Mandating Toxic Flu/Covid Jabs for US Military Personnel
by Stephen Lendman
In early August, US war secretary Lloyd Austin he’d ask for Biden regime “approval to make (toxic flu/covid jabs) mandatory no later than mid-September, or immediately upon (FDA approval), whichever comes first.”
Already mandated for federal workers, VA healthcare staff, students, faculty and other staff at 100s of US colleges and universities, by many businesses for employees, and other segments of society, US war department spokesman John Kirby said the following on Monday:
“Now that the Pfizer(’s) (flu/covid drug) has been approved, the department is prepared to issue updated guidance, requiring all service members to be” jabbed with its toxins designed to destroy health.
“A timeline for…completion (of mass-jabbing) will be provided in the coming days.”
“We’re preparing the guidance to the force right now and the actual completion date.”
“(H)ow fast we want to see it get done, we’re working through that guidance right now.”
Defying reality, he added:
“(E)fforts (will) ensure the safety of our service members (sic) and promote the readiness of our force (sic), not to mention the health and safety of the communities around the country in which we live (sic).”
Mass-jabbing harms health, the more jabs gotten, the more damage done.
Most US military personnel jabbed may be OK during most or all of their service, the moment of truth perhaps arriving after returning to civilian life — their health, lives and futures irreparably harmed.
Federal law prohibits the Pentagon from mandating drugs without full FDA approval — unless ordered by the White House for alleged national security reasons.
After Monday’s full FDA approval for Pfizer’s toxic flu/covid mRNA drug, Biden’s double said the following:
He “strongly support(s)” mass-jabbing of US military personnel, falsely claiming they’ll be kept safe “to do their jobs (sic),” adding:
“We are still on a wartime footing (sic)” against invented enemies, he failed to explain.
“(E)very American who is eligible should take immediate steps to get (jabbed) right away (sic).”
“I am proud (sic) that our military women and men will continue to help lead the charge in the fight against this (fake) pandemic (sic) by setting the example of keeping their fellow Americans safe (sic).”
According to Kirby, Austin directed Pentagon service branches to develop mass-jabbing “plans,” adding:
“The services have a fair but limited amount of time to come back to the secretary with their implementation plans for how they would go about mandatory (jabs) for all their personnel.”
“We understand, of course, that they have their own deployment schedules, their own manning constructs, their own different un(jabbed) numbers.”
“We’re working hard on what will be a policy directive to come in the coming days that will make it clear what those requirements and restrictions are and how they apply to” US military personnel.
In early August, attorney Greg Rinckey reported receiving “a deluge of calls” from US military personnel — wanting to know their legal rights and actions available to stay unjabbed.
“A lot of US troops have reached out to us saying, ‘I don’t want a (jab) that’s untested,” Rinckey explained.
“I’m not sure it’s safe, and I don’t trust the government’s” claims, callers stressed.
Rinckey should know but didn’t explain that rights of everyone everywhere are legally guaranteed by the Nuremberg Code — requiring voluntary consent on all things health related.
Many US military forces refused to be jabbed with what they fear harms health.
Some left the service, some court martialed, some disciplined in other ways, including by less-than-honorable discharges.
In December 2003, US District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled as follows, saying:
“This court is persuaded that (Anthrax Vaccine Absorbed) AVA is an investigational drug and a drug being used for an unapproved purpose,” adding:
“The women and men of our armed forces put their lives on the line every day to preserve and safeguard the freedoms that all Americans cherish and enjoy.”
“Absent an informed consent or presidential waiver, the US cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs.”
During the 1991 Gulf War, around 150,000 US troops were vaxxed for anthrax.
Short-term it caused redness, swelling and fever that’s associated with all vaccines.
Serious health issues weren’t discovered until later called Gulf War syndrome.
Experimental anthrax vaccines contained squalene-based adjuvants that caused severe autoimmune diseases and deaths among Gulf War veterans later on.
They included rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, neuritis risking later paralysis, uveitis risking blindness, neurological harm, congenital disabilities in offspring, cognitive impairment, and systemic lupus erythematosus, among other health issues.
The latter disease can harm joints, skin, brain, lungs, kidneys, and blood vessels.
From 1990 to 2001, over two million doses of anthrax vaccine were administered to US military personnel.
They were used and abused as unwitting lab rats. Many became ill. Thousands died.
Much the same is highly likely from mass-jabbing with Pfizer’s toxic mRNA drug and others for flu/covid when given full FDA approval ahead.
US military personnel have unacceptable options.
They can either obey what’s mandated at the expense of their health and well-being or refuse toxic jabs and risk severe punishment.
Damned either way, other members of society face similar unacceptable options.
US/Western nations are not only unsafe and unfit to live in, they risk the health, lives and rights of ordinary people by waging biowarfare with instituting full-blown tyranny in mind — largely with public compliance if things go as planned.