<\/p>\n
SOTN<\/strong><\/a> Editor’s Note: The following very important expos\u00e9 may appear to be irrelevant to the Kyle Rittenhouse case; however, reasons for packing the jury are many and diverse.\u00a0 In the Rittenhouse trial, the presented hard evidence provided overwhelming proof of Kyle’s innocence.\u00a0 Therefore, a lone government plant, even if he was the jury foreman, would draw extremely heavy suspicion were he to be the only juror not to vote for acquittal on all charges (as was done by the jury). See: ROGUE JUROR #54:<\/strong> All it takes is one government PLANT on a jury to sabotage the deliberation process or prevent an obvious acquittal.<\/a><\/p>\n However, what that planted juror did do was draw out the verdict deliberation process to a 3-day period.\u00a0 Any experienced criminal defense attorney will tell you that three days is TOTALLY unheard for such an open and shut case.\u00a0 The verdict should have been delivered same day.<\/strong><\/p>\n What this means is that the government-planted juror intentionally drew out the deliberation process as long as he could so as to present the appearance that there was serious doubt among the jurors.\u00a0 As follows:<\/p>\n Defense attorney says length of Rittenhouse jury’s deliberation instilled “doubt” prior to verdict.<\/p>\n “It was the longest jury deliberation I’ve ever been a part of.” https:\/\/t.co\/osaysWVXtG<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/6BO1cnAyMG<\/a><\/p>\n \u2014 ABC News (@ABC) November 19, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n