Dallas Ludlum
The Conservative Compass

In a recent development that has sparked concerns and raised eyebrows, the Department of Justice (DOJ) made significant revisions to its webpage on child sex trafficking, specifically removing sections related to international and domestic cases. These changes, which occurred in late May, have drawn attention amid discussions surrounding President Joe Biden’s immigration policies and the release of the film “The Sound of Freedom.” This article delves into the modifications made by the DOJ and their potential implications.

On May 12th, 2023, the DOJ’s webpage dedicated to addressing child sex trafficking underwent a substantial overhaul, effectively erasing three critical sections: “International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution.” Previously updated during the Trump administration in May 2020, this revision raises concerns about the motives behind the changes and the subsequent impact on public awareness. They also removed all mention of minors from their January 2022: “National Strategy to Combat Human Trafficking” documents.

International Sex Trafficking of Minors: Lost Narratives

The now-deleted description of international sex trafficking shed light on the grim reality of traffickers recruiting and transporting children across borders for sexual exploitation. It highlighted how these traffickers could operate individually or as part of organized crime groups, exploiting children from less-developed areas to more developed regions, including the United States. The erased section emphasized the scale of the problem within the country and the need for comprehensive measures to combat it.

Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors: Vanishing Insights

The section detailing domestic sex trafficking addressed the disturbing phenomenon of American children being coerced into prostitution. It exposed how pimps and traffickers exploited children in various locations across the United States, including street prostitution, adult night clubs, illegal brothels, and other venues. By removing this information, the revised webpage leaves a void in understanding the scope and urgency of addressing domestic child sex trafficking.

Child Victims of Prostitution: Silencing Their Stories

Gone from the revamped webpage is the section that shed light on the tactics employed by traffickers to keep children trapped in a life of prostitution. It described the process of cultivating relationships, engendering false trust, and using physical, emotional, and psychological abuse to control victims. The erased content also highlighted the isolation of victims, often moving them away from familiar surroundings and conditioning them to remain loyal to their exploiters.

Implications and the Quest for Transparency

While the motivations behind the DOJ’s revisions remain unclear, their timing in relation to discussions on immigration policies and concerns over child sex trafficking is concerning. The removal of crucial information from the public domain raises questions about the DOJ’s commitment to transparency and public awareness. As the battle against child sex trafficking intensifies, it is essential for the DOJ to foster an environment of openness, ensuring that the public and law enforcement agencies have access to accurate and comprehensive resources.

Conclusion:

The DOJ’s decision to revise its webpage on child sex trafficking, removing sections focused on international and domestic cases, has sparked concern and ignited discussions about transparency and the fight against child exploitation. As citizens, we must urge the DOJ to provide clarity on the motivations behind these revisions and reaffirm its commitment to combatting child sex trafficking. Ensuring public awareness and understanding is crucial to preventing and addressing this heinous crime, and it is our collective responsibility to advocate for the protection and well-being of our children.

As of the time.of publishing. The Conservative Compass reached out to the DOJ’s Criminal Division for comment. They have not responded.

___
https://conservativecompass.substack.com/p/doj-removes-all-mention-of-minors