Though the anti-Federalist viewpoint needs strong support, it seems the Federalist concern in the late 1700s was to quickly organize in order to simply survive. Having just thrown off the overt yoke of the Brits, military men, such as George Washington, were rightly concerned about establishing law and order ASAP. George (along with Hamilton and John Jay) was against inserting the Bill of Rights; George also suppressed the Whiskey Rebellion <= crushing the first anti-tax bunch of hard-drinking freedom lovers. (Make of it what you will.) Still, GW wanted to protect and preserve our fledgling nation, and these were noble presentiments.

But getting back to the late 1700s, it seems, as with all things, there needed to be a balance between Federalist and anti-Federalist, even back then. That is, between short and long-term survival. And now that the pendulum has swung way over to the side of the Federalists’ wet dream of central banking mercantilism (with even the real government going corporate) the time of the anti-Federalist playbook has become manifest and is an urgent necessity. But of course the same forces remain in play: survival in the short term vs. survival in the long term.

And now, besides weaponized technology, we must also beware of interlopers who come in the form of wolves in sheeps’ clothing, i.e., the same bunch of traitors. We will always owe our allegiance to those mighty men, Believers who founded this constitutional republic under God—that is, under the Laws of Nature, Nature’s God, and the Revealed Law upon which our country and its original documents are founded.

Submitted by Jack Suss aka Wyman Wicket