https://youtu.be/VWJV4JJ5vnE
YouTube Transcript
00:00
[Applause]
00:03
glad to have you with us
00:05
bless you
00:24
thank you so much thank you
00:29
okay so thank you so much for inviting
00:32
me
00:33
um i come to you tonight with a lot of
00:36
information
00:37
about the experimental vaccines what’s
00:40
called the experimental vaccines
00:42
regarding covid19
00:44
i think all of this information will be
00:47
brand new to you
00:49
i know that this was all brand new to me
00:51
over the last few months even as a
00:53
board-certified emergency physician
00:55
i did not know a lot of what i’m about
00:57
to share with you
00:58
and i come before you on behalf of
01:01
america’s frontline doctors which is a
01:03
volunteer physician organization that we
01:05
started
01:06
specifically to combat the serious and
01:09
life-threatening
01:10
disinformation campaign that has really
01:12
taken over
01:13
america and really the entire globe it’s
01:16
very very scary stuff
01:18
i’ve been a doctor for a long time
01:20
before me my father is a doctor
01:22
i’ve never seen anything like this where
01:24
we have groups
01:26
of physicians or scientists and
01:27
government bureaucrat
01:29
agencies essentially lying to the
01:31
american people
01:32
and people across the world i have many
01:34
many examples
01:36
one of one brief example i’ll give you
01:38
is that the national institute of health
01:40
right now has as its policy
01:41
recommendation for patients with covet
01:43
19
01:44
stating that unless you’re in the
01:46
hospital requiring oxygen there’s no
01:48
actual treatment available for you that
01:51
is a complete falsehood
01:53
completely false in most of the world uh
01:55
non-first world countries
01:57
there’s plenty of treatment easily
01:59
available hydroxychloroquine ivermectin
02:01
here in america if you can find a doctor
02:03
to prescribe it you get those medicines
02:05
or budestinide
02:06
there’s there’s many options and you
02:08
know this disinformation is why we came
02:10
public
02:11
when we started to speak out around july
02:14
a little bit sooner but we got a lot of
02:15
attention starting in july
02:18
you know we were promptly as the pastor
02:20
said d platformed and it doesn’t bother
02:22
me so much i know the information it
02:24
bothers me tremendously on behalf of all
02:26
of humanity
02:27
right this is a crime against humanity
02:29
there’s if there’s a physician in the
02:31
netherlands who’s bringing a lawsuit in
02:32
the hague
02:33
it’s calling it that calling this a
02:35
crime against humanity there is a lot of
02:37
information you haven’t heard there was
02:38
a senate testimony about a month ago
02:41
a bunch of doctors went and testified it
02:42
was i believe if senator johnson is the
02:44
chairman
02:45
you can find it on our website america’s
02:47
frontlinedoctors.com but the doctors
02:49
testified
02:50
that the vast majority of deaths in
02:52
america would have been
02:54
would have not never happened not ever
02:56
happen
02:57
um i start with that because
03:00
when you understand you must understand
03:02
the magnitude of the lie to understand
03:04
what they’re trying to tell you about
03:05
these experimental vaccines
03:07
so we need to just kind of go through
03:08
that for a little bit
03:10
in yeah okay
03:14
so i know some of you heard a little
03:16
this first sentence which i said
03:18
this morning but the disinformation was
03:20
apparent since the beginning
03:22
right we call this illness covid19
03:25
but its real name should be after the
03:28
location from where it arose which is
03:30
wuhan china and if you remember it was
03:32
called the wuhan virus
03:34
for a long you know a while i don’t know
03:35
a month or so before we discovered the
03:38
chinese communist party
03:39
didn’t like that name they set about
03:41
putting a lot of pressure on
03:43
media and other you know politicians
03:46
let’s say
03:47
to change it and they started calling it
03:48
the coronavirus they called it the
03:50
coronavirus
03:51
because it is actually a coronavirus but
03:53
that became very confusing to doctors
03:55
and scientists
03:56
because there are seven coronaviruses
03:58
this is just number seven
04:00
so we used to use the word coronavirus
04:01
sometimes on our charts
04:03
when we meant a common cold you know a
04:04
person would come into the er in my case
04:06
and
04:07
they just had a common cold and i would
04:08
sometimes write coronavirus on the chart
04:10
as the diagnosis so
04:11
it was pretty confusing for doctors and
04:12
scientists to call it the coronavirus
04:14
right so they had to change the name
04:16
again and it became known by its acronym
04:18
coronavirus disease 2019 covet 19.
04:21
i have to start there because it was
04:24
never a racist
04:25
or or weird thing to call it the wuhan
04:28
virus
04:28
right there’s so many diseases that are
04:30
named after the location from which they
04:31
arise
04:32
there’s zika and ebola there’s middle
04:34
east respiratory syndrome
04:36
rocky mounted spotted fever lyme disease
04:38
i mean the list is endless german
04:40
measles spanish flu
04:42
this list is endless so you need to
04:43
understand that deception was there from
04:45
the very beginning
04:51
so that was the first big lie the next
04:53
big lie
04:55
that the next big popular well-known lie
04:57
was the maligning of this common
04:59
ordinary cheap
05:00
safe medication called
05:01
hydroxychloroquine those of you who have
05:03
traveled abroad who have taken mission
05:05
trips for example or anybody in the
05:06
military are quite familiar with this
05:08
drug
05:09
doctors would just give it out you know
05:10
like candy i know that i was going to
05:12
take a holiday to africa about 20 years
05:14
ago and
05:14
i was a medical student at the time and
05:16
they just handed me the pills here you
05:18
go i never asked any questions it was a
05:19
big fat nothing burger
05:21
taking hydroxychloroquine all of a
05:23
sudden we started hearing his doctors
05:25
even as doctors that hydroxychloroquine
05:26
is unsafe
05:28
you can’t understand what’s going on
05:29
with the lies until you understand what
05:31
an enormous lie this is
05:33
hydroxychloroquine is over the counter
05:35
in much of the world
05:37
okay it’s taken in many african nations
05:39
they call it sunday sunday medicine
05:41
because you take it every sunday right
05:42
that’s like its name sunday sunday
05:44
people keep it in their pocket the way
05:45
americans might keep its tylenol in
05:46
their purse
05:47
it’s it’s absolutely ordinary stuff it
05:50
was over the counter
05:51
really in any country which had malaria
05:53
or any country that had citizens that
05:55
would visit malaria countries on holiday
05:56
it was over the counter for example is
05:58
over the counter in france the only
06:00
reason it wasn’t over the counter in
06:01
america is there just wasn’t a consumer
06:03
demand
06:03
right in america we use
06:04
hydroxychloroquine for two
06:06
main reasons that’s lupus and rheumatoid
06:08
arthritis and also for malaria for
06:10
people going on holiday
06:11
but generally it’s lupus and rheumatoid
06:13
arthritis and for those illnesses
06:14
patients regularly see physicians so
06:16
they can get a prescription for it
06:18
that’s why it was never over the counter
06:19
here not because it was unsafe
06:21
it’s been fda approved for 65 years we
06:23
give it to babies we give it to children
06:25
we give it to pregnant women we give it
06:26
to nursing mothers we give it to the
06:28
elderly and we give it to the immune
06:29
compromised
06:30
those last two categories take this
06:32
medication for decades there’s never a
06:34
pretense that it’s not safe
06:36
that’s the drug that you’ve been hearing
06:39
about for nine months now
06:41
ten months telling you it’s unsafe it’s
06:44
an incredible lie of incredible
06:46
proportions
06:47
once you understand that you will be
06:50
suspicious of everything that follows
06:52
so that’s where i found myself there i
06:54
was in the emergency department
06:56
treating patients as they came in with
06:57
covid19 and once we had the rapid test
07:00
so i can confirm the diagnosis
07:02
my first patient who i needed to give
07:04
hydroxychloroquine and zinc to
07:06
i did it and and even knowing the kind
07:08
of the controversy
07:09
i really didn’t think twice about it i
07:12
don’t know it was fine i gave it to her
07:13
i actually called her the next day she
07:15
was so much better
07:16
she herself got better within about 12
07:17
hours in about 48 hours she was
07:20
essentially completely well
07:21
this completely matched what i had read
07:23
in the scientific literature i knew many
07:25
doctors who had done this i’ve read many
07:26
journals
07:27
it was completely consistent what was
07:30
really shocking and completely
07:31
inconsistent
07:32
was my medical director who calls me the
07:35
next day
07:36
and threatens to fire me for doing this
07:39
this treatment it was it was i i can’t
07:41
even tell you to even as i described
07:42
this moment to you it’s shocking to me
07:44
i remember the case the situation the
07:45
conversation and he’s saying he’s going
07:47
to fire me and i said why would you fire
07:48
me over this well i don’t think it works
07:50
i said
07:50
well then don’t prescribe it you know
07:52
you haven’t read the science the way i
07:54
have i know it works you’ll change your
07:55
mind in a couple of months when you know
07:56
you get a little wiser
07:58
but why would you get involved with you
08:00
know me treating a patient you do your
08:01
thing i do my thing that’s how medicine
08:03
is practice we’re licensed as
08:04
individuals it’s actually against the
08:06
law to have what’s called a corporate
08:08
practice of medicine where
08:09
you know corporation practice is for you
08:11
it has to be the individual doctor’s
08:12
physician that’s why patients go to
08:14
multiple doctors
08:15
right no
08:22
and and really the almost the worst part
08:24
of the conversation was not even that he
08:25
was ignorant that the drug worked
08:27
but his reasons for saying that he was
08:28
going to fire me if i did this
08:30
and the reason which he put in writing
08:32
because he wasn’t so smart
08:34
he said it was because the the biggest
08:37
payer at that hospital which is a large
08:41
insurance company that everyone here has
08:43
heard of that’s back on the west coast
08:44
mainly
08:45
didn’t want us to prescribe it they were
08:47
blocking it
08:49
so that payer insurance company was
08:51
pressuring the hospital that
08:52
their doctor shouldn’t do it it had
08:54
nothing to do with even if he thought it
08:56
was good or bad for the patient it all
08:57
had to do with money and payment which
08:58
was
08:59
i honestly i still can’t believe i’m
09:01
relating the story it was really
09:02
unbelievable
09:03
so he said i could never do that again i
09:05
said well good luck with that
09:06
so it kept happening it happened about
09:09
four or five times and i kind of knew
09:11
that my days at that particular hospital
09:12
were
09:13
really we’re going to be numbered right
09:14
i mean how long is this going to last
09:16
so i started looking online for other
09:18
physicians like myself i knew i couldn’t
09:19
be the only one and i found the most
09:21
amazing group of doctors really just
09:22
brilliant intelligent compassionate kind
09:25
and and you know we got together and we
09:27
called ourselves the america’s frontline
09:28
doctors
09:29
and what i felt needed to happen was we
09:31
needed to break this disinformation
09:33
cycle
09:33
to which the americans were all being
09:35
subjected to and people across the world
09:36
as well
09:37
so i set up to do something called the
09:39
white coat summit
09:41
which was an entire day of education we
09:43
brought doctors
09:45
and we brought social media influencers
09:47
uh young people know them as youtubers
09:49
so we brought a whole bunch of youtubers
09:50
and a whole bunch of doctors we brought
09:52
to washington we did seven hours of
09:54
education
09:55
and we laid out all the facts all the
09:57
facts you know very dispassionate
09:59
here’s the facts on hydroxychloroquine
10:00
here’s the facts on lockdowns here’s the
10:02
facts on mass
10:03
here’s the facts on you know schools and
10:05
kids transmission here’s the facts for
10:07
the elderly
10:08
here’s the facts on um you know other
10:10
treatments other than hydroxychloroquine
10:12
and we did that in the middle of that
10:13
day
10:14
we took a break and we walked over to
10:15
the supreme court and that was the video
10:17
that got 20 million views it gets
10:19
20 million views not because i can sing
10:21
like beyonce
10:22
but because human beings recognize truth
10:26
we have something inside of us right
10:33
right i i really emphasize that point
10:36
because you can’t get to 20 million
10:37
views nobody plans such a thing it’s
10:39
only if people say oh my gosh you got to
10:41
listen to this you got to listen to this
10:42
you recognize the truth you recognize
10:43
the truth
10:44
so i guess after a while big tech you
10:45
know caught up with the fact that this
10:46
was like breaking the internet
10:48
and so within an hour all of the all of
10:51
the platforms censored us
10:52
simultaneously so it’s essentially a
10:54
monopoly so we’re talking
10:56
youtube instagram linkedin facebook
10:58
twitter
10:59
all of us all went down immediately the
11:01
president had retweeted us the
11:03
president’s son had retweeted us
11:05
and from that moment on everything
11:06
really kind of changed i did get fired
11:08
from both of my hospitals it is a scary
11:10
experience to get fired especially when
11:12
you’ve worked as long as i have to be
11:14
a board certified emergency physician
11:15
and that’s what i do you know i’m a mom
11:17
i have kids you know it’s not a
11:18
comfortable feeling to be fired you
11:20
don’t know what the future holds
11:21
on the other side of this which is now
11:23
several months it’s really been a
11:24
blessing right because we doctors have
11:26
been able to come forward
11:28
and speak freely and help other doctors
11:30
who’ve been put in this situation
11:32
there are several of my peers several
11:33
doctors in the americas frontline
11:35
doctors group that have faced tremendous
11:36
personal pushback
11:38
there’s a fellow right now in oregon who
11:40
refused to
11:42
force the mask right so he won’t wear
11:44
and he won’t force his mat his staff to
11:46
where if you want to wear it you could
11:47
wear it
11:48
um but the state of he was public about
11:51
it so the state of oregon
11:53
actually yanked his medical license and
11:55
when i when he first told me this i
11:56
thought i thought you know this this
11:59
can’t be
12:00
possible because you may not know but
12:01
i’m well i guess you know i’m also an
12:03
attorney
12:04
and it made it was impossible to
12:05
conceive of an event like that happening
12:07
without due process i mean the whole
12:09
thing about law if anybody’s been
12:10
involved in the law at all
12:11
it’s all about process you’ve got to go
12:13
through the process you can’t just pull
12:14
someone’s license you have to have
12:15
hearings and phone calls and
12:16
papers filed and all that i really just
12:18
thought oh he missed his deadlines you
12:19
know
12:19
there’s no but it was true they actually
12:21
just summarily pulled his license
12:24
it’s unbelievable so we’re going to help
12:26
him win we’ve already filed a lawsuit
12:27
and all that
12:28
so but but what i’m saying is it comes
12:30
with some degree of personal costs but
12:31
if you ask him
12:32
he’ll tell you that he’s so much happier
12:34
that he did this
12:35
right he said this
12:42
he just he felt that he couldn’t bow to
12:44
the tyranny
12:45
so i just want to encourage anybody in
12:47
their own personal life when you face
12:48
that little tyranny on a daily basis you
12:50
you know this is florida but you know i
12:51
hail from california and you can’t go
12:53
anywhere without a mask
12:54
except i do i go without a mask as much
12:56
as i possibly can and
12:58
you have to take moments like that and
13:00
push up against tyranny and it’s not
13:01
just for you
13:03
right it strengthens your sense of
13:04
freedom for yourself and it makes you
13:05
stronger
13:06
it’s also to role model that strength
13:08
for other people
13:09
so if you feel yeah
13:16
and i say that because a lot of us who
13:18
are very good-hearted people we don’t
13:20
really have the strength sometimes to
13:21
fight on our own behalf
13:22
well then tell yourself you’re doing it
13:24
for the other person who needs to see
13:26
you without the mask
13:27
so they can feel empowered
13:32
so i want to run through um some
13:34
information and
13:36
the the goal is to teach you about
13:38
what’s coming in terms of these
13:39
experimental vaccines
13:41
and i’m going to start with a few
13:42
minutes maybe five minutes on just kind
13:44
of reviewing the lies about what’s going
13:46
on with covert generally and then we’ll
13:47
turn
13:48
to that and sit tight because there’s a
13:50
lot a lot of interesting stuff
13:55
first um when i first started this i
13:59
really just wanted to help patients
14:01
you know i was i couldn’t believe that
14:02
patients were being denied this
14:04
this drug and i could sense that we were
14:07
not going to be able to fix this
14:09
from a government kind of policy
14:11
position because the doctors themselves
14:14
had drunk the kool-aid and not been
14:16
willing to prescribe this drug and i
14:18
tried very hard
14:20
to get the policy changed so that
14:22
hydroxychloroquine could become over the
14:24
counter in our country
14:25
just like it is in much of the world
14:27
that would have been the best solution
14:29
for everybody because it would have
14:30
taken the decision-making out of the
14:32
hands of the government you could have
14:34
decided for yourself if you needed this
14:35
medicine
14:37
and the advantage of having that pill in
14:39
your possession
14:40
meant that the majority of people would
14:42
have stopped living in fear
14:44
so that was the best solution but we
14:46
were unsuccessful in getting that
14:48
so i did the next best thing america’s
14:50
frontline doctors not i
14:51
just a group of us and we made getting
14:54
hydroxychloroquine available
14:57
for the entire nation by going to our
14:59
website then you can consult with a
15:01
telemedicine doctor
15:02
and whether you have covert or you don’t
15:03
have covert you’re just worried about
15:04
getting covered you can get yourself a
15:06
prescription and they mail it to you
15:07
that was the first thing we did and i i
15:09
felt so strongly about it
15:10
just because that’s that’s a practical
15:14
way
15:14
that you can try to lift the fear but i
15:16
learned pretty early that the big fight
15:18
was the fear
15:18
the big fight wasn’t the virus it was
15:20
the fear
15:22
that was my response to the fear was was
15:25
to give people a practical solution
15:28
now the fear has led to people
15:32
they they really just want to go back to
15:33
normal lives so they’re either kind of
15:35
consumed with fear
15:37
or consumed with just being weary of the
15:38
whole situation
15:40
that is what i think is leading to
15:42
people making what is really a
15:44
fundamentally irrational decision to
15:46
rush
15:46
headlong towards an experimental
15:48
medication they just kind of want to get
15:50
their lives back
15:51
right we’ve been told oh get the vaccine
15:52
you’ll get your life back i have to give
15:54
you the bad news
15:55
that is definitely not what’s going to
15:57
happen whether you take a shot you don’t
15:59
take a shot it’s not going to happen
16:01
you know dr fauci has gone public
16:02
already with saying
16:04
and as many others the surgeon general
16:06
many others have said it was in business
16:08
journal just today business insider i
16:10
think just today you know this
16:11
this so-called vaccine experimental
16:14
biological agent actually doesn’t stop
16:16
transmission
16:17
you’re gonna have to keep going with the
16:19
mass and the social distancing it
16:20
actually changes nothing
16:21
once you hear that you really have to
16:23
question why you would put yourself in
16:24
that situation
16:26
so that’s the starting point let’s talk
16:28
about some enduring
16:29
kobe 19 myths first of all
16:33
i’m probably gonna i’m glad that you
16:35
know i can’t be de-platformed here
16:37
but
16:38
[Applause]
16:47
let’s just talk basics about the numbers
16:50
okay what is the chance that you’ll
16:52
survive covet if you should get it
16:54
okay so this is a very educated audience
17:00
so if you’re under age 20 according to
17:01
the cdc which is not known for its
17:03
honesty
17:04
the survival rate is 99.997 percent
17:09
why are we talking about anything in
17:10
that group there’s nothing to talk about
17:13
for ages 20 to 49 the survival rate is
17:16
99.98
17:18
50 to 69 their survival rate is 99.5
17:21
i always kind of pause there because a
17:23
lot of people in their 50s they start to
17:25
get worried and they think oh my gosh
17:26
i’m in such a high risk group it’s not
17:28
really that true
17:29
right this is with no treatment your
17:30
survival is 99.5
17:33
and if you’re over 70 the survival rate
17:36
approaches
17:36
95 really with with no treatment
17:40
now the dirty little secret it’s even
17:42
better than that
17:43
right if you take early treatment this
17:46
is essentially a
17:47
either asymptomatic or very mildly
17:49
symptomatic or completely recoverable
17:52
the people who die from covet 19
17:55
are people who are kind of destined to
17:57
die in this period anyway
17:59
my thought which is which is tragic but
18:02
as people of faith you understand that
18:04
debt life and death go hand in hand so
18:07
my father had an expression it was that
18:09
pneumonia is an old man’s best friend
18:12
and that means that pneumonia is often
18:14
the way we exit this world
18:17
so if you are at kind of the end point
18:20
of your life
18:22
covid19 can take you out that’s a fact
18:25
so can a common cold i’ve seen it i once
18:28
had a patient in the icu who died
18:29
essentially from a nosebleed it kind of
18:32
escalated breath
18:32
so anything can take you out if you’re
18:35
frail and covered 19 is in that category
18:38
overwhelmingly the deaths of covet 19
18:40
are in
18:41
nursing home patients and i have to
18:43
mention that
18:44
because if there is truly the intent
18:48
to quote unquote save lives people would
18:51
not have thrown away
18:52
our frail elderly the politicians that
18:55
are
18:56
telling you to do this thing over here
18:58
had no problem throwing away the lives
19:00
of the very frail elderly over here
19:07
i don’t know how many if anybody in this
19:09
room was watching the coronavirus task
19:11
force meetings as closely as i was but i
19:13
was watching them every day that i
19:14
wasn’t at work
19:15
and i remember watching governor cuomo
19:18
and he was saying that he had to protect
19:19
the elderly had to protect the elderly
19:21
had to protect elderly i thought that
19:22
was great i thought that was great
19:24
and then one day literally out of the
19:26
blue because i was watching it every day
19:28
he made this rule that patients from
19:31
nursing homes who went to the hospital
19:34
with kova 19
19:35
but were survived and were ready to be
19:37
discharged from the hospital
19:39
could be sent back to their nursing home
19:41
and the nursing home was not allowed to
19:43
ask if they were covered positive or
19:44
covered negative in other words they
19:46
could completely intermingle with the
19:47
other patients
19:49
now to remind you that big navy ship
19:52
that was stationed off of new york city
19:55
and the jacob javits center were
19:56
virtually empty now what’s amazing about
19:59
that as an emergency physician i know
20:01
all the time we have bed problems don’t
20:02
have a bed here you don’t have a bed
20:04
there but it was a complete lie to say
20:05
that there was no room for these
20:06
patients or they would lose their beds
20:07
in the nursing homes there was
20:09
thousands and thousands of empty beds
20:11
between jacob javits and
20:12
the navy ship and i remember watching
20:14
this and thinking that is unbelievable
20:16
he’s like a he’s like an executioner it
20:19
was incredible
20:20
so i wouldn’t believe anything that
20:21
somebody like that has said
20:25
it’s tragic it was really tragic it you
20:28
know he’ll have to answer
20:29
he’ll have to answer yeah
20:33
yeah so i start with all of that because
20:36
you have to understand that the
20:37
magnitude of the lies is just so
20:39
enormous
20:40
are you all should i take a moment are
20:42
you all familiar with the lancet
20:43
the controversy with that oh this is a
20:46
good one
20:47
okay all right so i digress here but
20:50
it’s too good to leave out
20:51
so um the lancet is probably the world’s
20:54
most famous
20:55
medical journal all right new england
20:57
journal medicine is probably second most
20:59
famous drama
21:00
third most famous so sometime around
21:03
april i think the lance had published
21:05
this study that concluded that
21:06
hydroxychloroquine wasn’t safe
21:09
this threw the world into a tizzy based
21:11
on this article
21:12
the who stopped um hydroxyl chlorine
21:15
trials across the world the european
21:17
union stopped allowing
21:18
hydroxychloroquine
21:19
that was the reason that the headlines
21:21
trashed the president is calling it
21:23
snake oil
21:24
they had the cover of the lancet saying
21:26
it was bad now the lancet study that
21:28
said it was bad
21:29
had like 90 000 people in it and it was
21:31
took place on five continents
21:34
and it just didn’t really make sense
21:36
there was a group of independent doctors
21:37
who looked at this data and said there’s
21:39
no way you have
21:40
ninety thousand patients enrolled in a
21:42
trial across five continents and nobody
21:44
ever heard of this thing
21:45
it was just it was incredible so these
21:47
independent doctors got together and
21:48
they kind of forced it and they forced
21:50
the issue
21:51
and the lancet ended up retracting the
21:54
study
21:55
which is once in a generation or once in
21:58
a lifetime sort of event you can’t be
22:00
published in the lancet by accident
22:01
there’s many many layers
22:03
to it it just simply can’t happen it was
22:05
complete fraud that was published
22:08
but the damage was done because all
22:10
across the world hydroxychloroquine
22:11
trials have been halted and it was
22:12
very badly maligned that’s where we’re
22:14
coming from
22:16
why do we know we know that that was
22:17
fraud they’ve admitted they were fraud
22:18
if you go right now
22:19
to the internet you can type in the
22:21
lance’s study on hydroxychloroquine and
22:23
it’ll pop up
22:24
retracted okay now why do i say
22:27
so that was that was like level number
22:28
one of the corruption where the
22:29
scientists themselves were being
22:31
corrupted
22:32
level number two though is the media the
22:34
media lying how do we know they’re lying
22:36
and not
22:36
just misinformed or ill-informed
22:38
themselves
22:39
well because when it was retracted they
22:41
buried the story of it’s being retracted
22:44
you have to really struggle to find that
22:45
information
22:47
that’s very dishonest and then there’s
22:50
corruption really at the state level at
22:51
the federal level but
22:53
we’ll save that for another day so
22:56
let’s talk about these what i call
23:00
i i think it’s most properly called
23:01
experimental biological agents you might
23:03
hear me use that
23:04
phrase definitely you should not be
23:06
calling this the kovid 19 vaccines
23:08
the reason is whatever you call it it’s
23:11
experimental it’s not been approved as a
23:13
vaccine
23:14
it’s currently in its investigational
23:16
stage it’s been approved
23:17
by uh the pr i don’t want to speak which
23:21
the fda i assume is the one who would
23:23
approve it but it’s in an
23:24
investigational stage
23:25
only astrazeneca pfizer moderna and
23:29
johnson johnson
23:30
that’s very important legally if you
23:32
were to be injured by something and it’s
23:33
an experimental stage it’s
23:35
adjudicated under particular standard so
23:38
what what is what are the potential
23:41
problems with this experimental
23:42
biological agent
23:44
the first most obvious is that this is
23:46
brand new technology
23:47
the first two that are coming to market
23:50
use something called mrna technology
23:52
which has never ever been used before
23:53
for vaccines
23:55
this is when when you hear a lot of the
23:58
more
23:59
kind of concerning and flamboyant issues
24:02
it’s because people are very worried
24:04
that this is brand new mrna technology
24:07
i don’t really go down that path but
24:09
what i can say is i don’t really want to
24:11
be the first person to take brand new
24:13
things
24:14
when it comes to medicine right you
24:15
don’t have to be a genius to say that so
24:18
that’s
24:18
problem number one problem number two
24:22
is there’s been a tremendous failure of
24:25
previous coronavirus
24:26
vaccines this is not well known but
24:29
there are multiple coronavirus
24:31
viruses out there for example in 2002
24:35
there was an epidemic
24:36
a much smaller one but an epidemic of
24:38
stars cove one
24:39
what we’re in right now is sars cove two
24:42
stars cove one and stars cove two
24:44
by the way you may have heard it called
24:45
the novel coronavirus are what we’re in
24:47
right now
24:48
i never understood that because this
24:50
coronavirus is 78 identical
24:52
to stars cove one that’s in fact that’s
24:54
why it has the name stars co2
24:56
they’re 78 the same so prior coronavirus
25:00
vaccine attempts have been made
25:03
they have failed they can’t do it safely
25:06
in human beings
25:07
and i’m going to talk more about that
25:08
later but just note that we’ve not been
25:10
able
25:11
to successfully overcome the
25:14
human bodily hurdles that making a
25:17
vaccine against a coronavirus
25:19
has put up number three there is no
25:22
independently published
25:24
animal studies one of the companies says
25:27
they do have animal studies but they
25:28
haven’t published any data on it
25:30
there’s been a complete rush to put this
25:32
to market
25:33
and you simply cannot do this safely
25:36
without published data on animal studies
25:40
because animals often will die at the
25:42
end and unless we know that we don’t
25:44
know if it’s safe to give to humans
25:48
okay problem number four is known
25:50
complications
25:52
one of the most commonly known
25:54
complications of vaccines
25:56
is something called big science words
25:58
coming up guys
25:59
antibody dependent enhancement it’s also
26:02
sometimes called immune enhancement and
26:04
it’s sometimes called pathogenic priming
26:08
what this is is instead of really
26:10
causing immunity
26:12
it causes a person to overreact
26:16
in a negative way if they should
26:17
ultimately be exposed to the virus
26:19
this thing called antibody dependent
26:21
enhancement or pathogenic priming
26:23
although you haven’t heard of it
26:24
is well known to scientists i like to
26:26
say it has its own wikipedia page
26:29
this is not fringe this exists and this
26:32
is real
26:33
the biggest problem with antibody
26:35
dependent enhancement
26:36
we see this with prior coronavirus
26:39
vaccines
26:40
so when they were doing the studies with
26:42
sars cove one vaccine
26:44
back in 2005 they came up with a vaccine
26:48
and they gave it to the ferrets and it
26:50
was two dosed like the
26:52
ones today and the ferrets did fine
26:55
after the first dose they did fine after
26:57
the second dose later they exposed them
26:59
to the coronavirus
27:00
tsarska one in the wild and the ferrets
27:03
died
27:05
that’s why sars ko1 vaccine never came
27:07
to market
27:09
antibody dependent enhancement you can
27:12
find all the information i’m discussing
27:14
on america’s frontlinedoctors.com
27:16
vaccine information also i’ll get to at
27:18
the end at the
27:20
stopmedicaldiscrimination.org site it
27:21
has it there as well
27:22
everything is well footnoted and
27:24
referenced so known complications
27:26
include antibody dependent enhancement
27:28
and also some of the things you’ve seen
27:30
in the news like neurologic problems
27:31
like transverse myelitis bell’s palsy
27:34
guillain-barre etc those are known
27:36
complications with
27:37
vaccines that already exist there’s also
27:40
a lot of issues with
27:42
unknown vaccinations i think what’s
27:44
going wrong on the other side is there’s
27:46
a
27:46
complete lack of respect for what you
27:48
don’t know we don’t know what we don’t
27:50
know until you discover it i mean
27:52
these are the things parents teach their
27:54
children they don’t know enough right
27:56
so what are the potential unknowns well
27:58
something that i learned
27:59
this year actually in the last few
28:01
months which i was shocked because never
28:04
saw this anywhere in the newspaper and
28:05
i’d like a show of hands from anybody
28:07
here who’s heard of this before my
28:09
mentioning it has anybody here heard of
28:10
potential fertility problems with this
28:12
vaccine
28:15
that’s amazing you guys congrat i i did
28:18
not know this myself
28:19
until about maybe two months ago so i
28:22
had to look into it
28:23
and by the way the america’s frontline
28:24
doctors put together 10 doctors working
28:26
for more than a month to put together
28:28
all this research
28:29
so there’s a question if
28:32
this vaccine a biological agent i should
28:35
say
28:35
affects this thing called the cincio
28:37
trophoblast which is a layer on the
28:39
placenta
28:40
now it does seem to do that when you’re
28:43
sick with covid19
28:45
the problem is that these mrna vaccines
28:48
kind of mimic
28:49
having cova-19 indefinitely so while
28:52
coven-19 could be
28:53
bad for the placenta and the baby if you
28:56
get it like in the middle of the
28:57
pregnancy
28:58
eventually covet 19 goes away and you go
29:00
about your life and then you’re good
29:02
there’s a question if this type of
29:04
experimental agent
29:06
does that same negative effect to this
29:08
incitio trophoblast layer of the
29:09
placenta
29:11
and it would do it indefinitely this is
29:14
not a conspiracy as a scientist i’m
29:16
telling you we don’t know
29:18
we don’t know scientists better than me
29:21
right there’s the two guys in europe
29:24
that were expiser executives
29:26
that complained about this and filed a
29:28
petition with the
29:29
european equivalent of the fda saying
29:32
you’ve got to not approve this as an
29:34
emergency experimental vaccine
29:36
because we haven’t answered the question
29:38
on the antibody dependent enhancement
29:40
and we haven’t answered the question on
29:41
the placenta
29:42
it hasn’t been answered that it’s
29:43
dangerous to release this and you have
29:45
to put that together with what is the
29:47
risk of even having this problem
29:49
certainly in younger women right women
29:52
under 50 the survival we said
29:53
per the cdc is 99.98
29:58
for that reason america’s frontline
30:00
doctors feels very strongly that you
30:01
cannot even offer this
30:03
to women of child bearing age so we’ll
30:05
get to our official recommendations at
30:07
the end but i put
30:08
we put that information under the
30:10
category what we don’t know we simply
30:11
don’t know
30:12
we don’t know what the effect is
30:13
permanently on the placenta
30:16
another fact that is very concerning is
30:19
that pharmaceuticals
30:20
who manufacture these experimental
30:22
biological agents
30:23
are immune from all liability
30:26
so you probably this group probably
30:28
knows that but
30:30
i’m not saying that they have a negative
30:31
motive i think mostly they have a profit
30:33
motive
30:34
i’m not saying they’re trying to hurt
30:36
people or kill people what i am saying
30:37
is that if you know that you could be
30:38
sued and pay out millions of dollars
30:40
every single time something goes wrong
30:41
you’re really really careful
30:43
okay you’re a little less careful if you
30:46
know you’re going to be shielded from
30:47
that liability and they’re completely
30:48
shielded
30:49
some people ask me you know i’m going to
30:50
take the vaccine would i recommend my
30:51
children take the vaccine i said it’s
30:53
really irrational
30:54
to take a brand new untested untried
30:57
technology
30:58
from a company that’s completely
31:00
shielded from immunity when on the other
31:01
hand i’ve got a drug that’s 65 years old
31:03
has been given billions of time
31:05
completely safe for all age groups right
31:09
[Applause]
31:16
now those are the safety concerns with
31:19
this experimental biological agent what
31:21
are the concerns
31:22
regarding the effectiveness now what’s
31:24
super
31:25
shocking is that there’s no proof that
31:27
this biological agent actually stops the
31:30
transmission
31:31
amongst people
31:34
i mean it’s like it’s like a joke right
31:36
this is like a joke it’s like the punch
31:38
line to a joke
31:38
let’s take a vaccine and by the way it
31:40
doesn’t actually stop transmission i
31:41
mean
31:42
i don’t even know what to say to that
31:43
like i discovered that quite recently
31:45
and i i just i couldn’t believe it and
31:46
that’s by the way that’s not
31:47
in dispute now that i’m telling you that
31:49
the surgeon general gave an interview
31:51
uh 20 days ago last two two weeks and
31:53
six days ago on a
31:54
monday to good morning america stating
31:56
that and it’s been well documented now
31:58
it does not
31:59
is not known if it stops transmission um
32:01
i think what’s going to happen
32:04
you know it’s kind of putting people
32:05
into sort of an asymptomatic
32:08
carrier kind of state in other words
32:10
people are turning positive you might
32:11
have started to see some news stories
32:12
now people taking the vaccine
32:14
and now they’re testing positive for
32:15
covet 19. it’s kind of funny like we
32:17
don’t are they going to test positive
32:18
forever like what does that mean
32:20
you know they’ve been selling us this
32:21
bill of goods that there’s this
32:22
asymptomatic transmission and
32:24
that seems to be moot but if you’re
32:25
going to have you know tens or hundreds
32:27
of millions running around
32:28
just kind of positive low level like
32:30
what does that mean like why are we
32:31
doing that
32:32
another problem with doing that is i
32:34
think they’re going to gain the numbers
32:36
right all these people let’s say you
32:38
give this vaccine to 100 million people
32:39
and now all 100 million people have
32:41
quote unquote testing positive for coven
32:43
19.
32:43
they’re going to tell us that the cases
32:45
have risen and you know we can never
32:46
relax
32:50
like it’s it’s unbelievable
32:53
it’s unbelievable there’s been no proof
32:56
that this is actually reducing mortality
33:00
certainly from the levels of
33:02
non-lethality that we’re seeing it would
33:03
be hard to demonstrate that there’s any
33:05
real advantage right the
33:07
the odds of dying from this illness
33:09
already incredibly low
33:13
the third question about its
33:15
effectiveness we simply don’t know even
33:17
if it was effective and not
33:18
dangerous we don’t know how long it
33:20
lasts in other words are you going to be
33:22
asked to take this vaccine once
33:24
in a lifetime are you going to be asked
33:26
to take this vaccine
33:27
yearly like influenza we don’t know
33:29
those questions are not answered
33:32
so
33:36
i want to also i keep referencing the
33:38
fact that we need to call this by its
33:40
proper name
33:41
never talk about this without the word
33:42
experimental that’s critical
33:48
one of the problems that we doctors are
33:51
concerned about
33:52
about this antibody dependent
33:53
enhancement potential which we again i’m
33:56
not saying it exists or it doesn’t exist
33:58
i’m saying it hasn’t been answered
33:59
is if you’re going to run around and
34:00
give this vaccine to a whole bunch of
34:02
healthy people
34:03
you have to be really really sure taking
34:06
a vaccine is very different than taking
34:07
a drug for a disease if you have a
34:09
disease you’re certainly willing to take
34:10
on more risk
34:12
right to get rid of the disease but
34:14
vaccines are typically given to healthy
34:15
people
34:17
now what’s going to happen if you give
34:19
this vaccine to 100 million people
34:21
that are otherwise healthy and they do
34:23
have this antibody dependent enhancement
34:25
reaction because we haven’t
34:26
ruled it out they do get exposed to the
34:29
virus in the wild
34:31
and 30 percent of them drop and what if
34:34
for example
34:35
you’ve given that vaccine to all of your
34:38
health care workers and you’ve given
34:39
that vaccine to all of your military
34:40
and all of your police officers
34:44
i find this shocking as a public policy
34:46
matter that we would
34:48
even consider giving these
34:51
giving anything to our healthy
34:56
first responders and and front line
34:58
people
35:00
who defend our country it’s it’s
35:04
it’s so shocking and it’s in its risk
35:08
it i i you see me i’m struggling for the
35:10
words it’s
35:11
so shocking to accept that kind of risk
35:14
and again i want to be not misquoted i’m
35:17
not saying this is definitely
35:18
going to happen but i’m saying based on
35:20
prior sars
35:22
prior sars covid vaccine prior stars
35:25
coronavirus
35:26
vaccines there is a definite concern for
35:29
antibody dependent enhancement
35:31
this particular virus has very low
35:33
lethality
35:34
should you give it to healthy people not
35:36
knowing the answer to that question
35:38
is far too risky in my opinion from a
35:40
national security perspective
35:43
[Applause]
35:51
you know the more you dig into the stuff
35:53
the more upsetting it gets
35:55
so i gave this talk only once before
35:59
about two weeks ago
36:00
and i approached the black community
36:04
i’d like to just talk straight and
36:06
openly i was well aware as a physician
36:09
that african americans and
36:12
other black and brown minority persons
36:17
had a natural antipathy towards vaccines
36:21
and i wanted to give them the science
36:23
behind it so i ended up digging deeply
36:25
into that issue
36:27
so let me share some things that i knew
36:30
some of these things but i did not know
36:31
most of these things
36:33
prior to this year many of you in the
36:35
room i’m sure have heard of the tuskegee
36:36
experiments
36:37
we all know that okay but there’s a lot
36:40
more than that i was i was curious as to
36:41
why the antipathy was so
36:43
strong so let me give you some examples
36:46
of where vaccines have gone wrong for
36:49
black and brown people
36:51
so with the rubella vaccine
36:55
race and ethnicity were shown to affect
36:57
the antibody responses
36:59
like at a higher level than compared to
37:00
europeans with the measles
37:02
virus i think many people in this room
37:06
they also had that same experience
37:09
with pertussis was also the same
37:12
with the in wheat they also had the same
37:14
problem with the measles
37:16
haemophilus influenza also had the same
37:19
difference in the response
37:20
and the hepatitis vaccine also had this
37:23
similar
37:24
different response amongst races
37:26
specifically white boys
37:27
were 64 percent less likely to have
37:29
autism diagnosis relative to non-white
37:31
boys
37:32
when they gave the hepatitis vaccine to
37:34
babies
37:35
now
37:38
literally as a physician i did not know
37:40
this right
37:41
here we have examples well documented in
37:43
the scientific literature
37:45
of six different vaccines that were
37:47
affecting people
37:48
differently based on their races now why
37:51
is this important
37:53
because when you read the language that
37:55
the government is putting out
37:56
about how to prioritize the vaccine the
37:59
experimental
38:00
biological agent they are making an
38:03
overt and covert attempt to push this
38:07
heavily on blacks and browns
38:11
i’m going to give you some specific
38:13
language because it is just
38:15
shocking just bear with me one moment
38:24
all right
38:30
okay the cdc
38:34
is telling the public at large that
38:36
getting an experimental
38:38
vaccine is a good thing but it’s
38:40
additionally telling black people
38:43
getting the vaccine is racial justice
38:45
and it’s an advantage
38:48
now this is from the center for
38:51
healthsecurity.org
38:52
interim framework for covid19 vaccine
38:55
allocation and distribution in the u.s
38:58
this is the government’s words is that
39:00
getting the vaccine
39:02
early is social justice racial justice
39:05
and i just have to say as a scientist i
39:07
found it bizarre
39:08
that we’re talking about racial justice
39:11
either something works
39:12
scientifically or it doesn’t there might
39:14
be racial differences
39:16
in terms of dosages we’ve seen that now
39:18
in the prior six
39:19
but how is it racial justice to sign up
39:22
first
39:23
for an experimental biological agent
39:25
that we don’t know
39:29
[Applause]
39:39
you know in the same in this i believe
39:41
is the same document
39:42
yes in the exact same document they say
39:45
the ultimate safety of an approved
39:47
vaccine is not knowable
39:49
until it has been administered to
39:50
millions of people
39:52
it is possible that certain adverse
39:54
effects may occur more frequently in
39:56
certain population subgroups
39:58
which may not be apparent until millions
40:00
are vaccinated
40:01
pharmacovigilance track and trace
40:03
systems will provide
40:04
critical information that will inform
40:07
adjustments
40:08
to the allocation that literally is in
40:11
the same document
40:12
as let’s give it to black folks first i
40:17
you know you can’t even make this stuff
40:18
up
40:20
so um they also said that so it was our
40:24
words the most disenfranchised members
40:26
of society are to be vaccinated first
40:28
their words quote racial and ethnic
40:30
minorities tribal incarcerated rural
40:32
disabilities underinsured
40:34
people who work in school settings and
40:35
nurses and we must prioritize blacks and
40:38
latinos to reflect fairness and justice
40:41
now i i just find this so incredibly
40:44
offensive
40:45
we know exactly who falls from kovac 19.
40:49
it’s nursing home patients it’s people
40:51
with 2.6
40:53
comorbidities per person is average
40:57
people over 75 or living in nursing
40:59
homes this is who should get the vaccine
41:00
first if you believe the vaccine is safe
41:02
and effective
41:03
that’s it and i feel very offended on
41:06
this because
41:07
you know the people who they’re going to
41:08
target first honestly are my friends
41:10
which are all the black nurses that i
41:12
work with in the ers because i’ve spent
41:14
my whole career in the inner city
41:16
and so they’re all being told you got to
41:17
line up you got to take this and i’m
41:18
thinking to myself well you’re about 45
41:19
years old 50 years old you know you’re
41:21
in good health you’re working every day
41:22
why should you be prioritized there’s no
41:24
actual increased risk to the health care
41:26
worker
41:26
there it’s the risk we know who it is
41:29
it’s the 80 year old
41:30
woman who’s living in a nursing home a
41:32
man who’s living in a nursing home he’s
41:33
got bad heart
41:34
bad lungs you know diabetes especially
41:36
obesity is a big deal
41:37
those people are at high risk okay it’s
41:40
not your 45 year old nurse it’s not your
41:42
35 year old cop
41:43
okay and any other discussion i find
41:46
very disingenuous
41:48
now in case you didn’t you know believe
41:51
that
41:51
you went further into these documents
41:53
and you find the language that like they
41:55
talk about
41:56
targeting the black community by
41:58
understanding their
41:59
their quote-unquote vaccine hesitancy
42:01
based on these prior issues with prior
42:03
vaccines and tuskegee but they have like
42:05
actual policies they say
42:08
this is from hhs.gov
42:11
strategy for distributing covid19
42:13
vaccine
42:14
they say we have to focus on targeting
42:17
key populations and communities to
42:19
ensure
42:19
maximum vaccine acceptance and they talk
42:22
about and they quote the bill and
42:23
melinda gates foundation
42:24
about how to manipulate the media and
42:26
silence opposition to it
42:29
and then they put very you know famous
42:30
handsome you know
42:32
celebrities saying that they’re going to
42:35
take the vaccine obama being one of them
42:37
and it’s very clear it’s just very very
42:40
clear what’s going on
42:42
so i say to you as a scientist do you
42:45
want to be first if you want to be first
42:47
to
42:48
volunteer yourself for track and trace
42:51
system
42:52
enrolling yourself into a medical trial
42:54
i don’t think i explained that clearly
42:56
let me back up for one second you if you
42:58
take the vaccine you’re being enrolled
43:00
in a pharmacovigilance tracking system
43:03
it means you’ve enrolled yourself in a
43:05
medical trial
43:06
which is fine if you want to be a
43:08
good-hearted individual very altruistic
43:10
and you want to enroll yourself
43:12
into a medical trial fantastic i can
43:15
tell you as a physician very very few
43:16
people do that
43:18
okay but if you want to do that that’s
43:20
fine but
43:21
most people are not aware that that’s
43:22
what they’re doing this
43:24
pharmacovigilance tracking system tracks
43:25
you for two years it’s set up by the
43:27
department of defense
43:28
it was handed off to oracle and google
43:30
to to put the data together
43:33
how is it that people want to sign up
43:34
for this system on an experimental and
43:37
how is giving it to black people fair
43:38
racial justice i don’t know maybe
43:40
someone smarter than me can figure that
43:41
out
43:46
i also it also put in once i started
43:48
reading these documents about
43:49
about what i thought was just pure
43:51
racism in these documents it kind of
43:53
made it clearer to me why we were
43:56
hearing so much
43:57
about racial issues with covet 19. in my
44:01
experience as an er doctor i didn’t see
44:03
any real racial issues at all
44:04
we saw white people latino people and
44:06
black people every you know people got
44:08
it basically if you were old and frail
44:10
and you got it you know you were sick
44:12
but i never really saw a racial
44:13
difference and that’s not true there are
44:14
other things obviously that have racial
44:15
differences
44:16
so i remember thinking this is weird you
44:18
know aoc would get forward and say oh
44:20
it’s really bad against black people
44:21
this is terrible and it’s discrimination
44:22
and all that
44:24
here’s what i want to say to that it’s
44:25
true that in
44:27
there are many areas where black people
44:30
were disproportionately affected by
44:31
cover 19. so an example i like to use
44:34
was in new orleans louisiana where
44:36
blacks made up 31 percent of the
44:37
population but they made up 70
44:39
of the people admitted to the hospital
44:40
with cover 19. so on the left they were
44:43
saying
44:43
this was because of racism but when you
44:46
look at the data
44:47
there does not yet appear and i think
44:50
never will appear
44:51
to be an independent race to be an
44:53
independent risk factor right
44:54
we know what makes people really sick
44:56
it’s diabetes and obesity primarily
44:58
and then you know other serious medical
45:00
problems now
45:02
also living in a very crowded area
45:03
working in a very crowded area
45:05
the reason i don’t think this is ever
45:07
going to be shown to be a race problem
45:08
race problem is things that you just
45:11
know by common sense
45:12
one is it’s been all over the world all
45:14
races okay we can just start with that
45:17
second is in aries of the world where
45:20
people
45:21
are have those high individual risk
45:23
factors like diabetes or obesity and
45:25
other illnesses and the group risk
45:28
factors such as living and working in
45:29
thai quarters
45:31
it’s not black people that get it at a
45:32
worse rate it’s those people in those
45:34
situations
45:35
so in louisiana it was black people but
45:38
in the uk
45:39
it was middle eastern and east asian
45:42
now there’s the people living in those
45:43
crowded dense areas that have diabetes
45:46
those are the people it didn’t matter
45:47
what the race was it just mattered if
45:48
you if you had those
45:49
individual group risk factors and of
45:52
course the irony of saying that this is
45:54
really a racial
45:55
problem is looking at the continent of
45:57
africa for those of you who don’t know
45:58
it
45:59
the one continent that’s been spared is
46:01
africa except south africa but the rest
46:03
of africa
46:05
is you know the death rates you know in
46:07
africa are extraordinarily low for those
46:09
of you who
46:10
don’t know this or haven’t followed me
46:11
yet on twitter at america’s frontline
46:13
doctors there’s a lot of videos one of
46:14
my favorite
46:15
is a talk we gave on sub-saharan africa
46:17
because people just don’t know this
46:19
so in america the death rates are in the
46:21
like
46:22
800 range per million in india the death
46:25
rates around
46:26
if i might be slightly off on the
46:27
numbers around 70 per million right so
46:30
it’s 10 percent
46:31
because they have a very liberal
46:32
hydroxychloroquine policy in africa
46:34
sub-saharan africa the poorest places in
46:37
the world no social distancing no
46:39
masks no icus they have a death rate
46:42
of one percent of the western nations
46:45
one percent
46:46
one percent right
46:49
now i believe it’s due to widely
46:51
available hydroxychloroquine i don’t
46:52
think you can explain it for any other
46:54
reason but even if there’s another
46:55
reason
46:56
you certainly can’t say that this
46:57
affects black people worse
47:11
so i i would just not be signing up for
47:13
this immediately i would you know if i
47:14
was a mom and i or i you know again i
47:16
think of my friends the nurses if i was
47:17
a nurse and i was a mom i’d be like you
47:18
know what i’ll just wait let me let me
47:20
just wait a little bit let’s just see
47:22
so we doctors you know when we got
47:24
together about this we
47:25
we decided to um really come out and say
47:29
what we thought our opinion was and a
47:30
lot of people have told us not to do
47:31
that
47:32
but we felt it was really important you
47:34
have
47:36
you have the cdc the nih
47:39
and the fda all not helping you
47:43
so we we came up with our
47:46
recommendations about the vaccine
47:48
and and they’re pretty strong ultimately
47:50
america’s frontline doctors stands as
47:52
followers
47:54
if you’re under age 20 the experimental
47:58
vaccine is prohibited in our opinion
48:00
absolutely prohibited we simply don’t
48:02
know enough
48:04
about the effects on fertility and we do
48:06
know
48:07
this virus essentially does not affect
48:11
young people essentially irrelevant
48:14
from age 20 to 50 if you’re healthy we
48:17
strongly discourage there was a little
48:19
debate in our group
48:20
if we would come down and strongly
48:22
discourage in this group or prohibited
48:24
i fell in the prohibited category but
48:26
the majority of us said just strongly
48:28
discouraged for age
48:28
20 to 50. we strongly discourage the
48:32
vaccine
48:32
in age 20 to 50 because there’s an
48:35
exceedingly low risk of death from covid
48:38
there’s unknown risk from the
48:40
experimental vaccine of causing
48:41
autoimmune disease
48:42
there’s unknown risk of this pathogenic
48:44
priming antibody dependent enhancement
48:47
and there is an unknown risk of in for
48:49
lifelong infertility so age
48:50
20 to 50 we think it is strongly
48:53
discouraged
48:54
from age 50 to 70 if you’re healthy we
48:57
also
48:59
say strongly discouraged for the same
49:02
reasons there’s a very low risk from
49:03
covert 19 there’s an unknown risk of
49:04
autoimmune disease
49:05
unknown risk of pathogenic priming
49:07
unknown effect on the placenta
49:09
from age 50 to 70 and you are do have
49:12
serious comorbid conditions
49:15
we say it is discouraged
49:18
we say that because we feel the
49:21
experimental vaccine is higher risk
49:23
than early or prophylactic treatment
49:25
with long established medications such
49:27
as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin
49:30
from age 70 and above if you’re healthy
49:34
we tell people it’s just your own
49:35
personal risk assessment
49:37
we believe an experimental vaccine is
49:39
less ideal
49:41
than old established medicines but we
49:43
say leave it up to the person
49:45
over age 70 with serious comorbid
49:47
conditions such as nursing homes
49:49
we also call it to personal risk
49:52
assessment we again
49:53
stand with hydroxychloroquine ivermectin
49:55
being
49:56
safer in this population but we don’t
49:58
think it’s irrational
49:59
to take it if you’re over 70 living in a
50:02
nursing home we don’t think that that’s
50:04
irrational we’re not trying to say all
50:05
vaccines are unsafe in all
50:07
circumstances we don’t believe
50:10
anybody at any age should be pressured
50:12
and we are concerned about persons over
50:14
70
50:15
who don’t have advocates being pressured
50:17
into this we already know actually of
50:18
many cases like that
50:20
but we also don’t want people to be
50:22
overly worried
50:23
that we’re saying it’s definitely unsafe
50:25
we’re not saying it’s definitely unsafe
50:27
we’re saying we don’t know
50:28
and at least if you’re over 70 with
50:30
several medical conditions
50:32
you do have some dece you know you have
50:35
some risk of dying from this thing
50:37
so it’s not fundamentally irrational to
50:39
take it if you should decide to take it
50:41
but certainly under age 50
50:44
we fall at you know strongly discouraged
50:49
i myself would i tell everybody i would
50:51
never let a woman of child bearing age
50:53
take this
50:54
this i would never i would fight tooth
50:56
and nail under no circumstances until
50:57
this placenta question is answered
51:02
i always like to leave people with a bit
51:03
of a call to action
51:08
we intend from america’s frontline
51:09
doctors to fight the urge
51:11
that’s sweeping the globe to mandate
51:15
people taking an experimental biological
51:17
agent
51:18
this is a big fight we have in our hands
51:21
it’s not really the government first
51:22
that we’re concerned about
51:24
we’re very concerned about private
51:26
businesses mandating this
51:28
employers schools and travel
51:31
airlines in particular you can imagine
51:34
if all the airlines got together
51:36
the ceos and said you know what we’re
51:39
just going to mandate this and all
51:40
the six biggest ones got together and
51:42
said that it’s just like the masks right
51:45
you can’t avoid their mandates
51:48
this is a very big problem so america’s
51:51
frontline doctors is tackling this we
51:53
intend to talk
51:54
to the decision makers in the airline
51:56
industry one of our tools in that battle
51:59
will be to go in armed with at least at
52:02
least
52:03
one million signatures of human beings
52:06
who are going to say
52:07
no we are not going to do business with
52:10
anybody
52:10
and we are not going to comply with
52:12
anyone who’s going to mandate this
52:14
everyone whether you want to take the
52:15
vaccine you want your mom to take the
52:17
vaccine
52:18
that’s your choice but i think everyone
52:20
hearing this
52:21
can agree we don’t need the ceos of big
52:24
companies
52:25
forcing experimental biological agents
52:27
on anyone
52:38
what i need you to see now though before
52:41
we get to that point
52:43
is that we are going to be at their
52:44
mercy if we don’t get ahead of them
52:46
we must get ahead of that bad decision
52:48
that they seem headed towards making
52:51
qantas airlines has already said that
52:52
they’re going to do this
52:55
we need to go to these airlines we have
52:58
a plan
52:59
but part of that plan is at least a
53:01
million signatures you must
53:03
go to stop medicaldiscrimination.org
53:08
and sign the petition you also must
53:11
share that petition with everyone do not
53:14
be shy
53:15
okay this is your life are you going to
53:18
be able to travel
53:19
and it’s not just your personal can i
53:20
travel for fun but can you advocate can
53:23
you go to washington dc and advocate if
53:24
you can’t get on a plane
53:26
all right this is really important
53:29
stop medicaldiscrimination.org it is
53:32
your obligation
53:33
i’ve done my part my doctors have done
53:35
their part you must do your part people
53:37
come up to me all the time what can i do
53:38
this is such a small thing
53:40
not only do you sign it you each of you
53:43
should take it on yourself to say i’m
53:44
gonna make sure i get a thousand
53:45
signatures
53:46
because i’m gonna send you to this
53:47
facebook group and that facebook group
53:48
and this twitter everyone everyone
53:50
everywhere must
53:52
stopmedicaldiscrimination.org critical
53:54
critical
54:01
if you are part of a union you should be
54:04
bringing this to the union
54:06
as a humanitarian or human rights issue
54:09
your union should advocate for you now
54:10
this may sound strange to people because
54:12
they think the union’s on the other side
54:14
and maybe they are but the union hasn’t
54:15
even heard the facts
54:17
if you’re part of a union you should
54:19
stand up and say i don’t want this
54:20
forced on me
54:22
if you know a pilot pilots union
54:25
teachers union nurses union very
54:28
important
54:30
phrase this as a human rights issue this
54:33
is not
54:34
anti-vaccination i’m always reminded
54:36
please tell people where i stand on
54:38
vaccine issue i personally have been
54:39
vaccinated
54:40
for everything i personally might make
54:42
sure my kids have been vaccinated for
54:44
everything
54:45
this is a human rights issue that we
54:47
cannot mandate
54:48
human beings take experimental agents
54:50
and the
54:51
and the third and the third call to
54:53
action is always use the word experiment
54:56
when you talk about this always that the
54:58
socialists
55:00
win the war on win the language wars
55:03
right they change language remember i
55:05
said to you this was the wuhan virus
55:07
then it became the coronavirus then it
55:09
became kovac 19.
55:11
this is a battle for words the
55:19
the word to remember is not vaccine the
55:22
word to remember is experimental
55:24
every conversation you have with people
55:25
is experimental
55:27
now if you need backup for everything
55:29
i’ve said all of this is on our website
55:31
america’s frontlinedoctors.com
55:34
says big letter vaccine information it’s
55:37
also on stopmedicaldiscrimination.org
55:39
you’ve got a 35-page paper with 70
55:41
references
55:42
everything is is is clean and clear so
55:45
you don’t have to know all this yourself
55:46
it’s all there for you
55:48
so the call to action
55:51
stopmedicaldiscrimination.org
55:53
sign it share it go to your unions
55:59
and third experimental teach
56:02
everyone this is experimental if you do
56:04
podcasts if you talk to people if you
56:06
you know any any outlet you have