Under House Arrest as a Result of a Crime Committed by the CDC
UNEDITED TRANSCRIPT:
I think it’s
00:50
appropriate that we have a certain
00:51
decorum about how we engage when we are
00:54
actually making very serious and very
00:57
contemplated allegations. in this case
01:01
I’m reporting on some criminal activity
01:03
and as a result, this video is
01:06
also going to be submitted to a number
01:08
of US Attorney’s, to the Attorney General,
01:11
to other law enforcement agencies, and as
01:13
a result and in honor and respect for
01:16
their roles in their posts, I think it’s
01:18
appropriate that we bring a appropriate
01:21
level of decorum to the process.
the
01:23
second thing is I have some notes here
01:25
and the reason I have notes is because
01:27
I’m going to make very precise
01:28
statements and these statements are not
01:31
things to take lightly. they are actually
01:34
extremely serious. they are allegations
01:36
based
01:39
on the facts that I’m going to be
01:40
Presenting. as a result of that you’re
01:42
gonna see me look at my notes because I
01:44
take this matter very, very seriously. I
01:47
need to set the stage for where we’re
01:49
Going. at the end of this I’m going to
01:51
make a series of allegations of
01:52
violations of both the United States
01:54
Constitution a series of civil and
01:57
criminal acts that have been engaged
01:59
around the entire COVID19 pandemic,
02:02
fear-mongering and scare tactics, and I’m
02:05
going to be specific in naming
02:07
individuals and organizations that are
02:09
at least implicated if not directly
02:12
involved in the conspiracy that I’m
02:14
laying out. so let’s set the stage
with some laws that are not
02:18
necessarily
02:18
commonly known.
article 1 section 8
02:21
Clause 8 of the United States
02:22
Constitution and as it is manifest in
02:26
the 35 u.s. code is the law that gives
02:29
rise to intellectual property the right
02:31
for somebody an inventor and author to
02:33
have access to their inventions for a
02:36
period of time for commercial
02:38
exploitation that is a constitutional
02:40
right granted under article 1 section 8
02:43
Clause 8 of the United States
02:45
Constitution article 1 section 9 Clause
02:48
2 is the interesting Clause that you
02:52
don’t hear about very much but it’s
02:53
actually something that is a presumption
02:55
not only in the United States
02:56
Constitution but in most of the
02:58
civilized world and that is the writ of
03:00
habeas corpus now what does habeas
03:02
corpus mean that means that there is a
03:04
recourse in the law when someone has
03:07
been placed in confinement and when that
03:11
confinement is either unjustified or
03:14
inappropriate habeas corpus under the
03:18
Constitution under article 1 section 9
03:20
Clause 2 cannot be suspended and it
03:24
cannot be suspended in the absolute
03:26
sense of this this by the way is
03:28
something that is alluded to in attorney
03:31
general william bars memo dated today
03:33
released just a few hours ago now those
03:36
are constitutional provisions what I’m
03:39
also going to lay out our two very
03:41
important other provisions that come out
03:43
of the turn of the last century most of
03:45
them in the late 1800s and early 1900s
03:47
and those two provisions are called the
03:50
Sherman Act which is 15 US Code section
03:52
1 and following and the Sherman Act
03:56
which was amended with the thing called
03:58
the Clayton Act in 1914 and I just want
04:01
to make reference to three provisions
04:03
inside of the Sherman and Clayton Act
04:05
combined these represent what’s called
04:07
the antitrust acts of the United States
04:11
15 US Code section 1 actually makes it
04:15
illegal for anything that is a
04:18
conspiracy and restraint of trade or
04:20
commerce among the states with or with
04:23
foreign engine nations
04:25
and any of those actions are declared
04:27
illegal every person who shall make a
04:29
contract or engage in a combination
04:32
or conspiracy is declared to be illegal
04:34
and shall be deemed guilty of a felony
04:37
and I made reference to the fact that
04:39
this is criminal and civil allegations
04:41
the criminal allegations are given rise
04:43
from the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act
04:47
15 US Code section code 2 section 2
04:51
talks about a violation of monopolizing
04:55
trade and this says every person who
04:58
shall monopolize or attempt to Milaap
05:00
monopolize or combine or conspire with
05:03
any other person or persons to
05:05
monopolize any part of trade or commerce
05:06
among the several states or with foreign
05:09
nations shall be deemed guilty of a
05:11
felony and once again this is a criminal
05:14
violation and the penalty shall be not
05:18
exceeding a hundred million dollars if a
05:21
corporation or four person a million
05:23
dollars the third provision that I want
05:26
to give rise to with respect to the
05:28
antitrust acts is a thing in section 19
05:32
called interlocking directorates and
05:34
officers and specifically I just want to
05:37
make reference to this no person shall
05:39
at any time serve as a director or
05:41
officer in any two corporations engaged
05:44
in whole or in part in commerce and by
05:48
virtue of their business or location of
05:49
operation competitors so that the
05:52
elimination of competition by agreement
05:55
would constitute a violation of any trip
05:58
any entry antitrust law now those five
06:01
provisions 2x of the Constitution which
06:03
give rise to all kinds of cures in both
06:06
civil matters and otherwise and the
06:08
Sherman Act which are actually criminal
06:10
acts are very important to set the stage
06:12
for what happened on April 25th 2003 the
06:18
United States Center for Disease Control
06:19
broke the law they broke 35 US Code
06:23
section 101 in the filing of a patent
06:27
entitled coronavirus isolated from
06:32
humans under Section 101 of u.s. 35 u.s.
06:38
code the patenting of a substance of
06:41
nature is illegal this was confirmed by
06:44
the way
06:45
Supreme Court case with which we were
06:47
affiliated in 2013 against myriad
06:50
genetics and the Supreme Court ruled in
06:53
their affirmation of this that it is
06:56
illegal to have a patent on a human gene
07:00
the Center for Disease Control
07:04
April 25th 2003 filed a patent for and
07:10
ultimately received United States patent
07:12
seven seven seven six five to one and I
07:18
need to make a very specific reference
07:20
to the fact that in claims three and
07:22
four the method of detecting SARS virus
07:26
and a kit for the detection of SARS
07:31
virus was granted with no limitation
07:35
particularly claim for which reads a kit
07:38
for detecting a severe acute respiratory
07:40
syndrome associated corona virus in a
07:43
sample that’s as broad as you get they
07:46
received a patent that restricted anyone
07:48
anywhere in the United States from
07:51
engaging in any activity using this now
07:55
from April 2003 and following the CDC
08:00
owned not only SARS but they owned the
08:05
kit to detect SARS its ability to be
08:09
tected its ability to manufacture kits
08:11
and during that 15 year period the
08:13
effect of this grant which was ruled
08:15
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court
08:17
meant that commercial exploitation or
08:21
any research involving the commercial
08:23
exploitation of the virus or any kit to
08:26
detect the virus would have been an
08:29
infringement of the CDC patent and
08:32
therefore an infringement giving rise to
08:35
CDC’s actions were it not for the fact
08:38
that CDC’s patent and their maintenance
08:41
thereof is actually illegal CDC and the
08:47
National Institute of Allergy and
08:49
Infectious Disease led by Anthony foutch
08:51
II that’s the right that’s right the
08:53
doctor foul that you hear entered into
08:56
trade among states including
08:59
not limited to a corporation called eco
09:02
health alliance incorporated and with
09:05
foreign governments and foreign entities
09:08
in direct violation of the Sherman Act
09:10
provisions specifically the Wuhan
09:13
Institute of virology and the Chinese
09:15
Academy of Sciences through a 2004
09:18
National Institutes of Health grant ro1
09:22
AI one one zero nine six four that
09:27
constitutes commercial activity
09:30
involving an illegal asset entered into
09:34
interstate and international commerce in
09:37
violation of the Sherman Act the CDC and
09:40
n IA ID also entered into a commercial
09:47
engagement with the University of North
09:49
Carolina at Chapel Hill which is
09:52
obviously interstate and with foreign
09:56
nations specifically the Wuan Institute
09:58
of virology and the Chinese Academy of
10:00
Sciences with dr. Ralph s barrack of the
10:04
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
10:06
and doctor Zheng Li XI the head of the
10:11
research component of the project that
10:13
included not only the Wuhan Institute of
10:15
virology but the National Natural
10:18
Science Foundation of China CDC and the
10:23
NIAID entered into trade among states in
10:26
addition which gave rise not only to a
10:30
constructive infringement unless there
10:33
was another undisclosed agreement on the
10:36
patent that was held by CDC with the
10:39
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
10:40
and with foreign nations to conduct
10:43
chimeric construction of novel
10:46
coronavirus material with specific
10:47
virulence properties prior to during and
10:51
following the determination made by the
10:54
National Institute of Health on October
10:55
the 17th 2014 that this work was not
10:59
sufficiently vetted for biosecurity and
11:02
safety standards further it is presumed
11:05
and this is a presumption please make
11:08
the clear distinction this is a
11:10
presumption that the CDC and its
11:12
associates were
11:13
a fully aware of the work being
11:15
performed using their patented
11:17
technology be entered into explicit or
11:20
implicit agreements including licensing
11:22
or other consideration and we know
11:24
there’s other consideration because we
11:26
know the amounts of the grants that were
11:27
exchanged and see willfully engaged one
11:30
or more foreign interests to carry
11:32
forward the exploitation of their
11:34
proprietary technology after the United
11:37
States Supreme Court rendered that
11:39
technology and the proprietary rights to
11:42
that technology illegal under their 2013
11:46
determination now it’s interesting to
11:49
note that in January 2018 the u.s.
11:53
embassy reportedly sent two individuals
11:55
to the Wuhan Institute of virology and
11:57
in their examination found that a number
11:59
of individuals and and parts of the
12:02
laboratory procedure were not in
12:04
compliance with safe operating
12:06
procedures for the level of severity of
12:08
the bio hazards within that laboratory
12:10
the Washington Post reported that a
12:13
cable dated the 19th of January 2018
12:17
confirmed that there was and I quote
12:20
during interactions with scientists at
12:22
the wiv laboratory they noted that the
12:24
new lab has serious shortage of
12:27
appropriately trained technicians and
12:28
investigators needed to safely operate
12:30
this high containment laboratory a year
12:33
later in June 2019 the CDC conducted an
12:37
inspection of Fort Detrick s’ US Army
12:40
Medical Research Institute of expect
12:42
infectious diseases or us a Murud and
12:45
ordered it closed after what appears to
12:48
be the same violations and this is
12:50
actually quite critical because the
12:52
Center for Disease Control shut down a
12:55
laboratory for the very same argument
12:58
that was made when the State Department
13:01
and embassy staff reportedly found the
13:04
same or similar violations at the Wuhan
13:07
Institute of virology as those
13:09
information with respect to the Fort
13:11
Detrick investigation are not clearly
13:13
available all we can assume is that CDC
13:16
selectively and capriciously closed one
13:19
lab and let another with similar similar
13:22
violations that also had a financial
13:25
interest in their activity
13:27
to continue now here’s where it gets a
13:30
little messy folks because CDC reported
13:33
the first SARS Cove CoV case in January
13:37
2020 and according to the CDC’s own
13:40
epidemiology epidemic intelligence
13:43
service by the end of January to the 1st
13:46
or 2nd of February there were 650
13:49
clinical cases and what they report to
13:52
be 210 tests performed now just stop for
13:56
a minute and ask yourself the question
13:58
if the tests which reportedly was not
14:01
approved by the FDA for emergency use
14:05
remember for emergency use was not
14:07
approved until the 4th of February how
14:09
is it that in late January allegedly the
14:12
CDC had already allegedly conducted 210
14:15
tests on alleged cases of corona virus
14:20
infection in the United States
14:22
given that the suspected pathogen was
14:24
first implicated in official risk
14:26
reports on December 31st 2019 and only
14:30
isolated within that very short period
14:32
of time between December 31st and the
14:35
early part of January one can only
14:37
conclude that the CDC had the mechanism
14:39
and the wherewithal to conduct tests to
14:41
confirm the existence of a novel
14:43
coronavirus did not have the mechanism
14:47
but falsely reported the information and
14:50
it certainly tests credulity of both the
14:52
World Health Organization and the CDC
14:54
that they could manufacture before
14:56
anyone even knew this virus existed and
14:59
had not clarified it in any form of
15:02
genomic testing that they had tests for
15:04
210 tests before any emergency youth
15:08
authorization was granted did the CDC
15:13
had the test did they not have the test
15:14
why doesn’t the world have the test the
15:18
world doesn’t have the test because from
15:21
2003 until today the CDC illegally held
15:28
maintained and controlled an illegal
15:31
patent on both the virus and on the test
15:35
that would be required to detect its
15:37
presence the reason why you can be told
15:41
is a novel coronavirus and the reason
15:43
why there is no way to empirically
15:46
validate whether there actually is SARS
15:49
CoV – or not is because the CDC
15:52
maintained an illegal monopoly restrain
15:55
trade and violated both the Sherman the
15:59
Clayton Act in their business practices
16:01
with both domestic and foreign operators
16:04
around March 12th and this date becomes
16:07
exceptionally important – the last
16:10
comment I’m going to make around March
16:12
12th 2020 in an effort to enrich their
16:15
own economic interests by way of
16:17
securing additional funding from both
16:19
federal and foundation actors the CDC
16:22
and NIH dr. foul Chi elected to suspend
16:26
testing as a requirement to classify a
16:29
patient with kovat 19 now March 12th is
16:34
really important not surprisingly as
16:38
there was a drop in reported cases the
16:41
liberalization of what constituted a
16:45
suspected or presumptive positive case
16:47
needed to be created to incite fear and
16:51
to prop up the fear of a pandemic which
16:55
was never capable of being independently
16:58
verified because of an illegal action
17:01
taken by the Center for Disease Control
17:03
the CDC and the who elected to commit to
17:08
a narrative of a novel coronavirus and
17:10
remember they had the only ability to do
17:14
so they patented the compound of nature
17:16
illegally and then they held the patent
17:18
on the tests for that compound there was
17:21
no way to independently verify this
17:23
further they participated in exhibiting
17:26
properties of virulence that include the
17:28
ACE 2 receptor and other spike protein
17:32
properties which are the subject of US
17:34
patent seven six one eight eight zero
17:37
two issued to the University of North
17:40
Carolina’s own Ralph barek and in the
17:42
absence of testing protocols all of them
17:46
elected to insist that SARS CoV 2 was a
17:50
novel pathogen responsible for
17:53
conditions
17:54
that and I’m quoting were consistent
17:57
with moderate to severe acute
18:00
respiratory syndrome and pneumonia you
18:04
heard me correctly and the reason why
18:06
that last statement is so important is
18:08
because as of today there are still with
18:12
all of the liberal definitions of what
18:14
counts as a CO vid patient there are
18:17
still more cases since March the 12th of
18:21
pneumonia of an idiopathic origin
18:23
meaning a pneumonia that comes from a
18:25
pathogen we don’t know there are still
18:28
more cases of pneumonia with an
18:31
idiopathic origin then there are Co vid
18:34
cases by over 5,000 and for those of you
18:37
who like to go into the CDC web page and
18:39
do the gotcha moment on well but there’s
18:42
a reporting glitch the problem is the
18:44
reporting glitch lives in both sets of
18:46
data in both sets of data and the
18:50
pneumonia numbers still outstrip the
18:52
kovin numbers by over 5,000 as of today
18:56
there is no question that on February
19:02
17th 2014 when the Center for Disease
19:07
Control paid your tax dollars to renew a
19:12
patent that was declared illegal by the
19:15
United States Supreme Court in June 2013
19:19
almost a year apart when they renewed
19:23
their illegal patent on February 17 2014
19:27
the Center for Disease Control violated
19:29
article 1 section 8 Clause 8 of the
19:32
United States Constitution by renewing
19:36
their illegal patent on February 17th
19:39
2014 the CDC willfully violated the law
19:42
using public funds in light of a Supreme
19:46
Court ruling that actually had declared
19:48
their actions illegal on June 13 2013
19:53
with respect to article 1 section 9
19:57
Clause to the protection of habeas
19:59
corpus governor Gavin Newsom in
20:03
California under executive order n 33 20
20:08
based the declaration of a state of
20:11
emergency and the ultimate reach the
20:14
ultimate restriction of civil liberties
20:16
on and I quote the threat of Co vid 19
20:21
there is no constitutional protection
20:24
and by the way if you go and look at the
20:28
Juho case in in the case in san
20:33
francisco during the the previous
20:36
pandemic litigation in the supreme court
20:38
you’ll realize that there is no
20:41
protection that has ever afforded a
20:44
governor in any state the right to
20:46
suspend civil liberties on the threat of
20:50
a thing particularly when that threat
20:54
has not given been given the opportunity
20:57
to be examined no background of the
21:00
underlying supporting science has been
21:01
verifiable and in this particular case
21:03
could not be verified without infringing
21:07
the CDC’s patent or without their
21:11
collusion fox guarding the henhouse
21:14
absolutely and governor newsome’s order
21:17
by stating that it is under the threat
21:20
without any confirmed serology or
21:24
confirmed immunologic evidence violated
21:28
not only his rights under government
21:32
code sections eight five six seven eight
21:34
six two seven and eight six five five
21:37
which by the way never give anybody the
21:40
right to declare an emergency based on
21:43
merely an unsubstantiated threat at the
21:47
time of that declaration neither the CDC
21:50
nor the w-h-o had sufficient testing in
21:53
place to confirm or isolate the novel
21:56
coronavirus California did not have
21:59
pathology data to suggest that the
22:01
epidemic was even eminent and the rest
22:03
of the United States was incapable of
22:05
making any such assessment because of
22:07
the aforementioned actions of the
22:09
conspiring parties let me make this
22:12
point abundantly clear to date there is
22:15
no clinical data showing that the
22:17
restraint of healthy individuals also
22:20
known as social distancing
22:22
has any empirical data supporting its
22:25
use if you look at the University of
22:28
Washington Johns Hopkins and Imperial
22:31
College models not a single one of them
22:34
mandates entire lockdown of a healthy
22:38
population the most aggressive
22:40
assumptions under social distancing are
22:42
set forth to be a workplace reduction of
22:45
about a reduction of 50% but in no model
22:48
in no scientific document in no place at
22:51
all has there ever been validation that
22:55
quarantine in a healthy population has
22:57
any merit in science governor Newsom
23:00
followed by another 44 governors
___