Are There Two Coronas – One an Almost Fatal Weaponized Agent, Another a Virus?
by Dee McLachlan
The numbers just don’t stack up.
I’m sure some mathematicians are crunching the numbers and realizing that they probably make no sense. Even the US government don’t believe what’s going on. Doctors must be scratching their heads. There are reports that most symptoms are “mild”, but then there are accounts of entire families quickly dying agonizing deaths, and descriptions of bodies “melting” and just falling over in the streets.
There is also the exiled Chinese billionaire, Guo Wengui, saying that about 1.5 million people are infected and deaths are in the region of 50,000 — with Chinese officials burning bodies to cover up the true extent of the crisis. This led to a report and images of sulfur dioxide plumes over Wuhan indicating the incineration of organic material — which media sites attribute to the cremation of bodies. (Times Fact Check claims the reports of this are false.)
And then there is the HalTurner report on the leaked texts from an 18-year-old in upstate New York in the US. He was allegedly using his father’s cellphone and saw the text message exchange between his dad and Dr Nancy Messonnier, the Director of the Center for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) within the CDC. She wrote:
“We’re trying to prevent panic, as that will only make things worse. Please keep that between us. There have already been over 1,000 cases in the U.S.”
Also, many of us have seen the horrific videos of people being “escorted” (more like hauled) away by medico-suited teams.
I spoke to my brother, living in South Africa, a few days ago. A close friend of his is an English teacher that decided to have a new experience and went off to teach English in Wuhan. She returned to South Africa for a holiday around the 20th of January (I think) about two days before airports were locked down. The teacher was greeted warmly on her return with hugs and kisses all around. And then the scare began. Fortunately she was tested negative.
Analysis of Three “Closed Systems”
We don’t really get an accurate portrayal of the disaster in viewing the whole, so let me analyse three essentially “closed systems” — a household, ship, and a city.
The Film Director’s Family
Chang Kai, a director at Hubei Film Studios, died from the virus along with his father, mother, and sister.
Variety (the film industry broadsheet) carried the story on the 17th February 2019, and wrote:
“..the Chinese media reported that Chang’s father and mother were infected and died one after the other. Chang and his sister, who looked after their parents at home, were both infected with the virus as a result. His sister died just hours later.” [My emphasis]
Chang’s wife is also infected, apparently still alive, and is battling the virus in an intensive care unit. The BBC reported a note written by the director (just before he died), that was published on Caixin:
“…[the note] revealed the ordeal the 55-year-old had to go through before his death… his father had come down with a fever, cough and had difficulty breathing. ‘He was taken to many hospitals for treatment, but [was] told no beds [were] available,’
“A few days later his father died, followed afterwards by his mother… ‘The ruthless virus also devoured my wife and my body. I went to various hospitals and begged [to be admitted]. Beds were hard to find… we are nobody,’ … He died on 14 February, with his wife still battling the illness.”
Chang Kai leaves behind a son, who is reportedly studying in the UK.
What terrible statistics for a family. One has to consider that the two parents were elderly. Still, there were five in the household — all allegedly contracted COVID-19; four have died (quickly) and only one clings to life. 100% infection, and so far 80% mortality in a family unit. It may turn out to be 100%. Wow.
(Note: I was unable to find his profile on the major film database IMDB. Also, it is not clear what happened to the wife.)
The Diamond Princess Ship
The Diamond Princess ship is another interesting “sample” population — though maybe it is a biased sample, as theses people are crammed in one location. But let’s look at the stats.
As of February 2, 2020, the number of COVID-19 cases aboard the Diamond Princess cruise ship was 540 — out of 3700 guests and crew. Even with strict quarantine measures on board after the initial cases, the virus continued to spread.
That’s about a 15% transmission in a partly closed ‘system’. (With people being evacuated from the ship, the system is no longer closed.)
Reports are saying that that the RO of CoViD-19 has a value ranging between 1.4 and 3.8. RO is the mathematical term that indicates how contagious an infectious disease is — i.e., the number of persons a sick person infects. But the ship indicates an RO much higher (though in an artificially confined space).
Now to my third model. There are over 11 million people in Wuhan — the ninth most populous Chinese city. Wuhan became a ‘closed quarantined system’ similar to the ship.
But consider — let’s be conservative with the transmission rate of the ship to that of Wuhan and guesstimate that 5% of Wuhan is infected. That would mean, with ONE THIRD the infection rate of the ship, there could be as many as 550,000 infected with CoViD-19 in Wuhan alone.
Considering that the virus has now spread across China, maybe the Chinese billionaire is right — that there are at least 1.5 million infected.
Number of Deaths
Can we believe the figures out of China? No. So how does one estimate the number of deaths from the virus?
In the Chang Kai family household, the mortality so far is 80% (maybe 100%). Truly frightening. On the Diamond Princess it is said that two elderly people have passed away. Two out of 540 so far is 0.36% mortality.
Why the huge discrepancy? In one closed family unit it is 80-100%, the other closed unit is less than half a percent.
What’s going on?
Could there be a genetic component to the virus, or as some people are writing — there is a technology component to the virus, namely, 5G.
Many people are concerned about the dangers of 5G — and many scientific documents on the health effects of 5G claim that it can cause flu-like symptoms. Could 5G somehow assist the virus in a body already challenged by dealing with EMFs. And Wuhan is apparently one of the 5G cities,
“WUHAN, Oct. 31  (Xinhua) — The branches of Chinese major telecom operators in central China’s Hubei Province announced Thursday the launch of commercial 5G applications in the province. Wuhan City, the capital of Hubei, is expected to have 10,000 5G base stations by the end of 2019, said Song Qizhu, head of Hubei Provincial Communication Administration.”
So is the suggestion of 5G valid?
Mike Adams has just published an article about CoVid-19 being specifically engineered biological warfare weapon, designed to exterminate human beings.
“A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Antiviral Research (Vol. 16, April 2020) is entitled, “The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade.”
This allows it to function as a more efficient weapon system for human-to-human transmission, making the virus almost impossible to contain (even under “quarantine” conditions).
Mike Adams, if I recall correctly, has also reported on the strange and almost immediate way some people have died in China — e.g., seemly just falling over and dying in the street.
Looking at the Chang Kai family and the guests on the ship, something doesn’t add up. It seems the “illness” on the ship does not correlate what killed off the film director and his family.
Are there two different viruses? Different bio-weapons?
Was there a deadly accidental bio-weapon release in Wuhan, and to disguise this, an upgraded SARS-like virus was released to disguise an accident? Perhaps I am clutching at straws, but we need to do some speculating.
I was thinking about the strange anomalies in the reports, when a reader, Gil, forwarded me an article on the Chinese Intelligence officer. There is no way to verify it, but there’s a strange logic to some of the contents.
The Chinese Intelligence Officer
It is a very disturbing report allegedly written by a senior Chinese military intelligence officer — claiming to have access to a great deal of classified information — telling us the “virus” is far worse than the media are reporting. That I can believe — but hope it’s not true.
Essentially he claims that the virus was the accidental release of a very powerful and deadly bio-weapon. It is a complex tale of the Chinese experimenting on prisoners and trying to find the perfect “weapon” to dumb down the protesters in Hong Kong — to make them compliant. From there it all goes wrong, and a terrible bio-weapon is accidentally released and Wuhan becomes a city in lock-down and a graveyard.
Agent or Virus?
“Last year, large-scale anti-government protests erupted in Hong Kong… The U.S. government and the EU both knew that the Chinese were secretly working on a biological agent that was supposed to make the protesters docile and obedient.
“… the Hong Kong protests meant that we redoubled our efforts. We exposed the inmates [Islamic radicals, etc] to various “alpha” experimental agents… Once the initial experiments had yielded a “beta” agent, it was transported to Hubei Province, where it was deployed in a special military testing facility outside the city of Wuhan.
“By then our President had already introduced a “social credit” system that allowed us to identify disloyal, counter-revolutionary and bourgeois elements in our society… Once these troublemakers had been collected and placed in the testing facility, we exposed them to the Agent, which is biochemical in nature and spread in an invisible aerosol, akin to certain viruses. Initial results were encouraging, as we saw significant cognitive decline and reduction in higher mental processing facilities.
And then the account reads like a spy novel. The Americans become involved and tried to bribe an official. There was a shoot-out at the Wuhan market, and a vial is dropped — the weapon released. (The article is suspiciously well written — in English.)
The article continues:
“In reality, of course, there is no “coronavirus”. It was all made up. It was one of my colleagues who came up with the genius idea of pretending that people with the common flu suffered from the coronavirus. [It’s flu season] This allowed us to hide the true nature of the disease. Let me explain.
“…When we realised that we could no longer control the spread of the Agent, we sent our men to all the hospitals and instructed all doctors to diagnose every case of the common flu as “coronavirus”. We came up with a new name — 2019-nCoV — and handed out “factsheets” that described a made-up illness.
“… it allowed us to push the narrative that the disease was not that deadly; it also gave us time to prepare for the catastrophe that was sure to come by imposing a lockdown on Wuhan and other cities in Hubei Province. You have not heard this in the news — and given the size of Wuhan, with its population of 11 million, it is not known even to many of the residents — but within days thousands upon thousands were infected [with the weapon] and before long they suffered the agonising deaths that I have already described. Within a week, there were so many corpses that we did not know what to do with them… “
The account only get worse.
So could there be two agents on the loose?
I watched one video where a patient displayed severe symptoms, but was initially tested negative for the corona virus. In the video below and man is running and then just peels over. Another bedridden person displays uncontrollable shaking.
There is a virus, as doctors around the world are testing for one (now called CoVid-19). But did the Chang Kai family die from the virus or a deadly and almost fatal bio-weapon?
And are the Princess passengers becoming ill from a deliberately released — as a cover — to disguise a disaster that may have occured in Wuhan.
At this moment it is anyone’s guess, but I do know the mode of death and the stats do not add up. This article is written to spark discussion.
A compilation of videos below: