{"id":66912,"date":"2021-05-27T17:53:09","date_gmt":"2021-05-27T21:53:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=66912"},"modified":"2021-05-27T17:59:14","modified_gmt":"2021-05-27T21:59:14","slug":"the-corona-scandal-the-greatest-crime-against-humanity-in-the-history-of-the-world-video","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=66912","title":{"rendered":"THE CORONA SCANDAL: THE GREATEST CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD (VIDEO)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h3>Please watch this video in its entirety. Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is also a lawyer and is part of a global lawsuit against the Gates Foundation and all of the bad actors involved in the \u201cGreatest Crime Against Humanity in the History of the World\u201d<\/h3>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-embed-handler wp-block-embed-embed-handler wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\"><span class=\"embed-youtube\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/7RG3k76zTRM?version=3&amp;rel=1&amp;showsearch=0&amp;showinfo=1&amp;iv_load_policy=1&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en-US&amp;autohide=2&amp;wmode=transparent\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">From\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/1000-lawyers-and-10000-doctors-have-filed-a-lawsuit-for-violations-of-the-nuremberg-code\/\"><strong>sorendreier.com<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"has-large-font-size\">1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Have Filed a Lawsuit for Violations of the Nuremberg Code<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"jetpack-lazy-image jetpack-lazy-image--handled\" src=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/3i2lq13pvwgh2ffbbxk9da411le-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/corona.jpg?w=640&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" data-lazy-loaded=\"1\" \/><figcaption><strong>Notice: Auto translated from Swedish.<br \/>\n<\/strong>-SD<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Background to the new Nuremberg Trials 2021 :<\/p>\n<p>A large team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO and the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.<\/p>\n<p>Fuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death \u2013 as fraud.<\/p>\n<p>The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result.<\/p>\n<p>This invalidates over 90% of the alleged Covid cases \/ \u201cinfections\u201d detected by the use of this incorrect test.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to the incorrect tests and fraudulent death certificates, the \u201cexperimental\u201d vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention.<\/p>\n<p>Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, \u201cmutilation and medical or scientific experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person\u201d are prohibited.<\/p>\n<p>According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a serious breach of the Convention.<\/p>\n<p>The \u201cexperimental\u201d vaccine violates all 10 Nuremberg codes \u2013 which carry the death penalty for those who try to break these international laws.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1) Provides immunity to the virus<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is a \u201cleaky\u201d gene therapy that does not provide immunity to Covid and claims that they reduce the symptoms, but double-vaccinated are now 60% of patients who need ER or ICU with covid infections.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2) Protects the recipients from getting the virus<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This gene therapy does not provide immunity and the double vaccine can still catch and spread the virus.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3) Reduces deaths due to viral infection<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This gene therapy does not reduce deaths from the infection. Double-vaccinated people infected with Covid have also died.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4) Reduces the circulation of the virus<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This gene therapy still allows the virus to spread because it gives zero immunity to the virus.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5) Reduces the transmission of the virus<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This gene therapy still allows transmission of the virus because it does not confer immunity to the virus.<\/p>\n<p>The following violations of the Nuremberg Code apply:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 1: Voluntary consent is important<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>No person should be forced to take a medical experiment without informed consent.<\/p>\n<p>Many media, political and non-medical people urge people to take the injection.<\/p>\n<p>They do not provide information about the negative effects or dangers of this gene therapy. All you hear from them is \u2013 \u201csafe and effective\u201d and \u201cthe benefits outweigh the risks.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Countries use blockades, coercion and threats to force people to take this vaccine or are banned from participating in free society under the mandate of a vaccine pass or Green Pass.<\/p>\n<p>During the Nuremberg trials, the media were also prosecuted and members were killed for lying to the public, along with many of the doctors and Nazis found guilty of crimes against humanity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 2: Yields with fruitful results that cannot be produced by other means<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As mentioned above, gene therapy does not meet the criteria for a vaccine and does not offer immunity to the virus. There are other medical treatments that give fruitful results against Covid, such as Ivermectin, vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc and strengthened immune system for flu and colds.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 3: Basic experiments as a result of animal experiments and natural history disease<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This gene therapy skipped animal experiments and went directly to human experiments.<\/p>\n<p>In mRNA research used by Pfizer \u2013 a candidate study on mRNA with rhesus macaques monkeys using BNT162b2 mRNA and in that study all monkeys developed pneumonia but the researchers considered the risk low because these were young healthy monkeys from 2-4 years of age.<\/p>\n<p>Israel has used Pfizer and the International Court of Justice has accepted a requirement that 80% of recipients with pneumonia should be injected with this gene therapy.<\/p>\n<p>Despite this alarming development, Pfizer continued to develop its mRNA for Covid, without animal testing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 4: Avoid all unnecessary suffering and injury<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Since the launch of the experiment and listed under the CDC VAERS reporting system, over 4,000 deaths and 50,000 vaccine injuries have been reported in the United States. In the EU, more than 7,000 deaths and 365,000 vaccine injuries have been reported. This is a serious violation of this code.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 5: No experiment should be performed if there is reason to believe that injury or death will occur<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>See No. 4, based on fact-based medical data, this gene therapy causes death and injury. Previous research on mRNA also shows several risks that have been ignored for this current experimental gene experiment. A 2002 study of SARS-CoV-1 nail proteins showed that they cause inflammation, immunopathology, blood clots and inhibit Angiotensin 2 expression. This experiment forces the body to produce this nail protein that inherits all these risks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 6: The risk should never exceed the benefit<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Covid-19 has a recovery rate of 98-99%. Vaccine damage, death, and adverse side effects of mRNA gene therapy far outweigh this risk.<\/p>\n<p>The use of \u201cleaky\u201d vaccines was banned for agricultural use by the US and the EU due to the Marek Chicken study which shows \u201chot viruses\u201d and variants appear\u2026 make the disease even more deadly.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, this has been ignored for human use by the CDC aware that the risk of new, more deadly variants arises from leaky vaccinations. The CDC is fully aware that the use of leaky vaccines facilitates the emergence of hotter (more deadly) strains. Yet they have ignored this when it comes to humans<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 7: Preparations must be made for even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>No preparations were made. This gene therapy skipped animal experiments. The pharmaceutical companies\u2019 own clinical phase 3 studies will not end until 2022\/2023. These vaccines were approved in an emergency<\/p>\n<p>Use only action to force on a misinformed public. They are NOT FDA approved.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 8: Experiments must be carried out by scientifically qualified persons<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Politicians, the media and actors who claim that this is a safe and effective vaccine are not qualified. Propaganda is not medical science.<\/p>\n<p>Many stores such as Walmart &amp; drive-through vaccine centers are not qualified to administer experimental medical gene therapies to the uninformed public.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 9: Everyone must have the freedom to end the experiment at any time<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Despite the call from over 85,000 doctors, nurses, virologists and epidemiologists \u2013 the experiment does not end. In fact, there are currently many attempts to change laws to enforce vaccine compliance.<\/p>\n<p>This includes mandatory and mandatory vaccinations. Experimental \u201csprayers\u201d are planned every six months without using the growing number of deaths and injuries already caused by this experiment.<\/p>\n<p>These update images will be administered without any clinical trials. Hopefully, this new Nuremberg trial will put an end to this crime against humanity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nuremberg Code # 10: The researcher must terminate the experiment at any time if there is a probable cause for injury or death<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It is clear from statistical reporting data that this experiment leads to death and injury. But not all politicians, pharmaceutical companies and so-called experts make any attempt to stop this gene therapy experiment from harming a misinformed public.<\/p>\n<p>Legal proceedings are progressing, evidence has been gathered and a large growing group of experts is sounding the alarm.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sistatiden.se\/1000-advokater-och-10000-lakare-har-inlamnat-en-stamningsansokan-for-brott-mot-nurnbergkoden-den-nya-nurnberg-rattegangen-startar-den-3-juli-2021\/?fbclid=IwAR0XPxm1PIU0XmIv4eeev1FcoZmZFnhAlWvK3q-EwhNYr_U3JcX-dIh4z08\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>Source<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Related;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/dozens-of-reports-of-heart-inflammation-in-teenagers-and-young-adults-four-days-after-their-second-dose\/\">Dozens of Reports of Heart Inflammation in Teenagers and Young Adults Four Days After Their Second Dose<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/study-reopening-texas-100-percent-had-no-discernible-impact-on-covid-19-cases-or-deaths\/\">Study:\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/study-reopening-texas-100-percent-had-no-discernible-impact-on-covid-19-cases-or-deaths\/\">Reopening Texas \u2018100 Percent\u2019 Had No Discernible Impact on COVID-19 Cases or Deaths<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/tucker-how-many-americans-have-died-after-taking-covid-vaccines\/\">Tucker: How Many Americans Have Died after Taking COVID Vaccines?<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/tucker-calls-for-criminal-probe-of-fauci\/\">Tucker Calls for Criminal Probe of Fauci\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/exposed-uks-unethical-psyops-team-that-ramps-up-fear-over-covid-19-to-control-a-compliant-public\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Exposed: UK\u2019s Psyops Team that Ramps up Fear over Covid-19 to Control a Compliant Public<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/category\/all-posts\/health\/corona\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">All Covid Posts<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sorendreier.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sorendreier.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>From\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/alethonews.com\/2020\/09\/21\/lies-damned-lies-and-health-statistics-the-deadly-danger-of-false-positives\/\">alethonews.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics \u2013 the Deadly Danger of False\u00a0Positives<\/h2>\n<h5><a href=\"https:\/\/lockdownsceptics.org\/lies-damned-lies-and-health-statistics-the-deadly-danger-of-false-positives\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">By Dr Michael Yeadon | Lockdown Sceptics | September 20, 2020<\/a><\/h5>\n<p>I never expected to be writing something like this. I am an ordinary person, recently semi-retired from a career in the pharmaceutical industry and biotech, where I spent over 30 years trying to solve problems of disease understanding and seek new treatments for allergic and inflammatory disorders of lung and skin. I\u2019ve always been interested in problem solving, so when anything biological comes along, my attention is drawn to it. Come 2020, came SARS-CoV-2. I\u2019ve\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/lockdownsceptics.org\/addressing-the-cv19-second-wave\/\">written about the pandemic<\/a>\u00a0as objectively as I could.<\/p>\n<p>The scientific method never leaves a person who trained and worked as a professional scientist. Please do read that piece. My co-authors &amp; I will submit it to the normal rigours of peer review, but that process is slow and many pieces of new science this year have come to attention through pre-print servers and other less conventional outlets.<\/p>\n<p>While paying close attention to data, we all initially focused on the sad matter of deaths. I found it remarkable that, in discussing the COVID-19 related deaths, most people I spoke to had no idea of large numbers. Asked approximately how many people a year die in the UK in the ordinary course of events, each a personal tragedy, they usually didn\u2019t know. I had to inform them it is around 620,000, sometimes less if we had a mild winter, sometimes quite a bit higher if we had a severe \u2019flu season. I mention this number because we know that around 42,000 people have died with or of COVID-19. While it\u2019s a huge number of people, its \u2018only\u2019 0.06% of the UK population.<\/p>\n<p>Its not a coincidence that this is almost the same proportion who have died with or of COVID-19 in each of the heavily infected European countries \u2013 for example, Sweden. The annual all-causes mortality of 620,000 amounts to 1,700 per day, lower in summer and higher in winter. That has always been the lot of humans in the temperate zones. So for context, 42,000 is about ~24 days worth of normal mortality. Please know I am not minimising it, just trying to get some perspective on it. Deaths of this magnitude are not uncommon, and can occur in the more severe flu seasons. Flu vaccines help a little, but on only three occasions in the last decade did vaccination reach 50% effectiveness. They\u2019re good, but they\u2019ve never been magic bullets for respiratory viruses. Instead, we have learned to live with such viruses, ranging from numerous common colds all the way to pneumonias which can kill. Medicines and human caring do their best.<\/p>\n<p>So, to this article. Its about the testing we do with something called PCR, an amplification technique, better known to biologists as a research tool used in our labs, when trying to unpick mechanisms of disease. I was frankly astonished to realise they\u2019re sometimes used in population screening for diseases \u2013 astonished because it is a very exacting technique, prone to invisible errors and it\u2019s quite a tall order to get reliable information out of it, especially because of the prodigious amounts of amplification involved in attempting to pick up a strand of viral genetic code. The test cannot distinguish between a living virus and a short strand of RNA from a virus which broke into pieces weeks or months ago.<\/p>\n<p>I believe I have identified a serious, really a fatal flaw in the PCR test used in what is called by the UK Government the Pillar 2 screening \u2013 that is, testing many people out in their communities. I\u2019m going to go through this with care and in detail because I\u2019m a scientist and dislike where this investigation takes me. I\u2019m not particularly political and my preference is for competent, honest administration over the actual policies chosen.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re a reasonable lot in UK and not much given to extremes. What I\u2019m particularly reluctant about is that, by following the evidence, I have no choice but to show that the Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, misled the House of Commons and also made misleading statements in a radio interview. Those are serious accusations. I know that. I\u2019m not a ruthless person. But I\u2019m writing this anyway, because what I have uncovered is of monumental importance to the health and wellbeing of all the people living in the nation I have always called home.<\/p>\n<p>Back to the story, and then to the evidence. When the first (and I think, only) wave of COVID-19 hit the UK, I was with almost everyone else in being very afraid. I\u2019m 60 and in reasonable health, but on learning that I had about a 1% additional risk of perishing if I caught the virus, I discovered I was far from ready to go. So, I wasn\u2019t surprised or angry when the first lockdown arrived. It must have been a very difficult thing to decide. However, before the first three-week period was over, I\u2019d begun to develop an understanding of what was happening. The rate of infection, which has been calculated to have infected well over 100,000 new people every day around the peak, began to fall, and was declining before lockdown. Infection continued to spread out, at an ever-reducing rate and we saw this in the turning point of daily deaths, at a grim press conference each afternoon.<\/p>\n<p>We now know that lockdown made no difference at all to the spread of the virus. We can tell this because the interval between catching the virus and, in those who don\u2019t make it, their death is longer than the interval between lockdown and peak daily deaths. There isn\u2019t any controversy about this fact, which is easily demonstrated, but I\u2019m aware some people like to pretend it was lockdown that turned the pandemic, perhaps to justify the extraordinary price we have all paid to do it. That price wasn\u2019t just economic. It involved avoidable deaths from diseases other than COVID-19, as medical services were restricted, in order to focus on the virus. Some say that lockdown, directly and indirectly, killed as many as the virus. I don\u2019t know. Its not something I\u2019ve sought to learn. But I mention because interventions in all our lives should not be made lightly. Its not only inconvenience, but real suffering, loss of livelihoods, friendships, anchors of huge importance to us all, that are severed by such acts.<\/p>\n<p>We need to be certain that the prize is worth the price. While it is uncertain it was, even for the first lockdown, I too supported it, because we did not know what we faced, and frankly, almost everyone else did it, except Sweden. I am now resolutely against further interventions in what I have become convinced is a fruitless attempt to \u2018control the virus\u2019. We are, in my opinion \u2013 shared by others, some of whom are well placed to assess the situation \u2013 closer to the end of the pandemic in terms of deaths, than we are to its middle. I believe we should provide the best protection we can for any vulnerable people, and otherwise cautiously get on with our lives. I think we are all going to get a little more Swedish over time.<\/p>\n<p>In recent weeks, though, it cannot have escaped anyone\u2019s attention that there has been a drum beat which feels for all the world like a prelude to yet more fruitless and damaging restrictions. Think back to mid-summer. We were newly out of lockdown and despite concerns for crowded beaches, large demonstrations, opening of shops and pubs, the main item on the news in relation to COVID-19 was the reassuring and relentless fall in daily deaths. I noticed that, as compared to the slopes of the declining death tolls in many nearby countries, that our slope was too flat.<\/p>\n<p>I even mentioned to scientist friends that inferred the presence of some fixed signal that was being mixed up with genuine COVID-19 deaths. Imagine how gratifying it was when the definition of a COVID-19 death was changed to line up with that in other countries and in a heartbeat our declining death toll line became matched with that elsewhere. I was sure it would: what we have experienced and witnessed is a terrible kind of equilibrium. A virus that kills few, then leaves survivors who are almost certainly immune \u2013 a virus to which perhaps 30-50% were already immune because it has relatives and some of us have already encountered them \u2013 accounts for the whole terrible but also fascinating biological process. There was a very\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/370\/bmj.m3563\">interesting piece<\/a>\u00a0in the\u00a0<em>BMJ<\/em>\u00a0in recent days that offers potential support for this contention.<\/p>\n<p>Now we have learned some of the unusual characteristics of the new virus, better treatments (anti-inflammatory steroids, anti-coagulants and in particular, oxygen masks and not ventilators in the main) the \u2018case fatality rate\u2019 even for the most hard-hit individuals is far lower now than it was six months ago.<\/p>\n<p>As there is no foundational, medical or scientific literature which tells us to expect a \u2018second wave\u2019, I began to pay more attention to the phrase as it appeared on TV, radio and print media \u2013 all on the same day \u2013 and has been relentlessly repeated ever since. I was\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Su0wMysBYPM&amp;feature=youtu.be\">interviewed recently<\/a>\u00a0by Julia Hartley-Brewer on her talkRADIO show and on that occasion I called on the Government to disclose to us the evidence upon which they were relying to predict this second wave. Surely they have some evidence? I don\u2019t think they do. I searched and am very qualified to do so, drawing on academic friends, and we were all surprised to find that there is nothing at all.<\/p>\n<p>The last two novel coronaviruses, Sar (2003) and MERS (2012), were of one wave each. Even the WW1 flu \u2018waves\u2019 were almost certainly a series of single waves involving more than one virus. I believe any second wave talk is pure speculation. Or perhaps it is in a model somewhere, disconnected from the world of evidence to me? It would be reasonable to expect some limited \u2018resurgence\u2019 of a virus given we don\u2019t mix like cordial in a glass of water, but in a more lumpy, human fashion. You\u2019re most in contact with family, friends and workmates and they are the people with whom you generally exchange colds.<\/p>\n<p>A long period of imposed restrictions, in addition to those of our ordinary lives did prevent the final few percent of virus mixing with the population. With the movements of holidays, new jobs, visiting distant relatives, starting new terms at universities and schools, that final mixing is under way. It should not be a terrifying process. It happens with every new virus, flu included. It\u2019s just that we\u2019ve never before in our history chased it around the countryside with a technique more suited to the biology lab than to a supermarket car park.<\/p>\n<p>A very long prelude, but necessary. Part of the \u2018project fear\u2019 that is rather too obvious, involving second waves, has been the daily count of \u2018cases\u2019. Its important to understand that, according to the infectious disease specialists I\u2019ve spoken to, the word \u2018case\u2019 has to mean more than merely the presence of some foreign organism. It must present signs (things medics notice) and symptoms (things you notice). And in most so-called cases, those testing positive had no signs or symptoms of illness at all. There was much talk of asymptomatic spreading, and as a biologist this surprised me. In almost every case, a person is symptomatic because they have a high viral load and either it is attacking their body or their immune system is fighting it, generally a mix. I don\u2019t doubt there have been some cases of asymptomatic transmission, but I\u2019m confident it is not important.<\/p>\n<p>That all said, Government decided to call a person a \u2018case\u2019 if their swab sample was positive for viral RNA, which is what is measured in PCR. A person\u2019s sample can be positive if they have the virus, and so it should. They can also be positive if they\u2019ve had the virus some weeks or months ago and recovered. It\u2019s faintly possible that high loads of related, but different coronaviruses, which can cause some of the common colds we get, might also react in the PCR test, though it\u2019s unclear to me if it does.<\/p>\n<p>But there\u2019s a final setting in which a person can be positive and that\u2019s a random process. This may have multiple causes, such as the amplification technique not being perfect and so amplifying the \u2018bait\u2019 sequences placed in with the sample, with the aim of marrying up with related SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA. There will be many other contributions to such positives. These are what are called false positives.<\/p>\n<p>Think of any diagnostic test a doctor might use on you. The ideal diagnostic test correctly confirms all who have the disease and never wrongly indicates that healthy people have the disease. There is no such test. All tests have some degree of weakness in generating false positives. The important thing is to know how often this happens, and this is called the false positive rate. If 1 in 100 disease-free samples are wrongly coming up positive, the disease is not present, we call that a 1% false positive rate. The actual or operational false positive rate differs, sometimes substantially, under different settings, technical operators, detection methods and equipment.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m focusing solely on the false positive rate in Pillar 2, because most people do not have the virus (recently around 1 in 1000 people and earlier in summer it was around 1 in 2000 people). It is when the amount of disease, its so-called prevalence, is low that any amount of a false positive rate can be a major problem. This problem can be so severe that unless changes are made, the test is hopelessly unsuitable to the job asked of it. In this case, the test in Pillar 2 was and remains charged with the job of identifying people with the virus, yet as I will show, it is unable to do so.<\/p>\n<p>Because of the high false positive rate and the low prevalence, almost every positive test, a so-called case, identified by Pillar 2 since May of this year has been a FALSE POSITIVE. Not just a few percent. Not a quarter or even a half of the positives are FALSE, but around 90% of them. Put simply, the number of people Mr Hancock sombrely tells us about is an overestimate by a factor of about ten-fold. Earlier in the summer, it was an overestimate by about 20-fold.<\/p>\n<p>Let me take you through this, though if you\u2019re able to read Prof Carl Heneghan\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.spectator.co.uk\/article\/how-many-covid-diagnoses-are-false-positives-\">clearly written piece<\/a>\u00a0first, I\u2019m more confident that I\u2019ll be successful in explaining this dramatic conclusion to you. (Here is a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/coronavirus.data.gov.uk\/testing\">link<\/a>\u00a0to the record of numbers of tests, combining Pillar 1 (hospital) and Pillar 2 (community).)<\/p>\n<p>Imagine 10,000 people getting tested using those swabs you see on TV. We have a good estimate of the general prevalence of the virus from the ONS, who are wholly independent (from Pillar 2 testing) and are testing only a few people a day, around one per cent of the numbers recently tested in Pillar 2. It is reasonable to assume that most of the time, those being tested do not have symptoms. People were asked to only seek a test if they have symptoms. However, we know from TV news and stories on social media from sampling staff, from stern guidance from the Health Minister and the surprising fact that in numerous locations around the country, the local council is leafleting people\u2019s houses, street by street to come and get tested.<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line is that it is reasonable to expect the prevalence of the virus to be close to the number found by ONS, because they sample randomly, and would pick up symptomatic and asymptomatic people in proportion to their presence in the community. As of the most recent ONS survey, to a first approximation, the virus was found in 1 in every 1000 people. This can also be written as 0.1%. So when all these 10,000 people are tested in Pillar 2, you\u2019d expect 10 true positives to be found (false negatives can be an issue when the virus is very common, but in this community setting, it is statistically unimportant and so I have chosen to ignore it, better to focus only on false positives).<\/p>\n<p>So, what is the false positive rate of testing in Pillar 2? For months, this has been a concern. It appears that it isn\u2019t known, even though as I\u2019ve mentioned, you absolutely need to know it in order to work out whether the diagnostic test has any value! What do we know about the false positive rate? Well, we do know that the Government\u2019s own scientists were very concerned about it, and a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/895843\/S0519_Impact_of_false_positives_and_negatives.pdf\">report<\/a>\u00a0on this problem was sent to SAGE dated June 3rd 2020. I quote: \u201cUnless we understand the operational false positive rate of the UK\u2019s RT-PCR testing system, we risk over-estimating the COVID-19 incidence, the demand on track and trace and the extent of asymptomatic infection\u201d. In that same report, the authors helpfully listed the lowest to highest false positive rate of dozens of tests using the same technology. The lowest value for false positive rate was 0.8%.<\/p>\n<p>Allow me to explain the impact of a false positive rate of 0.8% on Pillar 2. We return to our 10,000 people who\u2019ve volunteered to get tested, and the expected ten with virus (0.1% prevalence or 1:1000) have been identified by the PCR test. But now we\u2019ve to calculate how many false positives are accompanying them. The shocking answer is 80. 80 is 0.8% of 10,000. That\u2019s how many false positives you\u2019d get every time you were to use a Pillar 2 test on a group of that size.<\/p>\n<p>The effect of this is, in this example, where 10,000 people have been tested in Pillar 2, could be summarised in a headline like this: \u201c90 new cases were identified today\u201d (10 real positive cases and 80 false positives). But we know this is wildly incorrect. Unknown to the poor technician, there were in this example, only 10 real cases. 80 did not even have a piece of viral RNA in their sample. They are really false positives.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m going to explain how bad this is another way, back to diagnostics. If you\u2019d submitted to a test and it was positive, you\u2019d expect the doctor to tell you that you had a disease, whatever it was testing for. Usually, though, they\u2019ll answer a slightly different question: \u201cIf the patient is positive in this test, what is the probability they have the disease?\u201d Typically, for a good diagnostic test, the doctor will be able to say something like 95% and you and they can live with that. You might take a different, confirmatory test, if the result was very serious, like cancer. But in our Pillar 2 example, what is the probability a person testing positive in Pillar 2 actually has COVID-19? The awful answer is 11% (10 divided by 80 + 10). The test exaggerates the number of covid-19 cases by almost ten-fold (90 divided by 10). Scared yet? That daily picture they show you, with the \u2018cases\u2019 climbing up on the right-hand side? Its horribly exaggerated. Its not a mistake, as I shall show.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier in the summer, the ONS showed the virus prevalence was a little lower, 1 in 2000 or 0.05%. That doesn\u2019t sound much of a difference, but it is. Now the Pillar 2 test will find half as many real cases from our notional 10,000 volunteers, so 5 real cases. But the flaw in the test means it will still find 80 false positives (0.8% of 10,000). So its even worse. The headline would be \u201c85 new cases identified today\u201d. But now the probability a person testing positive has the virus is an absurdly low 6% (5 divided by 80 + 5). Earlier in the summer, this same test exaggerated the number of COVID-19 cases by 17-fold (85 divided by 5). Its so easy to generate an apparently large epidemic this way. Just ignore the problem of false positives. Pretend its zero. But it is never zero.<\/p>\n<p>This test is fatally flawed and MUST immediately be withdrawn and never used again in this setting unless shown to be fixed. The examples I gave are very close to what is actually happening every day as you read this.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m bound to ask, did Mr Hancock know of this fatal flaw? Did he know of the effect it would inevitably have, and is still having, not only on the reported case load, but the nation\u2019s state of anxiety. I\u2019d love to believe it is all an innocent mistake. If it was, though, he\u2019d have to resign over sheer incompetence. But is it? We know that internal scientists wrote to SAGE, in terms, and, surely, this short but shocking warning document would have been drawn to the Health Secretary\u2019s attention? If that was the only bit of evidence, you might be inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt. But the evidence grows more damning.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, I published with my co-authors a short Position Paper. I don\u2019t think by then, a month ago or so, the penny had quite dropped with me. And I\u2019m an experienced biomedical research scientist, used to dealing with complex datasets and probabilities.<\/p>\n<p>On September 11th 2020, I was a guest on Julia Hartley-Brewer\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Su0wMysBYPM&amp;feature=youtu.be\">talkRADIO show<\/a>. Among other things, I called upon Mr Hancock to release the evidence underscoring his confidence in and planning for \u2018the second wave\u2019. This evidence has not yet been shown to the public by anyone. I also demanded he disclose the operational false positive rate in Pillar 2 testing.<\/p>\n<p>On September 16th, I was back on Julia\u2019s show and this time focused on the false positive rate issue (1m 45s \u2013 2min 30s). I had read Carl Heneghan\u2019s analysis showing that even if the false positive rate was as low as 0.1%, 8 times lower than any similar test, it still yields a majority of false positives. So, my critique doesn\u2019t fall if the actual false positive rate is lower than my assumed 0.8%.<\/p>\n<p>On September 18th, Mr Hancock again appeared, as often he does, on Julia Hartley-Brewer\u2019s show. Julia\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ZEqm0ldWf-8&amp;feature=youtu.be\">asked him directly<\/a>\u00a0(1min 50s \u2013 on) what the false positive rate in Pillar 2 is. Mr Hancock said \u201cIt\u2019s under 1%\u201d. Julia again asked him exactly what it was, and did he even know it? He didn\u2019t answer that, but then said \u201cit means that, for all the positive cases, the likelihood of one being a false positive is very small\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>That is a seriously misleading statement as it is incorrect. The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89-94%, or near-certainty. Of note, even when ONS was recording its lowest-ever prevalence, the positive rate in Pillar 2 testing never fell below 0.8%.<\/p>\n<p>It gets worse for the Health Secretary. On September the 17th, I believe, Mr Hancock took a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/desmondswayne\/status\/1306516264500842496?s=21\">question<\/a>\u00a0from Sir Desmond Swayne about false positives. It is clear that Sir Desmond is asking about Pillar 2.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Hancock replied: \u201cI like my right honourable friend very much and I wish it were true. The reason we have surveillance testing, done by ONS, is to ensure that we\u2019re constantly looking at a nationally representative sample at what the case rate is. The latest ONS survey, published on Friday, does show a rise consummate (sic) with the increased number of tests that have come back positive.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He did not answer Sir Desmond\u2019s question, but instead answered a question of his choosing. Did the Health Secretary knowingly mislead the House? By referring only to ONS and not even mentioning the false positive rate of the test in Pillar 2 he was, as it were, stealing the garb of ONS\u2019s more careful work which has a lower false positive rate, in order to smuggle through the hidden and very much higher, false positive rate in Pillar 2. The reader will have to decide for themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Pillar 2 testing has been ongoing since May but it\u2019s only in recent weeks that it has reached several hundreds of thousands of tests per day. The effect of the day by day climb in the number of people that are being described as \u2018cases\u2019 cannot be overstated. I know it is inducing fear, anxiety and concern for the possibility of new and unjustified restrictions, including lockdowns. I have no idea what Mr Hancock\u2019s motivations are. But he has and continues to use the hugely inflated output from a fatally flawed Pillar 2 test and appears often on media, gravely intoning the need for additional interventions (none of which, I repeat, are proven to be effective).<\/p>\n<p>You will be very familiar with the cases plot which is shown on most TV broadcasts at the moment. It purports to show the numbers of cases which rose then fell in the spring, and the recent rise in cases. This graph is always accompanied by the headline that \u201cso many thousands of new cases were detected in the last 24 hours\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>You should know that there are two major deceptions, in that picture, which combined are very likely both to mislead and to induce anxiety. Its ubiquity indicates that it is a deliberate choice.<\/p>\n<p>Firstly, it is very misleading in relation to the spring peak of cases. This is because we had no community screening capacity at that time. A colleague has adjusted the plot to show the number of cases we would have detected, had there been a well-behaved community test capability available. The effect is to greatly increase the size of the spring cases peak, because there are very many cases for each hospitalisation and many hospitalisations for every death.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, as I hope I have shown and persuaded you, the cases in summer and at present, generated by seriously flawed Pillar 2 tests, should be corrected downwards by around ten-fold.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-13345 jetpack-lazy-image jetpack-lazy-image--handled\" src=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/lockdownsceptics.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Screenshot-2020-09-20-at-02.58.17-1024x563.png?resize=640%2C352&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" data-lazy-loaded=\"1\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>I do believe genuine cases are rising somewhat. This is, however, also true for flu, which we neither measure daily nor report on every news bulletin. If we did, you would appreciate that, going forward, it is quite likely that flu is a greater risk to public health than COVID-19. The corrected cases plot (above) does, I believe, put the recent rises in incidence of COVID-19 in a much more reasonable context. I thought you should see that difference before arriving at your own verdict on this sorry tale.<\/p>\n<p>There are very serious consequences arising from grotesque over-estimation of so-called cases in Pillar 2 community testing, which I believe was put in place knowingly. Perhaps Mr Hancock believes his own copy about the level of risk now faced by the general public? Its not for me to deduce. What this huge over-estimation has done is to have slowed the normalisation of the NHS. We are all aware that access to medical services is, to varying degrees, restricted. Many specialities were greatly curtailed in spring and after some recovery, some are still between a third and a half below their normal capacities.<\/p>\n<p>This has led both to continuing delays and growth of waiting lists for numerous operations and treatments. I am not qualified to assess the damage to the nation\u2019s and individuals\u2019 health as a direct consequence of this extended wait for a second wave. Going into winter with this configuration will, on top of the already restricted access for six months, lead inevitably to a large number of avoidable, non-Covid deaths. That is already a serious enough charge. Less obvious but, in aggregate, additional impacts arise from fear of the virus, inappropriately heightened in my view, which include: damage to or even destruction of large numbers of businesses, especially small businesses, with attendant loss of livelihoods, loss of educational opportunities, strains on family relationships, eating disorders, increasing alcoholism and domestic abuse and even suicides, to name but a few.<\/p>\n<p>In closing, I wish to note that in the last 40 years alone the UK has had seven official epidemics\/pandemics; AIDS, Swine flu, CJD, SARS, MERS, Bird flu as well as annual, seasonal flu. All were very worrying but schools remained open and the NHS treated everybody and most of the population were unaffected. The country would rarely have been open if it had been shut down every time.<\/p>\n<p>I have explained how a hopelessly-performing diagnostic test has been, and continues to be used, not for diagnosis of disease but, it seems, solely to create fear.<\/p>\n<p>This misuse of power must cease. All the above costs are on the ledger, too, when weighing up the residual risks to society from COVID-19 and the appropriate actions to take, if any. Whatever else happens, the test used in Pillar 2 must be immediately withdrawn as it provides no useful information. In the absence of vastly inflated case numbers arising from this test, the pandemic would be seen and felt to be almost over.<\/p>\n<p><em>Dr Mike Yeadon is the former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&amp;D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">From\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/coercioncode.com\/2021\/04\/27\/mike-yeadon-ex-pfizer-warns-not-to-take-the-vaccine-if-you-have-its-too-late\/\">coercioncode.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"has-large-font-size\">Mike Yeadon Ex Pfizer Warns Not to Take the\u00a0Vaccine<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"jetpack-lazy-image jetpack-lazy-image--handled\" title=\"Mike Yeadon Ex Pfizer Warns Not to Take the\u00a0Vaccine\" src=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/assets.lifesitenews.com\/images\/made\/images\/remote\/https_www.lifesitenews.com\/images\/local\/Mike_Yeadon_810_500_75_s_c1.jpg?resize=816%2C9999&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" data-lazy-loaded=\"1\" \/><figcaption>Dr. Mike Eadon \u2013 former VP of Pfizer<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>April 7, 2021\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/\">(LifeSiteNews)<\/a>\u00a0\u2014\u00a0Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer\u2019s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy &amp; Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/news\/former-pfizer-vp-no-need-for-vaccines-the-pandemic-is-effectively-over\">retired<\/a>\u00a0from the pharmaceutical giant with \u201cthe most senior research position\u201d in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews in a telephone interview.<\/p>\n<p>He addressed the \u201cdemonstrably false\u201d propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the \u201clie\u201d of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for \u201cvaccine passports,\u201d and the strong possibility we are dealing with a \u201cconspiracy\u201d which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20<sup>th<\/sup>\u00a0century.<\/p>\n<p>His main points included:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>There is \u201cno possibility\u201d current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is \u201cjust a lie.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just \u201cconvergent opportunism,\u201d but a \u201cconspiracy.\u201d Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.<\/li>\n<li>Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded \u201ctop-up\u201d (\u201cbooster\u201d) vaccines for the \u201cvariants.\u201d The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/news\/mrna-covid-19-vaccines-are-really-gene-therapy-and-not-vaccines-ethicist\">vaccine<\/a>\u201d campaign.<\/li>\n<li>Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these \u201ctop-up\u201d vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to \u201cperform any clinical safety studies.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines \u201cgo from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a \u201cbanking reset\u201d could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, \u201cmass depopulation\u201d remains a logical outcome.<\/li>\n<li>The fact that this at least\u00a0<em>could be<\/em>\u00a0true means everyone must \u201c<em>fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms<\/em>.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Dr. Yeadon began identifying himself as merely a \u201cboring guy\u201d who went \u201cto work for a big drug company \u2026 listening to the main national broadcast and reading the broad sheet newspapers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Continuing, he said: \u201cBut in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus.\u00a0<em>Absolutely everything<\/em>. It\u2019s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don\u2019t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.\u00a0<strong>SUBSCRIBE<\/strong><em>to LifeSite\u2019s daily headlines<\/em>SUBSCRIBEU.S.\u00a0Canada\u00a0World\u00a0Catholic<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOr, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some \u2018top-up\u2019 vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEverything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n<h4>\u2018Conspiracy\u2019 and not just \u2018convergent opportunism\u2019<\/h4>\n<p>\u201cBut what I would like to do is talk about immune escape because I think that\u2019s probably going to be the end game for this whole event, which I think is probably a conspiracy. Last year I thought it was what I called \u2018convergent opportunism,\u2019 that is a bunch of different stakeholder groups have managed to pounce on a world in chaos to push us in a particular direction. So it\u00a0<em>looked<\/em>\u00a0like it was\u00a0<em>kind o<\/em>f linked, but I was prepared to say it was just convergence.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI [now] think that\u2019s na\u00efve. There is no question in my mind that very significant powerbrokers around the world have either planned to take advantage of the next pandemic or created the pandemic. One of those two things is true because the reason it must be true is that dozens and dozens of governments are all saying the same lies and doing the same inefficacious things that demonstrably cost lives.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd they are talking the same sort of future script which is, \u2018We don\u2019t want you to move around because of these pesky varmints, these \u201cvariants\u201d\u2019\u2014 which I call \u2018samiants\u2019 by the way, because they are pretty much the same \u2014 but they\u2019re all saying this and they are all saying \u2018don\u2019t worry, there will be \u201ctop-up\u201d vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.\u2019 They\u2019re all saying this when it is obviously nonsense.\u201d<\/p>\n<h4>Possible end game: vaccine \u2018passports\u2019 tied to spending allowances, thorough control<\/h4>\n<p>\u201cI think the end game is going to be, \u2018everyone receives a vaccine\u2019\u2026 Everyone on the planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen they do that every single individual on the planet will have a name, or unique digital ID and a health status flag which will be \u2018vaccinated,\u2019 or not \u2026 and whoever possesses that, sort of single database, operable centrally, applicable everywhere to control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that one human population database decide. And I think that\u2019s what this is all about because once you\u2019ve got that, we become playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that database want it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor example, you might find that after a banking reset that you can only\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/video\/2021\/03\/29\/naomi_wolf_mandatory_vaccine_passport_could_lead_to_end_of_human_liberty_in_the_west.html?fbclid=IwAR2Zz27s452tOHqpsq_mOn8WAJh3te_0XXGLXNk9-l_MkXtiQDgdDwIWotA\">spend through using an app<\/a>\u00a0that actually feeds off this [database], your ID, your name, [and] your health status flag.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd, yes, certainly crossing an international border is the most obvious use for these\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Naomirwolf\/posts\/960723488030006\">vaccine passports<\/a>, as they are called, but I\u2019ve heard talk of them already that they could be necessary for you to get into public spaces, enclosed public spaces. I expect that if they wanted to, you would not be able to leave your house in the future without the appropriate privilege on your app.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut even if that\u2019s not [the] true [intent of the vaccine campaign], it doesn\u2019t matter,\u00a0<em>the fact that it could be true<\/em>\u00a0means everyone [reading] this should\u00a0<em>fight like crazy to make sure that [vaccine passport] system never forms<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201c[With such a system], here is an example of what they could make you do, and I think this is what they\u2019re going to make [people] do.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou could invent a story that is about a virus and its variations, its mutations over time. You could invent the story and make sure you embed it through the captive media, make sure that no one can counter it by censoring alternative sources, then people are now familiar with this idea that this virus mutates, which it does, and that it produces variants, which is true [as well], which could\u00a0<em>escape your immune system<\/em>, and\u00a0<em>that\u2019s a lie<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut, nevertheless, we\u2019re going to tell you it\u2019s true, and then when we tell you that it\u2019s true and we say \u2018but we\u2019ve got the cure, here\u2019s a top-up vaccine,\u2019 you\u2019ll get a message, based on this one global, this one ID system: \u2018Bing!\u2019 it will come up and say \u2018Dr. Yeadon, time for your top-up vaccine. And, by the way,\u2019 it will say \u2018your existing immune privileges remain valid for four weeks. But if you don\u2019t get your top-up vaccine in that time, you will unfortunately detrimentally be an \u201cout person,\u201d and you don\u2019t want that, do you?\u2019 So, that\u2019s how it\u2019ll work, and people will just walk up and they\u2019ll get their top-up vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n<h4>Gov\u2019t lies, Big Pharma moves forward, medicine regulators get out of the way, and possible \u2018mass-depopulation\u2019<\/h4>\n<p>\u201cBut I will take you through this, Patrick, because I am qualified to comment. I don\u2019t know what\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lifesitenews.com\/news\/theory-of-gates-associated-virologist-challenged-though-vaccine-global-catastrophe-not-ruled-out\">Vanden Bossche<\/a>\u00a0is about. There was no possibility\u00a0<em>at all<\/em>, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous].<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.silive.com\/coronavirus\/2021\/02\/uk-coronavirus-variant-likely-carries-higher-risk-for-death-and-hospitalization.html\">saying that they are<\/a>. They\u2019re lying. Well, why would you do that?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHere\u2019s the other thing, in parallel, pharmaceutical companies have said, several of them, it will be quite easy for us to adjust our gene-based vaccines, and we can hasten them through development, and we can help you.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd here\u2019s the real scary part, global medicines regulators like [the U.S. Food and Drug Administration]\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.silive.com\/coronavirus\/2021\/02\/vaccines-adapted-for-covid-19-variants-wont-need-large-clinical-trials-says-fda.html\">FDA<\/a>, the Japanese medicines agency, the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationnews.com\/2021\/02\/13\/europes-medicine-regulator-fast-track-vaccines-covid-variants\/\">European Medicines Agency<\/a>, have gotten together and announced \u2026 since top-up vaccines will be considered so similar to the ones that we have already approved for emergency use authorization, we are not going to require the drug companies to perform any clinical safety studies.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo, you\u2019ve got on the one hand, governments and their advisers that are lying to you that variants are different enough from the current virus that, even if you\u2019re immune from natural exposure or vaccination, you\u2019re a risk and you need to come and get this top-up vaccine. So, I think neither of those are true. So why is the drug company making the top-up vaccines? And [with] the regulators having got out of the way \u2014 and if Yeadon is right, and I\u2019m sure I am or I wouldn\u2019t be telling you this \u2014\u00a0<em>you go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say \u2018let\u2019s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,\u2019 or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible].\u00a0<em>Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd since I can\u2019t think of a benign explanation for any of the steps: variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies\u2026 it\u2019s not only that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just described: unknown, and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of potentially billions of people for no reason.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m very worried \u2026 that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can\u2019t think of any benign explanation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Since the<a href=\"https:\/\/dailyguardian.com.ph\/those-killer-harmful-vaccines\/\">\u00a0middle of last year,\u00a0<\/a>the banner slogan of governments, the pharmaceuticals and the billionaires who founded the political, economic and religious concept of Globalism, is that the pandemic has no cure except the vaccine. Like the maestro of a grand orchestra, the globalists controlled the mainstream media to echo only their side and shut out others.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s start where these vaccines will end up and the indications that the globalists\u2019 end game is at hand.<\/p>\n<p>Two concrete examples in our province of what I will cite are the reported deaths of Dr. Julian Rizaldy Raca of the Bacolod Emergency Operations Center and Dr. Lorenzo Jungco, provincial health officer assigned in La Carlota City.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Both had their second vaccination and died.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>While it is claimed they had pre-existing ailments to explain their sudden deaths, this seems implausible because they knew that the vaccine could be deadly when a person is suffering from certain ailments. Surely, they did not agree to vaccination when they knew they are ill. Granting the excuse, then their vaccination hastened their demise.<\/p>\n<p>These cases (there are more in the province among the vaccinated) underscore the high possibilities of what\u00a0<strong>Dr. Michael Yeadon<\/strong>\u00a0is warning about.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-chief scientist of Pfizer has raised alarm \u201cthat it is now too late to save any person who has been injected with any C-19 vaccine. He urges those who have not yet been injected with the deadly compound to fight for the continuation of humans and the lives of their children.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The world-acclaimed immunologist goes on to outline the process which he says \u201cwill kill the vast majority of people now alive.\u00a0<strong>Immediately on receipt of the first injection around 0.8% of people died within 2 weeks<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The survivors have a life expectancy of two years on average. But this is decreased with every top-up or \u201cbooster\u201d injection.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u201cSupplemental vaccine are in development to cause degradation of specific organs \u2013 including heart, lungs and brain.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Having been intimately acquainted with goals of research and development of the Pharmaceutical giant, Pfizer for two decades, Yeadon claims that the final objective of the currently administered regime of vaccination can only be a mass depopulation event, which will make all the World Wars combined seem like a Mickey Mouse production.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He concluded, \u201cBillions are already condemned to certain, unchangeable and agonizing death. Each person who has received the injections will certainly die prematurely and three years is a generous estimate for how long they can expect to remain alive.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The above narrative was shared to me with a note that it was posted by\u00a0<em>LifeSiteNews<\/em>. When I checked Google it says the article no longer exists or had been moved. The following day, Google says, the site cannot be reached.<\/p>\n<p>I am not surprised because\u00a0<em>LifeSiteNews<\/em>\u00a0had been warning that its articles are being taken out. However, somebody was quick enough to copy and send out this article.<\/p>\n<p>There are skeptics about Yeadon\u2019s conclusions as with his other articles related to C-19.<\/p>\n<p>He was considered formerly pro-vaccine but there is no clue of his change of mind in relation to the vaccines. It is left to our readers to determine whether to get vaccinated or forego it. After all the vaccines are officially determined unable to immunize, protect or treat.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, there are deaths and damage to health, the numbers growing by the day. Let\u2019s cite the reports drawn from official announcements although the data could be downgraded as governments\u00a0loathe to tell the whole truth.<\/p>\n<p>The London report of\u00a0<em>LifeSiteNews<\/em>\u00a0(April 12) say that \u201cin official documents released by the U.K. government, models for the planned \u2018third wave\u2019 of COVID-19 predicted that any hospitalizations and deaths would be \u2018dominated\u2019 by people who had already been vaccinated.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Note that the data are projected by a model, and not actual incidence.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<strong>The resurgence in both hospitalizations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60 percent and 70 percent of the wave respectively.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunization failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>___<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/grandmageri422.me\/2021\/05\/26\/the-corona-scandal-the-greatest-crime-against-humanity-in-the-history-of-the-world-video\/\">https:\/\/grandmageri422.me\/2021\/05\/26\/the-corona-scandal-the-greatest-crime-against-humanity-in-the-history-of-the-world-video\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=66912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=66912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=66912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=66912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}