![](\"http:\/\/www.silverbearcafe.com\/private\/11.21\/images\/charlatans.jpg\")
<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\nAs we exit the pandemic, expect to hear much more about\u00a0The Great Reset<\/a>\u00a0and building back better. Far from resulting in a low-carbon dream life, though, it\u2019s a cartoonish fantasy that will hand the\u00a0global elite<\/a>\u00a0even more power.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u2018The Great Reset<\/a>\u2019 is a term that has been bandied about quite readily by most Western neo-liberal politicians. So often, in fact, and without proper explanation, that it strikes the prudent observer as a kind of paid advertisement.<\/strong><\/p>\n But what is it exactly? The term\u00a0rose to prominence<\/a>\u00a0at the 50th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in June 2020. It was initially launched by the\u00a0Prince of Wales,<\/a>\u00a0before being absorbed into the philosophy of the sartorially\u00a0dystopian sci-fi villain<\/a>\u00a0Klaus Schwab<\/a>, founder and executive chairman of the WEF.<\/p>\n The Great Reset refers to a plan to rebuild the world\u2019s infrastructure \u2018in a sustainable way\u2019 following the economic ravages of the Covid-19 pandemic and to establish a global treaty to prevent future pandemics, or as it is\u00a0described<\/a>\u00a0more formally, to\u00a0\u201cbuild a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0If you ever hear people talking about \u201cbuilding back better,\u201d they are referring to\u00a0The Great Reset<\/a>.<\/p>\n Probably the most disturbing part of The Great Reset is how much it strongly resembles business-as-usual, only with EXTRA globalism. Most of the plan\u2019s outlines include a further weakening of national boundaries and individual national autonomy, in favour of a more \u2018universal governance.\u2019 As usual, it is the rapidly vanishing Western middle class which must\u00a0shoulder this burden<\/a>, as their freedoms are further curtailed to meet the quotas of corporate-media-fuelled activism.<\/p>\n Regardless, many world leaders, no doubt charmed into acquiescence by Schwab\u2019s commandingly sinister Blofeld-esque wardrobe, agreed to the\u00a0Great Reset<\/a>, including Boris Johnson, Emmanuel Macron, Angela Merkel, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, Mark Rutte, Pedro S\u00e1nchez, Erna Solberg and Volodymyr Zelensky. According to\u00a0John Kerry<\/a>, Joe Biden\u2019s administration is on board, too.<\/p>\n But the general agreement of the Western leaders is absolutely typical of any agenda which is espoused by NATO, the UN, or the WEF. If an emotionally charged, politically vague and ultimately ineffectual edict or bill is proposed by one of these entities \u2013 each resembling a shabby, globe-trotting team of insurance salesmen \u2013 our effete politicians line up to show the most fervent compliance.<\/p>\n As a rule, it seems their solutions to specific environmental or scientific problems mysteriously become entwined with\u00a0LGBTQ+ rights<\/a>, workplace equity, open borders initiatives and other unrelated social justice causes. It\u2019s as though any goals they have are somehow unilaterally from the same source, or entail the same solution, regardless of causality or consequence. Therefore, a united response to a global pandemic mysteriously also equals\u00a0trans rights<\/a>\u00a0activism.<\/p>\n In their\u00a0own words<\/a>,\u00a0\u201cNo single government or multilateral agency can address this (pandemic) threat alone. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly co-ordinated fashion.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n There are many other sweeping sentiments expressed by Schwab and his acolytes which can seem either trite or threatening.\u00a0Consider<\/a>\u00a0\u201cthe gulf between what markets value and what people value will close\u201d<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0\u201cwe want more attention paid to scientific experts. No one can \u201cself-isolate\u201d from climate change so we all need to \u201cact in advance and in solidarity.\u201d\u00a0<\/em>There is much talk of the pursuit of\u00a0\u201cfairer and equitable outcomes.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n International treaties always tend to be about concentrating power. It\u2019s one of those rules of life, for realists, as there is no escaping power dynamics in human affairs. Real problems don\u2019t often have feel-good solutions. Often, they require \u2018solutions that sound mean\u2019, that don\u2019t sound good on a corporate goals bulletin. Initiatives like\u00a0The Great Reset<\/a>\u00a0all entail the gradual loss of the autonomy of individual nations, as their decision-making power is transferred to an international, disembodied rule-maker.<\/p>\n It has been, without a doubt, a globalist fantasy for a long time, but the key question is: do they realise what they are doing or not?<\/p>\n As far as their amazing coordinated pandemic response goes, this appears to be nothing more than forced world-wide vaccinations for EVERYBODY. According to\u00a0Klaus Schwab<\/a>\u00a0himself: \u201cAs long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe.\u201d To which the attendant neo-liberal world leaders nodded in re-affirming unison, repeating in unison their mantra: \u201cGlobal public good.\u201d<\/p>\n BREAKING!\u00a0Klaus Schwab Calls For Global Health Pass Based On Implantable Microchip<\/a>.<\/p>\n