![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Vaccine-Vial-Bottles-Covid-19.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
by: Nolan Barton<\/p>\n
(Natural News<\/a>) Dr. David Martin warned the\u00a0public that the\u00a0Food and Drug Administration<\/em>\u00a0(FDA)\u00a0has approved a coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine that does not exist<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cWhen members of the mainstream suggest that this approval has suddenly put what is sitting in freezers around the world into an approved status, that\u2019s actually not true,\u201d Martin said\u00a0during\u00a0his appearance on \u201cBrighteon Conversations.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThere are still manufacturing guidelines that were not required for the EUA that would be required for a full-approved product.\u201d<\/p>\n He told Health Ranger Mike Adams that the FDA has approved a \u201cunicorn.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cComirnaty does not exist,\u201d\u00a0Martin said, referring to the brand name of the Pfizer vaccine granted full approval by the federal agency. \u201cThe approval is for future production of COVID vaccine.\u201d (Related:\u00a0FDA fraudulently grants full approval to Comirnaty covid vaccine, skipping stage 3 trials and ignoring data on injuries and deaths.<\/a>)<\/p>\n Martin related that some vital information had been redacted in the approval letter that Pfizer had, as well as in its official publication from the FDA.<\/p>\n \u201cThe section of where it can be manufactured and when it can be manufactured is redacted, which is unusual given the fact that an approval letter is supposed to be a public announcement that makes these things visible,\u201d Martin said.<\/p>\n Both Adams and Martin agreed that the confusion brought by the approval was compounded by the extension of the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer vaccine used for children between the ages 12 and 15, as well as for the Moderna and the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines.<\/p>\n \u201cThe mandate for EUA has to live inside of no clinical alternative,\u201d said Martin. \u201cThe moment there is an approval, then the EUA protections for Moderna and Johnson & Johnson would cease to exist instantaneously.\u201d<\/p>\n In its approval letter, the FDA acknowledged that there is \u201ca significant amount\u201d of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine produced under\u00a0EUA still available for use. The FDA\u00a0ruled that Pfizer\u2019s COVID-19 vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used \u201cinterchangeably\u201d with Comirnaty.<\/p>\n Under the circumstances, it was clear that the granting of full approval was a calculated move by the government to encourage businesses and schools to impose vaccine mandates and enable Pfizer to unload inventories of its COVID-19 vaccine under EUA. Martin said the Biden administration is pushing to get students vaccinated in time for the start of the coming school year.<\/p>\n There is a huge real-world difference between products\u00a0approved under EUA compared with those fully approved by the FDA<\/a>.<\/p>\n EUA products are\u00a0experimental\u00a0under U.S. laws. Both the\u00a0Nuremberg Code\u00a0and federal regulations\u00a0state that no one can force a human being to participate in the experiment. Under\u00a0U.S. laws, it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse\u00a0experimental vaccines.<\/p>\n On the other hand, U.S. laws permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.<\/p>\n EUA-approved vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the\u00a02005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability.<\/p>\n The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.<\/p>\n The Comirnaty vaccine is subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products. Licensed adult vaccines, including Comirnaty, do not enjoy any liability shield. People injured by the Comirnaty vaccine could potentially sue for damages. Jury awards could be astronomical, so Pfizer is unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for the product.<\/p>\n Members of the mainstream media were quick to report that vaccine mandates are now legal for military, healthcare workers, college students and employees in many industries following the full approval given by the FDA to Comirnaty on Aug. 23.<\/p>\n The Pentagon promptly announced it will go ahead with its plan\u00a0to force members of the military to get vaccinated<\/a>\u00a0against the virus, while New York City announced on the same day that all public school teachers and other staffers will have to get vaccinated. (Related:\u00a0Pentagon orders ALL members of the armed forces to be vaccinated, essentially ordering thousands to die from blood clots and vascular damage.<\/a>)<\/p>\n One of the first to implement the requirement was the\u00a0State University of New York<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(SUNY) system, which has nearly 400,000 students and more than 85,000 faculty members spread across its 64 campuses. Several other prominent institutions are expected to impose vaccine mandates after consultation with their Boards of Trustees and state officials.<\/p>\n According to Martin, this madness all started in 1999. It was when\u00a0National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases<\/em>\u00a0(NIAID) Director Anthony Fauci came up with the idea of creating an infectious replication-defective form of coronavirus. Fauci paid researchers at the\u00a0University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill<\/em><\/a>\u00a0to invent a pathogen that did not exist, Martin said.<\/p>\n Fauci essentially asked the researchers to create a bioweapon. \u201cYou cannot manufacture a bioweapon and not say that you\u2019re trying to kill people. That\u2019s what a bioweapon is for,\u201d Martin said.<\/p>\n Kizzy Corbett, the person behind the development of COVID-19 vaccines using mRNA technology, once said: \u201cIt\u2019s really cool because you don\u2019t even need much of lab. You can build one of these on your computer at home.\u201d<\/p>\n That, Martin said, is an admission of biological warfare.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are not talking about a virus. We are talking about an engineered pathogen,\u201d Martin said. \u201cWe are not talking about a vaccine. We are talking about the introduction of a computer-simulated code in the form of mRNA \u2013 not to stimulate your immune system, but to turn your body into a factory producing S1 spike proteins similar to those found in coronavirus.\u201d<\/p>\n Watch the full episode of \u201cBrighteon Conversations\u201d\u00a0with Mike Adams and Dr. David Martin\u00a0here<\/a>:<\/p>\nCOVID-19 vaccines should lose EUA protections<\/h2>\n
Difference between\u00a0fully approved and under EUA\u00a0products<\/h3>\n
Public misled by mainstream media<\/h3>\n
Fauci started all the madness decades ago<\/h2>\n