![\"\"](\"https:\/\/vaccineimpact.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/07\/Science-Gene-Therapy-False-Science.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Comments by Brian Shilhavy
\nEditor, Health Impact News<\/p>\n
One of the topics we have exposed over the years here at\u00a0Health Impact News<\/em>\u00a0is the false science of \u201cgenetics\u201d research and the promise of new drugs based on such research.<\/p>\n This is simply a continuation of the field of \u201ceugenics\u201d made popular in the late 1920s and early 1930s here in the U.S., exported to Germany prior to WWII, and then brought back to the U.S. and repackaged. See some of our previous coverage on this topic:<\/p>\n What the study of genetics has done for the past several decades is bring in billions of dollars for research and focus research away from the real problems in health, the #1 problem being the toxic drugs and vaccines that have decimated the health of Americans and others around the world, with the promise of discovering \u201cnew drugs\u201d to solve all of society\u2019s woes.<\/p>\n But what it really consists of is a cash cow for the Globalists to come up with new methods of classifying and controlling people.<\/p>\n Reporter Jon Rappoport published\u00a0a good summary<\/a>\u00a0of this pseudo science today.<\/p>\n by Jon Rappoport Gene research companies tend to come and go. They start out banging and popping like fireworks in the sky, and then they fade out\u2014selling themselves to larger outfits who\u2019ve hired better liars\u2026<\/p>\n Once upon a time, it sounded easy. Start with a disease, find the gene responsible for the disease, and correct the problem.<\/p>\n Then, researchers wondered, was disease the result of one gene or a group of genes acting together?<\/p>\n Either way, the proof would be in devising cures for diseases using gene therapy. \u201cNot yet, but soon\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n And regardless, the major need was: money. Lots and lots of money.<\/p>\n This need required good PR people. \u201cWe have to pump up the idea that we\u2019re on the edge of tremendous breakthroughs. We\u2019re always on that edge\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n This hype also needed to obscure the fact that there wasn\u2019t (and isn\u2019t) ANY gene cure for ANY disease.<\/p>\n As time passed, lack of cure could be a problem. In fact, it could mean curing disease was not a genetic undertaking at all. What about environment? Toxicity? Malnutrition? Poverty? In order to raise money, those factors would have to be pushed back out of view.<\/p>\n Instead, the PR people would need to flood the news with positive glow around the subject of gene research. Also known as exaggeration. Or bullshit.<\/p>\n You can spot the key terms in these articles. POSSIBLE, SHOULD, COULD, EXPECTED TO, SEEMS, ON THE HORIZON, MAY BE, COULD LEAD TO, EVENTUALLY, and of course, the ever-popular BREAKTHROUGH.<\/p>\n I dug back in my files and found a piece I wrote in 2011. As you\u2019ll see, the \u201cbreakthroughs\u201d touted then haven\u2019t panned out so far. You don\u2019t read about them in the press these days. The PR pros have moved on to other exaggerations.<\/p>\n The first 2011 article I cited was from Reuters, headlined: SCIENTISTS FIND \u201cMASTER SWITCH\u201d GENE FOR OBESITY. Here are a few choice tidbits. Note the key terms I just mentioned.<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026and say it should help the search for treatments\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026the regulating gene could be [a] target for drugs to treat\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026seems to act as a master switch\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWe are working hard\u2026to understand these processes and how we can use this information to improve treatment\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n Sure. You bet.<\/p>\n Zero results.<\/p>\n Next, a 2011 blockbuster piece in the Financial Times. The headline read: SCIENTISTS FIND GENETIC LINK TO DEPRESSION.<\/p>\n Standard trumpet blaring.<\/p>\n Here are the text nuggets. Again, note key terms.<\/p>\n \u201cThe discovery\u2026is expected to lead to a better biological understanding of the condition and eventually to more effective antidepressants\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026as possibly for the first time we have found a genetic locus for depression.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026is likely to pin down the gene responsible\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c\u2026which may be the basis for designing more effective antidepressants\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n Sure. You bet.<\/p>\n Zero results.<\/p>\n Moving ahead in time\u2014From immunology.org: \u201cOn 17 December 2015, the journal Science voted [gene-editing tool] Crispr-Cas9 \u2018Breakthrough of the Year\u2019, saying that it had \u2018matured into a molecular marvel\u2019. It is already being used in cancer immunotherapy to edit a patient\u2019s own T-cell genome in order to remove the gene that \u2018tells\u2019 these immune cells not to target cancerous tissue.<\/p>\n It\u2019s already being used\u2014but where are the cures? Nowhere.<\/p>\n Anybody out there want to partner with me in launching a new company? This is a major winner. It covers a very broad area. Actually, there is no human endeavor it doesn\u2019t cover. The name of the company? MAYBE COULD BE INC.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re always on the edge and the frontier. We\u2019re always breaking through. We\u2019re always raising money. We\u2019re always pumping our stock. We\u2019re always ready to sell the company to a sucker with deep pockets.\u201d<\/p>\n Let\u2019s look at another type of gene research organization. This one happens to be the largest single medical research outfit in the world. It\u2019s part of the US government: the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Their PR is different. They\u2019re hedging their bets and covering their bases in every possible way. They\u2019re saying YES, NO, AND MAYBE all at once. Of course, they can get away with it, because they run on taxpayer money. Their annual budget is a formidable $30 billion. Grit your teeth and read through their text that explains \u201cgenetic diseases\u201d:<\/p>\n \u201cA genetic disorder is a disease caused in whole or in part by a change in the DNA sequence away from the normal sequence. Genetic disorders can be caused by a mutation in one gene (monogenic disorder), by mutations in multiple genes (multifactorial inheritance disorder), by a combination of gene mutations and environmental factors, or by damage to chromosomes (changes in the number or structure of entire chromosomes, the structures that carry genes).\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cAs we unlock the secrets of the human genome (the complete set of human genes), we are learning that nearly all diseases have a genetic component. Some diseases are caused by mutations that are inherited from the parents and are present in an individual at birth, like sickle cell disease. Other diseases are caused by acquired mutations in a gene or group of genes that occur during a person\u2019s life. Such mutations are not inherited from a parent, but occur either randomly or due to some environmental exposure (such as cigarette smoke). These include many cancers, as well as some forms of neurofibromatosis.\u201d<\/p>\n That is a DON\u2019T BLAME US statement. \u201cDon\u2019t blame us if a disease we thought was genetic turns out to be something else. Don\u2019t blame us if it\u2019s 65.34 percent environmental, 4.52 percent genetic, and 30.14 percent who knows what. Don\u2019t blame us if toxicity triggers genetic malfunctions and, in the absence of the toxicity, there would be zero cases of the disease. Don\u2019t blame us if a disease has nothing to do with genes. We\u2019re ready to jump in any direction. We may not know much, but we\u2019re sitting on a pile of cash. Don\u2019t blame us if we don\u2019t have any solid genetic cures for anything. We\u2019re working hard. That\u2019s all you can ask us to do.\u201d<\/p>\n If there is one disease the public tends to believe can be cured by gene therapy, it is sickle cell anemia. The PR pros have done a good job there. However, sicklecellanemianews.com states: \u201cGene therapy is an experimental technique that aims to treat genetic diseases by altering a disease-causing gene or introducing a healthy copy of a mutated gene to the body.\u201d<\/p>\n Experimental. Aims to. Not an established cure. The confusion arises because, as with a number of diseases, the researchers and the PR flacks claim they\u2019ve definitely traced the illness to a gene or two. They\u2019ve struck gold. But, as you read further, you discover they\u2019re just not ready to cure the patient. Clinical trials are underway. More work in the lab is necessary. The pudding is there, but the proof of it isn\u2019t. They claim to know the cause; they just don\u2019t know what to do with it.<\/p>\n In science, that\u2019s known as a hypothesis. Or more simply, a speculation. You say you\u2019ve found an answer, but you can\u2019t apply it. This means: you don\u2019t have an answer.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is no doubt. We went down into the mine and we found evidence of extraordinary amounts of gold. We just don\u2019t know how to get it out. What\u2019s that? You want to see the gold? No, I\u2019m sorry. The public isn\u2019t allowed down there. Only the professionals can enter. But don\u2019t worry. We\u2019re very close to a breakthrough. The gold will emerge soon. Trust us.\u201d<\/p>\n Trust you? Sure. How much do you need to finish the job? Fifty million? A hundred million? Let me call my broker and sell some stock. I\u2019ll write you a check. Just put a plaque with my name on the wall. Let me know how I\u2019ll profit on this venture. I\u2019m in. I\u2019ve always wanted to invest in MAYBE COULD BE INC.<\/p>\n In case you need to be reminded, the RNA COVID vaccines are genetic treatments. The PR pros tell us they are working quite well. And they\u2019re remarkably safe.<\/p>\n If you\u2019re buying that line, I have electric cars for sale. And they have wings. One charge in your garage, and they\u2019ll get you from Earth to Mars in just under two hours.<\/p>\n Comment on this article at\u00a0HealthImpactNews.com.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nDr. David Martin Exposes the False Foundation of Eugenics: \u201cYou Don\u2019t Have DNA\u201d<\/a><\/h3>\n
Mapping the Genome and Modern Genetics:\u00a0Eugenics<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0Repackaged for Modern Times<\/a><\/h3>\n
The American History Of Compulsory Vaccination and its Ties to Eugenics<\/a><\/h3>\n
Genetic baloney in thick slices<\/h2>\n
\nNoMoreFakeNews.com<\/a><\/p>\n