The charge of intellectual “anti-Semitism” is considered a far more heinous crime than support for Israeli genocide. This is Talmudic praxis.
By Jonas E. Alexis, Senior Editor | VT
In a recent development that almost seems too absurd to be true, Bill Ackman has declared that the stories about his wife, Neri Oxman, being caught plagiarizing were motivated by antisemitism!
The question arises: Are we being naïve, or could it be possible that major universities are making a grave mistake by allowing individuals like Ackman to gain a foothold? Perhaps this is precisely why there were restrictions on their significant influence in universities back in the 1920s. I find myself wondering about the perspective Jared Taylor might offer on this matter. It’s intriguing why Taylor opts for silence amidst this perplexing phenomenon.
JEA: The Guardian refers to Bill Ackman, the Jewish billionaire hedge fund manager, as “chief among the campaigners celebrating the resignation of Claudine Gay as president of Harvard University.”[1] Ackman was one of the first Jews who accused Gay of anti-Semitism and of plagiarism. Ackman tweeted no less than 100 times about Gay to his one million followers, saying things like she ought to be fired immediately for not addressing the issue of anti-Semitism on campus at Harvard on the eve of the Israel-Hamas war.
Ackman emphasized that a prestigious institution like Harvard shouldn’t tolerate individuals like Gay, citing allegations of plagiarism against her as a clear reason for her unsuitability. Ackman added that the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion movement was the “root cause of antisemitism at Harvard.”[2] But as the Guardian reported, there’s more to Ackman than initially meets the eye and ear:
“Ackman’s campaign came after ‘years of resentment,’ the New York Times reported, in part because his donations to Harvard did not give him greater influence over the university.”[3]
Gregg Gonsalves, an epidemiologist at Yale University, seemed to agree with the NY Times when he said:
“Bill Ackman is a pernicious influence on American education. He thinks his money equals wisdom, and even if it doesn’t, he thinks it gives him the right to bully at will. Time to stand up to people like him. He’s odious.”
Let’s take a quick pause and consider the perennial question: Was the real issue about Gay’s plagiarism? The answer resoundingly suggests otherwise. Ackman’s wife, Neri Oxman, a tenured Israeli-American professor at MIT, has also been found to be a plagiarist. The discovery occurred just a few days after Ackman was complaining about Gay’s plagiarism and after Gay resigned from Harvard. As the Daily Beast itself puts it, Oxman “plagiarized passages of her 2010 doctoral dissertation.”[4] The Daily Beast continued:
“Oxman engaged in a ‘similar pattern of plagiarism’ in her dissertation, according to Business Insider, plagiarizing from papers found in Nature, the Royal Society of London and a 1998 book published by Claus Mattheck, a German physicist. Oxman responded to Business Insider’s story via X, formerly Twitter, saying she was double checking her work to determine if there are indeed any errors. ‘When I obtain access to the original sources, I will check all of the above citations and request that MIT make any necessary corrections,’ she said. ‘I regret and apologize for these errors.’”[5]
In his relentless quest to get Gay fired over the charge of plagiarism, Ackman argued that “Students are forced to withdraw for much less.”[6] The central question now is pretty much simple, will Ackman relentlessly ask MIT to fire his wife? Commenting on Gay, Ackman said: “Rewarding her with a highly paid faculty position sets a very bad precedent for academic integrity at Harvard.”[7]
What about Oxman, Bill? Would that apply to her as well? If not, wouldn’t that be an infallible sign of double standard and duplicitous act? Identifying this hypocrisy doesn’t require a genius. And it was only a matter of time that much of the media would call out Ackman. As Mike Solana puts it:
“When he says ‘I love you,’ but Ackman said would they accuse you of plagiarism, I would burn the institutions to the ground, and salt the earth where they once stood, let there be a thousand dark ages, and you, lordess of my castle laboratory, my dark queen for eternity.’”
Another commenter declares: “Real talk, kids. If I look like this at age 47, and my husband’s a billionaire, you can catch me plagiarizing every thirty seconds and I will not give a flying fuck.”
Once again, when Oxman was caught red-handed, Ackman again declared that it is “a near certainty that authors will miss some quotation marks and fail to properly cite or provide attribution for another author on at least a modest percentage of the pages of their papers. Some plagiarism is due to the laziness of the author. Laziness is not a great excuse for a member of the faculty, but it does not seem like a crime to me. It is more a reflection of the competency and motivation of the faculty member. In the real world, employees can be fired for being lazy, but this can be challenging to do under the tenure system.”
There is more to Bill Ackman than meets the eye:
“In addition to copying from fellow scholars and her academic mentee, BI noted 15 instances in which Oxman copied sentences and whole paragraphs from Wikipedia without providing any attribution. For instance, Oxman copied hundreds of words from the Wikipedia entry on ‘Weaving’ without adding quotation marks. (To conduct its analysis, BI used archived versions of Wikipedia to review the exact language that appeared on the site in 2010, when Oxman published her dissertation.)
“Since BI published its report, critics have claimed that the story is a tit-for-tat response to Ackman’s own plagiarism charges against Gay. That’s almost certainly true, although an internal review nonetheless found that the article was “accurate and well documented” with “no unfair bias.” Nevertheless, Ackman has threatened to sue BI and its related corporate entities, in what may well become the next example of billionaires trying to punish the free press for unflattering coverage.
“While Oxman herself has admitted that she should have used quotation marks and has apologized for the mistakes, Ackman has attempted to deflect the charges against his wife, tweeting that Wikipedia is somehow exceptional as an ‘open source platform’ and that, therefore, copying from it should not count as plagiarism.”
Norman Finkelstein puts it best:
“Ackman: Jews don’t plagiarize; only schwarzes do! Jewish billionaire William Ackman was angry that Harvard students opposed genocide in Gaza. He was angry that Harvard president Claudine Gay didn’t suppress the students’ First Amendment right to speech and assembly. He then demanded that Gay be ousted because she supposedly committed plagiarism. Gay was ousted. When a Jewish billionaire says that the Black president of Harvard must go, she goes. But then it was discovered that Ackman’s wife, an Israeli-born former lieutenant in the Israeli air force, committed plagiarism. Ackman is now hopping mad. Only schwarzes are supposed to be punished for plagiarism. Ackman is now threatening to expose plagiarism among faculty at MIT (where his plagiarizing wife taught). I for one am relieved that Ackman didn’t order his wife to drop 2,000-pound bombs on MIT.
It appears that Ackman might retain a semblance of common sense, despite years seemingly steeped in Talmudic/Israeli ideology. However, he seems unable to employ that fragment of common sense, as he realizes it would dismantle his entire ideological framework.
Obviously Oxman’s plagiarism does not mean that she needs to get fired, according to Ackman himself. Oxman wrote on Twitter: “Part of what makes her human is that she makes mistakes, owns them, and apologizes when appropriate.”[8] Take it from Business Insider:
“That’s a starkly different approach than the one he took toward Gay after she stepped down earlier this week…. ‘Gay was accused, accurately in at least some of the cases, of using verbatim text from outside sources and, though in most cases the source was cited, it was not marked as quoted text,’ Jonathan Bailey, a plagiarism expert, told Business Insider. ‘That seems to be pretty much what happened here with Oxman.’”[9]
The next project for so-called conservative activists or people who are concerned about plagiarism like Elise Stefanik, Phillip Magness, Christopher Rufo and Christopher Brunet, who rightly condemn Gay for not giving proper credit, should involve questioning individuals such as Ackman. They should ask why people like Ackman can’t condemn their own peers (or wives) for the same behavior they accuse others of. If these activists fail to do so, it could indicate that they’ve been influenced or incentivized to act as puppets.
Neri Oxman Was Tied to Jeffrey Epstein
There is one last thing about Bill Ackman and his wife that should be brought to the light. In a 2019 article entitled “A meeting with Jeffrey Epstein led to a gift — and, now, regrets,” Deirdre Fernandes of the Boston Globe declared that
“Oxman’s lab, Mediated Matter, received $125,000 tied to Epstein over the years. And because MIT did not want the disgraced financier to use the gift to help rehabilitate his reputation, Oxman was told it would be kept confidential. The 2015 meeting offers a window into how the Media Lab was at once concerned about the optics of taking money from Epstein — a convicted sex offender who had by then served a 13-month sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution — and also tempted by his potential to donate and encourage others to give to the research center… Oxman, 43, who is currently on maternity leave, said Ito and some of the brightest minds at MIT seemed to have given their endorsement of Epstein.”[10]
MIT, we are told, “received around $800,000 in funding from the now-deceased sex offender.” Oxman herself wrote a letter or dossier saying that this was actually confidential money. Oxman, “along with other professors, were invited to dine with Epstein on several occasions, though she said she never attended. And in 2017, Ito requested that her design lab, which often produced donor gifts for the university, send a token of appreciation to Epstein: a grapefruit-sized, 3-D printed marble with a base that lit up. It came with a pair of gloves to avoid getting fingerprints on the surface. She complied, and asked lab members to mail it to Epstein’s Manhattan address.”[11]
When Oxman was getting too comfortable with Epstein, one student actually emailed her saying, “Have you read the articles about this Jeff Epstein? He seems pretty shady. . . . Just wanted to point it out in case you weren’t aware.” Oxman responded by saying, “Joi [Joichi Ito] and I are aware.”[12] Fernandes writes, “In the e-mail string, Oxman added that ‘Jeff E.’ should always be ‘confidential.’”[13]
Did Bill Ackman know about this? Of course. This is again from the Boston Globe: “journalists have asked questions of MIT about Oxman’s lab sending the gift to Epstein. According to e-mails obtained by the Globe, Ito asked Oxman how she wanted to respond to media questions. Oxman’s husband, William Ackman, a hedge-fund billionaire, in a phone conversation and e-mail to Ito raised concerns about Oxman’s name being tied to the Epstein situation…”[14] Here is what Ackman said:
“I don’t want to see her forced into a position where to protect her name she is required to be transparent about everything that took place at MIT with Epstein. Once her name appears in the press, she will face a barrage of questions, and anything other than perfect transparency to the media will make her look like she is hiding something. This has regretfully become a witch hunt.”[15]
It’s becoming evident that Gay’s dismissal wasn’t about plagiarism. Bill Ackman had a specific agenda in mind. His wife is an American-Israeli, and obviously she would more than likely support what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians in Gaza. Therefore, Ackman had to dress his ideology in light of an academic violation linked to Gay. In any event, Oxman was hardly the only Israeli or Jew who plagiarized.
So, the big question was, why did Gay get fired? Why didn’t Ackman raise this plagiarism issue before the Israel/Hamas war? As Business Insider has reported, the main reason was that Gay did not properly handle the massive protests against “Israel’s bombardment of Gaza on Harvard’s campus.”[16]
Gay’s position at Harvard came to an abrupt end when she appeared before Congress last December to address the issues of anti-Semitism on Harvard campus. Ackman alleged that certain students were advocating for the genocide of Jews on campus, while Gay took no action to address the situation. MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan responded to Ackman by saying: “Nobody was calling for the genocide of the Jews. You’re echoing Stefanik’s lies and stunts, which is another reminder of why you’re on the right, like she is.”[17]
Gay was not the only college president who had to appear before what one ought to call the Sanhedrin to answer questions of anti-Semitism on campus.
“Sally Kornbluth, the president of MIT, and Liz Magill, the president of University of Pennsylvania, answered more than five hours of questions over their response to antisemitism on their campuses. Frequent student protests over the Israel-Gaza conflict have triggered accusations that some of the rhetoric has crossed into antisemitism. Gay, Kornbluth and Magill all declined to provide a definitive ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer to the Republican congresswoman Elise Stefanik’s question about whether calling for the genocide of Jews would violate their university’s code of conduct. More than 70 US lawmakers signed a letter demanding all three university presidents be removed in response. Magill resigned, as did the University of Pennsylvania’s chairman of the board of trustees.”
Didn’t Alan Dershowitz and Albert Einstein Plagiarize?
If you still believe the critique aimed at Claude Gay pertained to academic rigor, then why does Alan Dershowitz hold an emeritus professorship at Harvard? Didn’t Norman Finkelstein thoroughly present evidence which led to the conclusion that Dershowitz plagiarized? I would encourage anyone to watch the debate between Dershowitz and Finkelstein and then read Finkelstein’s book, Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History, which is pertinent to the current issues at Harvard and elsewhere.
Moreover, there is compelling evidence, put forth by mathematician Roger Schlafly, suggesting that Einstein may have plagiarized several of his papers, notably the one credited with earning him a Nobel Prize.
Schlafly, in his book How Einstein Ruined Physics: Motion, Symmetry, and Revolution in Science has resurrected the long-dormant argument that a significant portion of what is attributed to Einstein’s work was actually accomplished by others. Eminent figures like mathematician Henri Poincaré and physicist Hendrik Lorentz had explored concepts of relativity well before Einstein, yet he popularized these ideas without properly acknowledging their prior contributions.
This point was articulated by a British mathematician and historian of science Sir Edmund T. Whittaker (1873-1956), who wrote in his work A History of the Theories of Aether & Electricity that the equation E = mc2 was the creation of Lorentz and Poincare.
“Einstein’s friend and colleague Max Born had even tried to persuade Whittaker not to publish this opinion,” and Born himself later admitted that it was highly plausible that Einstein got his idea from Poincare.[18] Similar points were made by Russian physicist A. A. Logunov in his book Henri Poincare and Relativity Theory.[19]
Upon being confronted with this reality by Whittaker, Einstein expressed a desire for posterity to recognize Lorentz and Poincaré’s contributions to the theory. As biographer Albrecht Folsing puts it, “After nearly half a century this was the first time that Einstein ever mentioned Poincare in connection with the special relativity theory.”[20]
Biographer Dennis Brian, however, declared that the charge that Einstein got some of his work from somewhere else has little weight. The evidence? No one, not even Poincare, argues Brian, has ever charged Einstein of plagiarism.
But Brian failed to mention that Lorentz came close to saying that Einstein snatched relativity out of his hand: “Einstein simply postulates what we [Lorentz and Poincare] have deduced.”[21]
Schlafly argues: “On every essential part of special relativity, Poincare published the same idea years earlier, and said it better. It was Lorentz’s and Poincare’s work, not Einstein’s, that led to time being considered the fourth dimension.”[22]
Shlafly continues to say that while historians “prefer to credit Einstein” for the theory, “no one can dispute the fact that Poincare discovered all the elements of special relativity with help from Lorentz and others, published them before Einstein, and developed a theory that was either identical or observationally equivalent to Einstein’s.”[23]
Einstein’s 1905 paper in particular “fails to cite any references to the scientific literature. The failure is extremely odd,” since “the best mathematical physicists in Europe had been writing papers on the subject for ten years, and Einstein did not cite any of them.”
Einstein “uses some of Poincare’s terminology without mentioning Poincare’s name. Einstein is not just sloppy; he is artfully vague about his sources.”[24] Here is how Einstein defended his position:
“It appears to me that it is the nature of business that what follows has already been partly solved by other authors. Despite that fact, since the issues of concern are here addressed from a new point of view, I am entitled to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature…”[25]
When Einstein was getting negative reviews for his theory, he quickly jumped to the anti-Semitism trump card,[26] which obviously shocked many of the scientists who were reviewing his work.
So, will Jewish groups and Jewish students ask Harvard to resurrect an investigation on Dershowitz’s plagiarism? Will they give credit to Lorentz and Pointcare, as they are celebrating the resignation of Claude Gay?[27]
Of course not.
What we are seeing here again and again is that the so-called Black-Jewish alliance which began in the 1960s and which culminated in the Civil Rights Movement was a weapon in the hands of powerful Jews to fight what they perceived to be anti-Semitism. The Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Movement (DEI) was also created and advanced by powerful Jews in order to change the academic climate.[28] Now that the DEI is posing a huge threat to their political existence, they are now stepping back from it.[29] Even Abraham Foxman, former leader of the anti-Defamation League, is now saying that it is time to scrap the DEI.[30]
Put simply, the DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) is no longer seen as beneficial to powerful Jews, so there’s a call for its removal. It seems it was initially a tool to combat “racism” or “antisemitism,” but now its significance has waned. Historically, Foxman and his brethren have used similar ideologies in the past. One of the first persons who figured this out in the 1960s was Harold Cruse, who ended up writing The Crisis of Negro Intellectual.[31]
First published in January 4.
The New York Times has thrown Harvard’s Claudine Gay under the bus with a Talmudic double-standard that fails to assess acts of plagiarism by campus exponents of Israel’s mass murder of 20,000 Palestinians.
The charge of intellectual “anti-Semitism” is considered a far more heinous crime than support for Israeli genocide. This is Talmudic praxis.
Slights to Israeli partisans are regarded as infinitely more outrageous and worthy of investigation and protest than the deaths of 10,000 Palestinian children (!) under the rubble of Israeli bombs, financed by U.S. taxpayers.
Meanwhile, pressure by Zionist billionaires to fire faculty and administrators including the black woman who heads Harvard, who happens to be insufficiently supportive of the Israeli massacres, confirms that when it comes to power over education in America it is indeed “all about the Benjamins.” (That’s the truth, not a “trope”).
Even the Times concedes that this is a tempest in a teapot: ”She (Dr. Gay) has not been accused of more egregious violations, such as falsifying data, or stealing another scholar’s original research or ideas. Still, the steady dribble of allegations has privately worried some faculty members who see a pattern of sloppiness unbecoming of a Harvard leader.”
A university president should be fired for intellectual sloppiness?
If that’s the case, then dozens of white university presidents, to say nothing of Times executives and reporters, should be fired—and Joe Biden should be expelled from the White House in view of his well documented plagiarism during his years in the Senate.
But this is not about academic rigor.
The media lynch mob aims to enforce standards of submission to Zionist supremacists and their murderously racist ideology which has dehumanized and collectively punished the Palestinian people in a series of unrelenting war crimes which the international criminal court in Europe has studiously ignored.
When the smoke has finally cleared in Gaza and the oceans of Palestinian blood wiped up, I predict that, barring divine intervention, the Gaza holocaust will go the way of the Beirut holocaust of the summer of 1982 when again, 20,000 Arab civilians were slaughtered by the indiscriminate terror bombing of schools, hospitals and apartment blocks perpetrated by the Israeli military.
One reason the Beirut Massacre is not remembered is because Arabs, Persians and Turks failed to convene their own criminal court and neglected to build state-of-the-art war crimes museums to educate the public and future generations concerning the slaughter by the Zionists.
The sybaritic, oil-rich Gulf sheikdoms depend on the masonic West —for whom the Talmud and Kabbalah are the holiest books of civilization and the rebuilding of the Temple of Solomon the supreme objective— for justice.
Every year this writer surveys American newspapers and television “news” for any commemoration or even the slightest mention of the anniversaries of the U.S. government’s incineration of hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians in Tokyo in March, 1945 and Nagasaki in August of that year. Usually there is nothing. The victims of those atrocities are non-entities in the view of a western media that peddles its “compassion” and human rights concerns like a flea market hawker.
In comparison, nearly every week The New York Times publishes a report with some Jewish Holocaust angle. The victims of the Nazis deserve to be remembered, make no mistake about that.
The victims of Washington and Jerusalem deserve the same memorialization, however.
Why don’t they receive it? Read the ancient Talmud Bavli, or the 18th century Tanya of Shneur Zalman of Lyady, or the 21st century Torah HaMelekh of Shapira and Elitzur. [https://share.transistor.fm/s/1a3b0418
The powers-that-be understand only too well that war-Zionism and the U.S. military, with its Allied doctrine of the indiscriminate bombing of civilians [https://share.transistor.fm/s/06706e96
] would be unable to operate with impunity as they have in Beirut, Gaza, Baghdad and Afghanistan, were it not for the enforced amnesia that makes one holocaust indelible, while flushing the others down Owell’s Memory Hole.
While we Christians believe that it is the love of money that is the root of evil (I Timothy 6:10), there is no denying that the loss of memory is also a source of diabolic malevolence.
—Michael Hoffman
https://revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html
The New York Times online, Dec. 21:
Debate Over Plagiarism Allegations Against Claudine Gay Adds to Pressures at Harvard
By Sarah Mervosh, Dana Goldstein, Jennifer Schuessler and Anemona Hartocollis
…The examples were part of a wave of plagiarism allegations that had surfaced against Harvard University President Dr. Claudine Gay over the past two weeks, driven by conservative activists and news outlets, just as she was under fire for failing to take a tougher stand against antisemitism during a tense congressional hearing convened by House Republicans this month.
The plagiarism allegations against Dr. Gay, which span her dissertation and about half of the 11 journal articles listed on her résumé, range from brief snippets of technical definitions to lightly paraphrased summaries of other scholars’ work without quotation marks or direct citation. In one example that drew ridicule, Dr. Gay appeared to borrow exact phrases from the acknowledgments section of another author’s book to thank her mentor and family in the acknowledgments section of her own dissertation.
She has not been accused of more egregious violations, such as falsifying data, or stealing another scholar’s original research or ideas.
Still, the steady dribble of allegations has privately worried some faculty members who see a pattern of sloppiness unbecoming of a Harvard leader. And some have begun to speak out more forcefully, questioning whether Dr. Gay can effectively carry out presidential duties, including raising money from the widest possible groups of donors.
You have to be practical, not ideological,” Avi Loeb, a professor of science who was critical of Dr. Gay’s earlier congressional testimony, said on Thursday. “If she cannot accomplish the goals she needs to pursue as a university president, then it’s obvious what needs to be done.”
Some major donors continue to be agitated. The billionaire Ukrainian-born magnate Len Blavatnik, whose name adorns an institute at Harvard’s medical school, in recent weeks decided to suspend giving more because of his unhappiness over the school’s response to antisemitic incidents on campus, a spokeswoman said. Mr. Blavatnik’s family, which has given more than $200 million, will not restart donating “until antisemitism at Harvard is addressed with real action,” the spokeswoman said in a statement. Mr. Blavatnik’s decision was reported earlier by Bloomberg.
In a note to colleagues that he shared with The New York Times, Eugene I. Shakhnovich, a professor of chemistry and chemical biology, wrote that Dr. Gay remaining as president was “unsustainable for Harvard.”
“Claudine Gay is a huge liability for Harvard and by implication for higher education in the U.S.,” he wrote…
[End quote. Emphasis supplied].
Read more at http://NYTimes.com
——————————-
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE CONTRA CANCEL CULTURE
Copyright©2023 by Independent History and Research
Michael Hoffman is the author of the banned 2008 textbook Judaism Discovered (1,102 pages), and nine other volumes of history and literature, including The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, and Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People, as well as 122 issues of the periodical, Revisionist History®. He is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and a former paid consultant to the news department of the New York Times. His books have been published in translation in Japan and France.
Listen to his broadcasts on the podcast, “Michael Hoffman’s Revisionist History”® and find Michael on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/HoffmanMichaelA
Revisionist History® is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as the trademark of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816. All Rights Reserved.
Sources:
[1] Adam Gabbatt, “‘A bully’: the billionaire who led calls for Claudine Gay’s Harvard exit,” Guardian, January 4, 2024.
[2] Ana Faguy, “Bill Ackman Calls For Harvard Board’s Resignation After Claudine Gay Ouster,” Forbes, January 3, 2024.
[3] Gabbatt, “‘A bully’: the billionaire who led calls for Claudine Gay’s Harvard exit,” Guardian, January 4, 2024.
[4] Mark Alfred, “Neri Oxman, Wife of Harvard Donor Bill Ackman, Apologizes After Plagiarism Allegations,” Daily Beast, January 4, 2024.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Katherine Long and Jack Newsham, “Bill Ackman’s celebrity academic wife Neri Oxman’s dissertation is marred by plagiarism,” Business Insider, January 5, 2024
[8] Lloyd Lee and Madeline Berg, “How plagiarism by Claudine Gay, Harvard’s former president, compares to that of Neri Oxman, an academic and Bill Ackman’s wife,” Business Insider, January 5, 2024.
[9] Ibid.
[10] Deirdre Fernandes, “A meeting with Jeffrey Epstein led to a gift — and, now, regrets,” Boston Globe, September 13, 2019.
[11] Ibid.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Ibid.
[14] Ibid.
[15] Ibid.
[16] Katherine Long and Jack Newsham, “Bill Ackman’s celebrity academic wife Neri Oxman’s dissertation is marred by plagiarism,” Business Insider, January 5, 2024
[17] Alfred, “Neri Oxman, Wife of Harvard Donor Bill Ackman, Apologizes After Plagiarism Allegations,” Daily Beast, January 4, 2024.
[18] Roger Schlafly, How Einstein Ruined Physics: Motion, Symmetry, and Revolution in Science (Create Space, 2011), 114.
[19] Ibid., 133.
[20] Denis Brian, The Unexpected Einstein: The Real Man Behind the Icon (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2005), 198.
[21] Quoted in Schlafly, How Einstein Ruined Physics, 116.
[22] Ibid., 11.
[23] Ibid., 117.
[24] Ibid., 128.
[25] Ibid.
[26] Ibid., 112.
[27] Carl Campanile and Social Links for Patrick Reilly, “Jewish groups, students celebrate Claudine Gay’s resignation as Harvard president: ‘Should have happened sooner,’” NY Post, January 2, 2024.
[28] See for example Maud S. Mandel, “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Notes from Jewish History and Campuses Today,” December 16, 2018; https://president.williams.edu/writings-and-remarks/columns-essays-and-speeches/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-notes-from-jewish-history-and-campuses-today/.
[29] See for example Adam Milstein, “The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies: a danger to Jews and all Americans,” Jerusalem Post, July 5, 2022.
[30] “Former ADL, AJC leaders Abe Foxman and David Harris call for scrapping DEI,” Jewish Insider, December 20, 2023.
[31] For a thoroughly researched study on this, see E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008). I have also addressed some of these issues in Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism (in three volumes).
___
https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/2024/01/a-jewish-coup-at-harvard/