What aren’t we being told? Is the highly toxic and controversial element graphene being seeded into our skies as part of the ongoing covert climate intervention operations? Is climate modification the only motive behind the elements being utilized for atmospheric aerosol spraying programs? Are other agendas also being carried out? Do the weather makers and their controllers consider the consequences of their actions? Or is it possible that many of the consequences are, in fact, part of the agenda? Please review the attached 5 minute video report for input and answers: Graphene Skies? (Video)
REFERENCED IN THE VIDEO
00:36 mins There is the extremely toxic and controversial element graphene. Is graphene also being dispersed into our skies as part of the ongoing global climate engineering operations? Examination of available science study is alarming.
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms
… typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. In these mechanisms, (toll-like receptors-) TLR-, transforming growth factor β- (TGF-β-) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) dependent-pathways are involved in the signalling pathway network, and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in these pathways. https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.
com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
Ice Nucleation Activity of Graphene and Graphene Oxides
Graphene and its derivatives offer suitable model systems for soot particles, which are ubiquitous aerosols in the atmosphere. In this work, we present an investigation of the ice nucleation activity (INA) of different types of graphene and graphene oxides. Immersion droplet freezing experiments as well as additional analytical analyses, such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy, were performed. We show within a group of samples that a highly ordered graphene lattice (Raman G band intensity >50%) can support ice nucleation more effectively than a lowly ordered graphene lattice (Raman G band intensity <20%). Ammonia-functionalized graphene revealed the highest INA of all samples. Atmospheric ammonia is known to play a primary role in the formation of secondary particulate matter, forming ammonium-containing aerosols. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10675
Weather modification method
https://patents.google.com/patent/US3613992A/
en
Phytotoxicity of Graphene Family Nanomaterials and Its Mechanisms: A Review
The increasing release of GFNs into the ecosystem is one of the key environmental problems that humanity is facing. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fch
em.2019.00292/full#:~:text=%20Phytotoxicity%20of%20Graphene%20Family%20Nanomaterials%20and%20Its,GFNs%20to%20plants%20is%
20summarized%20in…%20More%20
02:59 mins Climate engineering is creating unprecedented freeze/fry temperature extremes.
03:24 mins The sold out so called science community has now condoned the use of graphene oxide as an artificial ice nucleation element without
consideration of the consequences to human health.
2014 Two recent studies give us a less than rosy angle. In the first, a team of biologists, engineers and material scientists at Brown University examined graphene’s potential toxicity in human cells. They found that the jagged edges of graphene nanoparticles, super sharp and super strong, easily pierced through cell membranes in human lung, skin and immune cells, suggesting the potential to do serious damage in humans and other animals. https://newatlas.com/graphene-bad-for-environment-toxic-for-humans/31851/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352940718302853
2010!
The results of the combined morphological and physiological analyses indicate that after 20 days of exposure under our experimental conditions, graphene significantly inhibited plant growth and biomass compared to a control. The number and size of leaves of the graphene-treated plants were reduced in a dose-dependent manner. Significant effects also were detected showing a concentration-dependent increase in ROS and cell death as well as visible symptoms of necrotic lesions, indicating graphene-induced adverse effects on cabbage, tomato, and red spinach mediated by oxidative stress necrosis. Little or no significant toxic effect was observed with lettuce seedlings under the same conditions. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0008622311003915
03:59 mins If nanoparticulates of graphene oxide are in fact already being used for artificial ice nucleation operations what’s to stop the controllers from
utilizing the graphene particles for biological carrier platforms as well? Answer … nothing.
At any point of their choosing the controllers can wage all-out biological warfare against populations via the existing climate intervention atmospheric aerosol spraying operations.