2019-nCoV Could Not Be a Product of Nature

2019-nCoV could not be a product of nature, but rather a product of human genetic engineering

Our Greater Destiny

The war Lee Merritt talks about is the ‘quiet war using silent weapons documented in The Report From Iron Mountain’s blueprint to tyranny. See below.

From the start of the pLandemic, I downloaded scientific papers including papers they withdrew [below].

1] Abstract

It is the goal of this review to warn against and to correct international misunderstanding created by deliberate falsification of scientific documentations and events.

Page 44 Bottom of the page #2 Origins of covid

2019-nCoV genomics indicated that it was a recombinant virus of SARS-CoV and HIV origins. The two species of viruses had distinct and distance pedigrees, and because of the different space and time of their existence, their recombinant had never appeared in a natural setting [4]. Therefore, 2019-nCoV could not be a product of nature, but rather a product of human genetic engineering. https://www.scirp.org/pdf/ojrm_2020042016561553.pdf

2] Abstract similar at all 3 links

In 2019, a new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infecting Humans has emerged in Wuhan, China. Its genome has been sequenced and the genomic information promptly released. Despite a high similarity with the genome sequence of SARS-CoV and SARS-like CoVs, we identified a peculiar furin-like cleavage site in the Spike protein of the 2019-nCoV, lacking in the other SARS-like CoVs. In this article, we discuss the possible functional consequences of this cleavage site in the viral cycle, pathogenicity and its potential implication in the development of antivirals. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339153857_The_spike_glycoprotein_of_the_new_coronavirus_2019-nCoV_contains_a_furin-like_cleavage_site_absent_in_CoV_of_the_same_clade

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32057769/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528 this one includes

Highlights

The genomic sequence of 2019-nCoV indicates that the virus clusters with betacoronaviruses of lineage b.
2019-nCoV S-protein sequence has a specific furin-like cleavage site absent in lineage b CoV including SARS-CoV sequences.
The furin-like cleavage site in the S-protein of 2019-nCoV may have implications for the viral life cycle and pathogenicity.
Campaigns to develop anti-2019-nCoV therapeutics should include the evaluation of furin inhibitors.

3] S.T.A.R.
Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag
[this paper was withdrawn – see below]

Preprint (PDF Available) · January 2020 with 84,274 Reads

DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.30.927871

http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871

Prashant Pradhan$1,2, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey$1, Akhilesh Mishra$1, Parul Gupta1, Praveen Kumar Tripathi1, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon1, James Gomes1, Perumal Vivekanandan*1and Bishwajit Kundu*1 1Kusuma School of biological sciences, Indian institute of technology, New Delhi-110016, India. 2Acharya Narendra Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110019, India

$Equal contribution * Corresponding authors- email: bkundu@bioschool.iitd.ac.in

vperumal@bioschool.iitd.ac.in

Abstract

We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019- nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.

This paper is addressed in the Len Horowitz video
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338957445_Uncanny_similarity_of_unique_inserts_in_the_2019-nCoV_spike_protein_to_HIV-1_gp120_and_Gag

Dr. Len Horowitz – The Rockefeller Medical Monopoly & The CoronaVirus (LabVirus) https://www.bitchute.com/video/hi0pvf4UqcTc/

  1. This article has been withdrawn. Click here for details [see below]


Abstract

  • We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v1

Withdrawn Comments (130)

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

Prashant Pradhan, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon, James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan, Bishwajit Kundu

doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871

This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?].

Abstract

This paper has been withdrawn by its authors. They intend to revise it in response to comments received from the research community on their technical approach and their interpretation of the results. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.

Withdrawn paper  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339153857_The_spike_glycoprotein_of_the_new_coronavirus_2019-nCoV_contains_a_furin-like_cleavage_site_absent_in_CoV_of_the_same_clade

PDF https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0166354220300528?token=555A849FF8BA904B998BA78F9F5E4EF81086DC3AF7FA6D94737DA9C468AB1DEAFD44F76170995FF7016CF367F6BF4464

  1. 6. The war Lee Merritt talks about is the ‘quiet war’ using silent weapons for decades, documented in The Report From Iron Mountain’s blueprint to tyranny

https://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/index.shtml

DESCRIPTIVE INTRODUCTION OF THE SILENT WEAPON

Everything that is expected from an ordinary weapon is expected from a silent weapon by its creators, but only in it its own manner of functioning.

It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general.

It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone’s daily social life.

Yet it makes an unmistakable ‘noise’, causes unmistakable physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for.

The public cannot comprehend this weapon, and therefore cannot believe that they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon.

The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.

When a silent weapon is applied gradually to the public, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack up.

Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological war fare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses.

I suggest the evidence needs to be put in front of people who will leverage it toward justice and freedom for all. Any ideas or contacts?

Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino
http://freetobewealthy.net
Via ethernet to safeguard life

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.