{"id":81138,"date":"2021-08-28T15:17:58","date_gmt":"2021-08-28T19:17:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=81138"},"modified":"2021-08-28T15:19:47","modified_gmt":"2021-08-28T19:19:47","slug":"not-only-is-the-covid-pcr-test-is-a-complete-fraud-covid-vaccines-were-designed-to-fail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=81138","title":{"rendered":"Not only is the COVID PCR test a complete fraud, COVID ‘vaccines’ were designed to fail"},"content":{"rendered":"

The COVID PCR test is a complete fraud<\/strong><\/h2>\n

by Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n

NOTE: I\u2019ve posted this article several times. I post it again because so-called \u201crising COVID case numbers\u201d are being touted as justification for masking and other restrictions, as well as a reason for taking the destructive COVID vaccine.<\/p>\n

This article is part of my series on the COVID PCR test. These articles prove that the test is fatally flawed, gives rise to hugely inflated and false case numbers, which in turn lead to the unnecessary and brutal lockdowns.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m hoping readers will spread this information far and wide.<\/p>\n

OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.<\/p>\n

Right from the horse\u2019s mouth. Right from the man we\u2019re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.<\/p>\n

Well, how about THIS?<\/p>\n

July 16, 2020, podcast, \u201cThis week in virology\u201d: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at \u201c35 cycles or higher.\u201d A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.<\/p>\n

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci\u2019s key quote (starting at the 4m01s mark through to the 5m45s mark (Faucu begins his first answer to the first quesiotns at the 4m20s mark and begins his second answer to the second question at the 5m26s mark)):<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more\u2026the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule\u2026you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle\u2026even 36\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

Each \u201ccycle\u201d of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.<\/p>\n

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s called a false positive.<\/p>\n

What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.<\/p>\n

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because\u2026<\/p>\n

Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and\u2026<\/p>\n

The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.<\/p>\n

The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.<\/p>\n

Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it\u2019s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.<\/p>\n

\u201cHello, America, you\u2019ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.\u201d<\/p>\n

If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the global economy and its 8 billion citizens.<\/p>\n

All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I\u2019ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled: \u201cCDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.\u201d See page 35. This document is marked, \u201cEffective: 07\/21\/2021.\u201d That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2021. \u201cFor Emergency Use Only\u201d refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called \u201cEmergency Use Authorization.\u201d<\/p>\n

FDA: \u201c\u2026a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).\u201d<\/p>\n

Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, \u201cWell, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That\u2019s the official advice.\u201d<\/p>\n

Then we have a New York Times article (August 29\/updated September 17, 2020) headlined: \u201cYour coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn\u2019t be.\u201d Here are money quotes:<\/p>\n

\u201cMost tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.\u201d<\/p>\n

Set-the-limit would mean, We\u2019re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.<\/p>\n

The Times: \u201cThis number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients.\u201d<\/p>\n

Boom. That\u2019s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don\u2019t or won\u2019t reveal their collusion in this crime.<\/p>\n

Get the picture?<\/p>\n

I hope so.<\/p>\n

If a lawyer won\u2019t go to court with all this, or if a judge won\u2019t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.<\/p>\n

\n

COVID vaccines were designed to fail; that\u2019s how they won authorization<\/strong><\/h2>\n

by Jon Rappoport<\/p>\n

For the past year, I\u2019ve been demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a fake. It doesn\u2019t exist. Now let\u2019s enter the bubble where people assume the virus is real, and examine a few of the major crimes and contradictions that exist inside that lunatic bubble.<\/p>\n

I wrote and posted this piece almost a year ago, while the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine were in progress. It reveals how and why those trials were doomed to fail. They did fail. Since then, nothing has changed.<\/p>\n

The vaccine makers DESIGNED a series of clinical trials that, even on their own terms (\u201cthe virus is real, fear the virus\u201d) were destined to be a complete flop.<\/p>\n

Here is the piece I wrote in September 2020, before COVID vaccines were authorized for emergency use.<\/p>\n

PART ONE:<\/p>\n

Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.<\/p>\n

They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.<\/p>\n

September 22, 2020, the Times: \u201cThese Coronavirus Trials Don\u2019t Answer the One Question We Need to Know\u201d:<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBut that\u2019s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAccording to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies\u2019 benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cTo say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That\u2019s not what these trials will determine.\u201d<\/p>\n

This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.<\/p>\n

They are only designed to show effectiveness in preventing \u201cmild cases of COVID,\u201d which nobody should care about, because mild cases (cough, fever) naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.<\/p>\n

The leading vaccine clinical trials are useless, irrelevant, misleading, and deceptive.<\/p>\n

Now let\u2019s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I\u2019ll make comments.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer\u2019s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups— those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe \u201cthe coronavirus is spreading everywhere\u201d and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19, and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.<\/p>\n

The vaccine companies would say, \u201cWe just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that\u2019s all we need to do, in order to win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.\u201d<\/p>\n

The outcomes for 150 people equal \u201clet\u2019s shoot up seven billion people.\u201d That\u2019s staggering.<\/p>\n

But it gets even worse. The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 \u2014 for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test \u2014 would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.\u201d<\/p>\n

But wait. The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—in other words, not cases at all. Why? Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by many labs, is too sensitive. It registers \u201cpositive for COVID\u201d when it shouldn\u2019t.<\/p>\n

So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that \u201c150 people developed COVID-19\u201d is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical. On the one hand, a positive PCR test is unreliable and means nothing. On the other hand, a cough and fever (\u201cmild COVID\u201d) are nothing to worry about, and don\u2019t require a vaccine at all. We\u2019re talking about 150 cases of \u201cwho cares.\u201d That\u2019s what the COVID vaccine is designed to prevent.<\/p>\n

\u201cSo the magic number is 150? That\u2019s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cOf course.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19\u2026no one should care, because those symptoms cure themselves, and no vaccine is needed.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cCorrect.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAnd come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cYes, that\u2019s right.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cBut you\u2019re very confident in the success of the vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIndeed.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWhy?\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI have to be confident. If we\u2019re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit. And we\u2019ll wind up in prison.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThank you, sir. And that\u2019s tonight\u2019s news. Make sure you take the vaccine, everyone. It\u2019s vital. This is Fred J Clown, for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East, West, North, and South. The News, brought to you by Venom-X-2, a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects. Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.\u201d<\/p>\n

PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK:<\/p>\n

Now I\u2019m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I\u2019m going to show you how\u2026<\/p>\n

The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to\u2026<\/p>\n

Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.<\/p>\n

Stick with me. This is big.<\/p>\n

Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.<\/p>\n

Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to \u201ccome down with COVID-19.\u201d MILD cases. They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it\u2019ll infect their volunteers.<\/p>\n

Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless. Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test. The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible mild symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to \u201ccatch a mild case of COVID.\u201d When that number is reached, everything stops.<\/p>\n

Now comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, \u201cLook, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that\u2019s all we need to win emergency authorization from the FDA.\u201d<\/p>\n

BUT suppose 70 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 80 in the placebo group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective.<\/p>\n

Now comes the \u201creshaping of the data.\u201d<\/p>\n

HERE WE GO.<\/p>\n

The researchers say, \u201cWait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren\u2019t cases of COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there were only 40 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. Half as many as in the placebo group. The vaccine IS 50% effective. We\u2019re good. We\u2019re golden. We can get emergency authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody.\u201d<\/p>\n

Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.<\/p>\n

Why leave things to chance?<\/p>\n

Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?<\/p>\n

The definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn\u2019t fail.<\/p>\n

They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID as a reaction to the vaccine. They could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, \u201cThe vaccine reactions aren\u2019t serious. All right, no problem. We\u2019ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.\u201d<\/p>\n

However\u2026If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur. That might never happen.<\/p>\n

If it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases\u2026<\/p>\n

They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.<\/p>\n

FDA: \u201cWe can\u2019t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

The vaccine companies didn\u2019t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to \u201creshape their data\u201d and win FDA emergency approval for their vaccine.<\/p>\n

These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers. They want success and money now. They want to win the race.<\/p>\n

And they will win, if the truth isn\u2019t known and shared widely.<\/p>\n

EPILOGUE:<\/p>\n

The punchline.<\/p>\n

Every \u201cexpert,\u201d now, in August 2021, is instructed to say the vaccine is definitely protecting people against severe illness and hospitalization. This is their promotional message to the world.<\/p>\n

\u201cYes, even if you\u2019re vaccinated, you could become infected with the virus, you could develop COVID, and you could pass the virus to other people, BUT you must take the shot. It will protect you from becoming severely ill.\u201d<\/p>\n

As you can see from what I\u2019ve written above, this is a straight-out lie.<\/p>\n

It was always a fantastic lie, from the beginning of COVID vaccine development.<\/p>\n

___
\nNoMoreFakeNews.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The COVID PCR test is a complete fraud<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=81138"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81138\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=81138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=81138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=81138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}