It\u2019s an absolute treasure trove of information and I would encourage you to review this great resource that he is updating in real time.<\/span><\/p>\nVAERS Data Likely Off by Factor of 41<\/b><\/p>\n
In his video, \u201cVaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,\u201d<\/b>3<\/b> the first episode of \u201cThe False Narrative Takedown Series,\u201d<\/b> Kirsch explains how to estimate COVID jab mortality, which he and a team of statisticians have done based on a variety of sources, including but <\/span>not limited to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).<\/b><\/p>\nKirsch estimates VAERS reporting is off by a factor of 41, and that anywhere from 150,000 to 300,000 Americans have died from the COVID shots.<\/b><\/p>\n
\u201cWe looked at eight different ways and VAERS is just one of the ways. So, when people say, \u2018You can’t use VAERS for this, you can’t [calculate] causality [based on VAERS data], I’m saying, \u2018Fine. We got the same answer using seven other ways.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nIn the VAERS analysis, we determined that VAERS was under-reported by a factor of 41, which is quite reasonable … Ten years ago we had a system where we could actually discover all the unreported things in VAERS, and they discovered VAERS was severely underreported by as much as 95 times. Vaccines that we thought were safe, they’re not safe at all. So, what did they do? They killed the project.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nSo, the reason that we have such a bad system today is that it is intentional. If we had a good system, it would show all the flaws for all of these vaccines that we’ve been giving people.\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nThe system is clearly intentionally designed from a technical standpoint to radically decrease the number of cases entered. <\/span>It takes more than 30 minutes to complete a single report<\/b> and you can\u2019t save it until completed, so if you walk away and get timed-out, you have to start all over.<\/span><\/p>\nKirsch knows a neurologist in California who claims to have 2,000 COVID jab-injured patients (out of a client base of 20,000),<\/b> but she\u2019s only filed two reports to VAERS. She doesn\u2019t have time for the rest. So, she\u2019s under-reporting by a factor of 1,000. Also, while doctors are required by law to file adverse event reports, <\/span>there\u2019s no enforcement, and no punishment for not filing.<\/b><\/p>\nIt is also important to note that no one is paid to enter this data. That could be a part time job for most clinicians, were they to responsibly report all the side effects and deaths.<\/span><\/p>\nCOVID Shots Are Far Deadlier Than the Infection<\/b><\/p>\n
Overall, his team\u2019s calculations suggest we\u2019re killing 411 people per million doses<\/b> (and remember Moderna and Pfizer are both two-dose regimens), worldwide. And that\u2019s just the short-term mortality. <\/span>We still have no concept of how these shots might impact mortality in the longer term.<\/b><\/p>\nTo put things into further perspective, October 21, 2021, an Italian investigation found that by changing the COVID mortality definition to only include cases where COVID-19 was the primary cause of death and there were no comorbidities decreased the death toll by 97%, from 130,000 to fewer than 4,000.<\/span><\/p>\nKirsch believes the real death tally from COVID-19 in the U.S. may be about 50% of the reported number. <\/span>This means about 380,000 Americans died from COVID-19<\/b> (rather than with COVID), whereas the COVID \u201cvaccine\u201d has killed as many as 300,000<\/span>. In other words, it\u2019s possible that the cure may be worse than the disease.<\/span><\/p>\nCOVID Shot Is the Deadliest \u2018Vaccine\u2019 Ever Created<\/b><\/p>\n
It gets even worse though<\/span>. In Pfizer\u2019s children\u2019s trial<\/b>, one of the participants, 12-year-old <\/span>Maddie De Garay, suffered a number of devastating events<\/b>, including paralysis. This side effect was misreported, however, and put down as \u201cabdominal pain.\u201d Neither the FDA nor the CDC has investigated the case, despite promising to do so. <\/span>Pfizer has refused to investigate it as well.<\/b><\/p>\nThese COVID vaccines are over 800 times deadlier than the deadliest vaccine in human history. <\/span>So, this isn’t a close call. These vaccines are the deadliest vaccines ever created by man. <\/span>And they’re promoted as safe and effective. ~ Steve Kirsch<\/b><\/p>\nIn the youth trial, 1 out of 1,131 children was paralyzed<\/b>. Meanwhile, Pfizer\u2019s adult trial shows that the shot saves one COVID death for every 22,000 fully-vaccinated people. <\/span>But for children, it\u2019s estimated we need to fully vaccinate over 630,000 kids to save one life<\/b>. <\/span>That means we may permanently disable as many as 557 kids per life saved<\/span>. <\/span>Meanwhile, there\u2019s not a single report of a healthy child dying from SARS-CoV-2 infection anywhere in the world.<\/b><\/p>\nThis means the number needed to vaccinate to save one otherwise healthy child from COVID death is actually infinite, as they\u2019re not dying from COVID to begin with. There simply is no doubt that <\/span>in children, the COVID shot is no benefit and all risk<\/b>. Kirsch notes:<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cDr. Paul Offit<\/i><\/b> was interviewed 20 years ago on \u2018<\/span><\/i>CBS 60 Minutes,\u2019 and he said the smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that we would never consider doing that in modern times<\/i><\/b>. It’s the most dangerous vaccine ever invented … <\/span><\/i>and the smallpox vaccines only kills one person per every million-people vaccinated, which is a lot.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nYou vaccinate 300 million people, you’re going to kill 300 people. That is unacceptable according to Offit, but he just voted for a vaccine that kills 822 people per million fully vaccinated [assuming a two-dose regimen].<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nThat means these COVID vaccines are over 800 times deadlier than the deadliest vaccine in human history. <\/i><\/b>So, this isn’t a close call. These vaccines are the deadliest vaccines ever created by man. And they’re promoted as safe and effective.\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nCOVID Shot Gets Deadlier the Younger You Are<\/b><\/p>\n
Based on a request from Dr. Peter McCullough, Kirsch also analyzed COVID jab mortality<\/b> based on age using the VAERS data. <\/span>For 80-year-olds, he found we kill two people to save one. For 20-year-olds, we kill six to save one.<\/span><\/p>\nThe younger you are, the greater the risk. The Kostoff analysis<\/span>4<\/span> found this general pattern as well<\/span>. Ronald N. Kostoff is a research affiliate in Gainesville, Virginia<\/b>, who in 2016 wrote an expert review on under-reporting of adverse events in the biomedical literature.<\/span>5<\/span><\/p>\nIn a review published in October 2021, Kostoff found five elderly are killed by the shots for each elderly person saved<\/b>, and the ratios get worse as you go down in age. That said, \u201cthe vaccines don’t make sense for any age group, which is exactly the same thing I found independently,\u201d Kirsch says.<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cNobody should get these vaccines<\/span><\/i>. There is no cost-benefit analysis that I have seen that shows it is beneficial … <\/span><\/i>I mean, you’re not going to take an intervention that is just as likely to kill you as to save you.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\nYou want to take an intervention which is at least 10 times more likely to save you than to kill you, because <\/span><\/i>it’s an optional intervention<\/i><\/b>. What kind of business do you have taking an intervention which has a marginal benefit for a completely unknown short- and long-term risk profile?<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nThe other thing I want to say is that, the societal benefit argument, people are saying, \u2018You’re selfish because you didn’t get vaccinated.\u2019 Well, that’s irrational.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nHave you ever seen a CDC analysis showing you the societal benefit of being vaccinated?<\/i><\/b> It doesn’t exist. And there’s a reason it doesn’t exist, because the societal benefit would be so tiny that it\u2019s ludicrous<\/span><\/i>. Today, we know the vaccinated are as likely to spread the virus as the unvaccinated. So where is the societal benefit?<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nIf there are no downsides [to the shot], then people would say, sure, maybe there’s some societal benefit. I’ll do that. But here your life is at stake and the data show that roughly 1 in 1,000 will get killed by these vaccines. <\/span><\/i>So, if I say, hey, suppose sacrificing your life could save 100 person years (e.g., 10 people given another 10 years of life).<\/i><\/b><\/p>\nWhen I asked this live in a clubhouse room with a few hundred people, nobody raised their hand to volunteer to do that<\/i><\/b> \u2014 to sacrifice their life to save 100 person years. And I said, \u2018OK, what about 1,000 person years? If you could sacrifice your life to save people 1,000 person years, would you do it? Nobody would do that. It’s nonsensical.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nWe have a constitutional right to life …<\/i><\/b> And I don’t think you’re being selfish about it. You have a family, you have friends, you have loved ones, you have people you interact with … Why would I ask you to sacrifice your life? To save people you don\u2019t know?<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nEverybody has their own special way that they contribute to society. Why would we ever ask somebody to [sacrifice their life for a potential social benefit]? Maybe we should ask Joe Biden, \u2018<\/span><\/i>Joe, if you could give up your life to save 1,000 person-years, would you do that?<\/i><\/b>\u2019 It would be very interesting to see what he says.\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nCDC Performs Statistical Magic, Again<\/b><\/p>\n
Countering all of this data we have a recent CDC analysis,<\/span>6<\/span> which concluded that people who get the COVID shot are two-thirds less likely to die of any cause.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cI sent <\/i><\/b>Janet Woodcock<\/i><\/b> my deck of 180 questions. I said, \u2018Janet, I bet you can’t answer any of these 180 questions. Doesn’t this concern you?\u2019<\/i><\/b> She sends back an email saying, \u2018Look at the CDC analysis, showing that after you get the jab, there’s this two-thirds drop in mortality.\u2019<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nMy friends and I, when we saw in that paper, we were laughing our heads off over here. The stats on 18- to 44-year-olds [show] 35% die from accidents. The rest die from disease \u2014 cancer, heart disease, whatever.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nThe only way to get a two-thirds reduction [in all-cause mortality] is if nobody dies from anything anymore \u2014 any disease \u2014 and we also reduce the number of accidents that they have <\/span><\/i>… This is the immortality drug. All kidding aside, there’s no mechanism of action that could possibly justify that people are going to be better off from a health perspective after getting these vaccinations. Zero.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\nNothing is improved. You are not immortal. You are just the opposite; your immune system is compromised. You’re also more likely to get COVID. <\/span><\/i>In the U.K., the government numbers show that 40-year-olds, after the honeymoon period is over, were more than twice as likely to get infected if they were vaccinated.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\nIn the U.S.,<\/i><\/b> you have hospitals where you have a 50% community vaccination rate and the <\/span><\/i>hospital admissions are 90% vaccinated people. You can’t make these statistics up.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\nIn fact, the CDC was confronted by these statistics by <\/span><\/i>Aaron Siri<\/i><\/b>, who wrote about it on his <\/span><\/i>