{"id":76703,"date":"2021-07-31T12:51:14","date_gmt":"2021-07-31T16:51:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=76703"},"modified":"2021-07-31T12:51:14","modified_gmt":"2021-07-31T16:51:14","slug":"remington-sells-out-american-gun-owners","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=76703","title":{"rendered":"REMINGTON SELLS OUT AMERICAN GUN OWNERS"},"content":{"rendered":"

REMINGTON TAKES FALL: SELLS OUT AMERICAN GUN OWNERS & SETTLES SANDY HOOK FOR $33 MILLION<\/strong><\/h2>\n

by\u00a0Stephanie Sledge<\/p>\n

When I published\u00a0my book last year on my research findings about the Sandy Hook alleged school shooting,<\/a>\u00a0I wrote a chapter about the shady lawsuit that was filed by the \u201cvictims\u201d to hold gun manufacturers legally responsible for shootings. I also tied together the plot that insurance companies, banks, and gun manufacturers were in bed together helping disarm the nation. One year later, my suspicions of the Connecticut plot to further disarm the nation has been confirmed as Remington Arms agrees to be the fall guy. Remington Arms sold out American gun owners when there is enough evidence that Sandy Hook was a staged false-flag event and that American disarmament was the key agenda.<\/h3>\n
\n

I personally sent the President of Remington Arms a copy of my\u00a0book<\/a>\u00a0to let him know that there were only two logical reasons for the lawsuit in the State of Connecticut where a Supreme Court Judge\u00a0ruled<\/a>\u00a0that Remington could be held legally responsible. They were:<\/p>\n

A. Their company was being used as the fall guy to help in the effort to further disarm the nation by challenging the 2005 federal law that granted them immunity from liability claims over violent acts in which their guns were involved\u2026 or<\/p>\n

B. They agreed to be the fall guy as they were heading towards bankruptcy proceedings and that Connecticut would be the perfect place to carry out this new avenue to help further disarm civilians by using the children \u201cvictim\u201d card.<\/p>\n

The now-bankrupt gun manufacturer, Remington Arms Co. has offered to pay the Sandy Hook victims $33 million to settle claims and take responsibility that the (alleged) school shooting was a direct result of their marketing practices.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cSince this case was filed in 2014, the families\u2019 focus has been on preventing the next Sandy Hook,\u201d Mr. Koskoff\u00a0said<\/a>\u00a0in a statement. \u201cAn important part of that goal has been showing banks and insurers that companies that sell assault weapons to civilians are fraught with financial risk<\/em>.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n

The Back Story (my 2020 published findings on gun manufactures and the gun-hating gang)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

SANDY HOOK BROUGHT MORE THAN JUST DISARMAMENT<\/a><\/h3>\n

The Sandy Hook Shooting event energized a multi-pronged attack on gun ownership. The first attack was aimed at the gun owner and the second on the manufacturer.<\/p>\n

The first prong \u2013 the\u00a0Firearm Risk Protection Act 2015<\/strong>\u00a0and the second \u2013 the pending\u00a0Sandy Hook lawsuit<\/strong>\u00a0against various gun manufacturers to attempt to hold them criminally responsible for murders by which their products are used.<\/p>\n

Staying with the second attack, we have to ask: are the gun-manufacturing owners also involved in the plot? Hillary Clinton secretly met with several alleged Orlando Night Club shooting victims recently and several families have agreed to join the Sandy Hook lawsuit.\u00a0Lawyers representing some of the Orlando victims have already had preliminary talks with those representing the Sandy Hook families.<\/p>\n

\u00a0WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE SANDY HOOK LAWSUIT ABOUT?<\/strong><\/p>\n

TIMELINE \u2013 In January 2015, three years after the alleged mass murder at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, family members of some of the alleged dead victims filed a wrongful death suit against Remington Arms Company (the maker of the Bushmaster), the distributor (Camfour Holding, LLC), and Riverside Sales (the now-defunct East Windsor gun store).<\/p>\n

The wrongful death suit argues Remington Arms as well as the other defendants\u00a0\u201cunscrupulously marketed and promoted the assaultive qualities and military uses of AR-15s to civilian purchasers.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

In December of 2015, all defendants asked Judge Bellis to throw out the lawsuit on the claim of \u2018immunity\u2019 under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). According to the Act,<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201cTo prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. <<NOTE: Oct. 26, 2005 \u2013\u00a0\u00a0[S. 397]>><\/em><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.gpo.gov\/fdsys\/pkg\/PLAW-109publ92\/html\/PLAW-109publ92.htm<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Adam Lanza allegedly gunned-down 6 adults and 20 children using a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle (model XM15-E2S).\u00a0<\/em>\u00a0Adam was also reportedly to have killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, with a .22 rifle prior to going to the elementary school that morning. It was also reported Nancy Lanza had purchased the AR-15 legally prior to the shooting from Riverside Sales.<\/p>\n

The family members claimed the AR-15 military style rifle should not have been made available to the public<\/strong>\u00a0citing it is a\u00a0military style weapon<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0and is not suitable for civilian usage.\u00a0The families also claim the gun maker and sellers knew civilians are considered\u00a0unfit<\/strong>\u00a0to operate the assault rifle and yet they continue to sell it to civilians while disregarding the dangers and threats the weapon poses.<\/p>\n

Following the shooting, a campaign to ban military style high-powered weapons and accessories from the civilian populous has emerged again and the gun advocates have been on a deceptive marketing campaign to disarm America \u2013 begging for more rules, regulations, codes, and laws to restrict the sale of these guns to just police or military. Remington, the primary defendant in the case filed to have the lawsuit dismissed. The Plaintiffs then ask the judge to not seal the gun maker\u2019s records. Remington has argued to the judge the dangers of their company releasing trade secrets to the public due to this lawsuit.<\/p>\n

According to\u00a0Hartford Courant,<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cRemington Arms, the principal defendant, has asked Bridgeport Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis to keep records it views as proprietary from being made public. The company\u2019s court filing said that for competitive reasons, it does not want the public or its competitors to see the records. The company has also asked the judge to dismiss the suit.<\/em><\/p>\n

Bellis previously ruled that the process of \u201cdiscovery\u201d would go forward even as she considered whether to dismiss the lawsuit against the manufacturer of the AR-15 rifle used in the slayings. The discovery process allows the plaintiffs\u2019 lawyers to demand internal documents that could provide insight into how the gun maker markets the AR-15 and to depose company executives. Lawyers said those depositions began earlier this month.<\/em><\/p>\n

In unusually harsh language for a legal filing, the plaintiffs\u2019 lawyers wrote: \u201cThe Remington Defendants ask the Court to order the plaintiffs to keep their secrets, in the name of preserving Remington\u2019s competitive advantage among sellers of AR-15s. For plaintiffs, such conditions are repugnant.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

They also go on to say,<\/p>\n

\u201cRemington did not become the country\u2019s leading seller of military weaponry to civilians by accident. It ascended to that position through its calculated marketing and pursuit of profit above all else. Plaintiffs lost family members, including children, in the service of that bottom line. Now Remington wants them to do more to protect its profitability. Plaintiffs will of course abide by whatever order the Court enters, but they will not by agreement help in a cover up of Remington\u2019s marketing strategies or profit margins.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Connecticut Superior Court Judge, Barbara Bellis ruled the lawsuit could go then go forward; trial was set for April 2018.<\/p>\n

Following this lawsuit filing, just recently the Connecticut Supreme Court let part of the Newtown parent\u2019s gun industry lawsuit move forward.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe lawsuit brought by parents of nine of the Sandy Hook victims contends that the defendants negligently entrusted to civilian consumers an AR-15-style assault rifle that is suitable for use only by military and law enforcement personnel, and violated CUTPA through the sale or wrongful marketing of the rifle.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThe plaintiffs have offered one narrow legal theory \u2026 that is recognized under established Connecticut law,\u201d Justice Richard N. Palmer said in the majority opinion in\u00a0Soto<\/u><\/strong>\u00a0v.\u00a0Bushmaster Firearms International LLC<\/u><\/strong>. \u201cSpecifically, they allege that the defendants knowingly marketed, advertised, and promoted the XM15-E2S for civilians to use to carry out offensive, military style combat missions against their perceived enemies. Such use of the XM15-E2S, or any weapon for that matter, would be illegal, and Connecticut law does not permit advertisements that promote or encourage violent, criminal behavior.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Connecticut Supreme Court decision will give the plaintiffs the opportunity to subpoena the defendants for documents on how assault weapons are marketed.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThis blockbuster decision is really a \u2018wow\u2019 moment in American legal history,\u201d Sen.\u00a0Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn<\/strong>., said in a tweet Thursday. \u201cIt will seismically shift the legal landscape for gun violence victims.<\/em>\u201c<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Blumenthal<\/strong>\u00a0joined other Connecticut members of Congress in a related event on Capitol Hill Thursday to introduce a bill that would clarify that federal education dollars may not be used to arm teachers.<\/p>\n

There was no immediate reaction from Remington or other defendants. But the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms industry, issued a statement that said \u201cthe majority\u2019s decision today is at odds with all other state and federal appellate courts that have interpreted the scope of the [PLCCA] exception.\u201d<\/p>\n

http:\/\/blogs.edweek.org\/edweek\/school_law\/2019\/03\/connecticut_supreme_court_revi.html<\/p>\n

Senator Richard Blumenthal appears here again in the behind-the-scene links as to why Sandy Hook happened. Following the decision, Blumenthal makes his stand on the ruling:<\/p>\n

Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy have been trying for years to level that legal playing field to help people like the Phillips and other victims of gun violence seeking to sue the gun industry, including a group of Sandy Hook families.<\/p>\n

On Tuesday, the senators introduced a bill for the fourth time that would repeal the gun industry\u2019s legal protections.<\/p>\n

Those protections were obtained in 2005 with Congress\u2019 approval of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, or PLCAA, which shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products.\u00a0A similar bill was introduced by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., for the third time, in the U.S. House.<\/p>\n

The Democratic lawmakers hope their bill, called the \u201cEqual Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act,\u201d will bolster wrongful death lawsuits filed by the families of nine victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting against Remington Arms, the manufacturer of the rifle used in the massacre.<\/p>\n

\u201cAll we are doing is giving victims of gun violence their day in court,\u201d Blumenthal said.<\/p>\n

As a former trial lawyer, Blumenthal said the \u201csweeping immunity\u201d the gun industry has from lawsuits \u201cis an\u00a0abomination<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Remember, Hillary Clinton met with the families prior to filing a lawsuit against Remington. The Clintons have much to do and say about disarming Americans of militarized style rifles.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Remington is the oldest gun manufacturer in America. In 2018, they filed bankruptcy following the Sandy Hook shooting and was demeaned and given negative publicity from the mainstream and AP Press. Many global companies began to shut down their advertising and marketing campaigns following the shooting. However, only two months later, they exited from their bankruptcy after a pre-approved \u2018restructuring\u2019 plan that was supported by 97% of its creditors. I would encourage further research to determine if the \u2018creditors\u2019 forced a new deal to include\u00a0requiring liability insurance<\/strong>\u00a0from dealers, distributors, and citizens considering the legislation was already written and in the works at the time of the Sandy Hook shooting. I would also encourage more research into whether or not any \u2018hate-speech\u2019 or \u2018hate-crime\u2019 language is involved in their new terms to stay in business.<\/p>\n

WHAT IS THE H.R. 1369 (113th<\/sup>): FIREARM RISK PROTECTION ACT OF 2015?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Insurance banksters would like to have total control over American\u2019s weapons including prohibiting the sale or purchase of a firearm without the purchaser first obtaining qualified liability insurance policy.<\/p>\n

This could become an\u00a0economic hardship\u00a0for many families and owners of weapons during a\u00a0planned economic collapse. Individuals will be classified as criminals and face legal sanctions and punishments if they do not or cannot comply. It appears there will be \u201cnew terms\u201d waiting for those who want to purchase firearms from Remington.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2015\u00a0<\/u>was introduced on May 21, 2015 by N.Y\u2019s 12th Congressional District Democrat,\u00a0Carolyn Maloney<\/strong>. The Act is just another bowl of \u2018word salad\u2019 which appears to be a deceptive way to disarm more Americans while demanding gun owners purchase liability insurance on their weapons. Any person who fails to comply can be criminalized and face fines up to $10000 in fines and\/or jail time. Of course, the Act would\u00a0exempt<\/strong>\u00a0any federal, state, or local agencies from having to comply with obtaining liability insurance on the sale and transfer of every weapon. So, it is clear the banksters want their cut in owning your firearm and penalizing you if you do not comply. In addition, the banksters, their criminal mafia insurance monopolies, and of course the government would have yet another way to access your name and location of your weapons at any time as their newly created database grows. Waiting to be implemented, it could cost thousands of gun owners their weapons and freedoms if they cannot afford to purchase or maintain the insurance. Of course, the government, its representatives, and the agencies on a federal, state, and local level have no requirement or obligation to purchase insurance for their weapons.<\/p>\n

Summary:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>The\u00a0<\/em>Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2015 Amends the\u00a0Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act<\/strong>\u00a0to: (1) prohibit the purchase or sale of a firearm unless the purchaser presents proof to the seller and the seller verifies that the purchaser is covered by a qualified liability insurance policy, and (2) require any person who purchases a firearm on or after this Act\u2019s effective date to be covered by such a policy.\u00a0Exempts the purchase or sale of a firearm for use by a federal, state, or local agency.<\/strong>\u00a0Defines \u201cqualified liability insurance policy\u201d to mean a policy that: (1) provides liability insurance covering the purchaser specifically for losses resulting from use of the firearm while it is owned by the purchaser, and (2) is issued by an insurer licensed or authorized to provide the coverage by the state in which the purchaser resides.<\/em><\/p>\n

Maloney makes these\u00a0<\/u>remarks\u00a0in the House of Representatives on May 21, 2015:<\/p>\n

\u201cMrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce the Firearm Risk Protection Act, innovative legislation to promote safe gun ownership. Too often, our communities are left looking for answers after horrific tragedies inflicted with dangerous firearms. A requirement to carry liability insurance is a market-based solution that would hold gun owners responsible for the risk their firearms present, and create incentives for responsible gun safety practices. The Firearm Risk Protection Act would harness the power of insurance markets to allow professional actuaries to determine the risk presented by each gun and gun owner. Just as with car insurance, higher-risk owners of firearms would face higher premiums, while responsible owners could qualify for reduced rates. As gun violence continues to inflict scars on American families and our communities, Congress should look for new ways to promote gun safety and prevent future tragedies. I hope my colleagues will join me to support this forward-thinking legislation.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"EXPOSED: ZIONIST CAROLYN B. MALONEY<\/strong><\/p>\n

A brief peek into Maloney\u2019s history says a lot about who she is really interested in pleasing. I can guarantee, it is not the People; it is financial interests and the\u00a0Jewish Agenda to Disarm America: Communism\u2019s Secret Back Door.<\/u>\u00a0She has deep background ties to the banksters and works to criminalize speech, eliminate guns, and enslave the American people. She is the snake slithering in the grass waiting to dupe and bite the People using manipulative and dirty tactics. Maloney and her counterparts in law, banking and politics market deceptively named campaigns against the Civilian population which are intended to generate corporate profits by selling access to the Second Amendment in the form of insurance premiums for gun ownership.<\/p>\n

Ironically, Jared Lee Loughner allegedly shot Judge John Roll to death in 2011, who ruled that large portions of the Brady Bill were unconstitutional.<\/p>\n

\u201cToday, all across New York, all across the country, Americans are sitting in and standing up because we are tired of watching as each day 89 people die from gun violence,\u201d\u00a0said Congresswoman Maloney.\u200e<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cWe are tired of being told that the solution to gun violence is more guns. We are tired of massacres like Orlando and\u00a0Sandy Hook<\/strong>. And we are tired of tweets and prayers that do nothing to stop the bloodshed. Today, we are here to continue the movement that began on the House floor last week. We are sitting in to demand action. It is time for a vote to keep guns away from dangerous terror suspects, a vote to require background checks on all gun sales, a vote to stop gun trafficking, a vote to lift the ban on gun violence research, a vote on common sense. It\u2019s time for gun violence to end.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cJust one week after the historic sit-in on the House floor, today leaders in Congress will hold yet another historic event to urge our elected officials in the U.S. House of Representatives to hold a vote on bipartisan legislation that protects the rights of law-abiding Americans, keeps guns out of the wrong hands, and saves lives,\u201d\u00a0said former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords,\u00a0Co-Founder of the gun violence prevention organization Americans for Responsible Solutions<\/strong>. \u201cI want to thank Congresswoman Maloney for helping lead the fight against our nation\u2019s gun violence crisis. Speaking is difficult for me. But I haven\u2019t been silenced. And neither should the American people. Their Representatives must vote to make our communities safer.\u201d\u00a0<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Senator Richard Blumenthal was also highly involved in the Congressional \u2018sit-in\u2019 as well. His words put it blatantly where gun control sits and who is behind it.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was proud to walk over and join my colleagues in the House \u2013 led by Congressmen John Lewis and my fellow Members of the Connecticut Congressional Delegation \u2013 today in demanding action. Gun violence is a public health epidemic that is killing our constituents, and Congress\u2019s refusal to address it is nothing short of a profound injustice. Like the Senate filibuster I helped to lead last week, the House sit-in is a powerful demonstration of our responsibility not to give up, not to relent in calling for action to end the horror show of death and injury that Congress\u2019s failure has perpetuated.\u201d\u200e<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

SLITHERING SNAKE<\/u><\/strong>S IN THE GRASS<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

HILLARY CLINTON, GIFFORDS, AND CAROLYN MALONEY<\/p>\n

HOW DOES H.R. 1369 (113th<\/sup>): FIREARM RISK PROTECTION ACT OF 2015\u00a0TIE INTO THE SANDY HOOK LAWSUIT AGAINST THE GUN MANUFACTURERS?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

There are a lot of questions to be asked and as everyone is diverted by the most current false-flag details or \u2018wooing\u2019 the next post in line on Facebook, the snakes slither in the grass to turn Civilian\u2019s choice of weapons purchases into a tightly regulated \u2018pay-up\u2019 or do the time to keep and possess them.<\/p>\n

The families of the Sandy Hook lawsuit\u00a0argue\u00a0the rifle allegedly used by shooter, Adam Lanza,\u00a0should not have been entrusted to the general public<\/strong>\u2026<\/p>\n

\u201cShouldn\u2019t have been entrusted to the general public because it is a military-style assault weapon that is unsuited for civilian use.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201cThey say the gun companies knew\u2014or should have known\u2014about the high risks posed by the weapon, including the ability for a shooter to use it to inflict maximum casualties and serious\u00a0injury.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Now, in the \u2018discovery phase\u2019 this lawsuit is the first of its kind to challenge the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) after its enactment. According to the\u00a0so-called experts\u00a0<\/u>on the fake news network,\u00a0(CNN),<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is precedent setting in the sense that, after PLCAA, this is the first case against a firearms manufacturer under a negligence theory that looks like it might make it to trial,\u201d said Georgia State University law professor Timothy Lytton, who studies gun industry litigation.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The attorney, Joshua Koskoff, is representing families of nine people who allegedly died in the Sandy Hook\u00a0shooting\u00a0<\/u>saying,\u00a0\u201cIt was Remington\u2019s choice to entrust the most notorious American killing machine to the public.\u201d (Killing machine? In 2014, for example, there were approximately\u00a0275 people killed with a rifle of any kind \u2013 hardly a killing machine).<\/em><\/p>\n

He also denied claims\u00a0that the lawsuit amounted to an attempt to ban assault weapons.<\/p>\n

CLINTON, BLUMENTHAL, GIFFORDS, & THE GUN HATING GANG FOLLOWING SANDY HOOK<\/h3>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Hillary Clinton\u00a0and Gabrielle Giffords<\/em><\/p>\n

Hillary and the\u00a0gun-hating gang are right where we would expect them to be following the Sandy Hook alleged shooting and even right at the front gates of the alleged mass murder at the Orlando Pulse Night Club.<\/p>\n

Following the recent alleged shady shooting in Orlando, Hillary Clinton promptly met privately with family and friends of the alleged victims of the Pulse Night Club shooting. \u2018Shady- meaning there are unanswered questions, signs of crisis actors and false reporting from the mainstream media. The details reported by the \u2018Fake New Networks,\u00a0(FOX, CNN, ABC, NBC, ETC) about the shooting itself is suspect and should be classified by the general populous as another suspicious shooting with gun-control as it\u2019s primary marketing strategy. Just like the shootings in Tucson, Sandy Hook, the Navy Yard, San Bernardino, Aurora Theatre, and numerous others we had to endure during the Obama Administration and now continuing in the Trump administration.<\/p>\n

While in Orlando, Hillary uses the perfect mix of \u2018word-salad\u2019 to bring together people who are vulnerable and ready to buy into the lies about \u2018terrorism\u2019 while labeling everything a\u00a0\u2018hate\u2019<\/strong>\u00a0crime. As Hillary and the Gang continue to find more ways to disarm the nation, Gabrielle Giffords implements her \u2018victim marketing scam\u2019 aka Americans for Responsible Solutions anti-second amendment organization (Now Giffords Law Center). Giffords, Maloney, and Clinton are part of a malicious deception to disarm Americans coincident with the deliberate destruction and looting of the American financial system and collapse now in progress, not coincidently caused\u00a0by same people funding this anti-American agenda.<\/p>\n

Most Americans go throughout their day unaware of what is really happening around them. Most people are told through the fake news networks and Hollywood deception\u00a0media what the weather will be, how the economy is shaping up, what clothes to wear, what shoes to purchase, who is popular and who is not, and what is happening around the world. The majority of Americans do not have a clue as to the real matrix in which we now live\u00a0 \u2013 a real life version of the Truman Show. I like to refer to the nation as being \u2018duped\u2019 and deprived of the real pleasures of truth and freedom.<\/p>\n

Since the Sandy Hook shooting there has been fuel poured on the already burning fire to incite a war between blacks and whites, blacks and police, whites and police \u2013 a total divide. Rumors surface after each alleged shooting and chatter starts among social media on their opinions as to what is really happening. All of this was great news for Hillary considering she was out promoting racial division in the nation and was targeting black women using the St. Louis Ferguson shooting planned event. It seems very peculiar when there is another shooting Hillary, Giffords, Blumenthal, Maloney and others already have their war paint on and speeches prepared.<\/p>\n

Hillary\u2019s presidential campaign route was right in alignment with the Sandy Hook shooting. Another reason for their BULLHORNS to be screaming and preaching VICTIMS, VICTIMS, VICTIMS\u2026 MORE GUN CONTROL\u2026 WE HAVE MORE VICTIMS\u2026.<\/p>\n

Next, we have to question the gun manufacturers\u2026<\/p>\n

REMINGTON & BUSHMASTER\u2026\u00a0ARE THE GUN MANUFACTURER OWNERS ACTUALLY SELLING US THE GUNS TO SHOOT OURSELVES WITH?<\/strong><\/p>\n

REMINGTON and BUSHMASTER have been specifically named in the Sandy Hook lawsuit. Clearly, without question, the primary agenda for the lawsuit is to challenge the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.\u00a0Remington and Bushmaster are owned by Freedom Group (FG), which has a parent company called Cerberus Capital Management. Other companies FG owns are:<\/p>\n

Advanced Armament Corp, Barnes Bullets, Dakota Arms, DPMS Panther Arms, H&R Firearms, Marlin, Para USA, Parker Gunmakers, and TAPCO<\/p>\n

There are some specific shady actions that Cerberus Capital Management displayed directly following the Sandy Hook shooting.<\/p>\n

WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THE GUN COMPANIES WHEN THEY ARE NOT STANDING AGAINST THE GUN HATERS?<\/strong><\/p>\n

As most people already know, following the Sandy Hook shooting, gun sales were on the rise like because Americans felt threatened by gun-control and laws that might ban the civilian population from obtaining military-style high powered rifles, extended magazines, and other accessories.<\/p>\n

What exactly gives the gun haters the right\u00a0to claim, \u201cthe gun maker and sellers knew\u00a0civilians<\/strong>\u00a0are considered\u00a0unfit<\/strong>\u00a0to operate the assault rifle\u201d<\/em>\u00a0\u2026 Unfit? Really?<\/p>\n

Definition:<\/strong>\u00a0Oxford Dictionary \u2013\u00a0UNFIT<\/strong>\u2013\u00a0(Of a person) not having the<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>requisite<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>qualities or skills to undertake something\u00a0competently:<\/em><\/p>\n

REMINGTON ARMS \u2013 is the manufacturer of the Bushmaster. Freedom Group (FG) is the owner of Remington Arms and is a subsidiary of the private equity firm known as Cerberus Capital Management. L.P, Est. 1992.\u00a0\u00a0They are well-known for their takeover of struggling Chrysler, who was eventually rescued by the taxpayer. Zionist Stephen Feinberg is the co-founder & CEO.<\/p>\n

In just a few days following the Sandy Hook shooting, Cerberus Capital Management made a stunning move and announced the sale of Freedom Group.<\/strong>\u00a0As most Americans were distracted by the sorrows of the alleged Sandy Hook shooting, Cerberus Capital Management\u2019s executives, who own America\u2019s largest gun company, made their move making arrangements to sell off Freedom Group after receiving a harsh phone call from the\u00a0California State Teachers\u2019 Retirement System, or CalSTRS, which had $750 million invested in the private equity firm at that time. After just a few short hours of contemplating, Cerberus announced it was putting Freedom Group up for sale. How could this decision be made so\u00a0soon after an event that brought gun sales and gun control to the forefront of every conversation in America?<\/p>\n

Instead of taking the heat and fighting back (considering they know their products are not the reason for murder by guns), Cerberus took the cowards way out and gave notice to the nation it wanted to remove itself from the heated gun debate uproar. It was announced\u00a0they\u00a0would\u00a0sell Freedom Group, which made the weapon Adam Lanza allegedly used in the massacre. For the first time in history,<\/p>\n

According to PR News Wire,\u00a0Cerberus released the following statement publicly following the shooting at Newtown.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe were shocked and deeply saddened by the events that took place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in\u00a0Newtown, CT\u00a0on\u00a0December 14, 2012.\u00a0 We cannot comprehend the losses suffered by the families and friends of those killed by the unthinkable crimes committed that day.\u00a0No words or actions can lessen the enormity of this event or make a dent in the pain that was inflicted on so many.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cIt is apparent that the\u00a0Sandy Hook\u00a0tragedy was a\u00a0watershed event<\/strong>\u00a0that has raised the national debate on gun control to an unprecedented level. The debate essentially focuses on the balance between public safety and the scope of the Constitutional rights under the Second Amendment.\u00a0 As a Firm, we are investors, not statesmen or policy makers.\u00a0 Our role is to make investments on behalf of our clients who are comprised of the pension plans of firemen, teachers, policemen and other municipal workers and unions, endowments, and other institutions and individuals.\u00a0 It is not our role to take positions, or attempt to shape or influence the gun control policy debate.\u00a0 That is the job of our federal and state legislators.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

However, they did take a\u00a0position in the fierce gun control policy debate. Cerberus claims in their press release,\u00a0\u201cOur role is to make investments on behalf of our clients who are comprised of the pension plans of firemen, teachers, policemen and other municipal workers and unions, endowments, and other institutions and individuals.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

This alone should make the reader question everything considering these national shootings\u00a0revolve around special medical operations which use crisis actors, firemen, police officers, teachers, municipal workers, doctors, nurses, medical centers, news media(s), local Masonic orders,\u00a0etc. Do you see where this is going? However, as Cerberus is hiding under the table, knowing they are going to profit on both sides of the operation, Remington\u2019s profits soared 52+ percent following the alleged Sandy Hook shooting as a\u00a0direct result of this event as well as the national\u00a0gun debate.<\/p>\n

The surge in profits to Freedom Group came at the right time as Remington was preparing to replace 7.5+ million rifle triggers in a major recall resulting from a\u00a0class action lawsuit. Interesting\u2026<\/p>\n

Plus, let\u2019s not forget about the amount of money many states make from\u00a0the sales of guns with licensing fees and permits and such. Wow, is this what Obama meant by we are a nation investing in the service industry? What Obama meant by America\u2019s service industry growing was clearly in medical professions, mental health, technology, prisons, and the police-state.<\/p>\n

Regardless, more than two-years after Cerberus made the announcement to sell Freedom Group, after the phone call from the California State Teachers\u2019 Retirement System (CalSTRS), they exited their investments in the gun manufacturer anyway. Then months later, according to Forbes, CalSTRS made national headlines by:<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201c<\/em>voting at its annual board meeting to divest the$193.1 billion pension fund from manufacturers of firearms that are illegal for sale in the state of California.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Following the decision, CalSTRS liquidated $3 million of investments in the public shares of gun makers such as Smith & Wesson and Sturm Ruger, most of which the pension fund\u00a0held through ordinary index fund investments. However, when it came to exiting a $375 million investment in the Cerberus pool that owned Remington, CalSTRS hit a roadblock.<\/em><\/p>\n

Contractual and legal constraints made it hard for the fund to quickly exit Remington, CalSTRS said, leading to a multi-year frustration with the fund\u2019s continued firearms investment.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

It could be\u00a0safe to say hypothetically if a person wanted to make some money on the next false-flag or alleged national tragedy\u2026 they might want to invest in the players or sponsors\u2026 We have private humanitarian organizations, disaster relief agencies, jobs and more jobs to keep filled. Yes, we have become the new service nation to make sure state and federal workers are employed and continue to remain the heroes in the eyes of the civilian populous.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

There is quite a bit of information to digest when it comes to the Sandy Hook lawsuit, the Orlando shooting alleged victims families also joined the lawsuit,\u00a0the manufacturer\u2019s response to the Sandy Hook shooting, and the introduction of the Firearms Risk Protection Act. Studying the information closely, as well as the gun hater\u2019s agenda, it is quite clear the Second Amendment is either up for sale or being re-written.<\/p>\n

Thanks to the Tucson and Sandy Hook shootings, the Firearms Risk Protection Act alone could profit billions to insurance companies by making it mandatory gun owners have liability insurance on their weapons. Depending on your \u2018risk assessment\u2019, you may either be considered a \u2018low risk\u2019 individual and pay lower rates or a \u2018high risk\u2019 person and pay higher rates. What they do not specify is how they determine what risk you are. I suppose all the tracking and databases are tied together now so who knows what lies ahead for American gun owners. The saddest thing of all is most of the gun owners around continue to regurgitate the same slogan, \u201cthey ain\u2019t gonna get my guns\u201d or \u201ccome an take em\u201d however, they have no clue this operation of this magnitude is even going on.\u00a0 They won\u2019t be coming for the guns, they will come for insurance payments and the owners might just be handing over the weapons to escape the payment.<\/p>\n

Mental health agenda is also tied into the gun control debates. Following the Sandy Hook shooting, the push for DNA testing and studies for the ongoing search for the \u2018evil gene\u2019 is underway. Obama was demanding the CDC receive millions of dollars in funding to study gun-violence and Hillary Clinton vowed to keep the guns out of the hands of who she believes are dangerous individuals.<\/p>\n

Just recently, House Democratic appropriators allocated $50 million to the CDC & NIH gun violence and behavioral studies including research into genes. The CDC has been \u201coff-limits\u201d for over two decades from such research after racking up trillions, now finally gets the millions they need to accelerate again. As you can now clearly see the link between gun-control, the Surgeon Generals, prominent doctor groups, healthcare, insurance companies, and more. The reason why the CDC was not allowed to study gun violence for over two decades prior to the Sandy Hook alleged shooting is because money embezzlement and laundering was out of control. The CDC\u2019s funds were cut because they could not produce evidence that guns are a public health crisis. Now, prior to the Sandy Hook shooting, Janet Napolitano announced the crazy lone-gun man would be everywhere, including the schools.<\/p>\n

Suddenly, the CDC and National Institute of Health are back in the saddle researching the public health crisis because of the suspicious rise in mass shootings.<\/p>\n

According to Politico,\u00a0\u201cLawmakers haven\u2019t provided funding to study gun violence at the CDC in over two decades, largely because of a spending provision that had a chilling effect on research. A budget deal in March 2018\u00a0clarified\u00a0<\/u>that the federal government can study gun violence, as long as it doesn\u2019t use the research to promote gun control.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Earlier this year already, Democrats passed a bill, H.R. 8 (116) mandating more federal background checks for gun sales. This time they received a \u201cboost\u201d from surgeons, doctors, healthcare workers, EMS workers, using their social media slogan, #ThisIsOurLane.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Once again, we see CT Senator Richard Blumenthal appear in the midst of all these stricter gun regulations. This time, bussing in the victims and family members and bringing in the doctors and medical workers.<\/p>\n

\"\"Photo: Politico<\/p>\n

Cicero and countless others have reminded us\u00a0\u201cA nation can survive it fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from\u00a0within.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Mahoney, Clinton, and Giffords wear the face of do-gooders. Acting as of they are concerned women exercising the natural feminine desire to make things safe, but, in fact, they are liars, criminals, and frauds. All real women should be chasing these non-women down and dragging them to their Sheriff\u2019s department by the hair and demanding they be locked up for life. And, because of the New Legislation called \u201cA Thin Blue Line\u201d we should now insist they get the death penalty. However, there is no justice because the Justice Department is also part of the Sandy Hook plot.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese scums help rot the soul of a nation while working secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of America\u2019s Constitution, tirelessly seeking and exploiting weak spots wherein to insert their treason. \u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThese women and many other men and women are not Americans, nor\u00a0are they\u00a0nationalists, rather they are globalists, spiritual Talmudists, serving a self-fulfilling prophecy. The stateless one world government, a new world order, and new religion of tyranny \u2013 dictated by the same kinds of personalities that destroyed the old world order. These chosen-ones fantasize about a new paradise of psychopaths, bringing order out of chaos, but we expect in the end,\u00a0once again, they will remain\u00a0miserable,\u00a0having nothing left\u00a0to destroy but\u00a0themselves.\u201d\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jack Mullen<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Video: Sandy Hook \u201cVictims\u201d To Get $33 Million Settlement<\/p>\n

___
\nhttps:\/\/jamesfetzer.org\/2021\/07\/stephanie-sledge-remington-takes-fall-sells-out-american-gun-owners-settles-sandy-hook-for-33-million\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

REMINGTON TAKES FALL: SELLS OUT AMERICAN GUN OWNERS & SETTLES SANDY HOOK FOR $33 MILLION<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=76703"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76703\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=76703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=76703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=76703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}