Crimes against Humanity

Video produced by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

https://youtu.be/kr04gHbP5MQ

VIDEO Link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kr04gHbP5MQ&feature=emb_logo

YouTube Auto-generated Transcript

00:01
hello i am
00:03
reiner fulmich and i have been admitted
00:05
to the bar
00:06
in germany and in california for 26
00:09
years
00:10
i have been practicing law primarily as
00:12
a trial lawyer against fraudulent
00:14
corporations such as
00:16
deutsche bank formerly one of the
00:18
world’s largest and most respected banks
00:20
today one of the most toxic criminal
00:23
organizations in the world
00:25
vw one of the world’s largest and most
00:28
respected car manufacturers
00:30
today notorious for its giant diesel
00:32
fraud
00:33
and kuna and nage the world’s largest
00:36
shipping company
00:37
we’re suing them in a multi-million
00:39
dollar bribery case
00:41
i’m also one of four members of the
00:43
german corona
00:45
investigative committee since july 10
00:48
2020 this committee has been listening
00:51
to a large number
00:52
of international scientists and experts
00:55
testimony
00:56
to find answers to questions about the
00:58
corona crisis which
01:00
more and more people worldwide are
01:02
asking
01:03
all the above mentioned cases of
01:05
corruption and fraud
01:07
committed by the german corporations
01:09
pale in comparison
01:11
in view of the extent of the damage that
01:13
the corona crisis has caused and
01:15
continues to cause
01:17
this corona crisis according to all we
01:20
know today
01:21
must be renamed a corona scandal
01:24
and those responsible for it must be
01:26
criminally prosecuted
01:28
and sued for civil damages on a
01:31
political level
01:32
everything must be done to make sure
01:34
that no one
01:35
will ever again be in a position of such
01:38
power
01:39
as to be able to defraud humanity or to
01:41
attempt
01:42
to manipulate us with their corrupt
01:44
agendas
01:46
and for this reason i will now explain
01:48
to you how and where
01:50
an international network of lawyers will
01:52
argue this biggest
01:54
tort case ever the corona fraud scandal
01:57
which has meanwhile unfolded into
01:59
probably the greatest crime against
02:01
humanity ever committed
02:04
crimes against humanity were first
02:06
defined in connection with the nuremberg
02:08
trials
02:09
after world war ii that is when they
02:11
dealt with the main war criminals of the
02:13
third reich
02:14
crimes against humanity are today
02:16
regulated in section 7 of the
02:18
international criminal code
02:21
the three major questions to be answered
02:23
in the context of a judicial approach to
02:25
the corona scandal are
02:27
one is there a corona pandemic
02:30
or is there only a pcr test pandemic
02:34
specifically does a positive pcr test
02:37
result
02:37
mean that the person tested is infected
02:40
with covet 19
02:41
or does it mean absolutely nothing in
02:44
connection with the covet 19
02:46
infection two do the so-called
02:50
anti-corona measures such as the
02:52
lockdown
02:53
mandatory face masks social distancing
02:58
and quarantine regulations serve to
03:00
protect the world’s population from
03:02
corona
03:03
or do these measures serve only to make
03:05
people panic
03:07
so that they believe without asking any
03:09
questions
03:10
that their lives are in danger so that
03:12
in the end
03:13
the pharmaceutical and tech industries
03:15
can generate huge profits from the sale
03:17
of pcr tests
03:19
antigen and antibody tests and vaccines
03:22
as well as the harvesting of our genetic
03:24
fingerprints
03:26
and three is it true that the german
03:29
government was
03:30
massively lobbied more so than any other
03:32
country
03:33
by the chief protagonists of this
03:35
so-called corona pandemic
03:38
mr druzden virologist at charity
03:40
hospital in berlin
03:42
mr wheeler veterinarian and head of the
03:45
german equivalent of the cdc the rki
03:48
and mr tedras head of the world health
03:51
organization or
03:52
who because of germany is known as a
03:55
particularly disciplined country
03:57
and was therefore to become a role model
03:59
for the rest of the world
04:01
for its strict and of course successful
04:04
adherence to the corona measures
04:07
answers to these three questions are
04:09
urgently needed because the allegedly
04:12
new and highly dangerous coronavirus has
04:14
not
04:15
caused any excess mortality anywhere in
04:18
the world
04:18
and certainly not here in germany but
04:21
the anti-corona measures
04:23
whose only bases are the pcr test
04:26
results
04:26
which are in turn all based on the
04:29
german dresden test
04:30
have in the meantime cause the loss of
04:33
innumerable human lives
04:35
and have destroyed the economic
04:36
existence of countless companies and
04:39
individuals worldwide in australia
04:42
for example people are thrown into
04:44
prison if they do not wear a mask
04:46
or do not wear it properly as deemed by
04:48
the authorities
04:50
in the philippines people who do not
04:52
wear a mask or do not wear it properly
04:54
in this sense are getting shot in the
04:56
head
04:58
let me first give you a summary of the
05:00
facts that they present as they present
05:02
themselves today
05:03
the most important thing in a lawsuit is
05:06
to establish the facts that is
05:08
to find out what actually happened
05:11
that that is because the application of
05:13
the law always depends on the facts at
05:16
issue
05:17
if i want to prosecute someone for fraud
05:19
i cannot do that by presenting the facts
05:21
of a car accident
05:23
so what happened here regarding the
05:26
alleged corona pandemic
05:28
the facts laid out below are to a large
05:31
extent the result of the work of the
05:33
corona investigative committee this
05:36
committee was founded on july 10th by
05:38
four lawyers in order to determine
05:41
through hearing expert testimony of
05:43
international scientists and other
05:44
experts
05:46
one how dangerous is the virus really
05:49
two what is the significance of a
05:52
positive pcr
05:53
test three what collateral damage has
05:56
been caused by the corona measures
05:58
both with respect to the world’s
06:00
population’s health
06:01
and with with respect to the world’s
06:04
economy
06:06
me start with a background a little bit
06:08
of background
06:09
information what happened in may
06:12
2019 and then in early 2020
06:16
and what happened 12 years earlier with
06:18
the
06:19
swine flu which many of you may have
06:21
forgotten about
06:22
in may of 2019 the stronger of the two
06:26
parties which govern germany
06:28
in a grand coalition the cdu held a
06:31
congress on global health
06:33
apparently at the instigation of
06:35
important players
06:36
from the pharmaceutical industry in the
06:38
tech industry
06:39
at this congress the usual suspects you
06:42
might say gave their speeches
06:44
angela merkel was there and the german
06:47
secretary of health
06:48
jens spahn but some other people
06:52
whom one would not necessarily expect to
06:55
be present at such a gathering were also
06:57
there
06:58
professor drosten virologist from the
07:01
charity hospital in berlin
07:03
professor wheeler veterinarian and head
07:06
of the rki
07:08
the german equivalent of the cdc as well
07:11
as mr tadros philosopher
07:13
and head of the world health
07:15
organization who
07:17
they all gave speeches there also
07:19
present and giving speeches were the
07:21
chief lobbyists of the world’s two
07:23
largest
07:24
health funds namely the bill and melinda
07:26
gates foundation
07:27
and the welcome trust less than a year
07:31
later
07:31
these very people called the shots in
07:34
the proclamation
07:35
of the worldwide corona pandemic
07:38
made sure that mass pcr tests were used
07:40
to prove mass infections with covet 19
07:43
all over the world
07:44
and are now pushing for vaccines to be
07:47
invented and sold
07:48
worldwide these infections or rather
07:52
the positive test results that the pcr
07:54
tests delivered
07:56
in turn became the justification for
07:58
worldwide lockdowns
08:00
social distancing and mandatory face
08:03
masks
08:04
is it is important to note at this point
08:07
that the definition of a pandemic
08:09
was changed 12 years earlier until then
08:13
a pandemic was considered to be a
08:15
disease that spread worldwide
08:18
and which led to many serious illnesses
08:20
and deaths
08:22
suddenly and for reasons never explained
08:24
it was supposed to be a worldwide
08:26
disease
08:27
only many serious illnesses and many
08:30
deaths
08:30
were not required anymore to announce a
08:33
pandemic
08:35
due to this change the who which is
08:37
closely intertwined with the global
08:39
pharmaceutical
08:40
industry was able to declare the swine
08:43
flu pandemic
08:44
in 2009 with the result
08:47
that vaccines were produced and sold
08:49
worldwide on the basis of contracts that
08:52
have been kept secret
08:53
until today these vaccines proved to be
08:57
completely unnecessary
08:59
because the swine flu eventually turned
09:01
out to be
09:02
a mild flu and never became the horrific
09:05
plague that the pharmaceutical industry
09:08
and its affiliated universities kept
09:10
announcing it would turn into with
09:11
millions of deaths certain to happen if
09:13
people didn’t get vaccinated
09:16
these vaccines also led to serious
09:18
health problems
09:20
about 700 children in europe fell
09:22
incurably ill with narcolepsy
09:25
and are now forever severely disabled
09:29
the vaccines bought with millions of
09:31
taxpayers money
09:32
had to be destroyed with even more
09:35
taxpayers
09:36
money already then during the swine flu
09:39
the german virologist drusten was one of
09:41
those who stirred up panic in the
09:43
population repeating over and over again
09:46
that the swine flu would claim many
09:48
hundreds of thousands
09:49
even millions of deaths are all over the
09:52
world
09:53
in the end it was mainly thanks to dr
09:56
wolfgang vodak and his efforts as a
10:00
member of the german bundestag and also
10:02
a member of the council of europe
10:04
that this hoax was brought to an end
10:06
before it would lead
10:07
to even more serious consequences
10:10
fast forward to march of 2020
10:14
when the german bundestag announced an
10:16
epidemic situation of
10:17
national importance which is the german
10:19
equivalent of a pandemic
10:22
in march of 2020 and based on this the
10:25
lockdown with the suspension of
10:27
all essential constitutional rights for
10:30
an
10:30
unforeseeable time there was only one
10:32
single opinion
10:34
on which the federal government in
10:35
germany based its decision
10:39
in an outrageous violation of the
10:42
universally accepted principle audiator
10:44
at ultra parse which means that one must
10:46
also hear the other side the only person
10:49
they listened to was mr drusten
10:52
that is the very person whose horrific
10:55
panic-inducing prognosis
10:57
had proved to be catastrophically false
10:59
12 years
11:00
earlier we know this because a
11:03
whistleblower
11:04
named david siva a member of the green
11:07
party
11:07
told us about it he did so first on
11:10
august 29
11:11
2020 in berlin in the context of an
11:14
event at which robert f kennedy jr
11:16
also took part and at which both men
11:19
gave speeches
11:21
and he did so afterwards in one of the
11:23
sessions of our corona committee
11:26
the reason he did this is that he had
11:28
become increasingly skeptical about the
11:31
the official narrative propagated by
11:33
politicians and the mainstream media
11:36
he had therefore undertaken an effort to
11:39
find out about other
11:40
scientists opinions and had found them
11:42
on the internet
11:44
there he realized that there were a
11:46
number of highly renowned scientists who
11:48
held
11:49
a completely different opinion which
11:51
contradicted the horrific prognosis of
11:54
mr
11:54
dresden they assumed and still do assume
11:58
that there was no disease that went
12:00
beyond the gravity of the seasonal flu
12:03
that the population had already acquired
12:05
cross or
12:06
t-cell immunity against this allegedly
12:08
new virus
12:09
and that there was therefore no reason
12:12
for any special measures
12:13
and certainly not for vaccinations these
12:16
scientists
12:17
include professor john yoenitas of
12:19
stanford university in california
12:22
a specialist in statistics and
12:24
epidemiology as well as public health
12:27
and at the same time the most quoted
12:29
scientists in the world
12:30
professor michael levitt nobel prize
12:33
winner for chemistry
12:34
and uh and also a biophysicist at
12:37
stanford university
12:38
the german professors karin mulling
12:41
sushari bhakti
12:42
klud witkowski as well as stefan homburg
12:45
and now
12:46
many many more scientists and doctors
12:48
worldwide
12:49
including dr mike eden
12:53
dr mike yeedon is the former vice
12:55
president and scientific director of
12:57
pfizer one of the largest pharmaceutical
12:59
companies in the world
13:01
i will talk some more about him a little
13:03
later
13:04
at the end of march beginning of april
13:06
of 2020 mr sieber turned to the
13:09
leadership of his green party
13:11
with the uh knowledge he had accumulated
13:14
and suggested that they present these
13:16
other scientific opinions to the public
13:18
and explain that contrary
13:20
to mr druzden’s doomsday prophecies
13:22
there was no reason
13:24
for the public to panic incidentally
13:27
lord assumption who served as a judge at
13:30
the british
13:30
supreme court from 2012 to 2018
13:35
had the had done the very same thing at
13:37
the very same time
13:38
it had come to the very same conclusion
13:41
that there was no factual basis for
13:44
panic
13:44
and no legal basis for the corona
13:46
measures likewise the former president
13:49
of the german federal constitutional
13:51
court
13:51
expressed albeit more cautiously serious
13:55
doubts
13:55
that the corona measures were
13:57
constitutional
13:59
but instead of taking note of these
14:01
other opinions
14:02
and discussing them with david sieber
14:04
the green party leadership declared
14:07
that mr drusten’s panic messages were
14:09
good enough for the german party
14:11
for the green party remember they’re not
14:15
a member of the ruling coalition they’re
14:17
the opposition
14:19
still that was enough for them just as
14:22
it had been good enough for the federal
14:24
government as a basis for its lockdown
14:26
decision they said
14:28
they subsequently the green party
14:29
leadership called david sieber a
14:31
conspiracy theorist without ever having
14:34
considered the content of his
14:35
information and then stripped him of his
14:37
mandates
14:39
now let’s take a look at the current
14:40
actual situation regarding the virus’s
14:43
danger
14:44
the complete uselessness of pcr tests
14:46
for the
14:47
detection of infections and the
14:49
lockdowns based on non-existent existent
14:52
infections in the meantime we know that
14:55
the health care systems were never
14:58
in danger of becoming overwhelmed by
15:00
covet 19.
15:01
on the contrary many hospitals remain
15:04
empty to this day
15:05
and some are now facing bankruptcy the
15:08
hospital ship comfort which anchored in
15:10
new york at the time
15:12
and could have accommodated a thousand
15:13
patients never accommodated more than
15:15
some 20 patients
15:17
nowhere was there any access excess
15:20
mortality studies carried out by
15:23
professor juanitas and others have shown
15:25
that the mortality of corona
15:27
is equivalent to that of the seasonal
15:29
flu
15:31
even the pictures from bergamo and new
15:33
york that were used to demonstrate to
15:35
the world that panic was in order proved
15:37
to be deliberately
15:38
misleading then the so-called
15:41
panic paper was leaked which was written
15:44
by the german department of the interior
15:46
its classified content shows beyond a
15:49
shadow of a doubt that
15:51
in fact the population was deliberately
15:54
driven to panic by politicians and
15:56
mainstream media
15:58
the accompanying irresponsible
16:00
statements of the head of the rki
16:03
remember the cdc mr wheeler who
16:06
repeatedly and excitedly
16:08
announced that the corona measures must
16:10
be followed unconditionally by the
16:12
population without them
16:13
asking any question shows that
16:17
that he followed the script verbatim in
16:20
his public statements
16:21
he kept announcing that the situation
16:23
was very grave
16:24
and threatening although the figures
16:26
compiled by his own institute
16:28
proved the exact opposite among other
16:32
things
16:33
the panic paper calls for children to be
16:36
made to feel responsible
16:38
and i quote for the painful tortured
16:41
death of their parents and grandparents
16:43
if they do not follow the corona rules
16:45
that is if they do not wash their hands
16:47
constantly
16:48
and don’t stay away from their
16:50
grandparents
16:52
a word of clarification in bergamo the
16:55
vast majority of deaths
16:57
94 to be exact turned out to be the
17:00
result
17:00
not of covet 19 but rather the
17:03
consequence
17:04
of the government deciding to transfer
17:06
sick patients
17:07
sick with probably the cold or seasonal
17:10
flu
17:10
from hospitals to nursing homes in order
17:13
to make room
17:14
at the hospitals for all the covet
17:16
patients who ultimately never
17:18
arrived there at the nursing homes they
17:21
then
17:21
infected old people with a severely
17:24
weakened immune system
17:26
usually as a result of pre-existing
17:27
medical conditions
17:29
in addition a flu vaccination which had
17:32
previously been
17:33
been administered had further weakened
17:35
the immune systems of the people in the
17:36
nursing homes
17:38
in new york only some but by far not
17:42
all hospitals were overwhelmed many
17:44
people
17:45
most of whom were again elderly and had
17:48
serious pre-existing medical conditions
17:50
and most of whom
17:52
had it not been for the panic mongering
17:54
would have just stayed at home to
17:55
recover
17:56
raced to the hospitals there many of
17:59
them fell
17:59
victim to healthcare-associated
18:01
infections or
18:03
nosocomial infections on the one hand
18:05
and incidents of malpractice on the
18:07
other hand
18:08
for example by being put on a respirator
18:11
rather
18:12
than receiving oxygen through an oxygen
18:14
mask
18:16
again to clarify covet 19 this is the
18:19
current state of affairs
18:20
is a dangerous disease just like the
18:22
seasonal flu is a dangerous disease
18:24
and of course covet 19 just like the
18:27
seasonal flu
18:28
may sometimes take severe clinic take a
18:31
severe clinical course
18:33
and will sometimes kill patients however
18:36
as autopsies have shown which were
18:38
carried out in germany in particular
18:41
by the forensic scientist professor
18:43
klaus pusher in hamburg
18:46
the fatalities he examined had almost
18:48
all been
18:49
caused by serious pre-existing
18:51
conditions
18:52
and almost all of the people who had
18:54
died had died at the very
18:56
at a very old age just like in italy
18:58
meaning
18:59
they had lived beyond their average life
19:01
expectancy
19:03
in this context the following should
19:05
also be mentioned
19:06
the german rki that is again the
19:10
equivalent of the cdc
19:11
had initially strangely enough
19:14
recommended that
19:15
no autopsies be performed
19:18
and there are numerous credible reports
19:22
that doctors and hospitals worldwide
19:24
had been paid money for declaring a
19:26
deceased person a victim of covet 19
19:29
rather than writing down the true cause
19:31
of death on the death certificate
19:33
for example a heart attack or a gunshot
19:36
wound
19:37
without the autopsies we would never
19:39
know that the overwhelming majority of
19:41
the alleged covet 19 victims had died of
19:43
completely different diseases
19:45
but not of covet 19. the assertion that
19:49
the lockdown was necessary
19:51
because there were so many different
19:52
infections with sarskoff too
19:54
and because the healthcare systems would
19:56
be overwhelmed is wrong for three
19:58
reasons
19:59
as we have learned from the hearings we
20:01
conducted with the
20:02
corona committee and from other data
20:05
that has become available in the
20:06
meantime
20:08
a the lockdown was imposed when the
20:10
virus was already
20:12
retreating by the time the lockdown was
20:15
imposed
20:15
the alleged infection rates were already
20:18
dropping again
20:20
b there’s already protection from the
20:22
virus because of cross or t
20:24
cell immunity apart from the above
20:27
mentioned
20:28
lockdown being imposed when the
20:31
infection rates were already dropping
20:33
there is also cross or t cell immunity
20:36
in the general population against the
20:38
corona viruses con
20:40
contained in every flu or influenza wave
20:44
this is true even if this time around a
20:47
slightly different
20:48
strain of the coronavirus was at work
20:50
and that is because the body’s
20:52
own immune system remembers every virus
20:55
it has ever battled in the past
20:57
and from this experience it also
20:59
recognizes a supposedly new
21:01
but still similar strain of the virus
21:03
from the corona family
21:05
incidentally that’s how the pcr test for
21:08
the detection of an infection
21:10
was invented by now infamous professor
21:13
drosten
21:15
at the beginning of january of 2020
21:18
based on this very basic knowledge mr
21:20
drosten developed his pcr test
21:23
which supposedly detects an infection
21:25
with sarskoff
21:26
ii without ever having seen the real
21:29
wuhan virus from
21:30
china only having learned from social
21:33
media reports that there was something
21:34
going on in wuhan
21:36
he started tinkering on his computer
21:38
with what would become
21:39
his corona pcr test for this
21:43
he used an old sars virus hoping it
21:46
would be sufficiently similar
21:47
to the allegedly new strain of the
21:49
coronavirus found in wuhan
21:51
then he sent the result of his computer
21:54
tinkering to china
21:55
to determine whether the victims of the
21:57
alleged new coronavirus tested positive
22:00
they did and that was enough for the
22:02
world health organization to sound the
22:04
pandemic alarm and to recommend
22:07
the worldwide use of the drugston pcr
22:10
test for the detection of infections
22:12
with the virus now called sarskoff 2.
22:14
drusden’s opinion and advice was this
22:17
must be emphasized once again
22:19
the only source for the german
22:21
government when it announced the
22:23
lockdown
22:24
as well as the rules for social
22:25
distancing and the mandatory wearing of
22:27
masks
22:28
and this must also be emphasized once
22:30
again germany
22:32
apparently became the center of
22:34
especially massive lobbying by the
22:36
pharmaceutical and tech industry
22:38
because the world with reference to the
22:40
allegedly disciplined
22:41
germans should do as the germans do in
22:44
order
22:45
to survive the pandemic see
22:49
and this is the most important part of
22:51
our fact-finding
22:52
the pcr test is being used on the basis
22:55
of false statements
22:56
not based on scientific facts with
22:59
respect to infections
23:01
in the meantime we have learned that
23:03
these pcr tests
23:05
contrary to the assertions of messers
23:07
druzden
23:08
wheeler and the who do not give any
23:10
indication of an infection with any
23:12
virus let alone
23:14
an infection with sarskoff ii note not
23:17
only are pcr tests expressly not
23:20
approved for diagnostic purposes
23:22
as is correctly noted on leaflets coming
23:25
with these tests
23:26
and as the inventor of the pcr test
23:28
kerry mullis
23:29
has repeatedly emphasized instead
23:32
they’re simply
23:33
incapable of diagnosing any disease
23:37
that is contrary to the assertions of
23:40
drugs and wheeler and the who
23:42
which they have been making since the
23:43
proclamation of the pandemic
23:45
a positive pcr test result does not mean
23:48
that an infection is
23:50
present if someone tests positive it
23:52
does
23:53
not mean that they’re infected with
23:55
anything let alone with the contagious
23:57
sarcophage ii virus
23:59
even the even the united states cdc
24:03
even this institution says
24:07
agrees with this and i quote directly
24:09
from page 38 of one of its publications
24:11
on the coronavirus and the pcr
24:13
tests dated july 13 2020.
24:17
first bullet point says detection of
24:20
viral
24:20
rna may not indicate the presence of
24:23
infectious virus
24:24
or that 2019 ncov
24:27
is the causative agent for clinical
24:30
symptoms
24:31
second bullet point says the performance
24:33
of this test has not been established
24:35
for monitoring treatment
24:37
of two threat 2019 encode infection
24:41
third bullet point says this test cannot
24:44
rule out diseases caused by other
24:46
bacterial
24:47
or viral pathogens
24:50
it is still not clear whether there has
24:52
ever been a scientifically correct
24:54
isolation of the wuhan virus
24:56
so that nobody knows exactly what we’re
24:58
looking for when we
25:00
test especially since this virus just
25:03
like the flu viruses
25:04
mutates quickly the pcr swaps
25:07
take one or two sequences of a
25:10
molecule that are invisible to the human
25:13
eye
25:14
and therefore need to be amplified in
25:17
many cycles to make it visible
25:19
everything over 35 cycles is as reported
25:22
by the new york times and others
25:24
considered completely unreliable and
25:27
scientifically
25:28
unjustifiable however the dresden test
25:31
as well as the who recommended tests
25:33
that followed his example
25:35
are set to 45 cycles
25:38
can that be because of the desire to
25:40
produce as many positive results and
25:42
possible
25:43
as possible and thereby provide the
25:45
basis for the false assumption that a
25:47
large number of infections have been
25:48
detected
25:50
the test cannot distinguish inactive and
25:54
reproductive matter
25:55
that means that a positive result may
25:57
happen because the test detects for
25:59
example a piece of debris
26:01
a fragment of a molecule which may
26:03
signal nothing else
26:05
than that the immune system of the
26:06
person tested won a battle with a common
26:09
cold in the past
26:11
even drosten himself declared in an
26:13
interview with a german business
26:15
magazine in 2014
26:17
at that time concerning the alleged uh
26:20
detection of an infection with immersed
26:22
virus
26:22
allegedly with the help of the pcr test
26:25
that these pcr tests are so highly
26:28
sensitive that even
26:29
very healthy and non-infectious people
26:32
may test
26:33
positive at that time he also became
26:36
very much aware
26:37
of the powerful role of a panic and
26:39
fear-mongering media
26:40
as you’ll see at the end of the
26:42
following quote he said then
26:45
in this interview if for example such a
26:48
pathogen
26:49
scurries over the nasal mucosa of a
26:51
nurse for a day or so
26:53
without her getting sick or noticing
26:56
anything
26:57
then she’s suddenly immersed case this
27:00
could also explain the explosion of case
27:02
numbers in saudi arabia
27:04
in addition the media there have made
27:07
this
27:08
into an incredible sensation
27:11
has he forgotten this or is he
27:13
deliberately concealing this
27:15
in the corona context because corona is
27:18
a very lucrative
27:19
lucrative business opportunity for the
27:21
pharmaceutical
27:22
pharmaceutical industry as a whole and
27:25
for mr alford lund
27:27
his co-author in many studies and also
27:30
a pcr test producer in my view it is
27:34
completely implausible
27:35
that he forgot in 2020 what he knew
27:38
about the pcr tests and told the
27:40
business magazine in 2014
27:43
in short this test cannot detect any
27:47
infection contrary to all false claims
27:50
stating that it can an infection a
27:53
so-called
27:54
hot infection requires requires that the
27:57
virus or rather
27:58
a fragment of a molecule which may be a
28:01
virus
28:02
is not just found somewhere for example
28:04
in the throat of a person without
28:06
causing any damage
28:07
that would be a cold infection rather a
28:10
hot
28:10
infection requires that the virus
28:12
penetrates into the cells
28:14
replicates there and causes symptoms
28:16
such as headaches or a sore throat
28:19
only then is a person really infected in
28:22
the sense of a hot
28:23
sense of a hot infection
28:26
because only then is a person contagious
28:29
that is
28:30
able to infect others until then it is
28:33
completely harmless
28:35
for both the host and all other people
28:37
that the host comes into contact with
28:40
once again this means that positive test
28:43
results
28:44
contrary to all other claims by drusten
28:47
wheeler
28:47
or the who mean nothing with respect to
28:50
infections
28:51
as even the cdc knows as quoted above
28:56
meanwhile a number of highly respected
28:58
scientists worldwide assume
29:00
that there has never been a corona
29:02
pandemic but only a pcr test pandemic
29:05
this is the conclusion reached by many
29:07
german scientists such as professors
29:09
bhakti
29:10
rice milling hockerts wallach and many
29:12
others
29:13
including the above mentioned professor
29:15
john yoenitz
29:16
and the nobel laureate professor michael
29:18
levitt from stanford university
29:22
the most recent such opinion is that of
29:24
the aforementioned dr
29:26
mike eden a former vice president and
29:29
chief science officer
29:30
at pfizer who held this position for 16
29:33
years
29:34
he and his co-authors all well-known
29:37
scientists
29:38
published a scientific paper in
29:40
september of 2020
29:42
and he wrote a corresponding magazine
29:45
article
29:46
on september 20th 2020.
29:49
among other things he and they state
29:52
and i quote we’re basing our government
29:55
policy
29:56
our economic policy and the policy of
29:59
restricting fundamental rights
30:00
presumably
30:01
on completely wrong data and assumptions
30:05
about the
30:06
coronavirus if it weren’t for the test
30:08
results that are constantly reported in
30:10
the media
30:11
the pandemic would be over because
30:13
nothing really happened
30:15
of course there are some serious
30:17
individual cases of illness
30:19
but there are also some in every flu
30:21
epidemic there was a real wave of
30:23
disease in march and april
30:25
but since then everything has gone back
30:27
to normal
30:29
only the positive results rise and sink
30:31
wildly again and again
30:33
depending on how many tests are carried
30:35
out but the real cases of illnesses
30:38
are over there can’t there can be no
30:41
talk
30:41
of a second wave the allegedly new
30:45
strain of the coronavirus is dr yeden
30:47
continues
30:48
only new in that it is a new type of the
30:51
long known corona virus
30:53
there are at least four coronaviruses
30:55
that are endemic
30:57
and cause some of the common colds we
30:58
experience especially
31:00
in winter they all have a striking
31:03
sequence similarity to the coronavirus
31:06
and because the human immune system
31:08
recognizes the similarity
31:10
to the virus that has now allegedly been
31:12
newly discovered a t
31:13
cell immunity has long existed in this
31:16
respect
31:17
30 percent of the population had this
31:19
before the allegedly new virus even
31:22
appeared
31:22
therefore it is sufficient for the
31:25
so-called
31:26
herd immunity that 15 to 25 percent of
31:29
the population
31:30
are infected with the allegedly new
31:32
coronavirus to stop the further spread
31:34
of the virus and this has long
31:37
been the case regarding the
31:40
all-important pcr
31:42
tests yetin writes in a piece called
31:45
lies damned lies and health statistics
31:47
the deadly danger of false positives
31:50
dated september 20th 2020
31:52
and i quote the likelihood of an
31:55
apparently
31:56
positive case being a false positive
31:59
is between 89 to 94 percent
32:02
or near certainty dr yeden in agreement
32:07
with the professors of immunology camera
32:10
from germany kapel from the netherlands
32:12
and cahill
32:13
from ireland as well as a microbiologist
32:15
dr arve from austria
32:17
all of whom testified before the german
32:20
corona committee
32:21
explicitly points out that a positive
32:24
test does not
32:25
mean that an intact virus has been found
32:28
the authors explain that what the pcr
32:31
test
32:31
actually measures is and i quote simply
32:34
the presence of partial rna sequences
32:37
present in the intact virus which could
32:39
be a piece of dead virus which cannot
32:41
make
32:42
the subject sick and cannot be
32:43
transmitted and cannot make
32:45
anyone else sick because of the complete
32:49
unsuitability of the test for the
32:51
detection of infectious diseases
32:53
tested positive in goats sheep papayas
32:56
and even chicken wings
32:58
oxford professor carl hennigan director
33:00
of the center for evidence-based
33:02
medicine
33:03
writes that the covet virus would never
33:06
disappear
33:07
if this test practice were to be
33:09
continued but would always be
33:11
falsely detected in much of what is
33:14
tested
33:15
lockdowns as heden and his colleagues
33:18
found out do not
33:19
work sweden with its laissez-faire
33:22
approach
33:22
and great britain with its strict
33:24
lockdown for example
33:26
have completely comparable disease and
33:28
mortality statistics
33:30
the same was found by u.s scientists
33:33
concerning the different u.s states
33:35
it makes no difference to the incidence
33:37
of disease whether a state implements a
33:39
lockdown or not
33:42
with regard to the now infamous
33:45
imperial college of london’s professor
33:48
neil ferguson and his completely
33:50
false computer model models warning of
33:52
millions of deaths
33:54
he says that and i quote no serious
33:57
scientist
33:58
gives any validity to ferguson’s model
34:01
he points out with thinly veiled
34:03
contempt again i quote
34:05
it’s important that you know most
34:07
scientists don’t accept that
34:09
it that is ferguson’s model was even
34:12
faintly right
34:13
but the government is still wedded to
34:15
the model
34:16
ferguson predicted 40 000 corona deaths
34:19
in sweden by may
34:20
and a hundred thousand by june but it
34:23
remained at five
34:24
thousand eight hundred which according
34:27
to the swedish authorities
34:28
is equivalent to a mild flu
34:31
if the pcr tests had not been used as a
34:34
diagnostic tool
34:35
for corona infections there would not be
34:38
a pandemic
34:39
and there would be no lockdowns but
34:41
everything would have been perceived as
34:43
just a medium or light wave of influenza
34:46
these scientists conclude dr heedon in
34:49
his piece
34:50
lies damned lies and health statistics
34:52
the deadly danger of false positives
34:54
writes
34:55
this test is fatally flawed and must
34:59
immediately be withdrawn and never used
35:01
again in this setting unless shown to be
35:03
fixed
35:05
to be fixed and towards the end of that
35:07
article i have
35:08
explained how a hopelessly performing
35:11
diagnostic test
35:13
has been and continues to be used not
35:15
for diagnosis of disease but
35:17
it seems solely to create fear
35:23
now let’s take a look at the current
35:25
actual situation regarding the severe
35:28
damage
35:28
caused by the lockdowns and other
35:30
measures
35:31
another detailed paper written by a
35:34
german official in the department of the
35:36
interior
35:37
who is responsible for risk assessment
35:39
and the protection of the population
35:41
against
35:41
risks was leaked recently it is now
35:45
called the
35:46
false alarm paper this paper comes to
35:49
the conclusion that there was
35:50
that there was and is no sufficient
35:53
evidence for serious health
35:55
health risks for the population as
35:57
claimed by drawstring wheeler and the
35:58
who
35:59
but the author says there’s very much
36:02
evidence of the corona measures causing
36:04
gigantic health
36:06
and economic damage to the population
36:08
which he then describes in detail
36:10
in this paper this he concludes will
36:13
lead to
36:14
very high claims for damages which the
36:16
government will be held responsible for
36:19
this has now become reality but the
36:22
paper’s author
36:23
was more suspended more scientists but
36:27
also lawyers
36:28
recognize that as a result of the
36:30
deliberate panic mongering
36:31
and the corona measures enabled by this
36:34
panic
36:34
democracy is in great danger of being
36:37
replaced
36:38
by fascist totalitarian models
36:42
as i already mentioned above in
36:44
australia
36:45
people who do not wear the masks which
36:47
more and more studies show
36:48
are hazardous to health or
36:52
who allegedly do not wear them correctly
36:54
are arrested
36:55
handcuffed and thrown into jail in the
36:57
philippines they run the risk of getting
36:59
shot
37:00
but even in germany and in other
37:02
previously civilized countries
37:04
children are taken away from their
37:06
parents if they do not comply with
37:08
quarantine regulations
37:10
distance regulations and mask wearing
37:12
regulations
37:14
according to psychologists and
37:16
psychotherapists who testified before
37:18
the corona committee
37:20
children are traumatized on mass
37:24
with the worst psychological
37:26
consequences yet to be expected
37:28
in the medium and long term in germany
37:31
alone
37:31
500 000 to 800 000 bankruptcies are
37:35
expected in the fall
37:36
to strike small and medium-sized
37:39
businesses
37:40
which form the backbone of the economy
37:42
this
37:43
will result in incalculable tax losses
37:46
and incalculably high and long-term
37:48
social security money transfers for
37:51
among other things
37:52
unemployment benefits since in the
37:55
meantime pretty much everybody is
37:57
beginning to understand the full
37:58
devastating impact of the
38:00
completely unfounded corona measures i
38:03
will
38:04
ref i will refrain from detailing this
38:06
any further
38:07
let me now give you a summary of the
38:09
legal consequences sequences
38:12
the most difficult part of a lawyer’s
38:13
work is always
38:15
to establish the true facts not the
38:17
application of the legal rules to these
38:19
facts
38:20
unfortunately a german lawyer does not
38:23
learn this at law school
38:24
but his anglo-american counterparts do
38:26
get the necessary training for this at
38:28
their law schools
38:30
and probably for this reason but also
38:32
because
38:33
of the much more pronounced independence
38:35
of the american
38:37
anglo-american judiciary the
38:39
anglo-american law of evidence is much
38:41
more
38:42
effective in practice than the german
38:44
one a court of law can only decide a
38:48
legal dispute correctly if it has
38:50
previously determined the facts
38:51
correctly
38:52
which is not possible without looking at
38:54
all the evidence
38:56
and that’s why the law of evidence is so
38:57
important on the basis of the
39:00
facts summarized above in particularly
39:03
those i’m sorry in particular those
39:05
established with the help of the work of
39:06
the german corona committee
39:08
the legal evaluation is actually simple
39:11
it is simple for all civilized legal
39:13
systems regardless
39:15
of whether these legal systems are based
39:16
on civil law which follows the roman law
39:19
more closely
39:20
or whether they are based on
39:22
anglo-american common law
39:23
which is only loosely connected to roman
39:26
law
39:27
let’s first take a look at the
39:29
unconstitutionality of the measures
39:31
a number of german law professors
39:33
including professors king grain
39:35
morswig jungblood and foskarau
39:38
have stated either in written expert
39:40
opinions or in interviews
39:42
in line with the serious doubts
39:44
expressed by the former president of the
39:46
federal constitutional court with
39:48
respect to the constitutionality of the
39:50
corona measures
39:51
that these measures the corona measures
39:54
are without
39:55
a sufficient factual basis and also
39:58
without a sufficient legal basis and are
40:01
therefore
40:02
unconstitutional and must be repealed
40:05
immediately
40:06
very recently a judge torsten schleife
40:10
is his name
40:11
declared publicly that the german
40:13
judiciary
40:14
just like the general public has been so
40:16
panic-stricken
40:18
that it was no longer able to administer
40:20
justice properly
40:22
he says that the courts of law and i
40:25
quote have all too
40:26
quickly waved through coercive measures
40:28
which for millions of people all over
40:31
germany represent
40:32
massive suspensions of their
40:34
constitutional rights
40:35
he points out that german citizens again
40:38
i quote are currently experiencing
40:41
the most serious encroachment on their
40:43
constitutional rights since the founding
40:45
of the federal republic of germany
40:47
in 1949 in order to contain the corona
40:51
pandemic
40:52
federal and state governments have
40:53
intervened he says
40:55
massively and in part threatening the
40:58
very
40:58
existence of the country as it is
41:01
guaranteed by the constitutional rights
41:03
of the people
41:06
what about fraud intentional infliction
41:08
of damage and crimes against humanity
41:11
based on the rules of criminal law
41:13
asserting false facts concerning the pcr
41:16
tests or intentional risk
41:17
misrepresentation
41:19
as it was committed by messers dresden
41:21
and wheeler as well as the who
41:23
can only be assessed as fraud
41:26
based on the rules of civil tort law
41:28
this translates into
41:30
intentional infliction of damage the
41:32
german professor of
41:34
civil law martin schwab supports this
41:37
finding in public interviews
41:39
in a comprehensive legal opinion of
41:41
around
41:42
180 pages he has familiarized himself
41:46
with the subject matter
41:47
like no other legal scholar has done
41:49
thus far
41:50
and in particular has provided a
41:53
detailed account of the complete failure
41:56
of the mainstream media to report on the
41:58
true facts of this so-called
42:00
pandemic mrs drusten wheeler and tedras
42:04
of the who
42:04
all knew based on their own expertise or
42:08
the expertise of their institutions
42:10
that the pcr tests cannot provide any
42:12
information about infections
42:14
but asserted over and over again to the
42:17
general public
42:18
that they can with their counterparts
42:21
all over the world
42:22
repeating this and they all knew and
42:25
accepted
42:26
that on the basis of their
42:27
recommendations the governments of the
42:29
world would decide on lockdowns
42:31
the rules for social distancing and
42:34
mandatory wearing of masks
42:36
the latter representing a very serious
42:39
health hazard
42:40
as more and more independent studies and
42:42
expert statements
42:44
show under the rules of civil tort law
42:47
all those who have been harmed by these
42:49
pcr tests
42:51
pcr tests induced induced lockdowns
42:54
are entitled to receive full
42:55
compensation for their losses
42:58
in particular there is a duty to
43:00
compensate that
43:01
is a duty to pay damages for the loss of
43:03
profits suffered by companies
43:05
and self-employed employed persons as a
43:07
result of the lockdown and other
43:09
measures
43:10
in the meantime however the anti-corona
43:13
measures have caused and continue to
43:15
cause
43:15
such devastating damage to the world’s
43:18
population’s health
43:19
and economy that the crimes committed by
43:22
mrs dresden wheeler
43:24
and the who must be legally qualified as
43:27
actual crimes against humanity
43:30
as defined in section 7 of the
43:32
international criminal code
43:36
how can we do something what can we do
43:40
well the class action is the best route
43:43
to compensatory damages and to
43:45
political consequences the so-called
43:48
class action lawsuit
43:50
is based on english law and exists today
43:53
in the usa
43:54
and in canada it enables a court of law
43:57
to allow complaint for damages to be
43:59
tried as a class action lawsuit at the
44:02
at the request of a plaintiff if one
44:06
as a result of a damage inducing event
44:09
to
44:09
a large number of people suffer the same
44:12
type of damage
44:14
phrased differently a judge can allow a
44:16
class-action lawsuit to go forward
44:19
if common questions of law and fact make
44:22
up the vital component of the lawsuit
44:25
here the common questions of law in fact
44:27
revolve around the worldwide pcr test
44:30
based lockdowns
44:31
and its consequences just like the vw
44:35
diesel passenger cars were functioning
44:37
products but they were defective due to
44:40
a so-called defeat device
44:42
because they didn’t comply with the
44:43
emissions standards so too the pcr tests
44:46
which are perfectly good products in
44:48
other settings
44:49
are defective products when it comes to
44:51
the diagnosis of infections
44:54
now if an american or canadian company
44:56
or an american or canadian individual
44:58
decides to sue these persons in the
45:00
united states or
45:01
canada for damages then the court called
45:04
upon to resolve this dispute
45:06
may upon request allow this complaint
45:09
to be tried as a class action lawsuit
45:13
if this happens all affected parties
45:15
worldwide will be informed about this
45:18
through publications in the mainstream
45:19
media and will thus have the opportunity
45:22
to join this class action within a
45:24
certain period of time to be determined
45:26
by the court
45:27
it should be emphasized that nobody must
45:29
join the class action
45:31
but every injured party can join the
45:33
class
45:35
the advantage of the class action is
45:37
that only one trial is needed namely to
45:39
try the complaint of
45:41
a representative plaintiff who is
45:43
affected in a manner typical
45:45
of everyone else in the class this is
45:48
firstly
45:48
cheaper and secondly faster than
45:51
hundreds of thousands or more individual
45:53
lawsuits
45:54
and thirdly it imposes less of a burden
45:57
on the courts
45:58
fourthly as a rule it allows a much more
46:01
precise examination of the accusations
46:03
than would be possible in the context of
46:05
hundreds of thousands or
46:07
more likely in this corona setting even
46:10
millions of individual
46:12
lawsuits in particular the
46:14
well-established and proven
46:16
anglo-american law of evidence
46:18
with its pre-trial discovery is
46:21
applicable
46:22
this requires that all evidence relevant
46:24
for the
46:25
determination of the lawsuit is put on
46:28
the table
46:29
in contrast to the typical situation in
46:31
german lawsuits with
46:33
structural imbalance that is lawsuits
46:36
involving
46:37
on the one hand a consumer on the one
46:39
hand a consumer
46:41
and on the other hand a powerful
46:42
corporation the with
46:44
withholding or even destruction of
46:46
evidence is not
46:48
without consequence rather the party
46:51
withholding or even destroying evidence
46:54
loses the case under these evidence
46:56
rules
46:57
here in germany a group of tort lawyers
47:00
have banded together to help their
47:01
clients with
47:02
recovery of damages they have provided
47:05
all relevant information and forms
47:07
for german plaintiffs to both estimate
47:09
how much damage they have suffered
47:11
and join the group or class of
47:14
plaintiffs who will later join the
47:16
the class action when it goes forward
47:18
either in canada
47:19
or the u.s initially this group of
47:23
lawyers had considered to also collect
47:25
and manage the claims for damages of
47:27
other
47:28
non-german plaintiffs but this proved to
47:30
be
47:31
unmanageable however through
47:34
an international lawyer’s network which
47:36
is growing larger by the day
47:38
the german group of attorneys provides
47:41
to all of their colleagues in all other
47:42
countries
47:43
free of charge all relevant information
47:47
including expert opinions and
47:49
testimonies of experts showing that the
47:51
pcr tests cannot detect infections
47:54
and they also provide them with all
47:56
relevant information as to how they can
47:58
prepare and bundle the claims for
47:59
damages of their clients
48:01
so that they too can assert their
48:03
clients claims for damages either in
48:05
their home countries courts of law
48:07
or within the framework of the class
48:09
action as explained above
48:13
these scandalous corona facts gathered
48:17
mostly by the corona committee and
48:19
summarized above
48:20
are the very same facts that will soon
48:23
be proven
48:23
to be true either in one court of law
48:27
or in many courts of law all over the
48:29
world
48:30
these are the facts that will pull the
48:33
masks of the
48:34
faces of all those responsible for these
48:36
crimes
48:38
to the politicians who believe those
48:40
corrupt people
48:42
these facts are hereby offered as a
48:45
lifeline
48:46
that can help you readjust your course
48:48
of action and start the long
48:50
overdue public scientific discussion and
48:53
not
48:54
go down with those charlatans and
48:56
criminals
48:58
thank you