Jeremy Isaacs\u2019\u00a0The World at War<\/em>\u00a0includes an interview in which Hitler\u2019s personal secretary, Traudl Junge, reports that the F\u00fchrer, in his last days, replied to a question about the future of Germany as follows: \u201cI believe there will not any more be a National Socialist Party; the idea will die with me. But maybe in a hundred years or so there will arise another National Socialist idea, like a religion.\u201d<\/a>[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n It has not yet been a hundred years, but I begin to see what Hitler meant. From the South Pacific to the North Atlantic, even democratic countries such as Australia and Canada are rapidly going full Nazi.<\/a>[2]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0We\u2019ve been living for eighteen months now under a \u201chealth emergency\u201d in which rule by fiat has replaced the rule of law. In Australia, rubber bullets are flying to suppress resistance to this perpetual state of exception.<\/a>[3]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n Who knew that constitutional rights could be suspended for such a long and indefinite period, with routine renewal of emergency powers by the same people who wield them? Who knew that this could be done in the name of Health and Safety when more people are dying as a consequence of the special measures than are dying from the health threat that putatively requires them? Who knew that to \u201csafeguard\u201d healthcare, the government could cancel much of it or make it difficult to access; build and staff quarantine camps instead of hospitals, when neither are needed; impose coercive mandates that violate the most basic principles of the Nuremberg Code; dismiss physicians and healthcare workers who dissent from the dirty tactics and dare to expose government lies?<\/p>\n The most remarkable thing, however, is the stupendous credulity that characterizes significant tracts of the population, especially in academia, where our \u201ccritical minds\u201d are said to reside. The credulity and the cowardice; for when it comes to enrolling in the religion of fear, the universities have vied with each other to be first in line and to teach that religion to their students.<\/p>\n I have listened in disbelief to a mob of McGill professors demanding that the administration deny constitutionally guaranteed rights to students and colleagues who refuse their religion of fear. I have read with dismay the American Medical Association instructing its members how to manipulate patients and public opinion with dishonest language.<\/a>[4]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0I have taken note of government psy-op activity and of media censorship.<\/a>[5]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0Alas, I have also seen bishops and pastors, who ought to know better \u2013 who are\u00a0obligated<\/em>\u00a0to know better \u2013 succumb to the new law of Fear and preach the new gospel of Safety, even to the closing of their churches, the coercing of fellow clergy, and the dividing of their flocks.<\/a>[6]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n One would think that several months with a weekly COVID-related death rate of less than one per 100,000 Canadians would have calmed this hysteria.\u00a0<\/a>[7]<\/a><\/sup>\u00a0One would think that critical minds might recover their lost wits when jolted by new data showing that in Britain all-cause mortality has for some time been lower among the unvaccinated than among the vaccinated.<\/a>[8]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0Or when shown by age-stratified data that, for the majority of people, the risks of vaccination outweigh the risks of remaining unvaccinated. Or that vaccination does not prevent infection and transmission, and that a non-sterilizing vaccine cannot do so.<\/a>[9]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0Or that these are not vaccines in the first place, but novel gene therapy treatments with short-term efficacy at reducing symptoms, uncertain long-term dangers, and unacceptable levels of serious adverse reactions.<\/p>\n But no, our supposedly critical minds are baying for the blood of the unvaccinated and of any administrator who refuses to shed it through coercive mandates. Evidence of their own political, medical, and moral folly they simply refuse to consider.<\/a>[10]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n If patriotism was once the last refuge of the scoundrel, today that refuge is environmentalism and global health. Watching over the sphere of global health is the heavily politicized World Health Organization. There are also \u201cindependent\u201d monitors and advisory committees, such as The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness & Response and the\u00a0soi-disant<\/em>\u00a0Global Preparedness Monitoring Board.<\/a>[11]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0The former, maintaining that \u201cthe threats to human, animal and environmental health are inextricably linked,\u201d has used the COVID crisis to call for the establishment of a Global Health Threats Council with sweeping powers to monitor progress towards WHO objectives, including those of the 2030 Agenda.\u00a0<\/a>[12]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n Exactly who is monitoring whom, and who is colluding with whom to achieve what, is no easy question for a layman to answer.<\/a>[13]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0But collusion there plainly is, including collusion dating back more than a decade, to engineer crises that could be put to good use for economic and political ends. Both the definition of a \u201cpandemic\u201d and the strategy for fighting one were quietly changed. The new strategy, what we know as the COVID-zero strategy, holds real promise of concentrating power in the hands of a few. Indeed, it has already done so.<\/a>[14]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n Something else changed, too, which anyone could have and should have noticed. By early last year, the media had moved into lockstep mode. Identical (if highly contradictory) memes such as \u201ctwo weeks to flatten the curve\u201d and \u201cthe new normal\u201d and \u201cbuild back better\u201d and \u201cpandemic of the unvaccinated,\u201d began to appear simultaneously in the mouths of officials and of reporters the world over. So did censorship of opposing voices. Where censorship was not possible, the charge of\u00a0Misinformation!<\/em>\u00a0was laid down as covering fire by hired guns in the media or in the university sector, as by public figures such as Dr. Fauci.<\/p>\n Misinformation!<\/em>\u00a0covers a multitude of sins, sins that are not always random or inadvertent but quite often well-planned and carefully executed, many of them committed in the quest \u2013 the futile and medically counter-productive quest \u2013 to eliminate a coronavirus, something that has never before been done and cannot now be done.<\/a>[15]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0No one knows better than those who engineered SARS-CoV\u20132 that, like other coronaviruses, it cannot be eradicated by human measures and that there is in any case no need to eradicate it.<\/a>[16]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0But the phantasy of eradication must be maintained and\u00a0Misinformation!<\/em>\u00a0is the charm by which every threat to that phantasy is warded off.<\/p>\n I find it astonishing that so many people have not noticed how odd all this is, or how sinister. Can anyone who takes the slightest trouble to examine the facts doubt that we are faced with a plan, a ruthless plan, of global proportions? That the phantasy in question \u2013 together with the hysteria it feeds, the discrimination it breeds and, above all, the unconscionable abuse of children to which it leads and by which it will be damned<\/a>[17]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0has been carefully prepared and perpetuated? Some who are more or less immune to the\u00a0Misinformation!<\/em>\u00a0charm point to corporate greed, combined with political corruption and bureaucratic bumbling, to account for what has been unfolding around us. No doubt much of it can be accounted for in that way; that, after all, is the usual way. Yet what we are experiencing is not usual. It has the look and feel of a globalist coup.<\/p>\n To illustrate: It was already clear by late spring this year, from data in America and Europe, that adverse reactions and deaths through vaccine injury were at unprecedented and entirely unacceptable levels.<\/a>[18]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0The refusal of governments, international agencies, and the media to acknowledge this or to take account of it \u2013 the determination instead to keep on repeating the \u201csafe and effective\u201d mantra while maintaining the \u201cvaccine\u201d rollout at all costs \u2013 tells us that we are dealing with a criminal conspiracy. The fact that this rollout was supposed to be either \u201cone and done\u201d or \u201ctwo and done\u201d but has instead morphed into a perpetual booster program, backed with the threat of a lapsed health passport, points to the same conclusion.<\/a>[19]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0The documented psy-ops, backed where necessary by the adoption of jackboot methods, further cements the conviction that we are faced with a purpose and a plan. Mass dismissals of uncooperative doctors and nurses, and the imprisonment of protest leaders, deprives even the most reluctant onlooker of any contrary conclusion.\u00a0<\/a>[20]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n What is that plan, you ask? Who is behind it and how did it achieve such enormous reach and success? My best guess is that we are dealing with several overlapping plans: that of Bill Gates and his Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi), to make everyone dependent on Big Pharma; that of Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum, to effect the Great Reset; that of Xi Jingping and the Communist Party of China, to subvert democratic governance and economic power in the West; that of the eugenicists and transhumanists who inhabit the bowels of the Wellcome Trust;<\/a>[21]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0that of Peter Daszak and his EcoHealth Alliance, which appears to have worked with Anthony Fauci to fund and conduct enhanced-function coronavirus research in cooperation with the Chinese;<\/a>[22]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0that of Victor Dzau, who runs the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and helps to coordinate some of the others \u2013 to say nothing of George Soros, or the Rockefeller Foundation, or various other agents and agencies whose high and holy mission is \u201cto improve lives and the planet, and unleash human potential, through innovation.\u201d<\/a>[23]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n Please note: I am neither emulating nor mocking those despised conspiracy theorists who claim that one or more of these is deeply involved. I am not just rounding up the usual suspects. I have read or seen enough of their own aims and claims to conclude for myself that they are involved, in one fashion or another, though the particulars lie beyond my competence. Such organizations plainly have very deep pockets, very ambitious plans, and very extensive networks.<\/p>\n It is not at all unreasonable, then, to suppose that what we have been experiencing has been both planned and conducted with malice aforethought. Of course its engineers wouldn\u2019t call it malice, but \u201cunleashing human potential.\u201d Yet they have happily leashed us all in the process, preventing the sick from getting timely medical help from effective drug protocols,<\/a>[24]<\/sup><\/a>preventing the healthy from working or even leaving home without permission, dragging our whole society step by step into their bio-surveillance programs.<\/a>[25]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n What they will do with us then, when we are confined like dogs behind invisible fences moved at will by our masters, one shudders to imagine.<\/a>[26]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0It is not even clear what they will do with and to each other, for this much is certain: they can\u2019t all be in charge and they can\u2019t all get their own way. What\u2019s clear enough is that we are not dealing with men or women who themselves have boundaries, moral boundaries. We are dealing with scoundrels of the first order, who have upended whole societies and countries, and watched ordinary people suffer and die, to advance their own agenda. Nor, unless I miss my guess, have they yet got to the bottom of their bag of dirty tricks.<\/a>[27]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n As all this unfolds, what are we academics doing? Certainly not thinking! Just tiptoeing warily through campuses surrounded by billboards reminding us to wash up, wear masks, practice antisocial distancing, get vaccinated (again), report daily on our personal health, and stay safe. Our theatre of the absurd! Yet no one is permitted to say so, for this now is the nearest thing we have to a religion.<\/p>\n \u201cIn a world where everything is ridiculous,\u201d wrote G. K. Chesterton, \u201cnothing can be ridiculed. You cannot unmask a mask.\u201d\u00a0<\/a>[28]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0But unless my eyes deceive me, you can unmask a mask, because some people, conscious of the fact that the masks are as leaky as the \u201cvaccines,\u201d wear one on top of another, just as they take one booster on top of another. In a world where everything is ridiculous, you can\u2019t have enough masks to unmask! Nor can you have enough jabs. For there is no such thing as being fully vaccinated, not when Pfizer does your thinking for you and Pharma runs your immune system, tinkering at its pleasure.<\/a>[29]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n We ourselves are being unmasked, are we not?<\/p>\n I don\u2019t mean the university, which some time ago began peeling off sectors of its own moral economy for a share in Pharma\u2019s filthy lucre, and China\u2019s too; its present behaviour is not surprising. I mean we ordinary denizens of the university. Our masks are the most visible sacramental of the new religion. That we are willing to wear them for hours at a time, over months and even years, demonstrates our devotion, our dedication, like nothing else. Men without chests, to use Lewis\u2019s phrase, are becoming men without faces either. Our masters have told us to don the veil and we have done so. We are no longer free individuals, making rational choices of our own. We are the compliant, and the mask is our badge of compliance.<\/a>[30]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n In the meeting to which I alluded earlier, between members of the McGill Association of University Teachers and representatives of the senior administration, I pointed out the modest weekly virus-related death rate (0.2 per 100K in Quebec) and enquired whether such contortions as we are presently performing will have to be performed every time that very low bar is reached. One outraged colleague responded in the chat box, THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS DISEASE!\u00a0I restrained myself from replying that it seems a very serious case of rampant fervour than of rampant fever.<\/p>\n St. Augustine had us pegged long ago. In discussing the gods of the Romans and the folly of their devotees, he pointed out that all the evidence demonstrated that these gods did not actually exist, except in human fancy. And what could be more wretched, he asked, than \u201cfor a person to be under the dominion of a figment of his own imagination!\u201d<\/a>[31]<\/sup><\/a>\u00a0Augustine believed what Christians generally believed; namely, that behind such false gods were oppressive spiritual forces that enslaved people through their worship. He therefore invited his neighbours \u201cto acknowledge the true religion, by which the demons are unmasked and sent down to defeat.\u201d<\/a>[32]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n Behind the religion of fear in which so many colleagues and students seem to be enrolled, some of them my fellow Catholics, I too see spiritual forces that need to be unmasked and sent down to defeat. I don\u2019t mind saying that I pray fervently for just that! I also pray that colleagues and students who value academic freedom will stand and be counted alongside the courageous who have already stood.\u00a0<\/a>[33]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n To those who are valiant on other fronts, but who wish to sit out this particular battle, I say: There is no point pursuing academic freedom in a society that lacks personal and political freedom, or in an institution where one either worships the god COVID or is excluded from the communal life. There is far too much at stake to sit this out. We are witnessing the rise of something analogous to what we saw in the 1930s \u2013 not a national socialism, but a global socialism every bit as insidious, for which the watchwords are not Blood and Soil but Health and Environment.<\/p>\n (Edward Pentin<\/a>) \u2013\u00a0Editor\u2019s note: This essay, written by Professor Douglas Farrow, was first published on Edward Pentin\u2019s site.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n [1]<\/a>\u00a0Jeremy Isaacs, producer (Thames Television, 1973), vol. 9. See further Douglas Farrow,\u00a0Ascension Theology\u00a0<\/em>(T&T Clark 2011), 112 n. 62. Giorgio Agamben was the first to identify what we are now witnessing as a\u00a0religion<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/a>[2]<\/a>\u00a0Examples<\/a>, alas, abound.<\/p>\n <\/a>[3]<\/a>\u00a0See Julius Rueschel, \u201cThe Snake-Oil Salesmen and the\u00a0COVID-Zero Con<\/a>: A Classic Bait-And-Switch for a Lifetime of Booster Shots (Immunity as a Service).\u201d See further n. 14 below.<\/p>\n <\/a>[4]<\/a>\u00a0AMA COVID-19\u00a0GUIDE<\/a>: Background\/messaging on vaccines, vaccine clinical trials & combatting vaccine misinformation (Winter 2021). One learns there, for example, that one shouldn\u2019t say \u201chospitalizations\u201d but rather \u201cdeaths\u201d \u2013 as if the one led inevitably to the other.<\/p>\n <\/a>[5]<\/a>\u00a0On the former, see Laura Dodsworth,\u00a0A State of Fear\u00a0<\/em>(Pinter & Martin 2021), reviewed\u00a0here<\/a>. As for the latter, where does one begin, or\u00a0end<\/a>?<\/p>\n <\/a>[6]<\/a>\u00a0I have several times tried to warn against such actions. See, for example, \u201cLet the Dead Bury their Dead,\u201d \u201cThe Health-First Heresy,\u201d \u201cWhether There is a Moral Obligation to be Vaccinated,\u201d and \u201cUnclean! Unclean!\u201d, which can be found at\u00a0douglasfarrow.academia.edu<\/a>. I will add here that no one is bound by edicts issued without the requisite moral liceity and statutory authority.<\/p>\n <\/a>[7]<\/a>\u00a0At the time of writing, the rate is 0.7 in Canada as a whole and 0.3 in Quebec: this despite (a) denials of life-saving early treatment and (b) the inflated reckoning of deaths by including every deceased subject with a recent positive PCR test and (c) inclusion in some cases of vaccine-induced deaths. \u201cCOVID related<\/a>\u201c is, to say the least, an extremely generous category.<\/p>\n <\/a>[8]<\/a>\u00a0When the partially vaccinated are taken into account: see Norman Fenton and Martin Neil,\u00a0 \u201cProbability and Risk<\/a>,\u201d who rightly conclude that there is no foundation for vaccine mandates; cf. Chris Waldburger, \u201cBombshell<\/a>: U.K. data destroys entire premise of vaccine push.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/a>[9]<\/a>\u00a0See the mathematician Lubo\u0161 Motl\u2019s analysis of vaccine efficacy at\u00a0The Reference Frame<\/a>. With his customary rhetorical reserve, Motl laments the fact that so many Western nations \u201chave been totally overrun by these unhinged fanatics\u201d who worship PCR tests, \u201cone of the most characteristic symptoms of the disease of the Covidah Witnesses.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/a>[10]<\/a>\u00a0See. Charles Eisenstein,\u00a0Mob Morality<\/a>\u00a0and the Unvaxxed. See also David Cayley, \u201cThe Case Against Vaccine Passports\u201d (First Things<\/a>, 17 Sept. 2021).<\/p>\n <\/a>[11]<\/a>\u00a0These, including the Independent Oversight Advisory Committee \u2013 which before the pandemic began was already spreading the meme, \u201cFrom \u2018never again\u2019 to the \u2018new normal\u2019\u201d \u2013 are incestuously related; see further n. 13 below.<\/p>\n <\/a>[12]<\/a>\u00a0See COVID-19:\u00a0Make it the Last Pandemic<\/a>\u00a0(2021), chapter 6. This Independent Panel wants to \u201celevate political leadership for global health to the highest levels\u201d (46). In short, it wants to give more power over the planet to those who believe they know how to \u201cstrengthen universal peace in larger freedom,\u201d as the 2030\u00a0Preamble<\/a>\u00a0puts it. And who are these people? One supposes them to be very like those on the Panel.<\/p>\n <\/a>[13]<\/a>\u00a0At\u00a0sorting<\/a>\u00a0some of this, \u201cthe amazing Polly\u201d is pretty amazing; she was on the right track early. Anyone following up with their own review of the GPMB\u2019s\u00a0September 2019 Report<\/a>\u00a0will see that some people were peculiarly well-prepared for the COVID crisis.<\/p>\n <\/a>[14]<\/a>\u00a0In 2009, just before the swine flu episode, the\u00a0definition<\/a>\u00a0of a \u201cpandemic\u201d was changed to elide severity (which matters) and emphasize transmissibility (which, by itself, does not). Later the strategy for fighting a pandemic was changed from protecting the vulnerable (which again matters) to preventing transmission. Eventually the definition of \u201cherd immunity\u201d was changed to tie it to vaccines, the definition of \u201cvaccine\u201d was altered, and the measure of vaccine success likewise. All of these changes were designed to make Pharma field goals easier to kick. But with the appearance of\u00a0extraordinary<\/a>\u00a0search and seizure powers and\u00a0confinement<\/a>\u00a0camps they begin now to look more\u00a0sinister<\/a>\u00a0than that.<\/p>\n <\/a>[15]<\/a>\u00a0See Grant Brown, \u201cCan we really inject our way out of\u00a0this\u00a0<\/em>pandemic?\u201d (C2C Journal<\/a>, 22 September 2021).<\/p>\n <\/a>[16]<\/a>\u00a0After himself insisting on this point, Dr Eric Payne adds that \u201cAlberta Chief Medical Examiner of Health, Dr. Deena Hinshaw, shared evidence and publicly acknowledged that we cannot eradicate COVID-19 and are rather transitioning from a COVID-19 pandemic to endemic.\u201d Payne\u2019s well-documented\u00a0letter<\/a>\u00a0to the CPSA is worth reading in its entirety.<\/p>\n <\/a>[17]<\/a>\u00a0See \u201cWhy are we vaccinating children?\u201d (Toxicology Reports<\/a>, vol. 8, 2021, 1665-1684).\u00a0Good question<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/a>[18]<\/a>\u00a0\u201cThe EudraVigilance database reports that through June 19, 2021 there are\u00a015,472 deaths and 1,509,266 injuries\u00a0reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots\u201d (Technocracy News & Trends<\/a>). These numbers continue to climb. I have tried to warn my university that it will not escape liability for any damage suffered by students or staff through its constant pressure to get vaccinated.<\/p>\n <\/a>[19]<\/a>\u00a0\u201cMorphs\u201d is not quite the right word, perhaps. The European Commission, by 2018, already had in hand its\u00a0Roadmap for the Implementation of Actions<\/a>\u00a0that would establish vaccine passports and \u201caddress vaccine hesitancy.\u201d And as soon as \u201cvaccine\u201d orders were opened, the ever-profligate Justin Trudeau took options for enough doses to jab Canadians ten times each.<\/p>\n <\/a>[20]<\/a>\u00a0The citizen who is not utterly appalled by the dismissal or even threat of dismissal faced by so many conscientious doctors and nurses (see n. 24 below) is the citizen of a country I do not recognize. Likewise those who turn a blind eye to the arrest of principled young\u00a0women<\/a>\u00a0or\u00a0men<\/a>\u00a0for such high crimes and misdemeanours as refusing to wear a mask in a public place.<\/p>\n <\/a>[21]<\/a>\u00a0See Whitney Webb,\u00a0A \u201cLeap\u201d towards Humanity\u2019s Destruction<\/a>, which reads a bit like an update to C. S. Lewis\u2019s\u00a0That Hideous Strength.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/a>[22]<\/a>\u00a0See Ian Birrell,\u00a0Beijing\u2019s Useful Idiots<\/a>: Science journals have encouraged a false Covid narrative,\u201d and the (putatively) leaked Drastic Analysis\u00a0Project Defuse<\/a>\u00a0document.<\/p>\n <\/a>[23]<\/a>\u00a0Beware the\u00a0philanthropists<\/a>\u00a0and the Gaia worshipers alike! Both can be \u201chaters of the human race,\u201d to toss back an old epithet aimed at Christians in Roman days, especially where they are one and the same.<\/p>\n <\/a>[24]<\/a>\u00a0Thankfully, thousands of medical people are now\u00a0protesting<\/a>\u00a0against this. They need our support. They know very well that things have gone very seriously amiss. Dr Payne again (from the letter linked at n. 16 above): \u201cWhile I grew to respect and trust long-standing health organizations like the WHO and CDC, financial and political interests have crippled their independence, and during this pandemic, they have egregiously misrepresented facts and helped to censor scientific experts worldwide. This is not surprising, as it has been proven in court that WHO did not act ethically during the 2009 H1N1 swine flu \u201cpandemic\u201d when it came to their global vaccine agreements. These organizations that inform Canada health policy are completely compromised by vaccine and big pharma interest money.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/a>[25]<\/a>\u00a0If you think this fanciful, you might take the time to read\u00a0The Emerging Nowa Huta<\/a>, in which I probe the underlying logic of the extraordinary events we are experiencing, and to follow that essay\u2019s links, which will take you to institutional sources where various aspects of that logic appear.<\/p>\n <\/a>[26]<\/a>\u00a0Many things<\/a>\u00a0are becoming possible, things scientist in universities and in private labs are very keen to explore, and to explore without too much oversight. This, I think, explains some of the silence about the very bad \u201cscience\u201d behind official COVID policies.<\/p>\n <\/a>[27]<\/a>\u00a0In\u00a0The Fight for Canada<\/em>, Major William Wood discusses the criminal empire run in New France by Governor-General Rigaud (Marquis de Vaudreuil) and his brother, together with Fran\u00e7ois Bigot. Of the latter, he remarks that \u201che showed a truly satanic genius in all that he did\u201d (1905: 55). Of the former, after acknowledging his weakness of character, he says: \u201cYet he was so deeply involved in all the machinations of Bigot that he was drawn down from one bad step to another, until there was nothing for it but to let the confederates plunge the colony into utter confusion, in order to cover up their own misdoings\u201d (46). This illustration I offer in support of the Preacher\u2019s thesis that there is nothing new under the sun. But note well:\u00a0 What is transpiring today is not merely a fight for Canada, or even for Europe and its colonial dominions. It is a fight (as Patrick Wood maintains) against\u00a0global technocracy<\/a>, a fight for the whole world and every inhabitant thereof. What William Wood says of Bigot & Co. may be said, on a grander scale, of their globalist counterparts today: \u201cAltogether, it was one of the very worst bands of chartered brigands known to history that lived upon the misery of New France. And all their crimes were done officially, and with due decorum\u201d (55).<\/p>\n <\/a>[28]<\/a>\u00a0Illustrated London News<\/em>, 10 July 1927.<\/p>\n <\/a>[29]<\/a>\u00a0That, of course, is its gain and your loss. At present, natural immunity against COVID is more than ten times as effective as artificially induced immunity; by\u00a0this<\/a>\u00a0estimate, thirteen times. As for Pfizer, it has\u00a0more than once<\/a>\u00a0been forced to pay millions or even\u00a0billions<\/a>\u00a0for fraudulent marketing of dangerous products; but what is that against its\u00a0current profits<\/a>?<\/p>\n <\/a>[30]<\/a>\u00a0In the opening chapter of\u00a0The Abolition of Man\u00a0<\/em>(1943) Lewis points to the loss, especially in the academy, of those capacities and habits of heart that make men strong enough to be free: \u201cWe make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful\u201d (12). But I allude also to\u00a0Till We Have Faces\u00a0<\/em>(1956), a novel he originally entitled\u00a0Bareface<\/em>, which describes a movement from the masked self, which cannot recognize even itself, to the honest self capable of knowing the other as well as itself.<\/p>\n <\/a>[31]<\/a>\u00a0Augustine,\u00a0The City of God<\/em>, 8.23 (Babcock trans.; New City Press,, 2018).<\/p>\n <\/a>[32]<\/a>\u00a0Ibid., 7.35.<\/p>\n <\/a>[33]<\/a>\u00a0Dr Francis Christian at the University of\u00a0Saskatchewan<\/a>, for example, or Julie Ponesse at\u00a0Huron<\/a>, or Byram Bridle at\u00a0Guelph<\/a>; or even, if necessary, from the White Rose Society at\u00a0Munich<\/a>\u00a0during the dark days of the struggle with National Socialism.<\/p>\nQuis custodiet ipsos custodes?<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n
Unmasking the masked<\/strong><\/h4>\n
References<\/strong>:<\/h4>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Douglas-Farrow-featured-image-1024x680-1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n