{"id":98138,"date":"2021-11-25T17:04:20","date_gmt":"2021-11-25T21:04:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=98138"},"modified":"2021-11-25T17:06:18","modified_gmt":"2021-11-25T21:06:18","slug":"98138","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stateofthenation.co\/?p=98138","title":{"rendered":"This is exactly how the American bolsheviks intend this raging civil war to end.<\/b>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Are You Ready To Be An American Kulak?<\/strong> <\/em><\/h1>\n

Revolver<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

If one takes the ideologues who rule over America at their word, then the governing principles of this country\u2019s reigning regime are things like fairness, equality, diversity, or \u201canti-racism.\u201d<\/p>\n

But of course, anybody with a brain today isn\u2019t taking America\u2019s rulers at their word. It is obvious, and has been for many years now, that there is no spirit of \u201cfairness\u201d or \u201canti-racism\u201d in the heart of their ideology. Instead, the spirit at the heart of America\u2019s leadership is bitter, envious, resentful, hateful.<\/p>\n

Who is it hateful toward? You know who. The modern American regime is built on explicit, institutionalized hostility to the people who most resemble the great Americans of the past. It is anti-white, anti-male, anti-Christian, anti-rural, and anti-middle class. The more of these traits a person has, the more worthy of hate they become. The more the Globalist American Empire decays and squanders the inheritance it was given, the more bile and hatred it directs against those who symbolize what came before.<\/strong><\/p>\n

But those on the receiving end of this new discriminatory regime may not appreciate its full scope or the ultimate fate that the Globalist American Empire has planned for them. They may see recent anti-white animus as a temporary spell, or a limited affair that can be waited out.<\/p>\n

They are wrong. America\u2019s shrinking white middle class are the target of an ever-intensifying cycle, whose mechanics are ripped straight from another oppressive regime, the Soviet Union of the 1920s and 30s.<\/p>\n

The white American middle class have become America\u2019s kulaks \u2014 Blamed for every problem, vilified for every success, and deserving of every punishment. Their destruction has become a fundamental goal of American political life.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

What was a kulak? The term comes from Russian, and like so many other words popularized by a radical left regime, the definition was anything but stable. As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn explained a half-century ago in The Gulag Archipelago:<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

In Russian a kulak is a miserly, dishonest rural trader who grows rich not by his own labor but through someone else\u2019s, through usury and operating as a middleman. In every locality even before the Revolution such kulaks could be numbered on one\u2019s fingers. And the Revolution totally destroyed their basis of activity. Subsequently, after 1917, by a transfer of meaning, the name kulakhegan to be applied (in official and propaganda literature, whence it moved into general usage) to all those who in any way hired workers, even if it was only when they were temporarily short of working hands in their own families.<\/p>\n

\u2026<\/p>\n

[T]he inflation of this scathing term kulak proceeded relentlessly, and by 1930 all strong peasants in general were being so called \u2014 all peasants strong in management, strong in work, or even strong merely in convictions. The term kulak was used to smash the strength of the peasantry.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2026<\/p>\n

[A]nd now these peasants, whose breadgrain had fed Russia in 1928, were hastily uprooted by local good-for-nothings and city people sent in from outside. Like raging beasts, abandoning every concept of \u201chumanity,\u201d abandoning all humane principles which had evolved through the millennia, they began to round up the very best farmers and their families, and to drive them, stripped of their possessions, naked, into the northern wastes, into the tundra and the taiga.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

In short order, kulaks were the catch-all class enemy for the Bolshevik regime. Peasant uprisings were \u201ckulak revolts,\u201d because it was inconceivable that ordinary peasants might rebel against the workers\u2019 paradise. And any ordinary civilians who opposed agricultural collectivization, or were simply seen as a threat to local leaders, were apt to be branded kulaks or kulak-enablers.<\/p>\n

The consequences of being a kulak were lethal, as shown by Lenin\u2019s \u201cHanging Order\u201d of 1918:<\/a><\/p>\n

Comrades! The revolt by the five kulak volost\u2019s must be suppressed without mercy. The interest of the entire revolution demands this, because we have now before us our final decisive battle with the kulaks. We need to set an example.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1) You need to hang (hang without fail, so that the public sees) at least 100 notorious kulaks, the rich, and the bloodsuckers.<\/strong>
\n2) Publish their names.
\n3) Take away all of their grain.
\n4) Execute the hostages \u2013 in accordance with yesterday\u2019s telegram.<\/p>\n

This needs to be accomplished in such a way, that people for hundreds of miles around will see, tremble, know and scream out: let\u2019s choke and strangle those blood-sucking kulaks.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Telegraph us acknowledging receipt and execution of this.<\/p>\n

Yours, Lenin<\/p>\n

P.S. Use your toughest people for this.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

After the civil war, the purge of kulaks paused, but in 1928 Joseph Stalin reignited the persecution with a furious campaign of \u201cde-kulakization.\u201d State propaganda organs collectively denounced the kulaks as a class, deserving of annihilation, and all the while the definition kept expanding.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

By 1930, a kulak was defined as anybody who used hired labor, owned a mill or other processing equipment, rented land, engaged in moneylending, or otherwise collected an income through non-labor sources. Kulaks were accused of sabotaging the Soviet government by withholding grain from the market and otherwise being the source of the state\u2019s problems.<\/p>\n

And so, throughout the 1930s, \u201cde-kulakization\u201d was the order of the day. Kulaks has their land and grain seized without compensation, and were herded to far-off labor camps. As the kulaks were liquidated, the USSR\u2019s agricultural system fell into chaos, plunging the country into a famine which killed millions. But these failures only escalated the amount of hatred heaped onto the kulak \u201cwreckers,\u201d who continued to face deportation or an executioner\u2019s bullet. Such was the fate of the left\u2019s designated enemies.<\/p>\n

An important component of de-kulakization is that the kulaks were a scapegoat. From the beginning they were an easy target; envy of the haves by the have-nots is a constant of all human history, and in Communism\u2019s case was foundational to its whole worldview. But Communism didn\u2019t work, so the core ideas of the USSR were fundamentally impossible. When harvests, industrial output, and overall growth failed to meet the Communist Party\u2019s lofty promises, this led to even more hatred heaped on the kulaks. The kulaks were a living, humiliating embodiment of the system\u2019s failure: Peasants who succeeded based on their own abilities and not as a collective achievement of socialist will.<\/p>\n

And so it is again, today. Who is the American kulak? Like in the USSR, the definition is loose and ever-expanding. Some of the traits that push one toward kulakdom are obvious: Superficial markers like being white and male. But other kulak traits are less immediately obvious. They are the social markers of kulakdom: Being a small business owner, being the married parent of young children, being a heritage American descended from those who sailed on the Mayflower, signed the Declaration of Independence, or fought in the Civil War.<\/p>\n

Like the Russian kulaks, American kulaks represent the national hinterland. They are physically and politically remote from any center of real power, yet vilified as the source of all the nation\u2019s problems. Unlike the Russian kulak, American kulakdom is racialized: To be a white is to be a kulak, unless one is admitted to a narrow band of the elect. But it is not exclusively whites who are kulaks. Just as in Russia a poor peasant who aggravated the regime was swiftly branded a kulak, a non-white who makes too much common cause with \u201cwhite\u201d priorities will also be a kulak, as NYU professor Cristina Beltr\u00e1n wrote in The Washington Post<\/em>:<\/a><\/p>\n

Rooted in America\u2019s ugly history of white supremacy, indigenous dispossession and anti-blackness, multiracial whiteness is an ideology invested in the unequal distribution of land, wealth, power and privilege. \u2026 Multiracial whiteness reflects an understanding of whiteness as a political color and not simply a racial identity \u2014 a discriminatory worldview in which feelings of freedom and belonging are produced through the persecution and dehumanization of others.<\/p>\n

\u2026<\/p>\n

Multiracial whiteness offers citizens of every background the freedom to call Muslims terrorists, demand that undocumented immigrants be rounded up and deported, deride BLM as a movement of thugs and criminals, and accuse Democrats of being blood-drinking pedophiles.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The American kulak, whatever his color, is a person who understands the great country that America was. They are a person who expects and demands safe streets, effective infrastructure, and quality public schools, and who helped create and perpetuate those things in the past.<\/p>\n

The American kulak is a person who remembers and longs for a country that didn\u2019t hate its own people, its own heroes, its own history. The American kulak is a person who believes in all those mundane traits that CRT handouts describe as facets of \u201cwhite supremacy.\u201d<\/p>\n