27T21:39:53","slug":"judeocracy-heres-the-stark-and-perilous-reality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=66829","title":{"rendered":"JUDEOCRACY: Here’s the Stark and Perilous Reality"},"content":{"rendered":"

Confronting the Judeocracy<\/strong><\/h1>\n

<\/p>\n

The Six Stages of Enlightenment<\/em><\/p>\n

THOMAS DALTON
\nThe Unz Review<\/h3>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Anyone who has spent even a short time battling against the Judeocracy has surely experienced the frustration of attempting to persuade a trusted friend or colleague of the gravity of the situation\u2014only to fail. This is undoubtedly one of the most discouraging and troubling aspects of those who take up the mission for truth and justice. We repeatedly encounter intelligent and well-read individuals who, we believe, surely must share our sense of concern and outrage. If they do not, it can only be from lack of knowledge; therefore, a short chat or a targeted reading or two, we think, will do the trick. The facts are indisputable, and hence it is merely a matter of information. Once our friends have the requisite facts, they will surely\u2014surely<\/em>\u2014see things our way. And yet, time after time, they do not.<\/span><\/p>\n

Why is this? What are they thinking? What is their logic? How is it that they can fail to be fully convinced of the severity of the Jewish Question? Or even just be sympathetic to our stance? Why is it that they occasionally even become outright hostile\u2014not to them, but to\u00a0us?\u00a0<\/em>How can they be in denial of what is, from a rational and objective standpoint, surely one of the major problems facing civilized humanity? Undoubtedly this could be the topic of a book-length treatment, and I can only outline a few basic ideas here. But I think there is some merit in examining the basic categories of response and denial by those confronted, perhaps for the first time in a serious manner, with the Jewish Question and with the many problems of living under\u00a0de facto<\/em>\u00a0Jewish rule.<\/span><\/p>\n

At its most basic level, the situation is one in which the relative novice is confronted with a difficult, troubling, and potentially catastrophic scenario: profound social corruption by wealthy and powerful Jews. (I stress the \u2018relative\u2019 here; everyone, even the functionally illiterate, has heard\u00a0something<\/em>\u00a0negative about the Jews, likely many negative things.) It is a \u2018bad news\u2019 story of the highest magnitude. And the last thing many people want in their lives these days is another bad news story. God knows we\u2019ve had enough troubles in recent years: political upheaval, riots in the streets, a global pandemic, economic gyrations, unrestrained immigration, environmental decline, opioid crises, surging crime, falling lifespans. Who needs yet one more disaster heaped upon their plates? The Jews? Really? Are you serious? And I suppose\u00a0the Holocaust never happened<\/a>! (Hint:\u00a0it didn\u2019t<\/a>\u2014not in the way described.) What are you, some kind of Nazi? A White supremacist? On and on.<\/span><\/p>\n

Despite all this, many of us persevere. We realize that public education is one of our primary weapons in the Great Struggle, and we are bound and determined to press ahead and inform as many as possible of the nature of the problem. Therefore, it is of some use to understand more precisely how people typically respond to our overtures, in order to be more effective in our communication. After all, we are pursuing a noble cause, and we sincerely want people to be well-informed and, ideally, to join us in our mission. Apart from our opponents, we genuinely want people to like and appreciate us. You don\u2019t get very far coming off like a fanatic or a jerk. I\u2019m quite confident that virtually none of us relish making enemies for the sake of making enemies. We have no driving urge to be antagonistic or rabble-rousing. Generally speaking, what we have are facts, experiences, and informed opinions on the Jews; these, combined with a general sense of concern for social welfare, justice, and the state of the world, incline us to undertake unusual, unpopular, but highly valuable actions to educate others, and to articulate possible solutions. It is the prototypical \u2018thankless task,\u2019 and yet we do it all the same.<\/span><\/p>\n

That said, it is helpful to have a model of how people react to the Jewish Question. The approach I will outline here derives from another famous model describing how people react to a different crisis situation: death. In the 1950s and 60s, Swiss (later, American) psychiatrist Elisabeth K\u00fcbler-Ross developed a well-known scheme that came to be known as \u201cthe five stages of grief.\u201d When confronted with imminent death, she said, people typically progress through five relatively distinct mental phases: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.\u00a0Denial<\/em>: \u201cNo, this isn\u2019t true, it can\u2019t be happening. There must be some mistake.\u201d\u00a0Anger<\/em>: \u201cHow could this happen to me? It\u2019s just not fair! Someone is to blame. God, how could you let this happen!\u201d\u00a0Bargaining<\/em>: \u201cPlease, God, get me through this and I promise to do x, y, z. Or, doc, you have to help me; I\u2019ll do whatever it takes.\u201d\u00a0Depression<\/em>: \u201cThere\u2019s no use, nothing will work. I\u2019m doomed. What\u2019s the use of even trying?\u201d And finally,\u00a0Acceptance<\/em>: \u201cEveryone dies, and I guess my time is up. So be it. Time to meet my Maker.\u201d This schema was first described in her initial book,\u00a0On Death and Dying<\/em>\u00a0(1969).<\/span><\/p>\n

I\u2019ll not debate the merits or demerits of K\u00fcbler-Ross\u2019 theory here. Some have found it helpful, and others dismiss it as largely irrelevant or at least unsubstantiated. Still, based only on common sense, I think we can see that there is some insight here, and that many people\u2014perhaps some we have known personally\u2014indeed experience such stages in varying degrees. Obviously not everyone passes through all five stages, and not necessarily in the prescribed order, but nonetheless, these stages do describe some essential aspects of human response to the looming tragedy of one\u2019s own demise.<\/span><\/p>\n

Inspired by this model, let me then propose something analogous:\u00a0The Six Stages of Enlightenment on the Jewish Question<\/em>. I claim no real scientific grounding here, and I have done no exhaustive surveys or interviews. This is based simply on my own personal experience, over several years, of confronting people\u2014students, family, friends, strangers\u2014on the dangers of the Judeocracy. My six stages are as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n

1. Denial
\n2. Irrelevance
\n3. Impotence
\n4. Misplaced Anger
\n5. Acceptance
\n6. Righteous Anger and Action<\/span><\/p>\n

As with K\u00fcbler-Ross\u2019s theory, I do not claim that all people experience all of these stages, nor that they necessarily progress through them in order. But I do think that many people, when confronted with the data, do experience some or most of these stages. Let me briefly describe each in turn, and then outline some of the relevant facts that make the case for enlightenment.<\/span><\/p>\n

DENIAL. Upon first hearing a serious claim that Jews have outsized and detrimental influence in society, or dominate the ranks of the wealthy, or run the media, or control politics, the usual initial response is denial: \u201cNo they don\u2019t. That\u2019s ridiculous. There are no more Jews in power than anyone else. That\u2019s just an anti-Semitic canard.\u201d This, even from highly-educated people. Fortunately, this is an empirical question; an overwhelming Jewish presence can be easily proven, given the relevant data. Below I offer a concise version of this argument.<\/span><\/p>\n

IRRELEVANCE. Once it is shown that Jews are massively over-represented in key sectors of society, the standard reply is that this fact does not matter. \u201cOk, there are lots of Jews in media, finance, and politics, but this doesn\u2019t really matter. People are just people. There are good ones and there are bad ones. If Jews hold lots of influential positions, that only means that they worked hard and succeeded. And anyway, they\u2019re just doing their jobs. If they didn\u2019t do them, someone else would.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

This seems like a common-sense view, but to make such a claim is to hold an extremely na\u00efve and ill-informed view of the world. It\u2019s true that most decent people, and especially most Whites, tend to view others as individuals; there are likely evolutionary reasons for this, which I won\u2019t elaborate here, but see Kevin MacDonald\u2019s book\u00a0Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition<\/a><\/em>\u00a0for a good recent account. If we judge everyone as basically well-intentioned individuals, then of course, it doesn\u2019t really matter if Jews or any other minority dominates society. If Jews are disproportionate, then it can only mean that they are that much smarter or industrious than others, and thus they deserve their standing. (Nathan Cofnas is doing his best to make this thesis academically respectable\u2014refuted<\/a>\u00a0in several places, most recently by\u00a0Andrew Joyce<\/a>). And if some Jews commit crimes or other unethical actions, we have to judge and punish them individually, on a case-by-case basis. Or so they say.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Jewish critic must then respond to this stance with a demonstration that it\u00a0does<\/em>\u00a0matter, that Jewish over-representation has a long-standing and deep-rooted grounding in anti-White and even anti-human actions, and that it is remarkably detrimental to social and human well-being. This is a longer and more difficult argument to make, but it can be done; again, I outline this case below.<\/span><\/p>\n

IMPOTENCE. Once we have shown the deleterious effect of Jewish dominance, the next reply is typically something like this: \u201cOk, if Jews have so much power and influence, then you can\u2019t possibly win. They are just too strong. So why fight them? It can only hurt yourself and your family. Better to just ignore the whole situation and live your life as best you can.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Certainly this is a pragmatic view, and many otherwise well-intentioned critics adopt this line. But ultimately it means surrender: a moral capitulation to a malevolent ruling power. To yield to evil is itself a great evil. It is to condemn one\u2019s own future, and that of your children and grandchildren, to a life of increasing brutality and coarseness, of deprivation and suffering, of conflict and war. No truly concerned person can accept this. We must confront the situation head-on.\u00a0To fight against evil, even in the face of likely defeat, is noble; it actually makes life worth living.<\/em>\u00a0Even if victory is a long way off\u2014and ultimate victory for our side is\u00a0inevitable<\/em>, once we understand the history\u2014it is still a fight worth pursuing. Living in a Judeocracy means that every major aspect of society is affected. If you have any concerns or causes in this world that you think are worth fighting for\u2014the environment, social justice, education, human rights, health, democracy\u2014then you need to engage in the fight against Jewish rule because it has a negative impact on virtually every other social issue. To paraphrase Spengler, impotence is cowardice.<\/span><\/p>\n

MISPLACED ANGER. At this point, your friend is likely to start getting irritated\u2014with you. As a typical semi-thoughtful but uncritical television viewer, he has likely absorbed and internalized the conventional pro-Jewish mantra: Jews are a beleaguered and innocent people who have been unjustly attacked over the centuries, most notably during the Holocaust, and thus we owe them vast amends. Furthermore, being a typically decent person, he thinks that anyone attacking Jews, or any minorities, is a morally-deficient racist or neo-Nazi\u2014and now, this is you! For God\u2019s sake, everybody hates a racist! Even Tucker Carlson hates racists!\u2014as he informs us every night, in his unthinking, dim-witted, and duplicitous manner. Since you clearly hate Jews, you are now officially a \u2018hater.\u2019 And everyone hates a hater\u2014don\u2019t they?<\/span><\/p>\n

Sensing that he has lost the argument, your friend then launches into either subtle or overt\u00a0ad hominem<\/em>\u00a0attacks against you. Rational discussion is out the window, and emotion rules the day. You are now simply a \u2018bad person\u2019; no further need to debate with you. Having demonstrated your incivility and cruel-heartedness, you are either pitied or detested. Critically, the focus has shifted to\u00a0you<\/em>; Jews are suddenly nowhere in sight, even though this was the sole issue at hand. They are suddenly off the hook. How convenient; the Jews themselves couldn\u2019t have scripted a better outcome.<\/span><\/p>\n

Sadly, many people remain stuck in this mode for a long time, perhaps for their entire lives. They never address the real issue, but continue only to think negatively of you and you alone. This is a relatively good outcome for them; the social problem is not a multitude of wealthy, powerful, and ethnocentric Jews, but little ol\u2019 you, and perhaps a few of your like-minded hater friends. It\u2019s much easier, and much less threatening, to deal with you and your \u201cilk,\u201d rather than a potent, dispersed, malevolent force like world Jewry.<\/span><\/p>\n

Sometimes, though, and often in surprising ways, there is a shift in attitude. Your friend becomes curious. He investigates, he reads, he asks questions. Slowly, slowly, he comes around to your side. \u201cYou know, I\u2019ve been thinking, and I think you\u2019re on to something. Those Jews are everywhere, once you learn how to spot them. No one criticizes them. No one questions the Holocaust. No one is even willing to simply name the Jews. They get away with everything\u2026\u201d Thus we arrive, with luck, at ACCEPTANCE. Yes, Jews in fact dominate key sectors of society. Yes, Jews in fact are the major wire-pullers in politics and business. Yes, Jews couldn\u2019t care less about human well-being, and they would just as soon cause mass suffering and even death, if it profited them in any way. The denialism has been overcome.<\/span><\/p>\n

Once at this phase, it is only a short step to the final stage: RIGHTEOUS ANGER\u2014now against the real enemy\u2014and corresponding ACTION. Anyone with a conscience, with a sense of moral outrage, and with a larger sense of justice, will be utterly appalled at the situation. They will now become activist, speaking out, writing, informing others. They will develop the moral backbone to confront Jewish power and its proxies directly. Being truly knowledgeable and well-informed, they will make a formidable opponent. The movement will have taken one more small step forward. And victory will be one day closer.<\/span><\/p>\n

Constructing the Case<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Given that nearly everyone begins at some level of the \u2018denial\u2019 stage, it is worthwhile to offer some specific facts that can help build the case against it. The goal, again, is to show that Jews are massively disproportionate amongst the wealthy and powerful in society. This is the core truth from which all the rest proceeds. Fortunately, as I said, this is an entirely empirical matter. Basic research will reveal the truth. Of course, the names vary from nation to nation, and they change constantly over time. A specific case must be made at a given point in time, and in a specific nation of interest. Since I am an American, and the data here is extensive, let me briefly review the case in the present-day USA. Even a cursory overview demonstrates the failure of denial.<\/span><\/p>\n

We can separately examine four sectors of American society: politics, academia, finance, and media. In politics, we have a strong Jewish presence in all three branches of government\u2013Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court. Regarding the latter, we currently have 2 Jews among the 9 justices: Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer. Until the recent death of Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, the figure was 3 of 9, and if President Obama had had his way late in his final term, it would have been an astonishing 4 of 9, with Merrick Garland. (We can be sure that any future Biden nominee will be Jewish.)<\/span><\/p>\n

The current US Congress has\u00a038 Jews<\/a>\u00a0among its combined 535 members, with 10 in the Senate and 28 in the House. This constitutes around 7% of the Congressional total, versus an American Jewish population of some 6 million, or just under 2% of the nation. Hence Jews are over-represented in Congress by a factor of 3.5, and in the Senate by a factor of 5. The record high for Jewish representation, incidentally, occurred in the aftermath of the 2008 federal election, when fully 48 Jews held seats in Congress (15 Senate, 33 House).<\/span><\/p>\n

The Biden administration, like that of Trump, Obama, Bush, and Clinton, has an extensive Jewish presence. Start with the families of Biden and Kamala Harris. Remarkably, all three of Biden\u2019s adult children married Jews: daughter Ashley married Howard Krein, son Hunter married \u201cfilmmaker\u201d Melissa Cohen, and now-deceased son Beau married Hallie Olivere. Correspondingly, three of Biden\u2019s six grandchildren are half-Jews. Biracial VP Kamala Harris married a Jewish lawyer, Doug Emhoff, back in 2014; thankfully, they have no children.<\/span><\/p>\n

Biden\u2019s sympathies to the Jews extend, of course, to his highest-level administrative positions. Of 25 cabinet or cabinet-level positions, eight (32%) are held by Jews: Tony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Yellen, Merrick Garland (yes,\u00a0that<\/em>\u00a0Merrick Garland), Ron Klain, Avril Haines (half), Isabel Guzman (half), and Eric Lander. Other high-ranking Biden Jews include John Kerry (half), Rochelle Walensky of the CDC, Jeff Zients, Wendy Sherman, Gary Gensler of the SEC, David Cohen, \u201cRachel\u201d Levine, Anne Neuberger, Andy Slavitt, Victoria Nuland, and Roberta Jacobson. And this is not to mention Judeophilic Gentiles like Jake Sullivan, or Gentiles with Jewish spouses, like Samantha Power. Below I offer some thoughts about why, exactly, this situation came to be.<\/span><\/p>\n

What about academia? Here is one remarkable indication: It was\u00a0recently noted<\/a>\u00a0that of the eight Ivy League schools\u2014Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Penn, Brown, Cornell, and Dartmouth\u2014fully seven have Jewish presidents. In other words, 88% of these elite schools are run by Jews. We can be sure that this Jewish orientation then extends down into provosts and deans who are disproportionately Jewish, into faculty members who are disproportionately Jewish, and into the very curriculum itself, which undoubtedly caters to liberal-left Jewish interests.<\/span><\/p>\n

Then consider university faculty more broadly. In an article published in 2006, Schuster and Finkelstein found that \u201c25% of research university faculty are Jewish, compared to 10% of all faculty.\u201d[1]<\/a>\u00a0An older study by Steinberg[2]<\/a>\u00a0found that 17.2 percent of faculty at \u201chigh ranking\u201d universities were Jewish. By a different assessment, Harriett Zuckerman[3]<\/a>\u00a0examined just the \u201celite\u201d scientific and research faculty. She found the following, by major discipline:<\/span><\/p>\n

Law 36% Jewish
\nSociology 34% Jewish
\nEconomics 28% Jewish
\nPhysics 26% Jewish
\nPoli Sci 24% Jewish<\/span><\/p>\n

What about students? Experience shows that when Jews constitute more than just a few percent of the student body, they begin to dominate campus life. As it happens, there are\u00a0nine major American universities<\/a>\u00a0with over 20% Jewish undergrads (in descending order: Brandeis, Tulane, CUNY-Brooklyn, Binghamton, Queens College, George Washington University, Columbia, Boston University, and Washington University-St. Louis). And there are another\u00a023 major schools<\/a>\u00a0with more than 10% Jews (Maryland, American University, Brown, University of Miami, Rutgers, University of Florida, Cornell, Penn, Syracuse, Michigan, New York University, Northwestern, University of Hartford, Wisconsin, Yale, Indiana, UC-Santa Barbara, Duke, University at Albany, Harvard, Cal State-Northridge, Florida State, and USC). Hence we have 32 major American universities, representing the intellectual elite of the nation, with a hugely disproportionate Jewish presence, top to bottom. Again, this in a nation of scarcely 2% Jews.<\/span><\/p>\n

Consider, next, the realm of finance and wealth. When we run down the list of wealthiest Americans, we find a striking fact: around half of them are Jews. Among the top ten, we find five Jews: Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Larry Ellison, and Michael Bloomberg. Of the top 50 richest men, at least 27 are Jews, including Steve Ballmer, Michael Dell, Carl Icahn, David Newhouse, Micki Arison, and Stephen Ross.<\/a>[4]<\/a>\u00a0The combined wealth of these 27 individuals comes to roughly $635 billion. Note: If Jews were proportionately represented among the top 50, there would be\u00a0one<\/em>\u00a0individual; instead, there are\u00a027<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

More broadly, we can infer that this \u201c50% rule\u201d holds throughout much of the wealth hierarchy. In support, we may cite Benjamin Ginsberg, who wrote, \u201cToday, though barely 2% of the [American] nation\u2019s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews.\u201d<\/a>[5]<\/a>\u00a0At present, there are something like 615 American billionaires, which implies around 300 Jewish billionaires.<\/span><\/p>\n

Or perhaps the figures are even worse than we suspect. A\u00a0recent study<\/a>\u00a0of the most malicious \u201cvulture\u201d capitalists showed a heavy preponderance of Jewish names, far more than half. And\u00a0one ranking<\/a>\u00a0from a few years ago of the richest hedge fund managers in the US listed 32 individuals by name; of these, at least 24 (75%) are Jews. It seems that the more we look, the worse it gets.<\/span><\/p>\n

Even more impressively, consider total private wealth. In 2018, the total assets of all private households in the US hit $100 trillion for the first time ever. The 50% rule suggests that the 6 million or so American Jews own or control, in total, some $50 trillion. This works out to an average of $8 million for every Jewish man, woman, and child\u2014a truly astonishing figure.<\/span><\/p>\n

So much for Jewish wealth. More importantly, these various sectors are deeply interconnected. Jewish wealth is directly related to Jewish political influence. Take, for example, Joe Biden\u2019s top political donors. It turns out, unsurprisingly, that the vast majority of Biden\u2019s political donations came from Jewish billionaires. As Andrew Joyce\u00a0writes<\/a>, \u201cof [his] top 22 donors, at least 18 are Jews,\u201d followed by the list of names. This is perhaps extreme but not surprising, given that\u00a0Jews overall provide<\/a>\u00a0at least 50% of Democratic political funding, and at least 25% of Republican funds. These are truly disturbing numbers for anyone who cares about political corruption. Note that there are literally hundreds of lobby groups, all donating to their favored candidates. And yet one lobby\u2014the Jewish Lobby\u2014provides 25 to 50%, or more, of major candidate funding. Imagine if, say, half of your income came from one person, and the other half came from a mix of 200 other individuals; who would you listen to? The answer is obvious.<\/span><\/p>\n

Finally, take the media. Hollywood, as we all know, has long been a Jewish domain\u2014reaching back to its origins in the 1910s and 1920s. It was constructed by the likes of Carl Laemmle (Universal Pictures), Adolph Zukor, Jesse Lasky, Daniel and Charles Frohman, and Samuel Goldwyn (Paramount), William Fox (Fox Films, later 20th<\/sup>\u00a0Century Fox), and the four \u201cWarner\u201d Brothers\u2014in reality, the Wonskolaser clan: Jack, Harry, Albert, and Sam. They were soon followed by Marcus Loew (MGM), William Paley (CBS), and Harry and Jack Cohn (Columbia), establishing nearly complete Jewish control over the film business.<\/span><\/p>\n

Today the situation is little changed\u2014and is neither disputed nor even controversial. A notable story published in the\u00a0LA Times<\/em>\u00a0in 2008 openly proclaimed that \u201cJews totally run Hollywood\u201d.[6]<\/a>\u00a0It investigated every major studio and found nothing but Jewish bosses. Today the names have changed, but not the ethnicities. A recent survey of major executives or owners reveals the following:<\/span><\/p>\n

20th<\/sup>\u00a0Century Studios (S. Asbell)
\nParamount (S. Redstone)
\nDisney Studies (A. Bergman, A. Horn)
\nWarner Bros Studios (T. Emmerich, A. Sarnoff, R. Kavanaugh)
\nMGM (M. De Luca)
\nSony Pictures (T. Rothman, S. Panitch, J. Greenstein)
\nLionsgate (M. Rachesky, J. Feltheimer)
\nRelativity Media (D. Robbins)
\nMillennium Media (A. Lerner)
\nThe Chernin Group (P. Chernin)
\nAmblin Partners (S. Spielberg)
\nParticipant (J. Skoll, D. Linde)
\nSister (S. Snider, E. Murdoch)
\nSpyglass (G. Barber)
\nGlickmania (J. Glickman)<\/span><\/p>\n

As before, all of these individuals are Jews.[7]<\/a>\u00a0With such dominance, we should scarcely be surprised to find pro-Jewish themes repeatedly appear in film: from the Holocaust and the \u2018evil Nazis,\u2019 to the Arab and Muslim \u2018terrorists,\u2019 to the ignorant and corrupt Whites, to support for various socially and ethically degrading behavior such as casual sex, homosexuality, interracial couples and families, recreational drug use, crude materialism, and rampant multiculturalism. All these themes serve Jewish interests.<\/span><\/p>\n

The overall media situation is even more telling. The five largest media conglomerates in the US are: 1) Disney, 2) Warner Media, 3) NBC Universal, 4) Viacom CBS, and 5) Fox Corporation. A look at their owners, largest shareholders, and top officers is revealing:<\/span><\/p>\n