{"id":67262,"date":"2021-05-30T06:53:43","date_gmt":"2021-05-30T10:53:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=67262"},"modified":"2021-05-30T06:53:43","modified_gmt":"2021-05-30T10:53:43","slug":"nurses-scorching-resignation-letter-claims-nuremberg-code-violations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=67262","title":{"rendered":"Nurse’s Scorching Resignation Letter – Claims Nuremberg Code Violations"},"content":{"rendered":"

An NHS Nurses Resignation Letter \u2013 \u201cI am utterly dismayed and disheartened by my profession\u201d (An absolutely must-read)<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Dear Ms Sutcliffe and all Executive Directors,<\/p>\n

I write to you today as a highly experienced nurse with 27 years service, to inform you\u00a0 that when my registration expires on 31.05.2021 I will not be renewing it and therefore I\u00a0 am resigning my registration and leaving the profession.<\/p>\n

The reasons for this are many but to summarise I am utterly dismayed and disheartened\u00a0 by my profession and with you as our governing body at the complete lack of integrity\u00a0 that has been displayed since the beginning of the \u2018Covid19 Crisis\u2019.<\/p>\n

The facts about the reality and truth of this alleged crisis are readily available for anyone\u00a0 to find and investigate for themselves, not least you, a body that should have been doing\u00a0 just this, seeking the truth and advocating for both your members and our patients, past,\u00a0 present and future. We are patient advocates not government puppets.<\/p>\n

Under the guise of \u2018Covid19\u2019 (which has never been isolated or purified) a massive\u00a0 injustice has been served onto the people of this country and globally. It was and remains\u00a0 our duty as healthcare professionals to learn the truth and to be the voice of these\u00a0 people, yet there has been a deafening silence and a sickening desire to simply comply\u00a0 by you and so many of my colleagues that I can not and will not condone. Sadly in these\u00a0 times, for me to speak out about these injustices and to be a true advocate for my\u00a0 patients has meant me being bullied and ostracised by my colleagues, removed from\u00a0 clinical practice by hospital management who state they are unable to consider any\u00a0 evidence presented to them that questions the official narrative and state that they must\u00a0 simply comply with government \u2018guidance\u2019 regardless of any harm they may cause.<\/p>\n

When did our profession cease to be based on evidence? When did we become order\u00a0 followers uninterested in the facts on which we base the care we give and devastatingly\u00a0 now on which we deny patients and their families care? To speak out about the many\u00a0 1000s of people in this country alone that have had treatment and investigations delayed\u00a0 or have been left to die, has meant me living in constant fear of being \u2018struck off\u2019 the\u00a0 register for simply doing what I swore to do, speak and act for the benefit of my patients\u00a0 at all times.<\/p>\n

I refer below to the first part of our code of conduct.<\/p>\n

\u201cPrioritise People\u00a0\u201c<\/p>\n

You put the interests of people using or needing nursing or midwifery services first. You\u00a0 make their care and safety your main concern and make sure that their dignity is\u00a0 preserved and their needs recognised, assessed and responded to. You make sure that\u00a0 those receiving care are treated with respect, that their rights are upheld and that any\u00a0 discriminatory attitudes and behaviours towards those receiving care are challenged\u201d.<\/p>\n

NMC Code of Conduct<\/p>\n

This no longer seems to be at the forefront, of too many of my nursing and medical\u00a0 colleagues, minds and motives. I have witnessed personally and professionally many\u00a0 examples of the above ethos being completely disregarded and have been informed by\u00a0 patients and friends of their own experiences where their holistic needs have been\u00a0 disrespected and disregarded because \u2018Covid19\u2019 is a priority over, it seems, every other\u00a0 illness, and, a priority over the emotional, psychological and spiritual well being of both\u00a0 our patients and their families. Any nurse who can deny a child their families being with\u00a0 them when they are sick or dying totally contradicts the entire foundations of our\u00a0 profession, care. As does any nurse who denies end of life patients spending precious\u00a0 time with their loved ones, denying them entry into hospices for fear of \u2018Covid\u2019\u00a0 transmission. Enforcing these restrictions rigidly and brutally, making families say their\u00a0 last goodbyes via the internet or knowing that families have slept in hospital\/hospice\u00a0 carparks just so that they can feel close to their loved one at the time of death, because\u00a0 we have removed their right to hold their hands and be with them as they pass. The\u00a0 trauma that this must have caused people is unforgivable and not something I will ever\u00a0 condone and nor should you or anyone in our profession.<\/p>\n

The devastating isolation of residents in care homes was, in my opinion, inhumane. It is\u00a0 equally unforgivable and unthinkable that such treatment could ever have been\u00a0 perpetrated by staff who allege to care for these people. The emotional trauma they and\u00a0 their families must have suffered is irreparable and I am ashamed to be associated with a\u00a0 profession that claimed this was to protect them. Holistic care now seems to be a thing of\u00a0 the past as does an individuals right go choose.<\/p>\n

Mask exempt patients have been denied treatment in A&E and spoken to in such a\u00a0 manner that any healthcare professional found to be conducting themselves like this\u00a0 should be investigated and disciplined. Yet they are not, despite so much evidence in the\u00a0 public arena. Why are you seemingly supporting the actions of these health care\u00a0 professionals by omission of action, by your silent acquiescence?<\/p>\n

Do you condone the behaviour of the nurses on your register that are bullying and\u00a0 coercing patients into wearing masks and to take the test?<\/p>\n

What has happened to informed consent?<\/p>\n

Where is the informed consent for masks?<\/p>\n

Mask do not work and are potentially harmful. You should know this. Yet you remain\u00a0 silent and allow the people of this country to have this imposed on them despite the\u00a0 absence of any scientific supporting evidence. You remain silent while masks are imposed\u00a0 on children. Surely you have considered the devastating effect this will and has already\u00a0 had on their mental health and consequently their physical health?<\/p>\n

The shaming of people who are mask exempt is actively encouraged.<\/p>\n

Many of those that are mask exempt are too afraid to leave their homes for fear of the\u00a0 judgement and abuse they may receive. As a nurse I have been told by too many mask\u00a0 exempt patients of the distress they have suffered at the hands of others, healthcare\u00a0 professionals included. They have been bullied, shamed and coerced into feeling they\u00a0 must wear a mask even if this would be detrimental to them. Emotionally blackmailed, \u201d\u00a0 Wearing is Caring\u201d. Disgraceful marketing campaigns displayed everywhere insisting that\u00a0 masks must be worn otherwise entry\/service will be denied. Yet these masks are useless.<\/p>\n

Bullies in all types of establishments, once again, healthcare settings included, insisting\u00a0 on proof\/ disclosure of exemption and denial of the existence or validity of the \u2018Equality\u00a0 Act 2010\u2019. There are people that are simply not mentally robust enough to withstand the<\/p>\n

discrimination, judgements and verbal assaults, so they either stay home ( meaning\u00a0 further social isolation\/exclusion) or succumb to the bullying and wear masks despite it\u00a0 causing them physical or mental distress\/ harm. This is totally unacceptable. Yet you\u00a0 remain silent.<\/p>\n

Where is the informed consent for tests?<\/p>\n

The tests are unforgivably inaccurate. The PCR test was never designed as a diagnostic\u00a0 tool, clearly stated by its inventor Kary Mullis. Surely you are aware of this too? If not why\u00a0 not? It is your responsibility to be aware of the facts. And if you are aware why are you\u00a0 silent? Why are you not challenging the Government policy in order to protect and do no\u00a0 harm?<\/p>\n

These inaccurate tests have been used to justify injustices on the people on a scale that\u00a0 is nothing short of criminal.<\/p>\n

They have been used to fabricate a health threat and bring this country to its knees\u00a0 through fear.<\/p>\n

These tests have been used to label healthy, asymptomatic individuals as a potential\u00a0 threat to the lives of others and to facilitate world governments in rolling out Draconian\u00a0 measures\/restrictions on their people, the people they were elected to serve.<\/p>\n

So-called asymptomatic cases have never in the history of respiratory disease been the\u00a0 driver for the spread of infection. Rather it is symptomatic people who spread respiratory\u00a0 infections \u2013 not asymptomatic people.<\/p>\n

Why have you not challenged this?<\/p>\n

The measures imposed on us all are responsible for the destruction of lives, livelihoods,\u00a0 mental health and the very essence of what makes us human, our connections to one\u00a0 another, making people, and sickeningly, children, fearful of each other. Dehumanisation.<\/p>\n

It has all been \u2018marketed\u2019 as protecting the vulnerable.<\/p>\n

What about all the other vulnerable members of our society? I am sure I don\u2019t need to list\u00a0 them.<\/p>\n

Are their needs no longer important?<\/p>\n

The fact that Healthcare professionals across the UK are refusing patients treatment and\u00a0 investigations if they are mask exempt and if they refuse a test and\/or being told that they\u00a0 will be removed from treatment and investigation lists if they refuse the test is unethical\u00a0 medical tyranny.<\/p>\n

I have personally been party in my professional capacity to my colleagues proudly stating\u00a0 how they have informed patients that if they refuse a test they will be removed from the\u00a0 waiting list. I asked a senior colleague to show me where in the admission process we\u00a0 asked patients for their informed consent for mask wearing. I was told, that patients are<\/p>\n

told they must wear a mask and they know if they do not then they will not be admitted to\u00a0 the hospital and therefore they will not get treatment, so they wear a mask. I witnessed all\u00a0 surgical patients being expected to wear surgical masks post surgery and even some\u00a0 Consultant Anaesthetists insisting patients requiring oxygen therapy must wear surgical\u00a0 masks beneath their oxygen delivery masks, without any evidence of efficacy or potential\u00a0 harm this may cause. I saw my own colleagues enforcing this, without any evidence to\u00a0 back up this new practice.<\/p>\n

Do you condone this?<\/p>\n

Again, if you do not then why are you silent?<\/p>\n

Where is the informed consent for the experimental vaccines?<\/p>\n

Do you have the supporting evidence that the vaccines are safe and do not cause harm?<\/p>\n

In the absence of this evidence why are you not challenging Government roll out of the\u00a0 vaccine?<\/p>\n

Why are you not speaking out about the Government proposals to make it a requirement\u00a0 for healthcare professionals to have the vaccine ? Surely consultation is necessary? Why\u00a0 are you not in consultation with the Government on this matter?<\/p>\n

I called your helpline and was told that you were not in consultation and would simply\u00a0 follow the guidance of the Government.<\/p>\n

Why are you not advocating for your members and the people of the UK?<\/p>\n

Are you aware of the many devastating adverse reactions that are being experienced by\u00a0 people who are having this experimental vaccine? Are you aware of the deaths caused by\u00a0 this experimental vaccine?<\/p>\n

Why have you not challenged this?<\/p>\n

To be a healthcare professional who asks questions now is to be labelled \u2018uncaring\u2019 a\u00a0 \u2018firebrand\u2019 or a \u2018conspiracy theorist\u2019.<\/p>\n

This is wrong, we have a duty to question.<\/p>\n

We have a duty to be informed, to inform and to provide care that does no harm and is\u00a0 consented to via informed consent.<\/p>\n

I assume you agree.<\/p>\n

Yet part of our training on radicalisation now includes those people who question the\u00a0 official government narrative on \u2018Covid 19\u2019 as having been potentially radicalised into\u00a0 extreme views.<\/p>\n

This is wrong. Do you support this?<\/p>\n

Are your members that are in support of the vaccine roll out and are administering these\u00a0 vaccines fully aware of all the facts of each vaccine?<\/p>\n

Are they providing patients with all these facts? If not why not?<\/p>\n

I would suggest that this is in the very least negligence by any party to be not\u00a0 appropriately informed and to not appropriately inform.<\/p>\n

Are you aware that Dr Reiner Fuellmich has initiated legal proceedings against the CDC,\u00a0 WHO and the Davos Group for crimes against humanity and violations of the Nuremburg\u00a0 Code?<\/p>\n

\u201cFuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to\u00a0 describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death \u2013 as fraud.<\/p>\n

In addition to the incorrect tests and fraudulent death certificates, the \u201cexperimental\u201d\u00a0 vaccine itself violates Article 32 of the Geneva Convention\u2026<\/p>\n

Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention, \u201cmutilation and medical or scientific\u00a0 experiments not required for the medical treatment of a protected person\u201d are prohibited.<\/p>\n

According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a\u00a0 serious breach of the Convention.<\/p>\n

The \u201cexperimental\u201d vaccine violates all 10 Nuremberg codes \u2013 which carry the death\u00a0 penalty for those who try to break these international laws\u201d.<\/p>\n

Soren Dreier<\/p>\n

09.05.2021<\/p>\n

You will of course be aware that a \u2018Covid\u2019 death, is a death from any cause within 28 days\u00a0 of a positive test.<\/p>\n

A test that is inaccurate and deaths whose primary (actual) cause could have been\u00a0 anything, yet the people of the UK have had their businesses, lives and health destroyed\u00a0 based on these figures.<\/p>\n

And still you remain silent.<\/p>\n

Below is an article written by<\/p>\n

Dr Mike Yeadon<\/p>\n

May 10, 2021<\/p>\n

Why are we being lied to about Covid? There\u2019s no good reason<\/p>\n

BE in no doubt, among the reasons that voices and opinions like mine are never heard in\u00a0 the main media is extreme censorship more suited to China than a liberal democracy.\u00a0 Please allow me to illustrate with an example close to my heart why it is high time for us\u00a0 to change our response.<\/p>\n

Ivermectin is one of the WHO\u2019s \u2018essential drugs\u2019 which all countries should have access\u00a0 to. It\u2019s very cheap as its patent has long expired; it\u2019s one of the most-used drugs in world\u00a0 history; it\u2019s extraordinarily safe; it is often life-saving against parasitic infections. It is also\u00a0 one of the best-established pharmaceutical treatments for Covid-19, showing benefit in\u00a0 every stage of the disease, in multiple independent clinical trials of varying quality. On<\/p>\n

January 3, 2021, Dr Tess Lawrie attempted to alert the Prime Minister to the potential of\u00a0 Ivermectin. Her video was pulled from YouTube within hours of posting, though it survives\u00a0 on Vimeo. The paper by the FLCCC group of US intensivists (whose survival rates for\u00a0 severe Covid-19 are best in class) that was the inspiration for Dr Lawrie\u2019s work was\u00a0 accepted after extensive open peer review (including two career employees of the FDA)\u00a0 and \u2018provisionally accepted\u2019 by the \u2018open science\u2019 journal Frontiers in Pharmacology. The\u00a0 screenshot of the abstract tweeted by Clare Craig attracted more than 100,000 views.\u00a0 Then, mysteriously, it was rejected and pulled by the Frontiers editor in chief. It is still in\u00a0 cached form though the Ministry of Truth has been at work and placed it in a memory\u00a0 hole, so no trace survives on Frontiers\u2019 own website.<\/p>\n

Intended for a Special Issue on \u2018repurposed drugs\u2019 for Covid-19, various guest editors\u00a0 were so incensed at this behaviour that they resigned in protest. They concluded that\u00a0 \u2018these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by Frontiers.\u2019 Fortunately\u00a0 this major paper is now published by the American Journal of Therapeutics and can be\u00a0 read below.<\/p>\n

This nevertheless successfully delayed by nearly six months its circulation to leading\u00a0 public health bodies starting mid-November. A copy was sent to Sir Jeremy Farrar (boss\u00a0 of the Wellcome Trust and member of Sage) who passed it on to Professor Peter Horby\u00a0 (also on Sage), amongst others, on November 18, 2020. So the efficacy of Ivermectin\u00a0 must be well known to the Government\u2019s advisers, but they have done nothing about it.\u00a0 Likewise, the formal and rigorous meta-analysis performed by Dr Tess Lawrie\u2019s team at\u00a0 the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd has been communicated to Matt\u00a0 Hancock, but without reply.<\/p>\n

I am telling you about this, because all that governments, their scientific advisers, big\u00a0 Pharma and regulatory agencies will tell you is that Ivermectin doesn\u2019t work in Covid-19.\u00a0 They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won\u2019t, for I would win easily.<\/p>\n

If Ivermectin was more widely used, there\u2019d be no need for vaccines.<\/p>\n

To date, despite the brains, expertise and stature of those scientists questioning the\u00a0 official Covid-19 narrative, as a group they have quite patently been ineffective. And this\u00a0 is unlikely to change while, as polite professionals, they won\u2019t say: \u2018This is corruption and\u00a0 they\u2019re lying deliberately to scare the people.\u2019 Furthermore, unwittingly, they have been\u00a0 playing the parts intended by those, including our own Government and their advisers,\u00a0 who control the global Covid narrative.<\/p>\n

They judged correctly that we polite Brits wouldn\u2019t accuse them of outright lying, even\u00a0 though they often do exactly that. Boris Johnson\u2019s recent piece to camera, telling us that\u00a0 it was lockdown and not vaccination which reduced cases and deaths, is a case in point.<\/p>\n

Yet it\u2019s certain this isn\u2019t true, and also certain he and his advisers know it isn\u2019t true.<\/p>\n

The government\u2019s advisers are not fools. Some may be, but the upper echelons are very\u00a0 smart. They believe polite people won\u2019t say \u2018not only are you lying but you\u2019re doing it in\u00a0 concert with other, non-democratic actors\u2019, because that\u2019s conspiracy theory stuff, right?\u00a0 Powerful people never use their influence to benefit their interests, do they? Hmm. The\u00a0 only thing that\u2019s different is scale and the power their public positions give them. Other\u00a0 than that, they\u2019re just another a bunch of grubby criminals, ripping off unsuspecting\u00a0 people.<\/p>\n

Truth is our most powerful tool. And that truth is that we\u2019re being lied to.<\/p>\n

The truth also, however hard it is to believe it, is that there is unequivocal and clear\u00a0 evidence of planning and co-ordination. Not to face this fact is to have your head in the\u00a0 sand. Where it\u2019s leading is easy to discern, once people are willing to lift their internal\u00a0 censoring and look objectively at the evidence.<\/p>\n

First, though, the lies. It\u2019s abundantly clear now that pretty much everything that the\u00a0 public has been told and continues to be told is between untrue and downright lies.<\/p>\n

I offer as a shortlist that:<\/p>\n

-PCR mass testing reasonably reliably distinguishes infected and infectious people from\u00a0 others;<\/p>\n

-that masks reduce transmission of respiratory viruses;<\/p>\n

-that transmission of infection in the absence of symptoms is an important contribution to\u00a0 epidemic spreading;<\/p>\n

-that lockdowns as executed reduce hospitalisation and deaths;<\/p>\n

-that no matter how small the remaining susceptible population and no matter that\u00a0 virtually no people who, if infected, might die remain unvaccinated, the position is\u00a0 perilous;<\/p>\n

-that no pharmaceutical treatments are available;<\/p>\n

-that variants are different enough to warrant border closures and require new vaccines; -that the gene-based vaccines are safe and effective;<\/p>\n

-that \u2018vaccine passports\u2019 will increase safety while having no material impacts on freedom\u00a0 of choice in a liberal democracy.<\/p>\n

It is impossible to believe that intelligent, well-connected and well-briefed senior advisers\u00a0 to governments don\u2019t know that almost all, if not all, of the above are simply not true.<\/p>\n

It is not a matter of opinion in almost all cases. These statements, which have been\u00a0 explicitly stated and used in justification for the extraordinary interferences in the lives of\u00a0 citizens in democratic countries, are mostly demonstrably wrong, as defined by there\u00a0 being multiple well-conducted, peer-reviewed studies showing the contrary.<\/p>\n

To continue with the pretence that there\u2019s scientific uncertainty, and it is therefore\u00a0 understandable that an adviser might offer nuanced advice, is wrong and misleading. This\u00a0 perhaps is where the mainstream media has been most culpable.<\/p>\n

It is not reasonable to expect typical viewers and readers of speeches, articles and\u00a0 editorials \u2013 whether by scientist sceptics or by critical commentators \u2013 to appreciate that,\u00a0 when we point out that what\u2019s happening doesn\u2019t make sense, we mean \u2018the executive is\u00a0 knowingly and deliberately harming the country and its citizens\u2019. We are mostly not saying\u00a0 this, leaving it to the audience to sum up for themselves. But in my view the audience are<\/p>\n

reluctant to do this. They want to believe in government and perhaps above all they want\u00a0 a quiet life. To disbelieve is so much harder than to believe.<\/p>\n

So in recent weeks I\u2019ve made a clear decision no longer merely to point out what it is that\u00a0 governments and their advisers and spokespersons around the world are doing is wrong,\u00a0 scientifically unjustified and harmful, but to join the dots in an attempt to provide potential\u00a0 explanations of why they\u2019re doing these things.<\/p>\n

It is time for all Doubting Thomases to take a lead and state unambiguously that\u00a0 \u2018government and its advisers are telling us things that are manifestly untrue and\u00a0 maintaining restrictive, damaging measures for which there\u2019s no justification\u2019. By not\u00a0 doing so they are playing into the hands of those who I firmly believe are engaged in a\u00a0 determined series of crimes against humanity.<\/p>\n

Why do I say this? Simply because there is no benign interpretation of the acts of\u00a0 commission and omission consistently imposed upon us and no explanation of the\u00a0 statements which are flatly wrong other than an intention to deceive the population.<\/p>\n

Looking around us now, we see that the prevalence of the virus in the community is\u00a0 effectively zero. Note that the authorities have never conceded and determined the\u00a0 operational false positive rate of PCR mass testing. Subtracting any reasonable estimate\u00a0 of oFPR and we observe no cases at all. This was true for months as indicated by the\u00a0 positive rate in lateral flow tests.<\/p>\n

No variant of the virus differs by more than 0.3 per cent from the original sequence, and\u00a0 numerous academic immunologists have stated strongly that there is no possibility that\u00a0 booster\/top-up\/variant vaccines are required. Yet we get daily \u2018fear porn\u2019 on this topic.\u00a0 The European Parliament just voted through the basic outlines of a vaccine passport\u00a0 system. It\u2019s a racing certainty that the UK will soon follow.<\/p>\n

Mask regulations continue in force and many psychologists believe some people are so\u00a0 traumatised that they will continue to wear them indefinitely, even though they are\u00a0 useless.<\/p>\n

The economy and currency may already be damaged beyond repair. Yet there\u2019s another\u00a0 six weeks minimum until the last restrictions are scheduled to be lifted.<\/p>\n

Almost no one is dying \u2018with\u2019 Covid-19 now, and the attribution methodology\u00a0 overestimates this anyway. Yet hospitals and primary health care remain far less\u00a0 accessible than they should be, inevitably resulting in causing or storing up avoidable\u00a0 non-Covid-19 deaths, to say nothing of the suffering and misery of the millions awaiting\u00a0 treatments for painful and worrying illnesses.<\/p>\n

Most terrifyingly, it appears we will soon be required to possess VaxPass apps if we wish\u00a0 to continue to access our lives.<\/p>\n

This system can run effectively only if everyone is vaccinated. This is a monstrous\u00a0 concept, because it is known that all four vaccines in use in Europe contain a fatal design\u00a0 flaw: they cause the fusogenic, pro coagulation spike protein to be expressed wherever\u00a0 the vaccine is taken up. In some people, especially those so young that they\u2019re at no\u00a0 measurable risk of death if infected by the virus, vaccination results in their deaths from\u00a0 thromboembolic events. Permitting the inexpert population to walk into this trap is<\/p>\n

unconscionable: there will be thousands of further vaccine-induced deaths of young\u00a0 people.<\/p>\n

I invite thoughtful people to ask that difficult question: \u2018Why are they doing this?\u2019<\/p>\n

It is my deduction and conclusion that the only motivation that fits all the observations is\u00a0 the intention to \u2018herd\u2019 every citizen into a VaxPass system. This is a completely novel\u00a0 system. Never before have all individuals been represented in a single, interoperable\u00a0 database as a unique digital ID, accompanied by an editable health-related field. Whoever\u00a0 controls that database, and the algorithms which govern what it permits and denies, has\u00a0 literally totalitarian control of the entire population. There is no personal threshold\u00a0 crossing or transaction which doesn\u2019t fall to those operating that system.<\/p>\n

At the very least, the public deserves to be warned that this is coming. I do not expect\u00a0 conventional judicial processes to protect us in any way. Every institution has already\u00a0 failed the people of the UK.<\/p>\n

Given that numerous government decisions (as instructed by Sage) have arguably already\u00a0 led to many avoidable deaths, I think it\u2019s only reasonable to consider what the prize is that\u00a0 leads intelligent people to do the things they\u2019ve done and continue to peddle.<\/p>\n

The possible answers to this question are all bad. I cannot conceive of a situation where\u00a0 we will shortly be permitted to resume our normal lives. There is not the slightest hint of\u00a0 that in any case.<\/p>\n

I have found it impossible to come up with a benign interpretation of the events. No one\u00a0 works as carefully and for so long as evidently has been done, across the world, only\u00a0 suddenly to stop. Why?I\u2019ve asked hundreds of people and not a single one has (a)\u00a0 pointed out where my logic fails or (b) come up with a benign interpretation.<\/p>\n

My own conviction is that the purpose is, at minimum, to establish a system of totalitarian\u00a0 control which will mean the extinguishing of liberal democracy.<\/p>\n

It almost doesn\u2019t matter what the next steps might be, but they could, for example, have\u00a0 been sold to numerous people as the only solution to \u2018anthropogenic global warming\u2019: the\u00a0 amount of resources we\u2019ll be permitted to produce and consume will be set by some\u00a0 unseen controllers. It is possible they could go a step further than this, and see reducing\u00a0 population or depopulation as another route to solving the perceived problem of AGW.<\/p>\n

Consider the elimination of the class of the inquiring journalist, the censorship of all mass\u00a0 media. The relentless smearing and exclusion of those who ask too many awkward\u00a0 questions. The astonishing waste of public money, which apparently the foreign exchange\u00a0 markets are unperturbed about. The destruction of SMEs which provide a third of all jobs\u00a0 and a substantial proportion of tax revenues. The relentless lying. The misinformation. The\u00a0 use of psychological operations to frighten and subdue. The utter disregard for those\u00a0 vaccinated with \u2018vaccines\u2019 that are way too unsafe for their role. The bending past\u00a0 illegality of the use of incorrect information to persuade pregnant women to get\u00a0 vaccinated. The numerous breaches of the Nuremberg Code, since no one is being\u00a0 explicitly told that these vaccines are experimental and so recipients are being unwittingly\u00a0 enrolled in an unprecedentedly large and unmonitored Phase 3 clinical trial. The\u00a0 announcement that, soon, our minor children are to be vaccinated.<\/p>\n

Add in the \u2018top-up vaccines\u2019. They\u2019re not vaccines. Whoever has been vaccinated has no\u00a0 need of further vaccination. Immunology is perhaps my strongest suit, so I am certain of\u00a0 this. Is it impossible that in those one billion vials which has already told us its\u00a0 manufacturing, there is some gene sequence which will instigate one of a few dozen\u00a0 pathologies, with onset times ranging from near-immediate to a short number of years? I\u00a0 assure you, biotechnology has awesome power, and it can be used for good or ill.<\/p>\n

I think I\u2019ve made a decent case that what governments and their advisers have done\u00a0 easily amounts to conspiracy. The same \u2018mistakes\u2019 have been made everywhere. The\u00a0 same tricks and manipulation. Those who claim this is all coincidence are coincidence\u00a0 theorists.<\/p>\n

I argue that unless this is pointed out to the public before any possible \u2018vaccine\u00a0 passports\u2019 system is established, we\u2019ve all collectively failed to discharge our duties to be\u00a0 courageous, to take chances, to risk looking foolish: I am absolutely committed to\u00a0 continuing to speak out for as long as I have breath in my body\u201d.<\/p>\n

https:\/\/mobile.twitter.com\/ClareCraigPath\/status\/1366680939368243203<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20210225073859\/https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/ 10.3389\/fphar.2021.643369\/abstract<\/p>\n

https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/americantherapeutics\/Fulltext\/2021\/06000\/ Review_of_the_Emerging_Evidence_Demonstrating_the.4.aspx<\/p>\n

\u201cDr Mike Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based PhD\u00a0 in respiratory pharmacology. He has spent over 30 years leading new medicines research\u00a0 in some of the world\u2019s largest pharmaceutical companies, leaving Pfizer in 2011 as Vice\u00a0 President & Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory. That was the most senior research\u00a0 position in this field in Pfizer. Since leaving Pfizer, Dr Yeadon has founded his own biotech\u00a0 company, Ziarco, which was sold to the worlds biggest drug company, Novartis, in 2017\u201d<\/p>\n

I ask you, are you aware of Ivermectin and the work of Dr Tess Lawrie? If not why not?<\/p>\n

Why are you not pressuring the Government to at the very least consider this?<\/p>\n

Why are you not questioning government policy and demanding their evidence to support\u00a0 their policies?<\/p>\n

Instead through your silence you have and continue to allow them to aggressively\u00a0 enforce, social distancing, social isolation, closure of businesses and places of spiritual\u00a0 practice, ineffective and harmful masks, hand sanitiser and the roll out on an uninformed\u00a0 public of experimental vaccines?<\/p>\n

They trust us and you are failing them through your silence and unquestioning complicity.<\/p>\n

Dr Mike Yeadon and Dr Tess Lawrie are not alone in questioning what is happening yet all\u00a0 and anyone that does question are aggressively censored. Their work removed and\u00a0 labelled dangerous misinformation. All debate and reasonable discussion immediately\u00a0 quashed.<\/p>\n

Do you not stop to wonder why? You should. You have a moral and professional\u00a0 responsibility to do so.<\/p>\n

In my opinion anyone now that knows that something is very wrong with what we are\u00a0 being told, even merely suspects something is very wrong and does nothing, remains\u00a0 silent, condoning these injustices and encourages the vilification or actively vilifies or<\/p>\n

attempts to silence those speaking for truth and justice is morally bankrupt. So, do what you will or won\u2019t with this letter but now you are in possession of it and if you\u00a0 choose to ignore the issues presented then you can no longer claim nescience but are\u00a0 being wilfully ignorant.<\/p>\n

It is with immense sadness that I end my nursing career but I will not be a part of these\u00a0 crimes against humanity and against the patients I\/we should be protecting and I do not\u00a0 consent or wish to be governed by a body that silently complies with Government tyranny\u00a0 and bases their judgement as to whether I am fit to practice as a nurse on my levels of\u00a0 compliance or in my case<\/p>\n

non- compliance with tyranny.<\/p>\n

I echo Dr Mike Yeadon in saying I will fight for truth, freedom, medical freedom and the\u00a0 health, rights and freedoms of others so long as I have breath in my body.<\/p>\n

Yours sincerely<\/p>\n

(Sent by email)\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Emma<\/p>\n

___
\nhttps:\/\/davidicke.com\/2021\/05\/27\/an-nhs-nurses-resignation-letter-i-am-utterly-dismayed-and-disheartened-by-my-profession\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

An NHS Nurses Resignation Letter \u2013 \u201cI am utterly dismayed and disheartened by my profession\u201d (An absolutely must-read)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}